Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 1279-1290.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2026.53079

• REVIEW •     Next Articles

Strategies and prospects for large-scale crop yield improvement based on yield gap

Wang Yu-Cheng1(), Zhang Lu2(), Liu A-Kang3, Huang Jian-Liang1, Peng Shao-Bing1, Yuan Shen1,*()   

  1. 1 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement / Hubei Hongshan Laboratory / MARA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River / College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
    2 College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
    3 National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, Beijing 100125, China
  • Received:2025-10-15 Accepted:2026-01-22 Online:2026-05-12 Published:2026-01-26
  • Contact: *Yuan Shen, E-mail: syuan@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • About author:First author contact:**Contributed equally to this work
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(T2261129473);National Natural Science Foundation of China(72473049);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFD1900600);Natural Science Foundation of Wuhan(2024040801020290);China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-01)

Abstract:

In the context of the “New Round of the 100-Billion-Jin Grain Production Capacity Enhancement Initiative”, large-scale yield improvement has been identified as a core strategic pathway for ensuring national food security in China. Although national grain production has remained high and stable in recent years, further yield increases through cropland expansion are increasingly constrained by limited water and soil resources and growing environmental pressures. Addressing the key scientific questions of “whether major food crops still have room for yield improvement, how large this potential is, and how it can be realized”, research on yield potential and yield gaps provide an essential theoretical and methodological foundation to quantify production potential, identify limiting factors, and design yield-enhancement strategies. This paper systematically reviews recent advances in yield potential assessment and yield gap analysis, revealing the magnitude of untapped yield potential and the dominant constraints across different crops and regions. Based on these insights, differentiated technical pathways for large-scale yield improvement are proposed. In regions with large yield gaps, priority should be given to optimizing crop management practices and resource allocation to accelerate yield gap closure. In contrast, in areas where yield gaps are relatively small, further yield gains rely on breeding innovation, key technological breakthroughs, and cropping system optimization to raise yield ceilings. In addition, this paper analyzes major bottlenecks in the dissemination and application of yield-enhancing technologies, highlighting the persistent disconnect between scientific outputs and on-farm practices that hampers large-scale adoption. Looking ahead, establishing a coordinated and closed-loop framework encompassing yield potential assessment, yield gap diagnosis, technology integration, and on-farm implementation will be critical for translating scientific advances into sustained productivity gains. Through the synergistic advancement of technological innovations and supportive policy and system arrangements, China can continue to enhance its grain production capacity under constraints of limited arable land and environmental resources, thereby strengthening food security and agricultural sustainability.

Key words: large-scale yield improvement, yield potential, yield gap, technology pathways, food security

Fig. 1

Definitions on yield potential, attainable yield, and yield gap Yield potential refers to the maximum yield a crop can achieve under optimal management conditions, free from both biotic and abiotic stresses, and is influenced by natural factors such as climate, soil quality, CO2 concentration, and others. Attainable yield represents the yield that farmers can attain under large-scale production conditions through optimized management and technological applications, typically about 80% of the yield potential. The yield gap is the difference between yield potential and actual yield, reflecting the disparity between crop yields under ideal conditions and those achieved in actual production. It indicates the extent to which the crop has not fully realized its potential, usually due to limitations in resources or technology. The exploitable yield gap refers to the difference between attainable yield and actual yield, indicating the portion of the yield gap that can be closed under large-scale production conditions through improved management practices and technological innovations [20]."

