Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 169-176.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03013

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of phosphorus application on phosphorus uptake and utilization of sweet corn

YAN Xiao-Jun1,2(), YE De-Lian2,3, SU Da2,3, LI Fang1,2, ZHENG Chao-Yuan1,2, WU Liang-Quan1,2,*()   

  1. 1College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, China
    2International Magnesium Institute / Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, China
    3College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, China
  • Received:2020-03-06 Accepted:2020-08-19 Online:2021-01-12 Published:2020-09-11
  • Contact: WU Liang-Quan E-mail:16565710@qq.com;liangquan01@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0200200);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0200207);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0200400);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0200401);Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(41601244);Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(31701367);Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(2019J01374);Scientific Research Project of Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Fujian Education Department(JAT160174);Scientific Research Project of Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Fujian Education Department(JAT170157);Scientific Research Project of Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Fujian Education Department(JAT170156)

Abstract:

Understanding the phosphorus (P) absorption mechanism is the premise for high P utilization and high crop yield. In this study, the effects of different P rates (0, 37.5, 75, 150, and 300 kg hm-2, expressed as P0, P1, P2, P3, and P4, respectively) on sweet corn yield, biomass and P accumulation and tissue distribution, P transportation and P utilization were studied using a two-year P gradient positioning field experiment. Our results showed that P application significantly increased the fresh ear yield of sweet corn, but the yield difference among different P application rates (P1-P4) was not significant from 2018 to 2019 compared with P0 treatment. P application significantly increased the biomass and P accumulation of sweet corn plants at jointing, silking and fresh eating stages, respectively. In addition, P accumulation in grain was not significant different, which accounting for 42% of plant P accumulation. With P application, the contribution rate of P assimilation to the ear P accumulation was 57.3%-93.0% after anthesis, while the fresh ear yield per P accumulation, P physiological efficiency, agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency and partial productivity decreased with P rates. Considering the yield and utilization efficiency of phosphate fertilizer, the supply of 37.5 kg hm-2 of phosphate fertilizer can meet the needs of high yield and efficient utilization of phosphate fertilizer in sweet corn in this experiment.

Key words: sweet corn, phosphorus application rate, yield, phosphorus utilization

Fig. 1

Temperature and rainfall amount during the sweet corn growth period in Zhaoan"

Fig. 2

Relationships between P (P2O5 ) rates and fresh ear yield Values marked with different lowercase letters above the bars denote significant difference at P < 0.05. P0, P1, P2, P3, and P4 mean different P rates as 0, 37.5, 75, 150, and 300 kg hm-2, respectively."

Table 1

Dry matter mass of major growth stages under different P rates in sweet corn"

处理
Treatment
2018 2019
拔节期
Jointing stage
吐丝期
Silking stage
鲜食期
Fresh eating stage
拔节期
Jointing stage
吐丝期
Silking stage
鲜食期
Fresh eating stage
P0 0.21 c 2.29 b 7.27 b 0.28 b 2.20 c 5.88 c
P1 0.39 b 3.74 a 9.84 a 0.42 ab 3.49 b 8.28 b
P2 0.49 a 4.10 a 10.02 a 0.45 ab 3.72 b 8.71 ab
P3 0.51 a 4.02 a 10.05 a 0.48 a 3.61 b 8.83 ab
P4 0.52 a 4.30 a 10.10 a 0.49 a 4.36 a 9.42 a

Fig. 3

Phosphorus uptake of major growth stages under different P rates in sweet corn Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 2. Values marked with different lowercase letters are significantly different among treatments at P < 0.05."

