Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 151-164.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11005

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Physiological mechanisms of pre-anthesis waterlogging priming on waterlogging stress tolerance under post-anthesis in wheat

MA Bo-Wen(), LI Qing, CAI Jian, ZHOU Qin, HUANG Mei, DAI Ting-Bo, WANG Xiao*(), JIANG Dong*()   

  1. College Agronomy, Nanjing Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology Ecology and Production Management of Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2021-01-10 Accepted:2021-04-14 Online:2022-01-12 Published:2021-06-02
  • Contact: WANG Xiao,JIANG Dong E-mail:2017101016@njau.edu.cn;xiaowang@njau.edu.cn;jiangd@njau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0300107);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0300205);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31771693);National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1803235);China Agriculture Research System(CARS-03);Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production(JCIC-MCP)

RichHTML392

25

PDF

701

Abstract:

In order to investigate the responses and mechanisms of different wheat varieties to waterlogging stress and waterlogging priming, waterlogging priming was conducted for two days at the four-leaf and six-leaf stages, respectively, and waterlogging stress was performed for five days at post-anthesis using wheat varieties with different responses to waterlogging stress and waterlogging priming as experimental materials. Results showed that waterlogging stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content (SPAD) and actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), inhibited the accumulation of post-anthesis photosynthetic assimilation accumulation (PAA), decreased kernel weight and grain yield. Compared with the waterlogging-sensitive varieties, the waterlogging-tolerance varieties could maintain higher SPAD, ΦPSII and PAA, and higher activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), Catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR), lower contents of H2O2, O2?production rate and malondialdehyde (MDA) under post-anthesis waterlogging stress. Compared with non-primed plants, primed plants could maintain higher chlorophyll fluorescence performance and higher activities of antioxidant enzymes. Compared with the waterlogging priming-insensitive varieties, the priming-sensitive varieties increased SPAD (8.8%) and ΦPSII (17.6%), decreased the non-regulated energy dissipation ΦNO (10.7%) and the regulation energy dissipation ΦNPQ (16.5%), increased the activities of SOD (15.8%), CAT (17.8%), APX (8.9%) and GR (30.7%), increased the contents of total soluble sugar (17.5%) and sucrose (21.6%), increased remobilization efficiency of pre-anthesis stored dry matter (REP, 20.0%) and PAA (10.8%). The waterlogging tolerant varieties could maintain higher photosynthesis rate, dry matter translocation capacity and activities of antioxidant enzymes. Compared with waterlogging sensitive varieties, the increase amplitude of photosynthetic ability and antioxidant enzyme activity of priming-sensitive cultivars was higher under waterlogging stress.

Key words: wheat, waterlogging stress, waterlogging priming, fluorescence parameters, antioxidant capacity

Table 1

Soil properties at the beginning of the experiments in the two growing seasons"

年份
Year		 有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)		 全氮
Total nitrogen
(g kg-1)		 速效氮
Available nitrogen
(mg kg-1)		 速效磷
Available phosphorus
(mg kg-1)		 速效钾
Available potassium
(mg kg-1)
2018-2019 17.63 1.02 28.03 18.90 130.66
2019-2020 16.34 0.99 30.95 23.02 137.46

Table 2

The wheat varieties used in this study"

编号
No.		 品种名称
Variety		 类型
Type		 编号
No.		 品种名称
Variety		 类型
Type
1 淮麦22 Huaimai 22 锻炼敏感且耐渍 ST 9 师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1 锻炼不敏感且耐渍 IT
2 齐大195 Qida 195 锻炼敏感且耐渍 ST 10 汶农17 Wennong 17 锻炼不敏感且耐渍 IT
3 扬麦20 Yangmai 20 锻炼敏感且耐渍 ST 11 周麦27 Zhoumai 27 锻炼不敏感且耐渍 IT
4 镇麦10 Zhenmai 10 锻炼敏感且耐渍 ST 12 扬麦9号 Yangmai 9 锻炼不敏感且耐渍 IT
5 衡4399 Heng 4399 锻炼敏感且不耐渍 SI 13 济麦22 Jimai 22 锻炼不敏感且不耐渍 II
6 京冬22 Jingdong 22 锻炼敏感且不耐渍 SI 14 济南矮6号 Jinanai 6 锻炼不敏感且不耐渍 II
7 鲁垦麦9号 Lukenmai 9 锻炼敏感且不耐渍 SI 15 石麦22 Shimai 22 锻炼不敏感且不耐渍 II
8 郑麦004 Zhengmai 004 锻炼敏感且不耐渍 SI 16 中麦175 Zhongmai 175 锻炼不敏感且不耐渍 II

