This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Canopy Physiology and Characteristics of Yield Components during Reproductive Stage in Soybean Hybrids
ZHANG Wei, ZHAO Jing, QIU Qiang, WANG Shu-Ming, ZHANG Chun-Bao, YAN Xiao-Yan*, ZHAO Li Mei*, ZHANG Ming-Hao, ZHANG Wei-Long, FAN Hui-Mei
Soybean Research Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Engineering Research Center of Soybean, Changchun 130033, China
Abstract
Utilization of soybean hybrid is an effective way to increase soybean yield. We used two soybean hybrids (HybSoy-1 and HybSoy-2) and two conventional varieties (CV) with the same maturity (Jiyu 72 and Jilin 30) as materials to explore physiological characters of canopy, traits of yield and yield components, and the physiological mechanism of increasing yield in soybean hybrid at reproductive stage. The result showed that, from 2010 to 2011, compared with CV, the yields of soybean hybrids were increased by 13.9% and 16.7%. Leaf chlorophyll contents at late growth stages, photosynthetic rates at R2 (full bloom)-R7 (beginning maturity) and leaf area indices (LAI) at R2-R4 (full pod) were all significantly higher than those of CV; the maximum LAI of HybSoy-1 and HybSoy-2 in 2010 were 8.09 and 8.30, far more than those of CV, and LAI at late growth stages were not decreased sharply. Biomasses of all varieties reached a peak at R6 stage, while those of soybean hybrids at R2-R7 were higher than those of conventional varieties with significant difference between them atP<0.05 andP<0.01; the means and maximum accumulation rates of biomasses were 0.06 g d-1 and 0.20 g d-1 more than those of conventional varieties, respectively; and the days of speeding up or slowing down dry matter accumulation rate were ahead of 3.09 days and 5.85 days than those of CV, respectively, so premature advantage of dry matter accumulation was also obvious. As for yield components, there was no significant difference between hybrids and conventional soybean varieties on 100-seed weight, grain weight and pod weight of main stem, but grain weight and pod weight of branch in soybean hybrids were significantly higher than those in conventional varieties. There was no significant difference in the ratio of grain weight to biomass and the ratio of grain weight to stem weight between soybean hybrids and conventional soybean varieties. All results showed that the yields of soybean hybrids mainly depend on the strong canopy, high speed of dry matter accumulation, and higher biomass.
Keyword:
Soybean hybrids; High yield; Canopy physiology; Yield components
图1 不同生育时期大豆叶片叶绿素含量柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05水平上差异显著。Fig. 1 Leaf chlorophyll content of soybean at different stagesBars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
图2 不同生育时期大豆叶片光合速率柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05 水平上差异显著。Fig. 2 Photosynthetic rate of soybean at different stagesBars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
图3 不同生育时期大豆叶面积指数柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05 水平上差异显著。Fig. 3 Leaf area index (LAI) of soybean at different stagesBars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
图4 不同生育时期大豆无截获散射柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05水平上差异显著。Fig. 4 Diffuse non-interceptance (DIFN) of soybean at various growth stagesBars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
2.3 生物产量
各品种生物产量均在R6期最大(图5)。杂交大豆品种R2~R7期生物产量均显著或极显著高于常规品种。根据各时期生物产量, 用Logistic方程动态模拟(表2), 杂交大豆品种两年生物产量平均积累速度( V)和最大积累速度( Vm)分别为0.49 g d-1和1.20 g d-1, 常规品种两年 V和 Vm分别为0.43 g d-1和1.00 g d-1, 杂交大豆 V和 Vm均显著高于常规品种。杂交大豆品种平均干物质积累速率加快时间(t1)和干物质积累速率开始减缓的时间(t2)分别比常规品种提前3.09 d及5.85 d。说明杂交大豆前期干物质积累速度较快, 早发优势明显。
图5 不同生育时期大豆生物产量柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05 水平上差异显著。Fig. 5 Biomass of soybean at different stagesBars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
表2
Table 2
表2(Table 2)
表2 单株生物产量积累的Logistic模型及其特征值Table 2 Logistic equation and its feature of dry matter accumulation per plant
R2: correlation coefficient; V: average accumulation rate of dry matter; Vm: maximum accumulation rates of dry matter; t1: days of speeding up dry matter accumulation rate ; t2: days of slowing down dry matter accumulation rate .Values followed by different lowercases or capitals are significantly different at the 0.05 or 0.01 probability levels, respectively.