Table 2

Biomass of various organs at fresh ear stage under different P (P2O5) rates in sweet corn"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment

Stem
叶(含叶鞘)
Blade (including sheath)
苞叶
Bract
籽粒
Grain
穗轴
Cob
雄穗
Tassel
2018 P0 1.44 b 2.74 b 0.83 b 1.06 b 0.68 b 0.53 b
P1 1.58 a 3.24 a 1.14 a 2.17 a 1.17 a 0.55 ab
P2 1.63 a 3.32 a 1.22 a 2.12 a 1.19 a 0.53 b
P3 1.56 ab 3.35 a 1.16 a 2.15 a 1.28 a 0.55 ab
P4 1.57 ab 3.45 a 1.13 a 2.16 a 1.20 a 0.57 a
2019 P0 1.13 b 1.85 b 0.61 b 1.20 b 0.63 b 0.47 a
P1 1.29 ab 2.93 a 1.00 a 1.73 a 0.85 a 0.48 a
P2 1.23 b 3.04 a 1.15 a 1.89 a 0.93 a 0.47 a
P3 1.13 b 3.46 a 1.03 a 1.79 a 0.94 a 0.48 a
P4 1.43 a 3.49 a 1.14 a 1.91 a 0.96 a 0.49 a

Table 3

P (P2O5) concentration of various organs at fresh ear stage under different P rates in sweet corn"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment

Stem
叶(含叶鞘)
Blade (including sheath)
苞叶
Bract
籽粒
Grain
穗轴
Cob
雄穗
Tassel
2018 P0 0.04 d 0.10 c 0.05 d 0.30 b 0.17 a 0.05 d
P1 0.09 c 0.19 b 0.11 c 0.45 a 0.15 a 0.09 c
P2 0.14 b 0.20 ab 0.15 bc 0.43 a 0.15 a 0.09 c
P3 0.15 b 0.20 ab 0.20 ab 0.50 a 0.17 a 0.10 b
P4 0.19 a 0.23 a 0.23 a 0.48 a 0.17 a 0.12 a
2019 P0 0.05 c 0.12 b 0.07 c 0.42 b 0.16 c 0.08 c
P1 0.15 b 0.18 ab 0.16 b 0.50 a 0.20 bc 0.09 bc
P2 0.17 ab 0.18 ab 0.17 ab 0.48 ab 0.23 ab 0.11 ab
P3 0.19 ab 0.17 ab 0.19 ab 0.48 ab 0.25 ab 0.09 cbc
P4 0.21 a 0.22 a 0.23 a 0.49 ab 0.27 a 0.13 a

Fig. 4

P uptake of different organs at the fresh ear stage under different P rates in sweet corn Treatments are the same as those given in Fig. 2. Values marked with different lowercase letters are significantly different among treatments at P < 0.05."

Table 4

P translocation amount and contribution proportion from vegetative organs to ear after the anthesis"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
花后磷同
化量
AAAAp
(kg hm-2)
茎磷转
运量
TAFSp
(kg hm-2)
叶(含叶鞘)磷转运量
TAFBSp
(kg hm-2)
雄穗磷转
运量
TAFTp
(kg hm-2)
磷素转运对穗部的贡献率CFE (%)
AAAAp TAFSp TAFBSp TAFTp
2018 P0 1.29 b 0.62 ab 2.35 a 0.40 a 31.13 b 13.41 a 47.00 a 8.46 a
P1 6.93 a 0.75 a 3.89 a 0.48 a 57.33 ab 6.23 b 32.43 ab 4.00 b
P2 7.13 a -0.16 b 4.38 a -0.01 ab 62.34 ab -1.07 c 38.75 a -0.01 c
P3 10.17 a -0.29 b 4.03 a -0.47 b 75.92 ab -2.41 c 29.86 a -3.36 c
P4 10.51 a -0.26 b 2.83 a -0.11 b 80.98 a -2.03 c 21.87 a -0.82 c
2019 P0 4.98 b 0.02 a 1.02 a 0.38 c 74.53 b 1.11 a 17.29 a 7.06 a
P1 11.16 a -0.35 a -0.01 c 1.18 b 93.05 a -2.89 a -0.15 b 9.99 a
P2 12.20 a -0.35 a 0.19 bc 1.21 ab 92.06 ab -2.59 a 1.38 b 9.15 a
P3 10.90 a -0.18 a 0.86 ab 1.25 ab 84.95 ab -1.41 a 6.72 b 9.75 a
P4 12.33 a -0.16 a 0.66 abc 1.69 a 84.98 ab -1.11 a 4.43 b 11.70 a

