欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1606-1610.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

从葛根渣中酶法制备膳食纤维

钟海雁;韩军;苏勇;李忠海   

  1. 中南林学院绿色食品研究所,湖南长沙410004
  • 收稿日期:2005-02-14 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-12-12 网络出版日期:2005-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 钟海雁

Preparation of Dietary Fiber from the Root Dregs of Kudzu Vine (Pueraia lobata Ohwi) by Enzymatic Method

ZHONG Hai-Yan;HAN Jun;SU Yong;LI Zhong-Hai   

  1. Institute of Green Food, Central South Forestry University, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China
  • Received:2005-02-14 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-12-12 Published online:2005-12-12
  • Contact: ZHONG Hai-Yan

摘要: 以采自湖南省临湘市、张家界市的家葛和野葛为材料,对葛渣中的膳食纤维的酶法制备工艺进行了试验研究。通过单因素试验、正交试验和极差分析,得出了最佳工艺参数。结果表明,在混合酶(α-淀粉酶与糖化酶质量之比为1∶2)用量0.2%、70℃处理80 min,蛋白酶用量0.4%、50℃处理60 min时,膳食纤维得率较高,张家界家葛、岳阳野葛、张家界野葛和岳阳家葛膳食纤维中的酸性洗涤纤维含量分别达78.69% \78。74% 、76.34% 和73.11%。因此,该酶法工艺为葛根膳食纤维的制备提供了依据。

关键词: 葛根渣, 膳食纤维, 蛋白酶, 混合酶, 纯化

Abstract: Kudzu plants are widely distributed in China. The total content of dietary fiber (DF) in the root dreg reaches over 70%. The root dreg is a kind of natural sources of dietary fiber. The optimal technology parameters were been studied for four kinds of kudzu root dietary fiber with enzymatic hydrolysis, by using single factor and orthogonal design experments. Results showed that the best conditions for preparation evalusted by DF swelling ability were:(1)mixed enzyme(a-amylase: glucoamylose, 1:2) amount of 0.2%, 70℃,80 min for treatment; and (2) proteinase amount of 0.3%, 50℃,60 min for incubation(Table 1,Fig.6,Fig.7).After incubation of mixed enzymes and proteinase, the acid detergent fiber contents of four kinds of dietary fibers in the wild and cultivated kudzu in Zhangjiajie and Yueyang, Were increased to 78.69%,78.41%,76.34% and 73.11%, respectively(Table 2). Therefore this technology of enzymatic preparation may lay the foundation of processing for kudzu root dietary fiber.

Key words: Pueraia lobata Ohwi, Dreg of kudzu vine root, Dietary fiber, Protein enzyme, Mixed enzyme, Purification

中图分类号: 

  • S529
[1] 黄成, 梁晓梅, 戴成, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 马朝芝. 甘蓝型油菜BnAPs基因家族成员全基因组鉴定及分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 597-607.
[2] 柯丹霞,彭昆鹏,贾妍,曾硕,王英枝,张静怡. 大豆半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂基因GmCYS2的功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(8): 1159-1168.
[3] 樊艳平,成小芳,王宏民,张耀文,张仙红. 四个抗豆象绿豆品种的胰蛋白酶抑制剂稳定性[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 867-875.
[4] 樊艳平,张耀文,赵雪英,张仙红. 抗豆象绿豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂活性及理化性质[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(11): 1696-1704.
[5] 史宏志;赵永利;谢子发;陈志华;刘国顺;吴纯奎;李超;鲁喜梅. 白肋烟自然群体和纯化群体生物碱的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(08): 1444-1449.
[6] 王华忠;张文彬. 甜菜下胚轴颜色选择对后代品系及杂交组合的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(06): 1029-1033.
[7] 刘立科;郭小丽;刘冬成;刘春光;王化波;张爱民. 小麦TaLon1基因克隆与分析[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(10): 1247-1252.
[8] 马炳田;王玲霞;李平;朱祯;周开达. 转抗虫基因三系优良保持系的获得[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(01): 60-65.
[9] 梁炫强;潘瑞炽;周桂元. 花生种子胰蛋白酶抑制剂与抗黄曲霉侵染的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(02): 295-299.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!