表2 单株生物产量积累的Logistic模型及其特征值Table 2 Logistic equation and its feature of dry matter accumulation per plant
2.4 农艺性状
杂交大豆株高与常规大豆差异不显著, 两年杂交大豆株高87.1~106.5 cm, 常规品种株高105.3~ 117.9 cm。杂交大豆分枝数和茎粗显著高于常规品种, 杂交大豆平均分枝数2.3个, 常规大豆平均分枝数0.42个。杂交大豆结荚高度显著低于常规品种, 杂交大豆平均为22.8 cm, 常规大豆平均为26.7 cm。杂交大豆与常规品种的百粒重差异不显著(表3)。
表3
Table 3
表3(Table 3)
表3 大豆农艺性状Table 3 Agronomic traits of soybean
年份 Year
品种 Cultivar
株高 Plant height (cm)
节数 Node number
分枝数 Number of branches
茎直径 Stem diameter (cm)
结荚高度 Height of first pod (cm)
百粒重100-seed weight (g)
2011
杂交豆1号 Hybsoy-1
87.1 cB
20.2 aA
2.0 aAB
0.55 aA
23.0 bA
17.1 abA
杂交豆2号 Hybsoy-2
106.4 abA
21.8 aA
2.5 aA
0.52 aA
22.6 bA
16.3 bA
吉育72 Jiyu 72
105.3 bA
21.6 aA
0.2 bBC
0.46 bcAB
28.0 aA
17.9 aA
吉林30 Jilin 30
112.5 bA
19.5 aA
0.4 bC
0.42 cB
25.3 abA
16.9 abA
2011
杂交豆1号 Hybsoy-1
98.6 cB
18.9 aA
1.9 aAB
0.44 aAB
23.0 bA
17.1 bA
杂交豆2号 Hybsoy-2
105.6 bB
20.8 aA
2.7 aA
0.46 aA
22.6 bA
17.0 bA
吉育72 Jiyu 72
106.2 bB
20.7 aA
0.7 bBC
0.37 bBC
28.0 aA
18.1 aA
吉林30 Jilin 30
117.9 aA
20.4 aAB
0.4 bC
0.33 bC
25.3 abA
16.9 bA
数值后小写字母不同表示在0.05水平上差异显著; 大写字母不同表示在0.01水平上差异显著。
Values followed by lowercases or capitals are significantly different at the 0.05 or 0.01 probability levels, respectively.
图7 2011年大豆主茎荚、粒重柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05 水平上差异显著。Fig. 7 Pod weight and grain weight per plant on main stem in 2011Bars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
图8 不同品种分枝荚、粒重PWPPB: 单株分枝荚重; SWPPB: 单株分枝粒重。柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05 水平上差异显著。Fig. 8 Pod weight and grain weight per plant on branch of each cultivarPWPPB: pods weight per plant on branch; SWPPB: grain weight per plant on branch. Bars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
表4
Table 4
表4(Table 4)
表4 2010年不同品种主茎荚、粒重分布Table 4 Distribution of pod weight and grain weight on main stem of each cultivar in 2010 (g)
性状 Trait
品种 Hybrid
上部1~5节 Upper node 1-5
上部6~10节 Upper node 6-10
上部11节以下 Nodes below node 11
总重 Total weight
单株主茎荚重 Pod weight per plant on the main stem
杂交豆1号 Hybsoy-1
16.7 abA
11.4 aA
2.5 aA
30.7 aA
杂交豆2号 Hybsoy-2
18.0 aA
11.4 aA
2.5 aA
31.9 aA
吉育72 Jiyu 72
16.6 bA
9.7 bA
2.9 aA
29.2 bA
吉林30 Jilin 30
16.9 abA
10.2 abA
3.2 aA
30.2 abA
单株主茎粒重 Seed weight per plant on the main stem.
杂交豆1号 Hybsoy-1
12.6 aA
8.6 aA
1.7 aA
22.9 abA
杂交豆2号 Hybsoy-2
13.5 aA
8.4 aA
1.6 aA
23.5 aA
吉育72 Jiyu 72
12.5 bA
7.1 bA
2.0 aA
21.6 bA
吉林30 Jilin 30
12.7 abA
7.5 abA
2.1 aA
22.4 ab
表4 2010年不同品种主茎荚、粒重分布Table 4 Distribution of pod weight and grain weight on main stem of each cultivar in 2010 (g)
图9 R7期大豆籽粒占生物产量比例柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05 水平上差异显著。Fig. 9 Ratio of grain weight to biomass of soybean at R7 stageBars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
图10 大豆成熟期粒茎比柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05 水平上差异显著。Fig. 10 Ratio of grain weight to stem weight of soybeanBars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
图11 喷施生长抑制剂对杂交大豆2号产量影响柱上小写字母不同表示在0.05 水平上差异显著。Fig. 11 Effects of spraying growth inhibitor on yield of soybean hybridsBars superscripted by different lowercase are significantly different at P<0.05.