Fig. 1

Soil redox potential (Eh) under waterlogging priming and post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat C: no pre-anthesis waterlogging priming treatment; P: pre-anthesis waterlogging priming treatment; CK: control treatment; PW: pre-anthesis waterlogging priming and post-anthesis waterlogging stress treatment; NW: no pre-anthesis waterlogging priming and post-anthesis waterlogging stress treatment."

Table 3

Effects of waterlogging priming on grain yield and yield components under post-anthesis waterlogging stress"

品种
Variety		 处理
Treatment		 2019 2020
穗数 穗粒数 千粒重 产量 穗数 穗粒数 千粒重 产量
Spikes Kernels 1000-kernel Grain yield Spikes Kernels 1000-kernel Grain yield
pot-1 spike-1 weight (g) (g plot-1) pot-1 spike-1 weight (g) (g plot-1)
1 CK 22.5 a 38.0 a 52.1 a 44.5 a 24.7 a 37.8 a 49.9 a 46.6 a
PW 22.5 a 40.6 a 47.9 ab 43.7 ab 24.7 a 37.9 a 49.3 a 46.1 a
NW 22.0 a 41.1 a 45.5 b 41.1 b 24.7 a 37.5 a 46.9 b 43.3 b
2 CK 26.0 a 40.3 a 33.4 a 35.0 a 24.3 a 39.5 a 33.7 a 32.3 a
PW 26.5 a 42.3 a 30.1 a 33.7 ab 24.7 a 40.6 a 30.8 b 30.8 ab
NW 26.0 a 44.9 a 28.1a 32.5 b 24.3 a 40.1 a 29.9 c 29.2 b
3 CK 20.5 a 42.2 a 37.2 a 32.2 a 20.0 a 42.1 b 37.0 a 31.1 a
PW 21.0 a 42.0 a 35.5 a 31.2 a 20.0 a 42.8 ab 35.1 a 30.0 a
NW 20.5 a 43.7 a 33.3 a 29.8 b 19.3 a 43.5 a 32.0 b 26.9 b
4 CK 21.5 a 34.8 a 44.0 a 32.8 a 18.3 a 35.5 a 44.1 a 28.7 a
PW 20.5 a 35.6 a 43.4 a 31.7 a 19.3 a 33.9 a 43.6 a 28.6 a
NW 20.5 a 38.6 a 37.8 b 29.9 b 19.0 a 34.2 a 40.0 b 26.0 a
5 CK 22.0 a 36.6 a 51.8 a 41.7 a 23.0 a 38.3 a 51.4 a 45.3 a
PW 22.5 a 36.3 a 46.2 ab 37.7 ab 23.3 a 38.7 a 40.7 b 36.7 b
NW 22.0 a 37.3 a 40.4 b 33.1 b 21.7 a 39.9 a 38.3 c 33.1 b
6 CK 19.5 a 27.8 a 61.6 a 33.4 a 26.3 a 28.6 a 59.2 a 44.7 a
PW 20.5 a 27.4 a 47.6 b 26.7 b 26.7 a 28.1 a 55.3 b 41.3 b
NW 20.5 a 26.6 a 45.7 b 24.9 b 25.7 a 29.3 a 47.7 c 35.9 c
7 CK 24.0 a 42.7 a 45.6 a 46.7 a 29.3 a 42.3 a 44.1 a 54.7 a
PW 24.0 a 43.5 a 36.9 b 38.5 b 29.3 a 43.8 a 37.4 b 48.1 b
NW 23.5 a 41.9 a 34.4 b 33.9 b 30.0 a 42.7 a 33.0 c 42.3 c
8 CK 17.0 a 40.1 a 50.3 a 34.3 a 21.3 a 38.2 a 47.4 a 38.6 a
PW 17.0 a 40.4 a 38.6 b 26.5 b 22.0 a 37.3 a 39.7 b 32.6 b
NW 16.5 a 38.9 a 34.8 b 22.3 c 21.3 a 37.5 a 37.5 c 29.9 b
9 CK 21.5 a 31.7 a 49.0 a 33.3 a 32.7 a 31.7 a 44.7 a 46.1 a
PW 22.0 a 33.9 a 43.4 a 32.3 a 33.0 a 31.6 a 42.3 b 44.1 a
NW 22.0 a 32.2 a 44.7 a 31.7 a 32.3 a 31.6 a 42.2 b 43.1 a
10 CK 22.0 a 37.6 a 50.0 a 41.1 a 22.7 a 38.7 a 47.9 a 42.0 a
PW 21.5 a 39.8 a 45.2 b 38.5 a 23.0 a 37.8 a 47.1 a 40.9 a
