欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 2045-2054.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02045

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

冬小麦节水栽培三种灌溉模式的水氮利用与产量形成

张胜全1,方保停1,2,张英华1,周顺利1,王志敏1,*   

  1. 1中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100193;2河南省农业科学院小麦研究中心,河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-24 修回日期:2009-05-31 出版日期:2009-11-12 网络出版日期:2009-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 王志敏, E-mail: zhimin206@263.net; Tel: 010-62734011
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国际科技支撑计划项目(2007BAD69B05)和北京市自然科学基金项目(6072018)资助。

Utilization of Water and Nitrogen and Yield Formation Under Three ALimited Irrigation Schedules in Winter Wheat

ZHANG Sheng-Quan1,FANG Bao-Ting1,2,ZHANG Ying-Hua1,ZHOU Shun-Li1,WANG Zhi-Min1*   

  1. 1College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China;2Wheat Research Center,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou 450002,China
  • Received:2009-02-24 Revised:2009-05-31 Published:2009-11-12 Published online:2009-09-10
  • Contact: WANG Zhi-Min,E-mail:zhimin206@263.net;Tel:010-62734011

摘要:

为探讨华北平原冬小麦节水栽培适宜灌溉模式及其产量形成与资源利用规律,20042008连续4年在同一地块比较春不灌水(I0)、春灌1(I1)和春灌2(I2) 3种灌溉模式对冬小麦水氮利用特性与产量形成的影响。在均实行晚播和一次性底施氮量157.5 kg hm-2条件下,各模式年际间籽粒产量稳定,I0I1I2模式的4年平均产量分别为6 1347 5158 134 kg hm-2,平均总耗水量分别为3 3343 8294 270 m3 hm-2,平均总吸氮量分别为162.5197.9212.2 kg hm-2。在耗水构成中,土壤贮水消耗占总耗水量的比例分别为66.7%49.2%37.8%3种灌溉模式的水分利用效率达1.9~2.0 kg m-3,灌溉模式间无显著差异;氮素利用效率在3个灌溉模式间也无显著差异,平均为38.0 kg kg-1 N3种灌溉模式主茎穗占成穗数比例平均为81%,开花期上三叶叶面积指数2.6~3.8,旗叶节以上非叶绿色器官面积指数2.7~3.6。综合以上结果,冬小麦3种灌溉模式及其配套技术形成的群体结构可在不同产量水平上实现水、氮资源高效利用。

关键词: 冬小麦, 节水栽培, 氮素利用效率, 高产, 灌溉模式

Abstract:

Water shortage is a great challenge in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production worldwide. Studies on wheat physiology and ecology have been carried out aiming at yielding more grains with less consumptions of water and nitrogen fertilizer. Cultivation techniques based on limited irrigation and nitrogen application are highly emphasized in North China Plain, where water stress is the most major problem in regular years. In Wuqiao area, Hebei province, China, a series cultivation systems have been established with distinct effects of high yield and small water consumption. The principle measure in the technique system was controlling the irrigation frequency and water amount. The purpose of this study was to disclose the mechanism of high-yielding and high resource use efficiency in the cultivation system established in Wuqiao. In the consecutive growing seasons from 2004 to 2008, field experiments were conducted at the Wuqiao Experimental Station of China Agriculture University under three limited irrigation schedules, i.e., no irrigation in spring (I0), 750 m3 ha-1 of water at jointing (I1) and each 750 m3ha-1 of water at jointing and anthesis (I2). Fertilizers were only applied before sowing, including urea 225 kg ha-1, (NH4)2HPO4 300 kg ha-1 (thus, the total nitrogen was 157.5 kg ha-1),K2SO4225 kg ha-1, and ZnSO422.5 kg ha-1. The characteristics of water and nitrogen use and the formation of grain yield were investigated at jointing, booting, anthesis, and maturity stages. The results showed that the average yield was 6134 kg ha-1 for I0, 7 515 kg ha-1 for I1, and 8 134 for I2 treatment, and the average total evapotranspiration was in the order of 3 334, 3 829, and
4 270
m3 ha-1. The ratio of soil water consumption to total evapotranspiration was 67%, 49%, and 38% in I0, I1, and I2 treatments, respectively. The water use efficiency ranged from 1.9 to 2.0 kg m-3 with no significant differences among treatments. This indicated that approximately 52.6 m3 of water was required for yielding 100 kg of grains. Under the nitrogen application level of 157.5 kg ha-1, the average total nitrogen accumulation was 163, 198, and 212 kg ha-1 in I0, I1, and I2 treatments, respectively. Consistent results with slight variations were observed in the total nitrogen accumulation across years. The average nitrogen use efficacy of the three irrigation treatments was 38 kg kg-1and there were no significant differences among treatments. In terms of the characteristics of plant population, the leaf area index (LAI) at booting and anthesis, as well as the LAI for the top three leaves were not significantly different between I1 and I2 treatments, but they were significantly higher than those in I0 treatment. The LAI for the top three leaves and non-leaf organs green area index (NAI) above flag leaf ranged from 2.6 to 3.8 and from 2.7 to 3.6, respectively. The ratios of non-leaf organs green area above flag leaf to the uppermost three leaf area and total leaf area were more than 1.0 and 0.7, respectively. Three limited irrigation schedulesshowed steady grain yield and high resource use efficiency for consecutive four years.

Key words: Winter wheat, Water-saving cultivation, Nitrogen use efficiency, High yield, Irrigation schedule

[1] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[2] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
[3] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[4] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[5] 靳义荣, 刘金栋, 刘彩云, 贾德新, 刘鹏, 王雅美. 普通小麦氮素利用效率相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 394-404.
[6] 闫彩霞, 王娟, 赵小波, 宋秀霞, 姜常松, 孙全喜, 苑翠玲, 张浩, 单世华. 全生育期鉴定筛选耐盐碱花生品种[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 556-565.
[7] 张矞勋, 齐拓野, 孙源, 璩向宁, 曹媛, 吴梦瑶, 刘春虹, 王磊. 高分六号遥感影像植被特征及其在冬小麦苗期LAI反演中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2532-2540.
[8] 胡鑫慧, 谷淑波, 朱俊科, 王东. 分期施钾对不同质地土壤麦田冬小麦干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2258-2267.
[9] 周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 韩玉玲, 马玮, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853.
[10] 雒文鹤, 师祖姣, 王旭敏, 李军, 王瑞. 节水减氮对土壤硝态氮分布和冬小麦水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 924-936.
[11] 周磊,刘秋员,田晋钰,朱梦华,程爽,车阳,王志杰,邢志鹏,胡雅杰,刘国栋,魏海燕,张洪程. 甬优系列籼粳杂交稻产量及氮素吸收利用的差异[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(5): 772-786.
[12] 马艳明, 冯智宇, 王威, 张胜军, 郭营, 倪中福, 刘杰. 新疆冬小麦品种农艺及产量性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1997-2007.
[13] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 陈朝燕, 肖菁, 徐麟, 倪中福, 刘杰. 新疆冬小麦地方品种与育成品种基于SNP芯片的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1539-1556.
[14] 王艳,易军,高继平,张丽娜,杨继芬,赵艳泽,辛威,甄晓溪,张文忠. 不同叶龄蘖、穗氮肥组合对粳稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 102-116.
[15] 张力,陈阜,雷永登. 近60年河北省冬小麦干旱风险时空规律[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1407-1415.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!