XuZ-Y(许占友), LiL(李磊), QiuL-J(邱丽娟), ChangR-Z(常汝镇), WangM-B(汪茂斌), LiZ(李智), GuoP(郭蓓). Selection of three lines and localization of the restorer genes in soybean using SSR markers. ([本文引用:1]
[2]
GuleriaS K, AwaT D, SharmaB K. Heterotic performance of soybean crossesin F1 and F2 generations. , 2000, 1: 245-248[本文引用:1][JCR: 2.474]
[3]
Rand allL R, BernardR L. Production and performance of hybrid soybeans. , 1984, 24: 549-55[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.641]
[4]
WangZ-X(王志新), GuoT(郭泰), QiN(齐宁), ZhangR-C(张荣昌), HuX-P(胡喜平), WuX-H(吴秀红). Selection of high-superiority cross combination for soybean heterosis and its stability analysis. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 0.7823]
[5]
WangS-M (王曙明), SunH(孙寰), WangY-Q(王跃强), ZhaoL-M(赵丽梅), LiN(李楠). Studies on heterosis and screening of highly heterotic combinations in soybean. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 0.7571]
[6]
WangS-M(王曙明), FanX-H(范旭红), ZhangB-S(张宝石). Status on exploitation of heterosis in soybean in foreign countries. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 0.6276]
[7]
WangS-M(王曙明), SunH(孙寰), ZhaoL-M(赵丽梅), WangY-Q(王跃强), PengB(彭宝), FanX-H(范旭红), ZhangB-S(张宝石). Progress and problem analysis on soybean male sterility and heterosis exploitation in China. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 0.7571]
[8]
ZhaoL-M(赵丽梅), PengB(彭宝), ChengY-X(程延喜), SunH(孙寰), WangS-M(王曙明), ZhangW-L(张伟龙), ZhangJ-Y(张井勇). A review on soybean heterosis and its utilization. ([本文引用:2]
[9]
WangQ(王强), LuC-M(卢从明), ZhangQ-D(张其德), HaoB(郝斌), GeQ-Y(戈巧英), DongF-Q(董风琴), BaiK-Z(白克智), KuangT-Y(匡廷云). Studies on the photosynthesis and photoinhibition and the activities of C4pathway enzymes in super high yielding hybrid rice Liangyoupeijiu. ([本文引用:1]
[10]
JiangH, WangX H, DengQ Y, XuD Q. Comparison of some photosynthetic characters between two hybrid rice combinations differing in yield potential. , 2002, 40: 133-137[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.0]
[11]
OuZ-Y(欧志英), PengC-L(彭长连), LinG-Z(林桂珠). The characteristics of photooxidation and genetic performance in leaves of super high yielding hybrid rice Pei’ai 64S/E32 and its parental lines. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 1.8267]
[12]
WangR-F(王荣富), ZhangY-H(张云华), JiaoD-M(焦德茂), QianL-S(钱立生), YuJ-L(于江龙). Characteristics of photoinhibition and early aging in super-hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L. ) “Liangyoupeijiu” and its parents at late development stage. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 1.8267]
[13]
ZhangH-C(张洪程), WuG-C(吴桂成), LiD-J(李德剑), XiaoY-C(肖跃成), GongJ-L(龚金龙), LiJ(李杰), DaiQ-G(戴其根). Population characteristics and formation mechanism for super- high-yielding hybrid japonica rice (13. 5 t ha-1). ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 1.8267]
[14]
WuG-C(吴桂成), ZhangH-C(张洪程), DaiQ-G(戴其根), HuoZ-Y(霍中洋), XuK(许轲), GaoH(高辉), WeiH-Y(魏海燕), ShaA-Q(沙安勤), XuZ-J(徐宗进), QianZ-H(钱宗华), SunJ-Y(孙菊英). Characteristics of dry matter production and accumulation and super-high yield of japonica super rice in south china. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 1.8267]
[15]
ChengS-H(程式华), CaoL-Y(曹立勇), ChenS-G(陈深广), ZhuD-F(朱德峰), WangX(王熹), MinS-K(闵绍楷), ZhaiH-Q(翟虎渠). Conception of late-stage vigor super hybrid rice and its biological significance. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 1.4083]
[16]
HuangZ-X(黄振喜), WangY-J(王永军), WangK-J(王空军), LiD-H(李登海), ZhaoM(赵明), LiuJ-G(柳京国), DongS-T(董树亭), WangH-J(王洪军), WangJ-H(王军海), YangJ-S(杨今胜). Photosynthetic characteristics during grain filling stage of summer maize hybrids with high yield potential of 15000 kg·ha-1. ([本文引用:1]
[17]
ZhangW(张伟), XieF-T(谢甫绨), ZhangH-J(张惠君), SongX-J(宋显军), WangH-J(王海英). Canopy and yield characteristics of super-high-yielding soybean cv. Liaodou No. 14. ([本文引用:1]
[18]
HuangZ-H(黄智鸿), WangS-Y(王思远), BaoY(包岩), LiangX-H(梁煊赫), SunG(孙刚), ShenL(申林), CaoY(曹洋), WuC-S(吴春胜). Studies on dry matter accumulation and distributive characteristic in super high-yield maize. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 1.0045]
PengB(彭宝), ZhaoL-M(赵丽梅), WangS-M(王曙明), ZhangW-L(张伟龙), ZhangJ-Y(张景勇), SunH(孙寰). High production hybrid soybean new variety Hybsoy 2 and hybrid seed production technology. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 0.4815]
SongZ-X(宋珍霞), GaoM(高明), GuanB-Q(关博谦), XuA-D(许安定), DaiX-Q(代先强). Simulating the dynamics of dry matter and nutrient accumulation of flue-cured tobacco under different boron concentration. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 1.4752]
[23]
JiangG M, HaoN B, BaiK Z, SunJ Z, GuoR J, GeQ Y, KuangT Y. Chain correlation between variables of gas exchange and yield potential in different winter wheat cultivars. , 2000, 38: 227-232[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.0]
[24]
El-SharkawyM A, CockJ H, LynamJ K, Hernand ezA D P, CadavidL F. Relationship between biomass, root yield and single leaf photosynthesis in field grown cassava. , 1990, 25: 183-190[本文引用:1][JCR: 2.474]
[25]
Khan M N A, MurayamaS, IshimineY, TsuzukiE, NakamuraL. Physio-mornhotoloiaical studies of F1hybrids in rice (Oryza sativa L. ). photosynthetic ability and yield. , 1998, 4: 233-239[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.0]
[26]
BjornM, KebedeH, RillingC. Photosynthetic differences among Lycopersicon species and Triticum aestivum cultivars. , 1994, 34: 113-118[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.641]
[27]
HuangZ-X(黄振喜), WangY-J(王永军), WangK-J(王空军). Photosynthetic characteristics during grain filling stage of summer maize hybrids with high yield potential of 15000 kg hm-2. ([本文引用:1]
MaloneS D, HerbertA J, DavidL H. Evaluation of the LAI-2000 plant analyzer to estimate leaf area in manually defoliated soybean. , 2002, 94: 1012-1019[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.794]
[30]
WestgateJ M. Managing soybean for photosynthetic efficiency. In: Kauffman H E ed. 6th World Soybean Research Conference. Chicago, IL: Superior Print, Champaign II, 1999. pp223-228[本文引用:1]
[31]
DongZ(董钻), BinY-Q(宾郁泉), SunL-Q(孙连庆). The comparative study on soybean varieties productivity. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 0.5722]
[32]
LiD-H(李登海), ZhangY-H(张永慧), YangJ-S(杨今胜). Integrate the breeding and planting, maize hybrids of erectophile type creates high-yielding. ([本文引用:1][CJCR: 1.0045]
[33]
JorgeB. Physiological bases for yield differences in selected maize cultivars from Central America. , 1995, 42: 69-80[本文引用:1][JCR: 2.474]
[34]
DuvickD N. Genetic contributions to advances in yield in US maize. , 1992, 37: 69-79[本文引用:1][JCR: 0.395]
[35]
ZhangY B, TangQ Y, ZouY B, LiD Q, QinJ Y, YangS H, ChenL J, XiaB, PengS B. Yield potential and radiation use efficiency of “super” hybrid rice grown under subtropical conditions. , 2009, 114: 91-98[本文引用:1][JCR: 2.474]
[36]
KumudiniS, HumeD J, ChuG. Genetic improvement in short season soybeans: I. dry matter accumulation, partitioning, and leaf area duration. , 2001, 41: 391-398[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.641]
LiuJ-F(刘建丰), YuanL-P(袁隆平), DengQ-Y(邓启云), ChenL-Y(陈立云), CaiY-D(蔡义东). A study on characteristics of photosynthesis in super high yielding hybrid rice. ([本文引用:2][CJCR: 1.4522]
[39]
YangH-J(杨惠杰), LiY-Z(李义珍), YangR-C(杨仁崔), JiangZ-W(姜照伟), ZhengJ-S(郑景生). Dry matter production characteristics of super high yielding rice. ([本文引用:2][CJCR: 1.4083]
[40]
WuW-G(吴文革), ZhangH-C(张洪程), QianY-F(钱银飞), ChenY(陈烨), XuJ(徐军), WuG-C(吴桂成), ZhaiC-Q(翟超群), HuoZ-Y(霍中洋), DaiQ-G(戴其根). Analysis on dry matter production characteristics of middle-season indica super hybrid rice. ([本文引用:2][CJCR: 1.4083]
[41]
LiuX, JinJ, HerbertS J, ZhangQ, WangG. Yield components, dry matter, LAI, and LAD of soybeans in Northeast China. , 2005, 93: 85-93[本文引用:1][JCR: 2.474]
[42]
De Bruin J L, PedersenP. Growth, yield, and yield component changes among old and new soybean cultivars. , 2009, 101: 123-130[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.794]
[43]
GayS, EgliD B, ReicoskyD A. Physiological basis of yield improvement in soybeans. , 1980, 72: 387-391[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.794]
[44]
CuiY S, YuD Y. Estimates of relative contribution of biomass, harvest index, and yield components to soybean yield improvements in China. , 2005, 124: 473-476[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.596]
[45]
RigsbyB, BoardJ E. Identification of soybean cultivars that yield well at low plant populations. , 2003, 43: 234-239[本文引用:1][JCR: 1.641]
199 crossing combinations of Soybean heterosis were stadied i n 1996~2000. The first yield test indicated that the soybean had clea r heterosis . At the same time, 161 comparative high-superiority combinatio ns selected by the test amounted to 80.9% in total. And 69 combinations are amang the high-superiority crosses in total with 34%. From the second test, four stable high-superiority crosses were selected, They are 9661, 9672, 9 731, 97143. Additionally, The results proved that the soybean heterosis ha d better stability and varied a little with different years and places.