Table 1

The comparison among methods on yield potential estimation"

方法
Method
特点
Characteristic
优点
Advantage
局限性
Limitation
田间高产试验
Field high-yield trials
科研人员在试验田中优化管理
Researchers optimize crop management in experimental plots
精度高、结果直观
High accuracy, direct results
覆盖面窄, 代表性不足
Limited coverage, poor representativeness
高产记录
High-yield records
示范田或高水平农户田实测
Yield measured in demonstration fields or top-performing farmers’ fields
可操作性强、激励作用大
Highly practical, strong incentive effect
受自然条件和投入影响大, 缺乏普遍性
Strongly affected by natural conditions and inputs, limited generalizability
高产农户产量
Top farmer yields
调查产量排名前5%-10%的农户
Based on surveys of the top 5%-10% highest-yielding farmers
贴近实际、反映先进管理水平
Reflects real-world practices and advanced management
调查成本高, 受样本代表性限制
High survey cost, limited by sample
representativeness
作物模型模拟
Crop model
simulation
输入气象、土壤、品种等参数
Uses parameters such as climate, soil, and variety
可跨区域、跨年份模拟, 适用性广
Applicable across regions and years, wide adaptability
依赖数据质量, 结果不确定性大
Depending on data quality, results carry high uncertainty
遥感与机器学习
Remote sensing & machine learning
多源遥感+统计/机器学习
Integrates multi-source remote sensing with statistical or machine learning methods
空间覆盖广、估算快速
Broad spatial coverage, rapid
estimation
受遥感分辨率与校准限制, 算法复杂
Limited by resolution and calibration of remote sensing data, algorithmic complexity

Fig. 2

Yield gaps (expressed as percentage of yield potential) of maize, rice, wheat, and soybean in China Figures A-H show the yield gaps of the irrigated and rainfed maize [32], single-and double-season rice [33], irrigated and rainfed wheat [32], irrigated and rainfed soybean [34] systems at the agricultural climate zone level, respectively. This map is based on the standard map downloaded from the Standard Map Service of the Ministry of Natural Resources of China with the approval number GS (2024) 0650. The boundary of the base map is not modified."

Fig. 3

Crop yield increase strategies in different yield gap scenarios This figure illustrates the division of two types of regions and their corresponding prioritized technical measures. The left section represents areas with a large yield gap, where the primary objective is to reduce the yield gap and enhance actual yield through a series of measures. Key technologies include precision fertilization, efficient water management, optimization of sowing and transplanting, integrated pest and weed management, and mechanization. These measures aim to optimize existing production practices, thereby narrowing the yield gap and improving yield levels under current conditions. The right section represents areas with a smaller yield gap, where the focus is on increasing yield potential and surpassing the yield ceiling. Prioritized measures include breeding innovation and variety updates, efficient utilization of thermal and light resources, and expansion of irrigated areas. These technologies work by improving the crop’s growing environment and enhancing its yield potential [46-48]."