Table 5

Difference of phosphorus use efficiencies under different P rates in sweet corn"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
1 kg磷素产鲜穗量Yield per
phosphorus
accumulation
(kg kg-1)
磷素生理效率
Phosphorus
internal
efficiency
(kg kg-1)
磷素收获指数 Phosphorus
harvest index
(%)
磷肥农学效率
Phosphorus
agronomic
efficiency
(kg kg-1)
磷肥利用率Phosphorus
recovery
efficiency
(%)
磷肥偏生产力Phosphorus
partial factor productivity
(kg kg-1)
2018 P0 897.29 a 871.96 a 55.79 ab
P1 845.86 a 472.88 b 57.93 a 267.52 a 74.24 a 469.39 a
P2 829.97 a 458.59 bc 51.13 bc 141.73 b 41.02 b 242.67 b
P3 725.46 a 408.45 bc 54.50 abc 68.63 bc 24.40 c 119.10 c
P4 752.79 a 382.31 c 49.10 c 41.05 c 13.56 d 66.28 c
2019 P0 1124.13 a 641.26 a 67.63 a
P1 744.76 b 426.30 b 61.54 b 115.31 a 61.11 a 385.00 a
P2 694.17 b 411.69 b 62.61 b 61.15 b 35.73 b 196.00 b
P3 692.69 b 421.39 b 61.20 b 29.41 bc 17.56 c 96.83 c
P4 592.42 b 365.35 b 56.28 c 17.10 c 12.47 c 50.81 d
[1] 高磊, 李余良, 李武, 俞婷, 李高科, 李春艳, 胡建广. 不同施氮水平对南方甜玉米氮素吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23:1215-1224.
Gao L, Li Y L, Li W, Yu T, Li G K, Li C Y, Hu J G. Effects of nitrogen application on yields and nitrogen use efficiencies of sweet corn in south China. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2017,23:1215-1224 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 赵福成, 景立权, 闫发宝, 陆大雷, 王桂跃, 陆卫平. 施氮量对甜玉米产量、品质和蔗糖代谢酶活性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19:45-54.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0105
Zhao F C, Jing L Q, Yan F B, Lu D L, Wang G Y, Lu W P. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on yield, quality and enzyme activity associated with sucrose metabolism of sweet corn. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2013,19:45-54 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 陈建生, 徐培智, 唐拴虎, 张发宝, 解开治, 黄旭. 施肥对甜玉米物质形成累积特征影响研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16:58-64.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2010.0109
Chen J S, Xu P Z, Tang S H, Zhang F B, Xie K Z, Huang X. Effects of fertilization on cumulating characteristics of dried matter mass of sweet corn. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2010,16:58-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 曾晓花, 万忠, 尹艳, 胡建广. 2011年广东甜玉米产业发展现状分析. 广东农业科学, 2012, (3):12-14.
Zeng X H, Wan Z, Yin Y, Hu J G. Analysis the development status of sweet corn industry in Guangdong in 2011. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2012, (3):12-14 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 苗淑杰, 乔云发, 韩晓增, 王树起, 李海波. 缺磷对已结瘤大豆生长和固氮功能的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35:1344-1349.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01344
Miao S J, Qiao Y F, Han X Z, Wang S Q, Li H B. Effects of phosphorus deficiency on growth and nitrogen fixation of soybean after nodule formation. Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35:1344-1349 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 陈远学, 李汉邯, 周涛, 陈新平, 黄蔚, 刘静, 张朝春, 徐开未. 施磷对间套作玉米叶面积指数、干物质积累分配及磷肥利用效率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2013,24:2799-2806.
Chen Y X, Li H H, Zhou T, Chen X P, Huang W, Liu J, Zhang C C, Xu K W. Effects of phosphorus fertilization on leaf area index, biomass accumulation and allocation, and phosphorus use efficiency of intercropped maize. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013,24:2799-2806 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Vance C P, Uhde-Stone C, Allan D L. Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol, 2010,157:423-447.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x
[8] 李杰, 石元亮, 陈智文. 我国南方红壤磷素研究概况. 土壤通报, 2011,42:763-768.
Li J, Shi Y L, Chen Z W. Study on phosphorus in red soil in southern China. Chin J Soil Sci, 2011,42:763-768 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008,45:915-924.
Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, Cui Z L, Ma W Q, Chen X P, Jiang R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedol Sin, 2008,45:915-924 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] Li H, Huang G, Meng Q, Ma L, Yuan L, Wang F, Jiang R. Integrated soil and plant phosphorus management for corn and environment in China: a review. Plant Soil, 2011,349:157-167.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0909-5