NW 21.5 a 39.7 a 45.9 b 39.1 a 23.0 a 37.3 a 46.5 a 39.8 a
11 CK 23.0 a 29.3 a 43.1 a 29.0 a 24.7 a 29.5 a 41.4 a 30.1 a
PW 22.5 a 31.4 a 39.6 b 27.9 a 23.7 a 30.1 a 40.6 a 28.9 a
NW 23.0 a 32.3 a 37.3 b 27.7 a 23.3 a 31.2 a 37.3 b 27.2 a
12 CK 20.5 a 48.2 a 31.3 a 32.4 a 12.7 a 49.6 a 32.6 a 20.4 a
PW 19.5 a 51.9 a 30.2 a 30.6 a 12.0 a 50.7 a 33.2 a 20.2 a
NW 19.5 a 50.3 a 30.1 a 31.5 a 12.0 a 51.3 a 31.2 b 19.2 a
13 CK 23.0 a 40.2 a 53.2 a 49.2 a 26.3 a 40.1 a 48.8 a 51.6 a
PW 22.5 a 41.0 a 37.2 b 34.2 b 26.0 a 39.6 a 40.4 b 41.5 b
NW 23.0 a 40.1 a 36.5 b 33.6 b 24.7 a 41.0 a 41.7 b 42.2 b
14 CK 23.5 a 27.3 a 62.9 a 40.4 a 28.7 a 26.2 a 54.3 a 40.7 a
PW 23.5 a 26.5 a 43.2 b 26.9 b 28.3 a 25.9 a 45.3 b 33.2 b
品种
Variety		 处理
Treatment		 2019 2020
穗数 穗粒数 千粒重 产量 穗数 穗粒数 千粒重 产量
Spikes Kernels 1000-kernel Grain yield Spikes Kernels 1000-kernel Grain yield
pot-1 spike-1 weight (g) (g plot-1) pot-1 spike-1 weight (g) (g plot-1)
NW 23.5 a 26.6 a 41.6 b 26.0 b 27.3 a 27.1 a 45.7 b 33.9 b
15 CK 27.5 a 24.9 a 53.6 a 36.8 a 35.0 a 24.1 a 51.4 a 43.3 a
PW 26.5 a 24.3 a 43.8 b 28.2 b 35.0 a 24.6 a 36.8 b 31.7 b
NW 25.0 a 25.3 a 43.0 b 27.1 b 36.0 a 23.7 a 35.1 c 30.0 b
16 CK 19.0 a 35.6 a 51.8 a 35.0 a 16.7 a 36.2 a 50.1 a 30.1 a
PW 19.0 a 35.0 a 43.4 b 28.8 b 16.3 a 35.7 a 40.1 b 23.4 b
NW 20.0 a 34.6 a 42.1 b 29.1 b 16.3 a 36.7 a 37.6 c 22.6 b

Fig. 2

Effects of waterlogging priming on SPAD and ΦPSII under post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among different treatments of each variety. Varieties are as the same as in Table 2. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 3

Effects of waterlogging priming on ΦNO and ΦNPQ under post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among different treatments of each variety. Varieties are as the same as in Table 2. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 4

Effects of waterlogging priming on dry matter accumulation and translocation under post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat RAP: remobilization amount of pre-anthesis stored dry matter; REP: remobilization efficiency of pre-anthesis stored dry matter; CTA: contribution of pre-anthesis stored dry matter; PAA: post-anthesis photosynthetic assimilates accumulation. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among different treatments of each variety. Varieties are as the same as in Table 2. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 5