1.Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences 2.China National Hybrid Rice Research and Development Center
Photosynthetic characteristics of two hybrid rice combinations, Peiai 64S/E32 and Shanyou 63, were compared at the panicle differentiation stage. As compared with Shanyou 63, the new combination Peiai 64S/E32 showed a significantly higher net photosynthetic rate (PN), apparent quantum yield of carbon assimilation (c), carboxylation efficiency (CE), and photorespiratory rate (RP) as well as leaf chlorophyll content, but a significantly lower dark respiration rate (RD) and compensation irradiance (Ic). It also showed a slightly higher photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm andF/Fm) of photosystem 2, a lower non-photochemical quenching (qN), and a similar CO2 compensation concentration () as compared to Shanyou 63.
South China Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650,Guangdong
Photooxidative characteristics and physiological mechanism in leaves of super high-yielding hybrid rice Peiai64S/E32 and its parental lines were investigated by photooxidative treatment mediated with 200 µmol/L of exogenous methyl viologen under a PPFD of 2 000 µmol·m-2·s-1 for 1 h. Me
WANG Rong-Fu;Zhang Yun-Hua;Jiao De-Mao;Qian Li-Sheng;Yu Jiang-Long
王荣富;张云华;焦德茂;钱立生;于江龙
College of Life Sciences, Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei 230036,Anhui
With the materials of super-hybrid rice “Liangyoupeijiu” and its female parent Peiai64S and male parent indica rice 9311, relationships between Liangyoupeijiu and it’s parents were studied through chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and key indexes of active oxygen metabolism under natural condit
1Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation technology in Yangtze Valley,Ministry of Agriculture/Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic and Physiology of Jiangsu Province,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009, China;2 Rice Research Institute of xianghua, Fengyuan,Xinghua 22570,China;3Bureau of Agriculture of Xing hua County, Xinghua 225700,China;4 Bureau of Agriculture of Jiangyan County,Jiangyan 225500,China
Population characteristics of super-high-yielding hybridjaponica rice (13.5 t ha-1) were studied and its formation mechanism was explored using Yongyou 8 as material in Xinghua and Jiangyan. Results showed that population of 13.5 t ha-1 had more spikelets per panicle and total spikelets than population of 12.0 t ha-1. There was no significant difference in panicles, filled-grain percentage and 1000-grain weight between populations of 13.5 t ha-1 and 12.0 t ha-1. Population of 13.5 t ha-1 exhibited fewer tillers at the early growth stage and achieved excepted number of stems and tillers at critical leaf-age for productive tillers, whose max number of stems and tillers was at jointing stage and was about 1.3 times of excepted number. Then, the number of population stems and tillers began todecrease stably, which achieved expected number again. At last, ratio of productive tillers to total tillers of 13.5 t ha-1population was more than 75%, which was higher than that of population of 12.0 t ha-1.The leaf area index of 13.5 t ha-1 population was lower than that of 12.0 t ha-1 population at the early growth stage, and the max leaf area index was about 8.5 at booting, which decreased stably and was above 4.0 at maturity. The photosynthetic potential of population with 13.5 t ha-1 was small at early stage and larger at middle and late stages, as compared with population with 12.0 t ha-1. The total photosynthetic potential was above 6.75×106 m2 d ha-1, of which most than 45.0% was from heading to maturity. The dry matter accumulation was smaller compared with population with 12.0 t ha-1before jointing, and the weight of it was above 60 kg ha-1 at heading, which was significantly higher than that of population with 12.0 t ha-1. The total weight of dry matter was above 23.25 t ha-1, of which above 9.75 t ha-1 was accumulated from heading to maturity. Formation mechanism of super-high yielding population (13.5 t ha-1) was that: population quality was enhanced at critical leaf-age for productive tillers through cultivating strong seedlings, germinating low positiontillers and achieved expected number of stems and tillers in time, which formed the biological foundation for high quality population at middle stage; in order to form high photosynthetic efficiency of population structure with strong lodging-resistance and large population spikeletes at heading, suitable number of strong stems and large panicles was cultivated through establishing suitable dynamic and size of population; in order to enlarge sink-filling and keep strength of stems and sheaths, dry matter accumulation was enriched after heading through photosynthetic system smooth and steady fade away.