[11] He P, Li S, Jin J, Wang H, Li C, Wang Y, Cui R. Performance of an optimized nutrient management system for double-cropped wheat-maize rotations in North-Central China. Agron J, 2009,101:1489-1496.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0099
[12] 姚锦秋, 范富, 葛海峰, 张庆国, 侯迷红, 何凤艳, 李晓东. 施肥对玉米产量构成因素的影响. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,25:648-652.
Yao J Q, Fan F, Ge H F, Zhang Q G, Hou M H, He F Y, Li X D. Effect of fertilization on yield traits in maize. J Inner Mongolia Univ Nation(Nat Sci), 2010,25:648-652 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 李川, 乔江方, 朱卫红, 黄璐, 代书桃, 刘京宝. 不同磷肥处理对夏玉米干物质积累量及磷素吸收量的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(12):107-113.
Li C, Qiao J F, Zhu W H, Huang L, Dai S T, Liu J B. Effects of different phosphate treatments on dry matter accumulation and phosphorus uptake in summer maize. J Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2019,47(12):107-113 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 李文娟, 何萍, 金继运. 钾素营养对玉米生育后期干物质和养分积累与转运的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009,15:799-807.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2009.0410
Li W J, He P, Jin J Y. Potassium nutrition on dry matter and nutrients accumulation and translocation at reproductive stage of maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2009,15:799-807 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] Wu L, Cui Z, Chen X, Yue S, Sun Y, Zhao R, Chen K. Change in phosphorus requirement with increasing grain yield for Chinese maize production. Field Crops Res, 2015,180:216-220.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.06.001
[16] 肖春华, 李少昆, 刘景德, 王文静, 宋秋生. 种植方式对玉米养分吸收动态和利用效率的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2005, (2):10-13.
Xiao C H, Li S K, Liu J D, Wang W J, Song Q S. Study on the dynamics of dry matter and nutrient accumulation in maize under various planting systems. Soil Fert Sci China, 2005, (2):10-13 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 吕新, 张伟, 胡昌浩, 董树亭, 白萍. 玉米种植区气候生态因素优势综合评价研究. 干旱区研究, 2005,22:387-390.
Lyu X, Zhang W, Hu C H, Dong S T, Bai P. Study on the integrated evaluation of the advantages of climatic ecological factors in maize-growing regions. Arid Zone Res, 2005,22:387-390 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 高伟, 金继运, 何萍, 李叔田. 我国北方不同地区玉米养分吸收及累积动态研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,14:623-629.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0402
Gao W, Jin J Y, He P, Li S T. Dynamics of maize nutrient uptake and accumulation in different regions of northern China. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2008,14:623-629 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999. pp 268-270.
Bao S D. Soil Agrochemical Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999. pp 268-270(in Chinese).
[20] 李波, 张吉旺, 靳立斌, 崔海岩, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌. 施钾量对高产夏玉米产量和钾素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18:832-838.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.12032
Li B, Zhang J W, Jin L B, Cui H Y, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B. Effects of K fertilization on yield, K use efficiency of summer maize under high yield conditions. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012,18:832-838 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 陆大雷, 刘小兵, 赵久然, 刘萍, 王凤格, 陆卫平, 张凯迪. 甜玉米氮素吸收利用的基因型差异. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,14:258-263.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0209
Lu D L, Liu X B, Zhao J R, Liu P, Wang F G, Lu W P, Zhang K D. Genotypic differences in nitrogen uptake and utilization of sweet maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2008,14:258-263 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 易镇邪, 王璞, 陈平平, 屠乃美. 氮肥类型对夏玉米氮素吸收和利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,14:472-478.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0310
