欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (09): 1585-1595.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01585

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

Ceratotropis亚属基于SSR标记和ITS序列的分类与进化分析

马燕玲,程须珍*,王丽侠,王素华,赵丹   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-16 修回日期:2010-04-23 出版日期:2010-09-12 网络出版日期:2010-07-05
  • 通讯作者: 程须珍, E-mail: chengxz@caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-62189159
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由北京市自然科学基金项目(6103025),国家食用豆产业技术体系建设项目(nycytx-18)和食用豆行业科技专项(nyhyzx07-017)资助。

Classification and Evolution Analysis for Vigna Subgenus Ceratotropis Based on SSR Markers and ITS Sequences

MA Yan-Ling,CHENG Xu-Zhen*,WANG Li-Xia,WANG Su-Hua,ZHAO Dan   

  1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2010-03-16 Revised:2010-04-23 Published:2010-09-12 Published online:2010-07-05
  • Contact: CHENG Xu-Zhen,E-mail:chengxz@caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-62189159

摘要: 利用SSR分子标记和ITS序列分析研究Ceratotropis亚属已鉴定的93份种质以及Vigna亚属的2份地方种和Glycine属的1份野生种,共8个种及亚种的96份材料的遗传差异。初步筛选出分布于11个连锁群(linkage group, LG)的74对小豆引物及14对黒吉豆引物和第9连锁群的5对绿豆引物,得到分辨力强的27对引物,平均PIC值为0.4914;UPGMA聚类分析,在DICE系数0.021处,将95份参试材料(除HAI_103)划分为两大类,第I类包括Ceratotropis组所有种质和3个“过渡”种质,第II类包括Angulares组所有种质;且小豆引物通用性最高:23对小豆引物的转移能力达88%以上。对参试材料中的28份典型种质进行ITS测序分析,比较序列间Kimura进化距离发现,V. minima V. umbellata种间距离最小(0~0.005),V. radiata种内分化程度最高;利用MEGA4.0构建最大简约树(maximum parsimony, MP)和邻接树(neighbor-joining, NJ),将参试种质划分为3大类,这与形态学和SSR标记分类一致。

关键词: Ceratotropis亚属, 分类, SSR标记, ITS序列, 进化

Abstract: Ninety-three materials in subgenus Ceratotropis, two landraces ofsubgenus Vigna and one accession of Glycine soja from various regions of China were analyzed by using simple sequence repeat (SSR) makers and sequencing nrDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) for the genetic evaluation. Twenty-sevenspecific SSR primers were selected by screening 74 azuki bean primers and 14 blackgram primers that distributed in 11 linkage groups and five mungbean primers in linkage group 9 with the average polymorphic information content (PIC) value 0.4914. In UPGMA cluster analysis, 95 materials excluding HAI_103 (G. soja) were divided into Group I (including section Ceratotropis and three “transitional” materials) and Group II (section Angulares). And the transferability of 23 primers from azuki bean reached 88%. As for ITS analysis, Kimura-2-parameter distance was calculated based on ITS sequences of 28 representing materials. The shortest distance was found between V. minima and V. umbellata with 0–0.005 and V. radiata was the most intra-specific divergent. Phylogenetic trees constructed by maximum parsimony (MP) and neighbor-joining (NJ) methods with MEGA 4.0 showed that 28 materials were divided into three groups. This result was consistent with the classification results by phenotypes and SSR makers. Therefore, it is anticipated that more information for classification of subgenus Ceratotropis can be provided by these two molecular methods and also a system for evaluation combined by morphological characteristics can be established.

Key words: Subgenus Ceratotropis, Classification,SSR markers, ITS sequences, Evolution