选用杂交粳稻甬优8号,以国家粮食丰产工程兴化、姜堰实施基地1.0 hm2连片与6.67 hm2连片超高产攻关方为依托,研究了13.5 t hm-2超高产群体特征,并探讨了群体形成机制。结果表明,较之12.0 t hm-2左右群体,13.5 t hm-2群体的穗型大,群体颖花量多(60 000×104 hm-2以上),有效穗数、结实率和千粒重与之相当;群体茎蘖于生育前期稳步增长,至有效分蘖临界叶龄期达适宜穗数,高峰苗出现在拔节期,数量少,为预期穗数的1.3倍左右,此后群体平缓下降,至抽穗期达适宜穗数,成穗率高(>75%);群体叶面积指数前期增长相对较缓慢,最大值出现在孕穗期,为8.5左右,此后下降缓慢,成熟期仍保持在4.0以上;群体光合势生育前期较小,中、后期较大,总光合势为6.75×106 m2 d hm-2以上,抽穗至成熟期的光合势占总光合势的45.0%以上;群体拔节前干物质积累速度相对较缓、积累量略低,拔节后积累速度较快,至抽穗期群体生物量为13.5 t hm-2以上,抽穗后积累量亦高,一般为9.75 t hm-2以上, 总干物重高23.25 t hm-2以上。13.5 t hm-2超高产群体形成机制为,依靠精苗,发大蘖,及时够苗,提高够苗期群体质量(有效分蘖临界叶龄期),为中期高质量群体结构的培育奠定生物学基础;依靠合理的群体动态及其规模,培育适宜数量的壮秆大穗,于抽穗期形成具有强抗倒力和巨量安全库容的高光效群体;依靠平稳消退的光合系统,提高抽穗后群体光合物质生产力,增大群体库容的总充实量,并维持较大的茎鞘强度,增强群体的安全抗倒力。
1 Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangzhou 225009, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
The relationship between dry matter production and yield, dynamics of dry matter accumulation and output and translocation in middle and last stages of three types of populations (High Yield: 8.25–9.75 t ha-1; Higher Yield: 9.75-11.25 t ha-1; Super High Yield:>11.25 t ha-1) in fourjaponica super rice (Wujing 15, Huaidao 9, Xudao 3 and Changyou 1) were analyzed. The results showed that yield was significantly positively correlated with weight of dry matter at maturity and the dry matter accumulation from heading to maturity, there were parabolic relationships between yield and weight of dry matter at heading in high yield, higher yield and super-high yield populations. Weight of dry matter from jointing to heading was significantly positively correlated with yield from high yield population to higher yield population and from higher yield population to super-high yield population. Super-high yield population had more biomass at maturity than higher yield and high yield populations, and the harvest index was not significantly higher than that of higher yield population, but was significantly higher than that of high yield population. Weight of dry matter, LAI in heading, rate of leaf area of productive tillers, rate of leaf area from flag leaf to 3rd leaf, spikelets of population and spikelets per square centimeter leaf area in middle stage (from jointing to heading) were significantly higher than these of higher yield and high yield populations. Leaf area decreasing per day of super-high yield population from heading to maturity was significantly less than that of higher yield and high yield populations. Leaf area duration, crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, biomass and grain-leaf ratio (filled grains per square centimeter leaf area, grain weight per square centimeter leaf area) from heading to maturity were significantly higher than these of higher yield and high yield populations. Output and translocation of dry matter in super-high yield population from heading to milky stages were significantly higher than these of higher yield and high yield populations, while these from heading to maturity were significantly lower than these of higher yield and high yield populations. Weight per stem and sheath and total filling in maturity of super-high yield population were significantly higher than these of higher yield and high yield populations.