Yi Z X, Wang P, Chen P P, Tu N M. Effect of different types of nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen absorption and utilization of summer maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2008,14:472-478 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 李伟, 李絮花, 李海燕, 彭强, 刘旭凤, 唐慎欣. 控释尿素与普通尿素混施对夏玉米产量和氮肥效率的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38:699-706.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00699
Li W, Li X H, Li H Y, Peng Q, Liu X F, Tang S X. Effects of different mixing rates of controlled-release urea and common urea on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2012,38:699-706 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 鲁艳红, 聂军, 廖育林, 周兴, 谢坚, 汤文光, 杨曾平. 不同控释氮肥减量施用对双季水稻产量和氮素利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2016,30(2):155-161.
Lu Y H, Nie J, Liao Y L, Zhou X, Xie J, Tang W G, Yang Z P. Effects of application reduction of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on yield of double cropping rice and nitrogen nutrient uptake. J Soil Water Conserv, 2016,30(2):155-161 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Lang M, Christie P, Zhang J, Li X. Long-term phosphorus application to a maize monoculture influences the soil microbial community and its feedback effects on maize seedling biomass. Appl Soil Ecol, 2018,128:12-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.01.005
[26] 江帆, 张玉平, 李安乡, 曾新保, 陈历儒, 陈红日. 不同磷肥用量对玉米产量及磷素流失的影响. 天津农业科学, 2019,25(3):50-55.
Jiang F, Zhang Y P, Li A X, Zeng X B, Chen L R, Chen X R. Effect of different amount of phosphate fertilizer on corn yield and phosphorus loss. Tianjin Agric Sci, 2019,25(3):50-55 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] Wang X C, Deng X Y, Pu T, Song C, Yong T, Yang F, Liu J. Contribution of interspecific interactions and phosphorus application to increasing soil phosphorus availability in relay intercropping systems. Field Crops Res, 2017,204:12-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.020
[28] 张白鸽, 陈琼贤, 罗少波, 李强, 曹健, 张敏强, 钟玉娟, 杨秋. 广州地区甜玉米测土配方施肥指标体系研究. 广东农业科学, 2012, (20):46-48.
Zhang B G, Chen Q X, Luo S B, Li Q, Cao J, Zhang M Q, Zhong Y J, Yang Q. Research on index system for sweet maize fertilization by soil testing in Guangzhou. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2012, (20):46-48 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 李青军, 张炎, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 冯固. 棉花高产和磷高效的磷肥基施追施配合技术研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24:146-153.
Li Q J, Zhang Y, Harlhax Yibat, Feng G. Basal and topdressing application technology of phosphate fertilizer for high cotton yield and high phosphorous efficiency in Xinjiang. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2018,24:146-153 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 夏瑶, 娄运生, 杨超光, 梁永超. 几种水稻土对磷的吸附与解吸特性研究. 中国农业科学, 2002,35:1369-1374.
Xia Y, Lou Y S, Yang C G, Liang Y C. Characteristics of phosphate adsorption and desorption in Paddy soils. Sci Agric Sin, 2002,35:1369-1374 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 金鑫, 曾新颖, 齐昌国, 尹黎燕, 邓燕. 供磷水平对玉米丛枝菌根侵染及其对异质养分吸收的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24:163-169.
Jin X, Zeng X Y, Qi C G, Yin L Y, Deng Y. Influences of phosphorus application level on maize arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and hyphal acquisition to heterogeneous phosphorus supply. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2018,24:163-169 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 黄岩, 曹国军, 耿玉辉, 韩圆圆. 降水量与施磷量对黑土区玉米产量及磷素吸收利用的影响. 玉米科学, 2018,26(1):142-148.
Huang Y, Cao G J, Geng Y H, Han Y Y. Effects of precipitation and phosphorus application rate on yield and phosphorus absorption and utilization of maize in black soil region. J Maize Sci, 2018,26(1):142-148 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 吴启华, 刘晓斌, 张淑香, 尹彩侠, 李桂花, 谢佳贵. 施用常规磷水平的80%可实现玉米高产、磷素高效利用和土壤磷平衡. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22:1468-1476.