[1] Marechal R, Mascherpa J M, Stainier F. Etude taxonomique dun groupe complexe despeces des genres Phaseolus et Vigna (Pap ilionaceae) sur la base de donneesmorphologiques et polliniques, traitees par lanalyse informatique. Boissiera, 1978, 28: 1-237
[2] Baudoin J P, Marechal R. Taxonomy and evolution of the genus Vigna. In: Shanmugasundaram S, McLean B T, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Mungbean Symposium. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Tainan, 1988. pp 2-12
[3] Tomooka N, Vaughan D A, Moss H. The Asian Vigna: Genus Vigna Subgenus Ceratotropis Genetic Resources. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. pp 92-184
[4] Tomooka N, Egawa Y, Kaga A. Biosystematics and genetic resources of the genus Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis. In: 7thMAFF International Workshop on Genetic Resources, Wild Legumes. Tsukuba, Japan, 2000. pp 37-62
[5] Dong Y-C(董玉琛), Liu X(刘旭). Chinese Crops and Wild Relatives: Volume of Crops (中国作物及其野生近缘植物: 粮食作物卷). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007. pp 412-426 (in Chinese)
[6] Tomooka N, Kaga A, Isemura T, Vaughan. Vigna genetic resources. In: 14th MAFF International Workshop on Genetic Resources. Tsukuba, Japan, 2009
[7] Maekawa F. Topo-morphological and taxonomical studies in Phaseoleae, Leguminosae. Jpn J Bot, 1955, 15: 103-116
[8] Egawa Y, Nakagahra M, Fernandez G C J. Cytogenetical analysis of tetraploid Vigna glabrescens by interspecific hybridization involving diploid Asian Vigna species. In: Proceedings of the Second International Mungbean Symposium, 1988. pp 200-204
[9] Chen N C, Baker L R, Honma S. Interspecific crossability among four species of Vigna food legumes
[J].Euphytica
[10] Tomooka N, Yoon M S, Doi K, Kaga A, Vaughan D. AFLP analysis of diploid species in the genus Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis
[J].Genet Resour Crop Evol
[11] Doi K, Kaga A, Tomooka N, Vaughan D. Molecular phylogeny of genus Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis based on rDNA ITS and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer of cpDNA sequences
[J].Genetica
[12] Dixit A, Ma K H, Yu J W, Cho E G, ParkY J. Reverse transcriptase domain sequences from mungbean (Vigna radiata) LTR retrotransposons: sequence characterization and phylogenetic analysis
[J].Plant Cell Rep
[13] Saini A, Jawali N. Molecular evolution of 5S rDNA region in Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis and its phylogenetic implications. Plant Syst Evol, 2009, 280: 187–206
[14] He H-H(贺浩华), Luo X-J(罗小金), Zhu C-L(朱昌兰), He X-P(贺晓鹏), Fu J-R(傅军如), Sun J-L(孙俊立), Zhang H-L(张洪亮), Li Z-C(李自超). Classification for some sterile lines and their restorers of hybrid rice with SSR Markers. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(2): 169-175 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] Wu X-L(吴晓雷), He C-Y(贺超英), Chen S-Y(陈受宜). Genetic diversity and evolution relationships of genus Glycine. Prog Nat Sci (自然科学进展), 2001, 11(7): 689-698 (in Chinese)
[16] Dikshit H K, Jhang T, Singh N K. Genetic differentiation of Vigna species by RAPD, URP and SSR markers
[J].Biol Plant
[17] Li X-Y(李学营), Peng J-Y(彭建营), Bai R-X(白瑞霞). Use of ITS sequence on nuclear rDNA for phylogenetic research of seed plants. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin 西北植物学报), 2005, 25(4): 829-834 (in Chinese with English abstract)(
[18] Goel S, Raina S N, Ogihara Y. Molecular evolution and Phylogenetic implications of internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA in the Phaseolus-Vigna complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 2002, 22: 12-19