以超级粳稻品种武粳15、淮稻9号、徐稻3号和常优1号为材料,对高产(8.25~9.75 t hm-2)、更高产(9.75~11.25 t hm-2)和超高产(>11.25 t hm-2) 3个产量等级群体的物质生产与产量的关系、干物质积累、输出与转运等方面进行了系统的比较研究。结果表明,4个超级稻品种成熟期、抽穗至成熟期的干物质重与产量呈极显著正相关,抽穗期干物质重均与产量呈抛物线关系,拔节至抽穗期的干物质重与产量呈极显著正相关(高产—更高产、更高产—超高产以及将3个产量等级综合起来);从高产到更高产再到超高产,4个超级稻品种的生物学产量不断提高(差异显著),而超高产群体的经济系数则与更高产水平相当(0.5000以上),显著高于高产水平;较之更高产、高产群体,超高产群体在生育中期(拔节至抽穗期)干物质积累量大,抽穗期叶面积指数高、株型挺拔、群体质量优[有效叶面积率、高效叶面积率、总颖花量与颖花/叶(cm2)、基部节间粗、单茎茎鞘重均高],在生育后期(抽穗至成熟期),光合能力强(叶面积衰减率小,光合势、群体生长率、净同化率高)、干物质积累量高(占生物学产量的40.0%以上)、茎鞘物质的输出与转运协调[实粒/叶(cm2)、粒重(mg)/叶(cm2)均高]。
CHENG Shi-hua , CAO Li-yong , CHEN Shen-guang , ZHU De-feng , WANG Xi , MIN Shao-kai , ZHAI Hu-qu
程式华;曹立勇;陈深广;朱德峰;王熹;闵绍楷;翟虎渠
China initiated its research program of super rice breeding in 1996, in reference of new plant type rice breeding program of IRRI. The super hybrid rice was depicted as the combination of ideo-plant type and strong subspecies heterosis,and the targeted grain yield for single season cropping in 2005 is 12 t/hm2 under the scale of 6.67 hm2. The status of super hybrid rice breeding program in China and high-yielding rice breeding program in other countries were introduced. Xieyou 9308, a super hybrid developed by China National Rice Research Institute(CNRRI), showed high-yielding potential in combination with ideo-plant type and vigorous leaf and root in late growth period. It yielded the record of 11 837 kg/hm2under 6 67 hm2and (12 282) kg/hm2in small plot at Xinchang, Zhejiang in 2000. Based on its performance, the conception of late-stage vigor super hybrid rice and its biological significance are formulated. Meanwhile, the further breeding strategy for super hybrid rice is discussed.
1.Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, 100093 Beijing, P. R. China 2.Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, 100093 Beijing, P. R. China
Variables of gas exchange of flag leaves and grain yield potentials of five representative winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars varied greatly across different development stages under the same management and irrigation. The cultivars with high yield potential had higher net photosynthetic rate (PN), PPFD (photosynthetic photon flux density) saturated photosynthetic rate (Psat), stomatal conductance (gs), and maximum apparent quantum yield of CO2 fixation (Φm,app) than those with low grain yield, but their dark respiration rate (RD) and compensation irradiance (Ic) were remarkably lower. Compared with overall increase of yield potential of 71 % from low yield cultivars to high yield ones,PN,Psat, Φm,app, andgs were 13, 19, 57, and 32 % higher, respectively; butRD andIc decreased by 19 and 76 %, respectively. Such difference was evidently large during anthesis stage (e.g.,PN by 33 %), which indicated that this period could be the best for assisting further selection for better cultivars. However, transpiration rate (E) and water use efficiency (WUE) differed only little. At different development stages, especially at anthesis,PN andPsat were positively correlated with Φm,app,gs, and yield potential, and negatively correlated withRD andIc. Thus the high-yield-potential winter wheat cultivars possess many better characters in photosynthesis and associated parameters than the low-yield cultivars.
1Agronomy College, Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110161,China;2Crop Institute, Academy of Land-Reclaimable Sciences, Shihezi 832000,China
The objective of this study was to explore the mechanism of high yield via analyzing relatedparameters. Soybean cultivars, Zhonghuang 35 and Xindadou 1 (CK) were grown in arandomized block design with three replications in 2006 and 2007. Thephysiological andecological parameters associated with yield were determined. The results showed that for Zhonghuang 35 and Xindadou 1, the highest leaf area index reached 4.31 and 3.64, respectively, the green duration of leaf weight (LAI > 3) was 50 d and 36 d, total leaf area duration(LAD) at growing season was 2 766 375 and2 385 645 m2d hm-2, and the harvest index (ratio of seed weight to total plant dry weight) was 37.9% and 33.7%, respectively. Compared with Xindadou 1, the duration of maximum LAI of Zhonghuang 35 was long, the totalLAD at growing season and thephotosynthetic rate at the late stage were high. The theoretical yields of the two cultivars were5 521.5 kgha-1and4 666.5kg ha-1. Zhonghuang 35 showed good adaptability to the farmland ecology of the Xinjiang oasis, and gave a seed yield of 5 577kg ha-1.