Wu Q H, Liu X B, Zhang S X, Yin C X, Li G H, Xie J G. Application of 80% of routine phosphorus rate to keep high yield and P efficiency of maize and P balance in soil. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2016,22:1468-1476 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] 钟新科, 刘洛, 徐新良, 游松财. 近30年中国玉米气候生产潜力时空变化特征. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(15):94-101.
Zhong X K, Liu L, Xu X L, You S C. Characteristics of spatial-temporal variation of maize climate productivity during last 30 years in China. Trans CSAE, 2012,28(15):94-101 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[35] Saseendran S A, Ma L, Nielsen D C, Vigil M F, Ahuja L R. Simulating planting data effects on corn production using RZWQM and CERES-Maize models. Agron J, 2005,97:58-71.
[36] Kwabiah A B. Growth and yield of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars in response to planting date and plastic mulch in a short-season environment. Sci Hortic, 2004,102:147-166.
[37] 杨欢, 赵浚宇, 施凯, 施燕凌, 陆大雷, 陆卫平. 磷素施用对鲜食糯玉米养分积累分配和产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2016,24(1):148-155.
Yang H, Zhao J Y, Shi K, Shi Y L, Lu D L, Lu W P. Effects of phosphorus application on nutrient uptake and distribution and grain yield of fresh waxy maize. J Maize Sci, 2016,24(1):148-155 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] WANG Dan, ZHOU Bao-Yuan, MA Wei, GE Jun-Zhu, DING Zai-Song, LI Cong-Feng, ZHAO Ming. Characteristics of the annual distribution and utilization of climate resource for double maize cropping system in the middle reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] WANG Wang-Nian, GE Jun-Zhu, YANG Hai-Chang, YIN Fa-Ting, HUANG Tai-Li, KUAI Jie, WANG Jing, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong. Adaptation of feed crops to saline-alkali soil stress and effect of improving saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] YAN Jia-Qian, GU Yi-Biao, XUE Zhang-Yi, ZHOU Tian-Yang, GE Qian-Qian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Li-Jun, WANG Zhi-Qin, GU Jun-Fei, YANG Jian-Chang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, XU Da-Yong. Different responses of rice cultivars to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] CHEN Jing, REN Bai-Zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] LI Yi-Jun, LYU Hou-Quan. Effect of agricultural meteorological disasters on the production corn in the Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] SHI Yan-Yan, MA Zhi-Hua, WU Chun-Hua, ZHOU Yong-Jin, LI Rong. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] YAN Xiao-Yu, GUO Wen-Jun, QIN Du-Lin, WANG Shuang-Lei, NIE Jun-Jun, ZHAO Na, QI Jie, SONG Xian-Liang, MAO Li-Li, SUN Xue-Zhen. Effects of cotton stubble return and subsoiling on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, and yield of cotton in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[9] KE Jian, CHEN Ting-Ting, WU Zhou, ZHU Tie-Zhong, SUN Jie, HE Hai-Bing, YOU Cui-Cui, ZHU De-Quan, WU Li-Quan. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[10] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] WANG Lyu, CUI Yue-Zhen, WU Yu-Hong, HAO Xing-Shun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, WANG Jun-Yi, LIU Yi-Xin, LI Xiao-Gang, QIN Yu-Hang. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[12] DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[13] CHEN Yun, LI Si-Yu, ZHU An, LIU Kun, ZHANG Ya-Jun, ZHANG Hao, GU Jun-Fei, ZHANG Wei-Yang, LIU Li-Jun, YANG Jian-Chang. Effects of seeding rates and panicle nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and quality in good taste rice cultivars under direct sowing [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[14] YUAN Jia-Qi, LIU Yan-Yang, XU Ke, LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[15] DING Hong, XU Yang, ZHANG Guan-Chu, QIN Fei-Fei, DAI Liang-Xiang, ZHANG Zhi-Meng. Effects of drought at different growth stages and nitrogen application on nitrogen absorption and utilization in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!