[19] Liang H-W(梁宏伟), Wang C-Z(王长忠), Li Z(李忠), Luo X-Z(罗相忠), Zou G-W(邹桂伟). Improvement of the silver-stained technique of polyacrylamide gel Electrophoresis. Hereditas (遗传), 2008, 30(10): 1379-1382 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] Saini A, Reddy S K, Jawali N. Intra-individual and intra-species heterogeneity in nuclear rDNA ITS region of Vigna species from subgenus Ceratotropis
[J]. Genet Res Camb
[21] Wang L-X(王丽侠), Cheng X-Z(程须珍), Wang S-H(王素华), Liu C-Y(刘长友), Liang H(梁辉). Transferability of SSR from adzuki bean to mungbean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(5): 816−820 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] Hou X(侯鑫), Liu J-E(刘俊娥), Zhao Y-Z(赵一之), Zhao L-Q(赵利清). Interspecific relationships of Caragana microphylla, C. davazamcii and C. korshinskii (Leguminosae) based on ITS and trnL-F data sets. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sin (植物分类学报), 2006, 44(2): 126-134 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] Vir R, Bhat K V, Lakhanpau S. Transferability of sequences tagged microsatellite sites (STMS) primers to pulse yielding taxa belonging to Phaseolae. Intl J Interg Biol, 2009, 5: 62-66
[24] Gopinathan M C, Babu C R. Structural diversity and its adaptive significance in seeds of Vigna minima (Roxb.) Ohwi & Ohashi and its allies (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae).Ann Bot,1985, 56: 723-732
[25] Lin R-F(林汝法), Chai Y(柴岩), Liao M(廖敏), Sun S-X(孙世贤). Minor Grain Crops in China. Beijing: China Agricultural and Technical Press, 2002. pp 193-208 (in Chinese)
[26] Tateishi Y. A Revision of the Azuki Bean Group, the Subgenus Ceratotropis of the Genus Vigna (Leguminosae). PhD Dissertation of Tohoku University, 1985 (in Japanese)
[27] Wang Z-C(王子成), Li Z-A(李忠爱), Li S-P(李锁平). The technology of MSAP and its applications in plant. Biotechnol Bull (生物技术通报), 2006, (suppl): 195-196 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] Yang X-Y(杨秀英), Gao Y(高英), Shen M(沈敏). Comparative analysis of chromosomal karyotype for three species of Vigna savi
[J]. Plant J Tianjin Norm Univ (Nat Sci Edn) (天津师范大学学报·自然科学版.2003, 23(4):23-26
[29] Stebbins G L. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. London: Edward Arnold Ltd, 1971. pp 85-104
[1] 景秀清, 蔡永朵, 邓宁, 赵晓东, 翟飞红, 曾群. 藜麦RopGEF家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 28-43.
[2] 蒋雨洲, 王甲, 张宏媛, 冯文豪, 王鹏, 李玉义. 化肥配施有机物料对玉米田土壤细菌和真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1378-1388.
[3] 周恩强, 缪亚梅, 周瑶, 姚梦楠, 赵娜, 王永强, 朱宇翔, 薛冬, 李宗迪, 石宇欣, 李波, 汪凯华, 顾春燕, 王学军, 魏利斌. 基于种子发育转录组的豌豆bZIP基因家族分析及种子发育候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 914-931.
[4] 罗珍, 杨妮, 尚晓晖, 余心城, 朱婧怡, 杨光, 胡笑涛. 基于Planet Scope卫星及无人机多光谱影像的宝鸡峡灌区种植结构信息提取[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3317-3330.
[5] 王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885.
[6] 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148.
[7] 郑栋, 周仙莉, 滕长才, 侯万伟, 张红岩, 刘玉皎. 基于SSR标记的青海蚕豆品种亲缘关系分析与指纹图谱构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 79-90.
[8] 匡博文, 韦妳, 刘金典, 陈美燕, 毛兴洁, 段维兴, 杨细平. 基于甘蔗及其近缘属参考基因组开发SSR标记及数据库[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 103-116.
[9] 王添宁, 冯雅岚, 琚吉浩, 吴毅, 张均, 马超. 小麦及其祖先物种GRF转录因子家族鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 897-813.
[10] 赵荣荣, 丛楠, 赵闯. 基于Landsat 8影像提取豫中地区冬小麦和夏玉米分布信息的最佳时相选择[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 721-733.
[11] 陈志凯, 周仙莉, 张红岩, 滕长才, 侯万伟. 320份蚕豆蛋白质含量的SSR关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2775-2786.
[12] 梅玉琴, 刘意, 王崇, 雷剑, 朱国鹏, 杨新笋. 甘薯PHB基因家族的全基因组鉴定和表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1715-1725.
[13] 李赢, 刘海翠, 石吕, 石晓旭, 韩笑, 刘建, 魏亚凤. 江苏裸大麦种质资源遗传多样性和群体结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2687-2697.
[14] 怀园园, 张晟瑞, 武婷婷, 李静, 孙石, 韩天富, 李斌, 孙君明. 大豆主要营养品质性状相关分子标记的育种应用潜力评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 1957-1976.
[15] 晋敏姗, 曲瑞芳, 李红英, 韩彦卿, 马芳芳, 韩渊怀, 邢国芳. 谷子糖转运蛋白基因SiSTPs的鉴定及其参与谷子抗逆胁迫响应的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 825-839.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!