控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响

张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦

Reduced application and different combined applications of loss-control urea on summer maize yield and fertilizer efficiency improvement

ZHANG Qian, HAN Ben-Gao, ZHANG Bo, SHENG Kai, LI Lan-Tao, WANG Yi-Lun

图5 不同施肥处理对高产田夏玉米叶片SPAD值的影响 处理同表2。TS: 大喇叭口期; SS: 吐丝期; FS: 灌浆期。不同小写字母表示处理(CK、CF、CL、CL10、CL20)间差异显著(P < 0.05); 不同大写字母表示处理(CF、CL、CL7:3、CL5:5、CL3:7)间差异显著(P < 0.05)。

Fig. 5 Effects of different fertilizer treatments on leaf SPAD value of summer maize in high-yield field Treatments are the same as those given in Table 2. TS: trumpeting stage; SS: silking stage; FS: filling stage. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among CK, CF, CL, CL10, and CL20 treatments. Different capital letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 among CF, CL, CL7:3, CL5:5, and CL3:7 treatments.