Effects of waterlogging priming on the contents of soluble total sugar and sucrose under post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among different treatments of each variety. Varieties are as the same as in Table 2. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 6

Effects of waterlogging priming on O2? production rate and H2O2 content under post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among different treatments of each variety. Varieties are as the same as in Table 2. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 7

Effects of waterlogging priming on MDA content under post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among different treatments of each variety. Varieties are as the same as in Table 2. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 8

Effects of waterlogging priming on the activities of SOD and CAT under post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among different treatments of each variety. Varieties are as the same as in Table 2. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

Fig. 9

Effects of waterlogging priming on the activities of GR and APX under post-anthesis waterlogging stress in wheat Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among different treatments of each variety. Varieties are as the same as in Table 2. Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

[1] Singh G, Kumar P, Gupta V, Tyagi B S, Singh C, Kumar S A, Singh G P. Multivariate approach to identify and characterize bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm for waterlogging tolerance in India. Field Crops Res, 2018, 221:81-89.
[2] Chen Y Y, Huang J F, Song X D, Gao P. Spatiotemporal characteristics of winter wheat waterlogging in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China. Adv Meteorol, 2018, 9:1-11.
[3] 任正隆. 中国南方小麦优质高效生产的若干问题. 四川农业大学学报, 2002, 20:299-303.
Ren Z L. Several limiting factors of wheat production in south area of China and the new approach of wheat breeding. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2002, 20:299-303 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Crisp P A, Ganguly D, Eichten S R. Reconsidering plant memory: intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Sci Adv, 2016, 2:e1501340.
[5] Wang X, Liu F L, Jiang D. Priming: a promising strategy for crop production in response to future climate. J Integr Agric, 2017, 16:2709-2716.
[6] 李同花, 王笑, 蔡剑, 周琴, 戴廷波, 姜东. 不同小麦品种对干旱锻炼响应的综合评价. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(1):65-73.
Li T H, Wang X, Cai J, Zhou Q, Dai T B, Jiang D. Comprehensive evaluation of drought priming on plant tolerance in different wheat cultivars. J Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(1):65-73 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Zhou W G, Chen F, Meng Y J, Chandrasekaran U, Shu K. Plant waterlogging/flooding stress responses: from seed germination to maturation. Plant Physiol Bioch, 2020, 148:228-236.
[8] Herzog M, Striker G G, Colmer T D, Pedersen O. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat: a review of root and shoot physiology. Plant Cell Environ, 2016, 39:1068-1086.
[9] Li C Y, Jiang D, Wollenweber B, Li Y, Dai T B, Cao W X. Waterlogging pretreatment during vegetative growth improves tolerance to waterlogging after anthesis in wheat. Plant Sci, 2011, 180:672-678.
[10] Wang X, Huang M, Zhou Q, Cai J, Dai T B, Jiang D. Physiological and proteomic mechanisms of waterlogging priming improve tolerance to waterlogging stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ Exp Bot, 2016, 132:175-182.
[11] Moya J L, Ros R, Picazo I. Influence of cadmium and nickel on growth, net photosynthesis and carbohydrate distribution in rice plants. Photosynth Res, 1993, 36:75-80.
[12] 张永清, 苗果园, 李慧明. 冬小麦根系对不同生育时期渍水胁迫的生物学响应. 麦类作物学报, 2005, 25(4):59-63.
Zhang Y Q, Miao G Y, Li H M. Biological response of winter wheat root system to waterlogging stress at different growth stages. J Triticeae Crops, 2005, 25(4):59-63 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] Du Z Y, Bramlage W J. Modified thiobarbituric acid assay for measuring lipid oxidation in sugar-rich plant-tissue extracts. J Agric Food Chem, 1992, 40:1566-1570.