[1] 国家统计局. 2024年全国粮食产量迈上新台阶: 国家统计局农村司副司长魏锋华解读粮食生产情况. (2024-12-13) [2025-08-30]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/sjjd/202412/t20241213_1957743.html.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. National grain production in 2024 reaches new high level: Wei Fenghua, Deputy Director of the Department of Rural Surveys of the National Bureau of Statistics interprets the situation of grain production. (2024-12-13) [2025-08-30]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/sjjd/202412/t20241213_1957743.html.
[2] 国务院.实施新一轮千亿斤粮食产能提升行动: 国家发展改革委负责同志就《行动方案》答记者问. (2024-04-09) [2025-8-30]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202404/content_6944059.htm.
State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Launching a new round of the 50-million-ton grain production capacity enhancement action-Responsible official of the National Development and Reform Commission answers reporters’ questions on the “Action Plan”. (2024-04-09) [2025-8-30]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202404/content_6944059.htm.
[3] 徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, 等. 我国水稻大面积单产提升面临的现实困境与出路. 中国稻米, 2025, 31(4): 1-4.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.04.001
Xu C C, Ji L, Chen Z D, et al. Current challenges and pathways to enhancing large-scale per-unit yield of rice in China. China Rice, 2025, 31(4): 1-4 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.04.001
[4] van Ittersum M K, Cassman K G, Grassini P, et al. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance: a review. Field Crops Res, 2013, 143: 4-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009
[5] Lobell D B, Cassman K G, Field C B. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annu Rev Environ Resour, 2009, 34: 179-204.
doi: 10.1146/energy.2009.34.issue-1
[6] 刘保花, 陈新平, 崔振岭, 等. 三大粮食作物产量潜力与产量差研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23: 525-534.
Liu B H, Chen X P, Cui Z L, et al. Research advance in yield potential and yield gap of three major cereal crops. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2015, 23: 525-534 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 国务院. 如何推动粮油作物大面积单产提升(政策问点·推进乡村全面振兴)? (2024-04-05) [2025-08-30]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202404/content6943559.htm.
State Council of the People’s Republic of China. How to promote large-scale yield improvement of grain and oil crops (Policy Focus: advancing comprehensive rural revitalization)? (2024-04-05) [2025-08-30]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202404/content6943559.htm.
[8] 仇焕广, 雷馨圆, 冷淦潇, 等. 新时期中国粮食安全的理论辨析. 中国农村经济, 2022(7): 2-17.
Qiu H G, Lei X Y, Leng G X, et al. A comprehensive theoretical analysis of grain security in the new era. Chin Rural Econ, 2022(7): 2-17 (in Chinese).
[9] Zhao H, Chang J F, Havlík P, et al. China’s future food demand and its implications for trade and environment. Nat Sustain, 2021, 4: 1042-1051.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00784-6
[10] Hu Y C, Su M R, Wang Y F, et al. Food production in China requires intensified measures to be consistent with national and provincial environmental boundaries. Nat Food, 2020, 1: 572-582.
doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00143-2 pmid: 37128013
[11] 陈阜, 赵明. 作物栽培与耕作学科发展. 农学学报, 2018, 8(1): 50-54.
Chen F, Zhao M. Developments of the crop cultivation and farming system in China. J Agric, 2018, 8(1): 50-54 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 李文华, 成升魁, 梅旭荣, 等. 中国农业资源与环境可持续发展战略研究. 中国工程科学, 2016, 18(1): 56-64.
doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2016.01.008
Li W H, Cheng S K, Mei X R, et al. Study on strategies for the sustainable development of China’s agricultural resources and environment. Strateg Study CAE, 2016, 18(1): 56-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] Norse D, Ju X T. Environmental costs of China’s food security. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2015, 209: 5-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.014
[14] 王斌, 李玉娥, 蔡岸冬, 等. 碳中和视角下全球农业减排固碳政策措施及对中国的启示. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18: 110-118.
Wang B, Li Y E, Cai A D, et al. Global policies in agricultural greenhouse gas reduction and carbon sequestration and their enlightenment to China in the view of carbon neutrality. Clim Change Res, 2022, 18: 110-118 (in Chinese).