为探索新疆绿洲农田生态条件下大豆超高产(≥5 625 kg hm-2)栽培的产量形成机理,在2006和2007年超高产栽培试验中测定了中黄35的群体生理指标和生态参数,分析了品种群体结构。结果表明,中黄35和新大豆1号(对照)的最大叶面积指数(LAImax)分别为4.31和3.64,LAI>3的天数分别持续50 d和36 d;全生育期的总光合势(LAD)分别为2 766 375 m2 d和2 385 645 m2 d;中黄35生育前期(出苗后第16~58天群体的光合生产率为3.3~5.2 g m-2 d-1,而后期(出苗后第72~114天)则为2.52~5.0 g m-2 d-1,对照分别为3.8~6.0和0.6~3.5 g m-2 d-1;中黄35的生物产量、籽粒产量和经济系数为13 943.2 kg hm-2、5 521.5 kg hm-2和39.6%,对照则为13 108.1 kg hm-2、4 666.5 kg hm-2和35.63%。和对照相比,中黄35最大叶面积指数持续时间长,全生育期的总光合势高,后期群体的光合生产率大,经济系数高是达到超高产目标的基础。中黄35在新疆绿洲农田栽培,具有良好的适应性。
The morphological features and photosynthetic characteristics of 7 hybrid rice combinations with different canopy structure and super high-yielding potential were studied in comparison with Shanyou 63.The results showed that 4 combinations having significant increase in grain weight per plant compared with Shanyou 63 have advantages including (1) a smaller light extinction coefficient resulted from the more erect leaf blades and longer flag leaves enhanced the capacity of source supply on the basis of significant increase of sink demand (i.e. spikelets per panicle), (2) a higher rate of canopy photosynthesis during grain filling and higher rates of flag leaf photosynthesis at saturating light intensity during different stages (i.e. booting stage,10 days after heading, 30days after heading), (3) More dry matter accumulated in stems and sheaths before heading and translated to grains after flowering efficiently.
YANG Hui-jie1; 2; LI Yi-zhen2; YANG Ren-cui1; JIANG Zhao-wei2; ZHENG Jing-sheng2
杨惠杰 1,2; 李义珍2; 杨仁崔 1,*; 姜照伟2; 郑景生2
(1Institute of Genetics & Crop Breeding; Fujian Agricultural University; Fuzhou 350002; China;2Institute of Rice and Wheat; Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350019, China)
Physiological characteristics of super high yielding rice cultivars, which were bred recently, were studied in Longhai, Fujian and Taoyuan, Yunnan. The results showed that super high yielding rice cultivars accumulated high biomass production. The grain yield were raised with the increase of total dry matter accumulation. The grain yield resulted primarily from biomass production and harvest index contributed little to the grain yield. The production superiority of super high yielding rice was exhibited during the middle and late growth stages and the yield was increased with the increase of net dry matter accumulation during the two stages. The crop growth rate(CGR) of the cultivar during the middle and late growth stages had high positive correlation with the yield. However there was no close correlation between the CGR and the yield during the early stage. The average exportation amount of stem and leaf dry matter contributed 24%(Fujian) or 33%(Yunnan) to grain production. Both stem and leaf dry matter exportation amount and dry matter accumulation after heading had a very significant positive correlation with the grain yield. The contribution of CGR to dry matter accumulation was significantly larger than that of growth duration.
WU Wen-ge , ZHANG Hong-cheng , QIAN Yin-fei , CHENG Ye , XU Jun , WU Gui-cheng , ZHAI Chao-qun , HUO Zhong-yang , DAI Qi-gen
吴文革1, 2 ;张洪程1,*; 钱银飞1;陈烨1;徐军1;吴桂成1;翟超群1;霍中洋1;戴其根1
Six middle-season indica hybrid rice combinations(Shanyou 63 as CK) were used as experimental materials to study dry matter production characteristics of super hybrid rice.There were great advantages for super rice in dry matter production and accumulation and its yield rose as the increase of dry matter accumulation.Grain yield was not significantly correlated with dry matter accumulation before elongation stage,while significantly positively correlated(P<0.05) from elongation to heading stage and significantly positively correlated(P<0.01) from heading to maturity stage.There were more dry matter in vegetative organs at the heading stage in super rice but its contribution to yield was less than 148.5 kg/hm2 averagely(apparent translocation percentage was 2.5% lower than that of the control Shanyou 63).Along with the increase in leaf area index and leaf area duration,the crop growth rate rose.The mean of crop growth rate in super rice was 4542(m2·d)/hm2,higher than that of CK after transplanting.