[14] Vwioko E, Adinkwu O, El-Esawi M A. Comparative physiological, biochemical, and genetic responses to prolonged waterlogging stress in okra and maize given exogenous ethylene priming. Front Physiol, 2017, 8:1-10.
[15] Tan W, Liu J, Dai T B, Cao W X, Jiang D. Alterations in photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme activity in winter wheat subjected to post-anthesis waterlogging. Photosynthetica, 2008, 46:21-27.
[16] Liu N, Lin Z F, Guan L L, Gaughan G, Lin G Z. Antioxidant enzymes regulate reactive oxygen species during pod elongation in Pisum sativum and Brassica chinensis. PLoS One, 2014: e875882.
[17] Thomas M A. Measuring activities of the enzymes superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase in lichens. In: Kranner I C, Beckett R P, Varma A K, eds. Protocols in Lichenology. Springer Lab Manuals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56359-1_12.
[18] Foyer C H, Halliwell B. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: a proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta, 1976, 133:21-25.
[19] Mishra S, Agrawal S B. Interactive effects between supplemental ultraviolet-B radiation and heavy metals on the growth and biochemical characteristics of Spinacia oleracea L. Brazilian J Plant Physiol, 2006, 18:307-314.
[20] 姜东, 陶勤南, 张国平. 渍水对小麦扬麦5号旗叶和根系衰老的影响. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13:1519-1521.
Jiang D, Tao Q N, Zhang G P. Effect of waterlogging on senescence of flag leaf and root of wheat Yangmai 5. J Appl Ecol, 2002, 13:1519-1521 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 武文明, 陈洪俭, 李金才, 魏凤珍, 王世济, 周向红. 氮肥运筹对孕穗期受渍冬小麦旗叶叶绿素荧光与籽粒灌浆特性的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38:1088-1096.
Wu W M, Chen H J, Li J C, Wei F Z, Wang S J, Zhou X H. Effects of nitrogen fertilization application regime on dry matter, nitrogen accumulation and transportation in summer maize under waterlogging at the seedling Stage. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38:1088-1096 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 胡继超, 曹卫星, 姜东, 罗卫红. 小麦水分胁迫影响因子的定量研究: I. 干旱和渍水胁迫对光合、蒸腾及干物质积累与分配的影响. 作物学报, 2004, 30:315-320.
Hu J C, Cao W X, Jiang D, Luo W H. Quantification of water stress factor for crop growth simulation: I. Effects of drought and waterlogging stress on photosynthesis, transpiration and dry matter partitioning in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30:315-320 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 姜东, 谢祝捷, 曹卫星, 戴廷波, 荆奇. 花后干旱和渍水对冬小麦光合特性和物质运转的影响. 作物学报, 2004, 30:175-182.
Jiang D, Xie Z J, Cao W X, Dai T B, Jing Q. Effects of post-anthesis drought and waterlogging on photosynthetic characteristics, assimilates transportation in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30:175-182 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] Wang X, Cai J, Liu F, Jin M, Yu H, Jiang D, Wollenweber B, Dai T B, Cao W X. Pre-anthesis high temperature acclimation alleviates the negative effects of post-anthesis heat stress on stem stored carbohydrates remobilization and grain starch accumulation in wheat. J Cereal Sci, 2012, 55:331-336.
[25] Bansal R, Srivastava J P. Antioxidative responses to short term waterlogging stress in pigeon pea. Ind J Plant Physiol, 2015, 20:182-185.
[26] Candan N, Tarhan L. Tolerance or sensitivity responses of mentha pulegium to osmotic and waterlogging stress in terms of antioxidant defense systems and membrane lipid peroxidation. Environ Exp Bot, 2012, 75:83-88.
[27] Sairam R K, Kumutha D, Ezhilmathi K, Chinnusamy V, Meena R C. Waterlogging induced oxidative stress and antioxidant activity in pigeonpea genotypes. Biol Plant, 2009, 53:75-84.
[28] Oukarroum A, Bussotti F, Goltsev V, Kalaji H M. Correlation between reactive oxygen species production and photochemistry of photosystems I and II in Lemna gibba L. plants under salt stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2015, 109:80-88.
[29] Kafi M, Stewart W S, Borland A M. Carbohydrate and proline contents in leaves, roots, and apices of salt-tolerant and salt sensitive wheat varieties. Russ J Plant Physl, 2003, 50:155-162.
[30] Hossain A, Uddin S N. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat: Morphological and metabolic adaptations under hypoxia or anoxia. Aust J Crop Sci, 2011, 5:1094-1101.
