Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 1153-1165.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2026.55056

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on breeding and cultivation strategies for winter rapeseed to cope with climate change in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River

Yang Rui1(), Chen Jing-Dong1, Huang Ying1, Zhang Xue-Kun1,2, Zhou Deng-Wen3, Liu Qing-Yun4, Xu Jin-Song1, Xie Ling-Li1, Xu Ben-Bo1,*()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Yangtze University / Key Laboratory of Green and Efficient Crop Production in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Engineering Research Center of Wetland Ecology and Agricultural Use, Ministry of Education, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, China
    2Yuelu Mountain Laboratory / Institute of Crops, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
    3Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Jingzhou, Jingzhou 434020, Hubei, China
    4Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Xishui County, Huanggang 438021, Hubei, China
  • Received:2025-08-20 Accepted:2026-01-22 Online:2026-04-12 Published:2026-02-05
  • Contact: *E-mail: benboxu@yangtzeu.edu.cn E-mail:ruiyang.stu@yangtzeu.edu.cn;benboxu@yangtzeu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Major Projects of Agricultural Biology Breeding of China(2023ZD04042);Improving Rapeseed Yield Potential Ability in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River(152304045)

Abstract:

Climate change has a significant impact on rapeseed production, making it essential to clarify breeding and management strategies under evolving climatic conditions to ensure production stability. To systematically investigate the relationships between meteorological factors and yield, oil yield, and resistance-related traits, multi-year and multi-location national trial data from major production areas in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River during 2009-2023 were analyzed using a mixed linear model (MLM), linear regression, and canonical correlation analysis. Results showed a significant increase in mean temperature during the rapeseed growing season in this region, accompanied by greater temperature fluctuations and increased precipitation variability. Overall, the rise in mean temperature was beneficial for improving yield and oil production; however, extreme weather events substantially weakened this positive effect, and low temperatures in November had a particularly negative impact on yield. Canonical correlation analysis revealed two dominant meteorology-trait coupling patterns: Type 1 (humid late autumn-moderately cool early spring-moderately warm late spring), which supported safe overwintering, strong regrowth, and effective disease control, thereby significantly boosting yield but potentially reducing oil content; and Type 2 (cold spring), which was associated with suppressed yield and structural traits, as well as increased disease risk. It is recommended to enhance monitoring and early warning systems for extreme weather, especially low temperatures in November, and to adopt targeted management strategies. Under different climatic scenarios, differentiated field practices and a “dual-target” breeding strategy should be implemented: in warm and moist favorable years, optimize planting density and nutrient management to enhance oil content and thousand-seed weight; in cold spring years, apply timely control measures for Sclerotinia sclerotiorum rot and reinforce nutrient supply during the flowering to maturity stages. Breeding efforts should focus simultaneously on developing high-yield, disease-resistant genotypes and high-oil, high-thousand-seed-weight genotypes to enhance adaptability under complex climate conditions. A multidimensional meteorology-trait-yield early warning system should be established, integrating historical climate patterns with future projections to enable dynamic optimization of cultivar selection and field management.

Key words: rapeseed, climatic factors, canonical correlation analysis, mixed linear model, yield, oil content, Sclerotinia disease

Table 1

BLUP conversion value for each CK line"

品系
Line
产量
Yield
株高
Plant height
单株角果数
Silique number
per plant
每角粒数
Seed number per silique
千粒重
Thousand seeds weight
全生育期
Whole growth period
沣油737
Fengyou 737
224.18 -11.74 12.99 -1.04 0.106 -3.91
秦优10号
Qinyou 10
15.22 11.66 -34.88 0.28 0.005 -1.53
秦优7号
Qinyou 7
-104.12 8.04 -51.42 1.79 0.036 0.13
越优1203
Yueyou 1203
508.78 1.67 8.52 0.10 0.284 -0.11
品系
Line
含油量
Oil content
菌核病指数
Sclerotium index
选育单位
Breeding institution
作为对照品系年度
Years served as a
control line
沣油737
Fengyou 737
1.02 1.41 湖南省作物研究所
Crop Research Institute of Hunan province
2018, 2020-2022
秦优10号
Qinyou 10
1.76 1.07 咸阳市农业科学研究所
Xianyang Institute of Agricultural Sciences
2011-2019
秦优7号
Qinyou 7
1.93 -2.63 陕西杂交油菜研究中心
Hybrid Rapeseed Research Center of Shaanxi province
2009-2011
越优1203
Yueyou 1203
-0.02 -0.98 浙江省农业科学院
Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences
2022-2023

Table 2

Correlation analysis between monthly meteorological factors and yield and quality traits of winter rapeseed during the growth period"

月份与气象因子
Month and climatic factors
菌核病病指
Sclerotium index
单株角果数
Silique number per plant
株高
Plant height
每角粒数
Seed number per silique
11月最高气温Max. temp. in Nov. -0.22 0.10 -0.42 0.02
11月最低气温Min. temp. in Nov. 0.16 0.30 0.29 -0.12
11月平均气温日较差DTD in Nov. -0.30 -0.07 0.03 0.22
11月降水量Precipitation in Nov. 0.19 0.03 -0.07 -0.20
11月日照时数Sunshine duration in Nov. -0.38 -0.17 0.04 0.28
12月降水量Precipitation in Dec. 0.55* 0.15 0.29 -0.01
12月日照时数Sunshine duration in Dec. -0.55* -0.34 -0.03 0.10
1月平均气温Mean temp. in Jan. 0.30 0.59* -0.19 -0.70**
1月最低气温Min. temp. in Jan. 0.21 0.29 0.23 -0.36
2月平均气温Mean temp. in Feb. -0.21 0.34 -0.20 -0.26
2月最高气温Max. temp. in Feb. -0.28 0.25 -0.31 -0.27
2月最低气温Min. temp. in Feb. 0.07 0.46 -0.33 -0.45
3月平均气温Mean temp. in Mar. 0.26 0.66** -0.33 -0.44
3月最低气温Min. temp. in Mar. 0.15 0.60* -0.29 -0.48
4月平均气温Mean temp. in Apr. 0.31 0.11 -0.10 -0.12
月份与气象因子
Month and climatic factors
千粒重
Thousand seeds weight
全生育期
Whole growth period
含油量
Oil content
产量
Yield
产油量
Oil yield
11月最高气温Max. temp. in Nov. 0.53* -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.39
11月最低气温Min. temp. in Nov. -0.05 -0.14 0.02 0.52* 0.41
11月平均气温日较差DTD in Nov. 0.23 -0.43 -0.56* 0.47 0.23
11月降水量Precipitation in Nov. -0.13 0.52* 0.43 -0.45 -0.26
11月日照时数Sunshine duration in Nov. 0.16 -0.31 -0.53* 0.43 0.26
12月降水量Precipitation in Dec. -0.30 0.31 0.31 -0.03 -0.05
12月日照时数Sunshine duration in Dec. 0.08 -0.12 -0.40 0.05 0.14
1月平均气温Mean temp. in Jan. 0.54* -0.17 0.04 0.38 0.23
1月最低气温Min. temp. in Jan. 0.14 0.28 -0.22 0.53* 0.48
2月平均气温Mean temp. in Feb. 0.48 -0.10 0.53* 0.01 0.08
2月最高气温Max. temp. in Feb. 0.59* -0.30 0.13 0.09 0.05
2月最低气温Min. temp. in Feb. 0.57* -0.03 -0.11 0.39 0.19
3月平均气温Mean temp. in Mar. 0.51 -0.76** 0.09 0.52* 0.16
3月最低气温Min. temp. in Mar. 0.39 -0.59* 0.08 0.45 0.21
4月平均气温Mean temp. in Apr. 0.02 -0.58* -0.13 0.09 -0.12

Fig. 1

Temperature trends over the years from 2009 to 2023 Asterisks above R2 values indicate significance levels based on the F-test. * indicates P < 0.05, *** indicates P < 0.001."

Fig. 2

Precipitation and sunshine duration trends over the years from 2009 to 2023"

Fig. 3

Yield and oil yield change in 2009-2023"

Fig. 4

Monthly variation trends of meteorological factors during the growth period of rapeseed from 2009 to 2023 A: monthly variation trend of mean temperature; B: monthly variation trend of diurnal temperature range; C: monthly variation trend of maximum temperature; D: monthly variation trend of minimum temperature; E: monthly variation trend of precipitation; F: monthly variation trend of sunshine duration. For each box, the upper and lower edges represent the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; the whiskers represent the 90th and 10th percentiles. The solid line inside the box denotes the median, while the dashed line represents the mean. Significance of interannual variation among months is tested using the F method. Asterisks above the boxes indicate statistical significance. ***: P < 0.001; *: P < 0.05. The percentages shown in the figure denote the coefficients of variation (CV)."

Table 3

Distribution of years and months with above- or below-normal meteorological factors"

气象因子
Factor
偏高或偏低
Above or below
年份
Year
月份
Month
气象因子
Factor
偏高或偏低
Above or below
年份
Year
月份
Month
最低气温
Min. temp.
偏高Above 2010 11 平均气温Mean temp. 偏高Above 2020 2
偏高Above 2011 11 偏高Above 2010 1
偏高Above 2012 11 最高气温Max. temp. 偏高Above 2010 1
偏高Above 2014 11 降水量Precipitation 偏高Above 2013 10
偏高Above 2017 11 偏高Above 2016 10
偏高Above 2018 11 偏高Above 2009 11
偏高Above 2019 11 偏高Above 2015 11
偏高Above 2020 11 偏高Above 2012 12
偏高Above 2021 11 偏高Above 2018 12
偏高Above 2018 1 偏高Above 2015 1
偏高Above 2019 1 偏高Above 2017 1
偏高Above 2019 2 偏高Above 2019 1
偏高Above 2016 3 偏高Above 2013 2
偏高Above 2018 3 偏高Above 2018 2
偏高Above 2019 3 偏高Above 2023 2
偏高Above 2020 3 偏高Above 2009 3
最低气温
Min. temp.
偏高Above 2021 3 降水量Precipitation 偏高Above 2021 3
偏高Above 2022 3 偏高Above 2015 4
偏高Above 2011 4 偏高Above 2023 4
偏高Above 2015 4 偏低Below 2009 10
偏低Below 2009 11 偏低Below 2018 10
偏低Below 2013 11 偏低Below 2019 10
偏低Below 2015 11 偏低Below 2023 10
偏低Below 2016 11 偏低Below 2010 11
偏低Below 2022 11 偏低Below 2013 11
偏低Below 2023 11 偏低Below 2011 12
偏低Below 2023 12 偏低Below 2014 12
偏低Below 2017 1 偏低Below 2020 12
偏低Below 2017 2 偏低Below 2021 12
偏低Below 2009 3 偏低Below 2010 1
偏低Below 2011 3 偏低Below 2013 1
偏低Below 2012 3 偏低Below 2010 2
偏低Below 2015 3 偏低Below 2015 2
偏低Below 2017 3 偏低Below 2016 2
偏低Below 2023 3 偏低Below 2010 3
偏低Below 2010 4 偏低Below 2010 4
偏低Below 2012 4 偏低Below 2019 4
偏低Below 2014 4

Fig. 5

Structure diagram of the typical correlation between important traits and meteorological condition The figure shows two pairs of canonical variables: U1-V1 and U2-V2. Arrows indicate the correlations between variables, with blue representing positive correlations and red representing negative correlations. U represents canonical variables derived from combinations of meteorological factors, while V represents those derived from trait combinations. The numbers on the arrows are canonical loadings (weights); higher absolute values indicate a greater contribution to the corresponding U or V variable. When |coefficient| < 0.2, arrows are omitted, indicating negligible contribution to the canonical variable."

[1] 王汉中. 以新需求为导向的油菜产业发展战略. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40: 613-617.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2018.05.001
Wang H Z. New-demand oriented oilseed rape industry developing strategy. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2018, 40: 613-617 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 周香玉, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 等. 甘蓝型油菜苗期响应渍害胁迫的生理调控机制. 作物学报, 2024, 50: 1015-1029.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.34116
Zhou X Y, Xu J S, Xie L L, et al. Physiological mechanisms in response to waterlogging during seedling stage of Brassica napus L. Acta Agron Sin, 2024, 50: 1015-1029 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.34116
[3] 宁宁, 莫娇, 胡冰, 等. 长江流域不同生态区油菜籽关键品质比较研究. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 3315-3327.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.34017
Ning N, Mo J, Hu B, et al. Comparative study on the processing quality of winter rape in different ecological zones of the Yangtze River valley. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 3315-3327 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.34017
[4] Jannat A, Ishikawa-Ishiwata Y, Furuya J. Does climate change affect rapeseed production in exporting and importing countries? evidence from market dynamics syntheses. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 6051.
doi: 10.3390/su14106051
[5] 李谷成, 牛秋纯, 冷博峰, 等. 新时代十年: 我国油菜产业发展与路径选择. 中国油料作物学报, 2024, 46: 228-235.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2023248
Li G C, Niu Q C, Leng B F, et al. The decade of rapeseed industry in the new era: development and its path choice. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2024, 46: 228-235 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] Mohamed I A A, Shalby N, El-Badri A M, et al. Multipurpose uses of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) crop (food, feed, industrial, medicinal, and environmental conservation uses) and improvement strategies in China. J Agric Food Res, 2025, 20: 101794.
[7] 王瑞元. 我国粮油产销情况喜人. 中国油脂, 2025, 50(5): 1-4.
Wang R Y. Production and consumption of China’s grain and oil. China Oils Fats, 2025, 50(5): 1-4 (in Chinese).
[8] 殷艳, 廖星, 余波, 等. 我国油菜生产区域布局演变和成因分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32: 147-151.
Yin Y, Liao X, Yu B, et al. Regional distribution evolvement and development tendency of Chinese rapeseed production. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2010, 32: 147-151 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 谢雄泽, 谢捷, 褚乾梅, 等. 长江流域冬油菜需水量及水分盈亏特征分析. 作物学报, 2024, 50: 1829-1840.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.34190
Xie X Z, Xie J, Chu Q M, et al. Analysis of water requirement and water surplus/deficit characteristics of winter rapeseed in Yangtze River Basin. Acta Agron Sin, 2024, 50: 1829-1840 (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.34190
[10] 张智. 长江流域冬油菜产量差与养分效率差特征解析. 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2018.
Zhang Z. Characteristic Analysis of Yield Gap and Nutrient Use Efficiency Gap of Winter Oilseed Rape in Yangtze River Basin. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Pithan F, Schatt L. Diurnal temperature range trends differ below and above the melting point. Geophys Res Lett, 2024, 51: e2024GL109751.
[12] Pineda M, Barón M. Health status of oilseed rape plants grown under potential future climatic conditions assessed by invasive and non-invasive techniques. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 1845.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081845
[13] Zhang S Q, Ren G Y, Zheng X, et al. Changes in the mean and extreme temperature in the Yangtze River Basin over the past 120 years. Weather Clim Extrem, 2023, 40: 100557.
[14] Huang H J, Zhu Z W, Li J. Disentangling the unprecedented Yangtze River Basin extreme high temperatures in summer 2022: combined impacts of the reintensified La Niña and strong positive NAO. J Clim, 2024, 37: 927-942.
doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0466.1
[15] 张学昆, 张春雷, 廖星, 等. 2008年长江流域油菜低温冻害调查分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2008, 30: 122-126.
Zhang X K, Zhang C L, Liao X, et al. Investigation on 2008'low temperature and freeze injure on winter rape along Yangtze River. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2008, 30: 122-126 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] Zohner C M, Mo L D, Renner S S, et al. Late-spring frost risk between 1959 and 2017 decreased in North America but increased in Europe and Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020, 117: 12192-12200.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920816117
[17] Sun B, Xue R F, Li W L, et al. How does Mei-yu precipitation respond to climate change? Natl Sci Rev, 2023, 10: nwad246.
[18] Wei S Z, Hsu P C, Xie J H. Effects of intraseasonal oscillation on timing and subseasonal predictability of Mei-yu onset over the Yangtze River Basin. J Clim, 2024, 37: 2277-2295.
doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0504.1
[19] Ding Y H, Liu Y Y, Hu Z Z. The record-breaking Mei-yu in 2020 and associated atmospheric circulation and tropical SST anomalies. Adv Atmos Sci, 2021, 38: 1980-1993.
doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-0361-2
[20] Shi H R, Zhang J Q, Zhao B, et al. Surface brightening in eastern and central China since the implementation of the clean air action in 2013: causes and implications. Geophys Res Lett, 2021, 48: e2020GL091105.
[21] Song Z Y, Chen L T, Wang Y J, et al. Effects of urbanization on the decrease in sunshine duration over Eastern China. Urban Clim, 2019, 28: 100471.
doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100471
[22] Raza A. Eco-physiological and biochemical responses of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) to abiotic stresses: consequences and mitigation strategies. J Plant Growth Regul, 2021, 40: 1368-1388.
doi: 10.1007/s00344-020-10231-z
[23] Fahim A M, Cao L R, Ma L, et al. Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis revealed hub genes and metabolites associated with subzero temperature tolerance following cold acclimation in rapeseed (Brassica rapa L.). Plant Physiol Biochem, 2025, 221: 109647.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109647
[24] Ghafoor A, Karim H, Asghar M A, et al. Effect of high-temperature, drought and nutrients availability on morpho-physiological and molecular mechanisms of rapeseed; an overview. Pak J Bot, 2021, 53: 2321-2320.
[25] Secchi M A, Fernandez J A, Stamm M J, et al. Effects of heat and drought on canola (Brassica napus L.) yield, oil, and protein: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Res, 2023, 293: 108848.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108848
[26] 谢伶俐, 李永铃, 许本波, 等. 油菜耐渍机理解析及遗传改良研究进展. 作物学报, 2025, 51: 287-300.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44121
Xie L L, Li Y L, Xu B B, et al. Progress on waterlogging tolerance mechanism and genetic improvement in rapeseed. Acta Agron Sin, 2025, 51: 287-300 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44121
[27] Piepho H P, Möhring J, Melchinger A E, et al. BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica, 2008, 161: 209-228.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8
[28] Pathy T L, Mohanraj K. Estimating best linear unbiased predictions (BLUP) for yield and quality traits in sugarcane. Sugar Technol, 2021, 23: 1295-1305.
doi: 10.1007/s12355-021-01011-4
[29] Zorić M, Gunjača J, Galić V, et al. Best linear unbiased predictions of environmental effects on grain yield in maize variety trials of different maturity groups. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 922.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy12040922
[30] 常世豪, 耿臻, 杨青春, 等. 基于BLUP值的夏大豆产量与农艺性状的相关分析. 作物杂志, 2023(5): 10-15.
Chang S H, Geng Z, Yang Q C, et al. Correlation analysis of yield and agronomic traits of summer soybean based on BLUP value. Crops, 2023(5): 10-15 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] Marjanović-Jeromela A, Terzić S, Jankulovska M, et al. Dissection of year related climatic variables and their effect on winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) development and yield. Agronomy, 2019, 9: 517.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy9090517
[32] Pullens J W M, Kersebaum K C, Böttcher U, et al. Model sensitivity of simulated yield of winter oilseed rape to climate change scenarios in Europe. Eur J Agron, 2021, 129: 126341.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126341
[33] Brown J K M, Beeby R, Penfield S. Yield instability of winter oilseed rape modulated by early winter temperature. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 6953.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43461-7 pmid: 31061437
[34] Li X H, Chen C, Yang X, et al. The optimisation of rapeseed yield and growth duration through adaptive crop management in climate change: evidence from China. Ital J Agron, 2022, 17: 2104.
[35] Han X, Tang Q Q, Xu L P, et al. Genome-wide detection of genotype environment interactions for flowering time in Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 1065766.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1065766
[36] Li L L, Qiao J W, Yao J, et al. Automatic freezing-tolerant rapeseed material recognition using UAV images and deep learning. Plant Methods, 2022, 18: 5.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00838-6 pmid: 35027060
[37] 陈于婷, 丁晓雨, 许本波, 等. 气候变暖对冬油菜产量、品质及重要农艺性状的影响. 作物学报, 2025, 51: 516-525.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44074
Chen Y T, Ding X Y, Xu B B, et al. Effects of climate warming on yield, quality-related and agronomic traits of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2025, 51: 516-525 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.44074
[38] O'Sullivan C A, Belt K, Thatcher L F. Tackling control of a cosmopolitan phytopathogen: Sclerotinia. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 707509.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.707509
[39] Verdejo J F, Calderini D F. Resilience of rapeseed to temperature increase during early grain filling in a high yielding environment. Field Crops Res, 2025, 330: 109950.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109950
[40] Alberio C, Aguirrezábal L A N. Meta-analysis unravels common responses of seed oil fatty acids to temperature for a wide set of genotypes of different plant species. Front Plant Sci, 2024, 15: 1476311.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1476311
[41] Wang R S, Zhao C, Asseng S, et al. Winter dormant wheat will benefit from mean temperature increase of 2℃ when well-watered and fertilized in the main producing regions of China. Glob Change Biol, 2025, 31: e70324.
[42] Zheng C Y, Zhang J, Chen J, et al. Nighttime warming increases winter-sown wheat yield across major Chinese cropping regions. Field Crops Res, 2017, 214: 202-210.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.014
[43] Zhou Y J, Xu L, Xu Y Z, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of global warming on rice and wheat yields in a rice-wheat rotation system. Food Energy Secur, 2021, 10: e316.
[44] 丛日环, 张智, 鲁剑巍. 长江流域不同种植区气候因子对冬油菜产量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41: 894-903.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2019046
Cong R H, Zhang Z, Lu J W. Climate impacts on yield of winter oilseed rape in different growth regions of the Yangtze River Basin. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2019, 41: 894-903 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2019046
[45] Canales J, Verdejo J F, Calderini D F. Transcriptome and physiological analysis of rapeseed tolerance to post-flowering temperature increase. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 15593.
doi: 10.3390/ijms242115593
[46] Rivelli G M, Calderini D F, Abeledo L G, et al. Yield and quality traits of wheat and rapeseed in response to source-sink ratio and heat stress in post-flowering. Eur J Agron, 2024, 152: 127028.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.127028
[47] Liu S S, Xiong L X, Fang W, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium fertilization on rapeseed yield under freeze stress. Crop Environ, 2025, 4: 143-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.crope.2025.04.002
[48] Liang J P, Li H, Li N, et al. Analysis and prediction of the impact of socio-economic and meteorological factors on rapeseed yield based on machine learning. Agronomy, 2023, 13: 1867.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy13071867
[49] Soni S, Kumar S, Sood A K, et al. Modeling of aphid complex and its associated natural enemies in rapeseed-mustard in relation to climatic factors. J Agrometeorol, 2021, 23: 207-212.
doi: 10.54386/jam.v23i2
[50] He Y Q, Revell B J, Leng B F, et al. The effects of weather on oilseed rape (OSR) yield in China: future implications of climate change. Sustainability, 2017, 9: 418.
doi: 10.3390/su9030418
[51] Tian Z, Ji Y H, Sun L X, et al. Changes in production potentials of rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin of China under climate change: a multi-model ensemble approach. J Geogr Sci, 2018, 28: 1700-1714.
doi: 10.1007/s11442-018-1538-1
[52] Han J C, Zhang Z, Luo Y C, et al. The RapeseedMap10 database:annual maps of rapeseed at a spatial resolution of 10 m based on multi-source data. Earth Syst Sci Data, 2021, 13: 2857-2874.
[53] Rajković D, Marjanović Jeromela A, Pezo L, et al. Yield and quality prediction of winter rapeseed: artificial neural network and random forest models. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 58.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy12010058
[54] Abebaw S E. A global review of the impacts of climate change and variability on agricultural productivity and farmers' adaptation strategies. Food Sci Nutr, 2025, 13: e70260.
[55] Butkevičienė L M, Kriaučiūnienė Z, Pupalienė R, et al. Influence of sowing time on yield and yield components of spring rapeseed in Lithuania. Agronomy, 2021, 11: 2170.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112170
[56] Wu W, Shah F, Ma B L. Understanding of crop lodging and agronomic strategies to improve the resilience of rapeseed production to climate change. Crop Environ, 2022, 1: 133-144.
doi: 10.1016/j.crope.2022.05.005
[57] Guo C Y, Bai Z H, Wang X Z, et al. Spatio-temporal assessment of greenhouse gas emission from rapeseed production in China by coupling nutrient flows model with LCA approach. Food Energy Secur, 2022, 11: e398.
[58] HabibTabar Shiadeh S S, Feizabadi Y, Kosari-Moghaddam A. To what extent cultivar selection can affect the environmental impact of rapeseed production? Environ Sustain Indic, 2025, 26: 100619.
[1] Hu Chuan, Zhao Kai-Nan, Huang Xiu-Li, Wu Jin-Zhi, Ren Kai-Ming, Wang He-Zheng, Fu Guo-Zhan, Huang Ming, Li You-Jun. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen rates on yield and quality of dryland wheat under one-off irrigation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] Ma Sheng-Qian, Wang Zhi-Ping, Chen Hao-Tian, Dou Shu-Xian, Zhang Yan, Deng Ai-Xing, Zhang Wei-Jian, Yuan Xiang-Yang, Song Zhen-Wei. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen application rate on maize yield and soil aggregates in northeastern China under straw returning [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] Zhang Si-Si, Zhao Xiang-Hui, Zhou Yang, Yao Yun-Feng, Zhu Rong-Yu, Dong Yuan-Jie, Hu Guo-Qing, Xu Tong, Liu Zhao-Xin. Effects of plowing and green manure returning in winter fallow period on soil physicochemical properties and yield in continuously cropped peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] Ren Yi-Han, Zhao Man-Li, Dai Jing, Li Yin-Shui, Gu Chi-Ming, Yang Lu, Du Xue-Zhu, Hu Wen-Shi, Qin Lu. Effects of dynamic changes in leaf functional nitrogen on photosynthetic rate and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[5] Zhang Ning-Ning, Teng Yu-Fei, Ren Na-Na, Wei Xing-Zhuo, Yan Shu-Hao, Fan Ke-Xin, Wang Yong-Hong, Chen Wen-Kang, Zhang Xing-Hua, Zhu Wan-Chao, Xu Shu-Tu, Xue Ji-Quan. Phenotypic evaluation and plasticity analysis of drought resistance in 201 maize inbred lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] Zhang Zhen, Feng Lian-Jie, Shi Yu, Yu Zhen-Wen, Zhang Yong-Li. Yield formation of wheat with different ear types under water-saving supplementary irrigation conditions [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[7] Yan An, Jiang Kun-Wei, Wang Rong-Yuan, Tian Lin, Zhang Lu, Wang Yun, Xu Jian-Long. Identification and cloning of SVN7 controlling small vascular bundle number in the rice flag leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[8] Liu Xin-Meng, Ren Hao, Zhang Ji-Bo, Zhang Ji-Wang, Zhao Bin, Ren Bai-Zhao, Liu Peng, Wang Hong-Zhang. Physiological mechanisms of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) alleviating the effects of heat stress on ear differentiation in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[9] Wang Zhuang-Zhuang, Wu Zi-Jun, Zhang Yong-Xin, Zhang Xin-Yuan, Yuan Li-Xue, Chen Ru-Xue, Liu Shi-Ju, Duan Jian-Zhao, Feng Wei, Wang Tong-Chao, Wang Yong-Hua. Optimized water-nitrogen synergy enhances winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency in clay-loam fluvo-aquic soils of southeastern Henan, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] Wang Yu-Cheng, Zhang Lu, Liu A-Kang, Huang Jian-Liang, Peng Shao-Bing, Yuan Shen. Strategies and prospects for large-scale crop yield improvement based on yield gap [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11] Zhao Jia-Xue, Zhou Long-Hao, Guo Qi-Yuan, Shang Lun-Xiao, Wang Han, Liu Zhi-Tao, Chen Xi, Zhang Xiao-Pei, Song Xian-Liang, Ahmedov Miraziz Baltaevich, Mao Li-Li. Long-term stubble return and subsoiling enhance cotton yields in coastal saline-alkali soils by improving soil conditions and photosynthetic characteristics [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] Guo Xing-Yu, Hu Dan, Lin Su-Qi, Wang Meng-Kai, Tan Wen-Feng, Huang Chuan-Qin. Biochar combined with chemical fertilizer increases maize yield and soil ecosystem multifunctionality in an intercropped maize-soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] Zhang Hong-Rong, Wang Fei-Er, Li Pan, Qiu Hai-Long, Zhu Jing, Zhao Lian-Hao, Nan Yun-You, He Wei, Fan Zhi-Long, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang, Yin Wen. Photosynthetic characteristics of 20% reduced irrigation combined with 25% organic substitution for chemical fertilizer in increasing silage maize yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[14] Hou Si-Yu, Wang Guo-Cui, Wei Jin-Gui, Xie Wei-Xin, Yin Wen, Fan Zhi-Long, Chai Qiang, Hu Fa-Long. Effects of green manure combined with chemical nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter accumulation and yield formation of wheat in arid irrigation areas of northwestern China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[15] Shang Yun-Qiu, Zhao Zhu, Chen Huan, Ding Yong-Gang, Qiao Yu-Qiang, Li Wei, Zhang Xiang-Qian, Cao Cheng-Fu, Du Shi-Zhou. Effects of long-term tillage practices on grain-filling and yield formation in rain-fed wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!