[15] 杨晓光, 刘志娟. 作物产量差研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 2731-2741.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.14.004
Yang X G, Liu Z J. Advances in research on crop yield gaps. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 2731-2741 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Evans L T, Fischer R A. Yield potential: its definition, measurement, and significance. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1544-1551.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.3961544x
[17] Yuan S, Linquist B A, Wilson L T, et al. Sustainable intensification for a larger global rice bowl. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 7163.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27424-z pmid: 34887412
[18] Fischer R A. Definitions and determination of crop yield, yield gaps, and of rates of change. Field Crops Res, 2015, 182: 9-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.006
[19] Grassini P, van Bussel L G J, Van Wart J, et al. How good is good enough? Data requirements for reliable crop yield simulations and yield-gap analysis. Field Crops Res, 2015, 177: 49-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.004
[20] Cassman K G, Dobermann A, Walters D T, et al. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu Rev Environ Resour, 2003, 28: 315-358.
[21] Cassman K G, Grassini P, van Wart J. Crop yield potential, yield trends, and global food security in a changing climate. In: Hillel D, Rosenzweig C, eds. Handbook of Climate Change and Agroecosystems. London: Imperial College Press,2010. pp 37-51.
[22] FAOSTAT.Crops and livestock products database. [2025-8-30]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
[23] Sayre K D, Rajaram S, Fischer R A. Yield potential progress in short bread wheats in northwest Mexico. Crop Sci, 1997, 37: cropsci1997.0011183X003700010006x.
[24] Stuart A M, Pame A R P, Silva J V, et al. Yield gaps in rice-based farming systems: insights from local studies and prospects for future analysis. Field Crops Res, 2016, 194: 43-56.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.039
[25] Grassini P, Thorburn J, Burr C, et al. High-yield irrigated maize in the Western U.S. Corn Belt: I. On-farm yield, yield potential, and impact of agronomic practices. Field Crops Res, 2011, 120: 142-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.012
[26] Li T, Hasegawa T, Yin X Y, et al. Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions. Glob Change Biol, 2015, 21: 1328-1341.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.2015.21.issue-3
[27] 薛昌颖, 杨晓光, 邓伟, 等. 利用ORYZA2000模型分析北京地区旱稻产量潜力及需水特征. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 625-631.
Xue C Y, Yang X G, Deng W, et al. Yield potential and water requirement of aerobic rice in Beijing analyzed by ORYZA2000 model. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 625-631 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] Deng N Y, Grassini P, Yang H S, et al. Closing yield gaps for rice self-sufficiency in China. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 1725.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09447-9 pmid: 30979872
[29] Liu B H, Chen X P, Meng Q F, et al. Estimating maize yield potential and yield gap with agro-climatic zones in China: distinguish irrigated and rainfed conditions. Agric For Meteor, 2017, 239: 108-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.035
[30] Liu Z T, Ying H, Chen M Y, et al. Optimization of China’s maize and soy production can ensure feed sufficiency at lower nitrogen and carbon footprints. Nat Food, 2021, 2: 426-433.
doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00300-1
[31] 黄少辉, 杨云马, 刘克桐, 等. 河北省小麦产量潜力、产量差与效率差分析. 作物杂志, 2018(2): 118-122.
Huang S H, Yang Y M, Liu K T, et al. Yield potential, yield gap and nitrogen use efficiency gap of winter wheat in Hebei province. Crops, 2018(2): 118-122 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] GYGA. Global Yield Gap Atlas. [2025-8-30]. https://www.yieldgap.org.
[33] Yuan S, Fang F, Wang Y, et al.Ratoon rice allows millions of smallholders to meet production and environmental goals. Research Square. (2025-09-14) [2025-9-30]. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7339561/v1.
[34] Wang Y C, Ling X X, Ma C M, et al. Can China get out of soy dilemma? A yield gap analysis of soybean in China. Agron Sustain Dev, 2023, 43: 47.
doi: 10.1007/s13593-023-00897-6
[35] Aramburu-Merlos F, van Loon M P, van Ittersum M K, et al. High-resolution global maps of yield potential with local relevance for targeted crop production improvement. Nat Food, 2024, 5: 667-672.
doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01029-3
[36] Zhao Y, Chen X P, Cui Z L, et al. Using satellite remote sensing to understand maize yield gaps in the North China Plain. Field Crops Res, 2015, 183: 31-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.004
[37] Yuan S, Saito K, van Oort P A J, et al. Intensifying rice production to reduce imports and land conversion in Africa. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 835.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44950-8 pmid: 38280881
[38] Lu C H, Fan L. Winter wheat yield potentials and yield gaps in the North China Plain. Field Crops Res, 2013, 143: 98-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.015
[39] Meng Q F, Hou P, Wu L, et al. Understanding production potentials and yield gaps in intensive maize production in China. Field Crops Res, 2013, 143: 91-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.023
[40] Licker R, Johnston M, Foley J A, et al. Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2010, 19: 769-782.
doi: 10.1111/geb.2010.19.issue-6
[41] 郑娜, 刘秀位, 王锡平. 利用产量差距方法进行华北冬小麦产量受气候影响规律的分析: 以河北省栾城县为例. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22: 234-240.
Zheng N, Liu X W, Wang X P. Determining the effects of climate on winter wheat yield in Northern China via yield gap analysis: a case study of Luancheng county, Hebei province. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2014, 22: 234-240 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2014.30893
[42] Mueller N D, Gerber J S, Johnston M, et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature, 2012, 490: 254-257.
doi: 10.1038/nature11420
[43] 刘建刚, 褚庆全, 王光耀, 等. 基于DSSAT模型的氮肥管理下华北地区冬小麦产量差的模拟. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(23): 124-129.
Liu J G, Chu Q Q, Wang G Y, et al. Simulating yield gap of winter wheat in response to nitrogen management in North China Plain based on DSSAT model. Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(23): 124-129 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[44] Beza E, Silva J V, Kooistra L, et al. Review of yield gap explaining factors and opportunities for alternative data collection approaches. Eur J Agron, 2017, 82: 206-222.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.016
[45] 范兰, 吕昌河, 陈朝. 作物产量差及其形成原因综述. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26: 2155-2166.
Fan L, Lyu C H, Chen Z. A review on crop yield gaps and the causes. J Nat Resour, 2011, 26: 2155-2166 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.12.014
[46] Ma G H, Yuan L P. Hybrid rice achievements, development and prospect in China. J Integr Agric, 2015, 14: 197-205.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60922-9
[47] 彭少兵. 对转型时期水稻生产的战略思考. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2014, 44: 845-850.
Peng S B. Reflection on China’s rice production strategies during the transition period. Sci Sin Vitae, 2014, 44: 845-850 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.1360/052014-98
[48] Zhao J C, Wang Y X, Zhao M Y, et al. Prospects for soybean production increase by closing yield gaps in the Northeast farming region, China. Field Crops Res, 2023, 293: 108843.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108843
[49] Anderson W, Johansen C, Siddique K H M. Addressing the yield gap in rainfed crops: a review. Agron Sustain Dev, 2016, 36: 18.
doi: 10.1007/s13593-015-0341-y
[50] Saito K, Vandamme E, Johnson J M, et al. Yield-limiting macronutrients for rice in sub-Saharan Africa. Geoderma, 2019, 338: 546-554.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.036
[51] Aramburu-Merlos F, Tenorio F A M, Mashingaidze N, et al. Adopting yield-improving practices to meet maize demand in Sub-Saharan Africa without cropland expansion. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 4492.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48859-0 pmid: 38802418
[52] Rattalino Edreira J I, Mourtzinis S, Conley S P, et al. Assessing causes of yield gaps in agricultural areas with diversity in climate and soils. Agric For Meteor, 2017, 247: 170-180.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.07.010
[53] Tseng M C, Roel Á, Macedo I, et al. Field-level factors for closing yield gaps in high-yielding rice systems of Uruguay. Field Crops Res, 2021, 264: 108097.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108097
[54] Senapati N, Semenov M A. Large genetic yield potential and genetic yield gap estimated for wheat in Europe. Glob Food Secur, 2020, 24: 100340.
doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100340
[55] Cooper M, Tang T, Gho C, et al. Integrating genetic gain and gap analysis to predict improvements in crop productivity. Crop Sci, 2020, 60: 582-604.
doi: 10.1002/csc2.20109
[56] 彭少兵. 转型时期杂交水稻的困境与出路. 作物学报, 2016, 42: 313-319.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00313
Peng S B. Dilemma and way-out of hybrid rice during the transition period in China. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42: 313-319 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00313
[57] Huang L Y, Sun F, Yuan S, et al. Different mechanisms underlying the yield advantage of ordinary hybrid and super hybrid rice over inbred rice under low and moderate N input conditions. Field Crops Res, 2018, 216: 150-157.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.019
[58] 边晓萌, 李华锋, 陈彦宾. “十三五”国家重点研发计划“经作”专项杂粮领域资助情况及实施进展概述. 作物杂志, 2023(4): 1-6.
Bian X M, Li H F, Chen Y B. Overview of the funding and implementation for miscellaneous grains in “economic crops” special-purpose project of the national key R & D program during the 13th Five-Year Plan. Crops, 2023(4): 1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[59] 刘家伸. 玉米种植技术推广应用中存在的问题及策略分析. 安徽农学通报, 2025, 31(5): 10-12.
doi: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2025.05.003
Liu J S. Analysis of problems and strategies in the promotion and application of corn planting techniques. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2025, 31(5): 10-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2025.05.003
[60] 苏姗姗. 农业技术推广中存在的问题与改进对策. 河北农业, 2025(1): 48-49.
Su S S. Problems and improvement countermeasures in agricultural technology popularization. Hebei Agric, 2025(1): 48-49 (in Chinese).
[61] Zhang X Y, Yang Q, Al Mamun A, et al. Acceptance of new agricultural technology among small rural farmers. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 2024, 11: 1641.
doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-04163-2
[62] 阎世平, 龚大永. 我国小农户经营困境与出路. 广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 40(6): 19-25.
Yan S P, Gong D Y. The dilemma and way out of small farmers’ management in China. J Guangxi Univ Philos Soc Sci, 2018, 40(6): 19-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[63] 李晓辉, 姜春雷, 张杰. 基层农业技术推广工作存在问题及措施. 农业开发与装备, 2023(7): 130-132.
Li X H, Jiang C L, Zhang J. Problems and measures of agricultural technology extension at grass-roots level. Agric Dev Equip, 2023(7): 130-132 (in Chinese).
[64] Nayak H S, McDonald A J, Kumar V, et al. Context-dependent agricultural intensification pathways to increase rice production in India. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 8403.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52448-6 pmid: 39333483
[65] 曹馨元, 杜明利, 王宇诚, 等. 稻油系统周年产量差及形成因素探究: 以湖北省武穴市为例. 作物学报, 2024, 50: 1287-1299.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32030
Cao X Y, Du M L, Wang Y C, et al. Evaluation of annual yield gap and yield limiting factors in rice-rapeseed cropping system: an example from Wuxue city, Hubei province, China. Acta Agron Sin, 2024, 50: 1287-1299 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32030
[66] 石全红, 刘建刚, 王兆华, 等. 南方稻区水稻产量差的变化及其气候影响因素. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 896-903.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00896
Shi Q H, Liu J G, Wang Z H, et al. Change of rice yield gaps and influential climatic factors in Southern China. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 896-903 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00896
[67] Touch V, Tan D K Y, Cook B R, et al. Smallholder farmers’ challenges and opportunities: implications for agricultural production, environment and food security. J Environ Manag, 2024, 370: 122536.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122536
[1] MENG Xiang-Yu, DIAO Deng-Chao, LIU Ya-Rui, LI Yun-Li, SUN Yu-Chen, WU Wei, ZHAO Wen, WANG Yu, WU Jian-Hui, LI Chun-Lian, ZENG Qing-Dong, HAN De-Jun, ZHENG Wei-Jun. Genetic analysis of high yield and yield stability characteristics of new wheat variety Xinong 877 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(5): 1261-1276.
[2] CAO Xin-Yuan, DU Ming-Li, WANG Yu-Cheng, CHEN Xin-Hua, CHEN Jia-Xin, LING Xiao-Xia, HUANG Jian-Liang, PENG Shao-Bing, DENG Nan-Yan. Evaluation of annual yield gap and yield limiting facters in rice-rapeseed cropping system: an example from Wuxue city, Hubei province, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(5): 1287-1299.
[3] YAN Sheng-Ji, DENG Ai-Xing, SHANG Zi-Yin, TANG Zhi-Wei, CHEN Chang-Qing, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Wei-Jian. Characteristics of carbon emission and approaches of carbon mitigation and sequestration for carbon neutrality in China’s crop production [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 930-941.
[4] DU Xiang-Bei, XI Min, KONG Ling-Cong, WU Wen-Ge, CHEN Jin-Hua, XU You-Zun, ZHOU Yong-Jin. Yield gaps of rice-wheat double cropping and its relationship with resource utilization in Yangtze-Huaihe Rivers region [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(2): 351-358.
[5] WANG Hong-Zhang,LIU Peng,JIA Xu-Cun,LI Jing,REN Hao,DONG Shu-Ting,ZHANG Ji-Wang,ZHAO Bin. Analysis of differences in summer maize yield and fertilizer use efficiency under different cultivation managements [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(10): 1544-1553.
[6] LI Zhi-Jie,ZHANG Zhen-Ping,ZHANG Yi,DENG Ai-Xing,SONG Zhen-Wei,ZHENG Cheng-Yan,ZHANG Wei-Jian. Responses of Plant Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency to Nitrogen Fertilization Rate among Rice Varieties Released from Different Years in Liaoning Province [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(09): 1679-1686.
[7] QIAN Chun-Rong,YU Yang,GONG Xiu-Jie,JIANG Yu-Bo,ZHAO Yang,HAO Yu-Bo,LI Liang,ZHANG Wei-Jian. Response of Nitrogen Use Efficiency to Plant Density and Nitrogen Application Rate for Maize Hybrids from Different Eras in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(11): 2069-2077.
[8] QIAN Chun-Rong1,3,YU Yang3,GONG Xiu-Jie,JIANG Yu-Bo,ZHAO Yang,WANG Jun-He,YANG Zhong-Liang,ZHANG Wei-Jian. Response of Grain Yield to Plant Density and Nitrogen Application Rate for Maize Hybrids Released from Different Eras in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(10): 1864-1874.
[9] SHI Quan-Hong,LIU Jian-Gang,WANG Zhao-Hua,TAO Ting-Ting,CHEN Fu,CHU Qing-Quan. Change of Rice Yield Gaps and Influential Climatic Factors in Southern China [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(05): 896-903.
[10] ZHANG Yong, LI Shi-Zhao, TUN Zhen-Lu, YANG Wen-Xiong, XU E-Xiong, XIA Xian-Chun, HE Zhong-Hu. Contribution of CIMMYT Wheat Germplasm to Genetic Improvement of Grain Yield in Spring Wheat of Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu, and Xinjiang Provinces [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(10): 1752-1762.
[11] HE Zhong-Hu, JIA Xian-Chun, CHEN Xin-Min, ZHUANG Qiao-Sheng. Progress of Wheat Breeding in China and the Future Perspective [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(02): 202-215.
[12] ZHOU Yang;HE Zhong-Hu;CHEN Xin-Min;WANG De-Sen;ZHANG Yong;ZHANG Gai-Sheng. Genetic Gain of Wheat Breeding for Yield in Northern Winter Wheat Zone over 30 Years [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(09): 1530-1535.
[13] XUE Chang-Ying;YANG Xiao-Guang;DENG Wei;ZHANG Tian-Yi;YAN Wei-Xiong;ZHANG Qiu-Ping;ROUZI Aji;ZHAO Jun-Fang;YANF Jie;Bouman B A M. Yield Potential and Water Requirement of Aerobic Rice in Beijing Analyzed by ORYZA2000 Model [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(04): 625-631.
[14] SUN Qing-Quan;WU Yuan-Qi;HU Chang-Hao;DONG Shu-Ting;RONG Ting-Zhao;ZHANG Ying. Physiological Activities and Multiplication of Endosperm Cell at Filling Stage of Kernels with Different Yield Potential in Maize [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31(05): 612-618.
[15] WU Zheng-Feng;WANG Kong-Jun;DONG Shu-Ting;HU Chang-Hao;LIU Peng;ZHANG Ji-Wang. Physiological Characteristics of Source and Sink in High Oil Corn [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31(03): 283-288.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!