[31] Ren B Z, Zhang J W, Dong S, Liu P, Zhao B. Responses of carbon metabolism and antioxidant system of summer maize to waterlogging at different stages. J Agron Crop Sci, 2018, 204:505-514.
[1] HU Wen-Jing, LI Dong-Sheng, YI Xin, ZHANG Chun-Mei, ZHANG Yong. Molecular mapping and validation of quantitative trait loci for spike-related traits and plant height in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] GUO Xing-Yu, LIU Peng-Zhao, WANG Rui, WANG Xiao-Li, LI Jun. Response of winter wheat yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen balance to rainfall types and nitrogen application rate in dryland [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[3] LEI Xin-Hui, WAN Chen-Xi, TAO Jin-Cai, LENG Jia-Jun, WU Yi-Xin, WANG Jia-Le, WANG Peng-Ke, YANG Qing-Hua, FENG Bai-Li, GAO Jin-Feng. Effects of soaking seeds with MT and EBR on germination and seedling growth in buckwheat under salt stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221.
[4] FU Mei-Yu, XIONG Hong-Chun, ZHOU Chun-Yun, GUO Hui-Jun, XIE Yong-Dun, ZHAO Lin-Shu, GU Jia-Yu, ZHAO Shi-Rong, DING Yu-Ping, XU Yan-Hao, LIU Lu-Xiang. Genetic analysis of wheat dwarf mutant je0098 and molecular mapping of dwarfing gene [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[5] FENG Jian-Chao, XU Bei-Ming, JIANG Xue-Li, HU Hai-Zhou, MA Ying, WANG Chen-Yang, WANG Yong-Hua, MA Dong-Yun. Distribution of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities in layered grinding wheat flour and the regulation effect of nitrogen fertilizer application [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[6] LIU Yun-Jing, ZHENG Fei-Na, ZHANG Xiu, CHU Jin-Peng, YU Hai-Tao, DAI Xing-Long, HE Ming-Rong. Effects of wide range sowing on grain yield, quality, and nitrogen use of strong gluten wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[7] XU Long-Long, YIN Wen, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, FAN Zhi-Long, ZHAO Cai, YU Ai-Zhong, CHAI Qiang. Effect of water and nitrogen reduction on main photosynthetic physiological parameters of film-mulched maize no-tillage rotation wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[8] YAN Yan, ZHANG Yu-Shi, LIU Chu-Rong, REN Dan-Yang, LIU Hong-Run, LIU Xue-Qing, ZHANG Ming-Cai, LI Zhao-Hu. Variety matching and resource use efficiency of the winter wheat-summer maize “double late” cropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[9] WANG Yang-Yang, HE Li, REN De-Chao, DUAN Jian-Zhao, HU Xin, LIU Wan-Dai, GU Tian-Cai, WANG Yong-Hua, FENG Wei. Evaluations of winter wheat late frost damage under different water based on principal component-cluster analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[10] CHEN Xin-Yi, SONG Yu-Hang, ZHANG Meng-Han, LI Xiao-Yan, LI Hua, WANG Yue-Xia, QI Xue-Li. Effects of water deficit on physiology and biochemistry of seedlings of different wheat varieties and the alleviation effect of exogenous application of 5-aminolevulinic acid [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[11] MENG Ying, XING Lei-Lei, CAO Xiao-Hong, GUO Guang-Yan, CHAI Jian-Fang, BEI Cai-Li. Cloning of Ta4CL1 and its function in promoting plant growth and lignin deposition in transgenic Arabidopsis plants [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[12] WEI Yi-Hao, YU Mei-Qin, ZHANG Xiao-Jiao, WANG Lu-Lu, ZHANG Zhi-Yong, MA Xin-Ming, LI Hui-Qing, WANG Xiao-Chun. Alternative splicing analysis of wheat glutamine synthase genes [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[13] LI Ling-Hong, ZHANG Zhe, CHEN Yong-Ming, YOU Ming-Shan, NI Zhong-Fu, XING Jie-Wen. Transcriptome profiling of glossy1 mutant with glossy glume in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[14] LUO Jiang-Tao, ZHENG Jian-Min, PU Zong-Jun, FAN Chao-Lan, LIU Deng-Cai, HAO Ming. Chromosome transmission in hybrids between tetraploid and hexaploid wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
[15] WANG Yan-Peng, LING Lei, ZHANG Wen-Rui, WANG Dan, GUO Chang-Hong. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of B-box gene family in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1437-1449.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No.12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081,China Email:xbzw@chinajournal.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd