欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (04): 578-582.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

紫花苜蓿品种间自毒性物质含量差异研究

卢成1,2,**;曾昭海1,**;郑世宗2;戚志强1;胡跃高1,*   

  1. 1 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院草业工程研究中心,北京100094;2 浙江省水利河口研究院,浙江杭州310020
  • 收稿日期:2006-06-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-04-12 网络出版日期:2007-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 胡跃高

The Difference of Autotoxic Compounds Content in Alfalfa Cultivars

LU Cheng12**,ZENG Zhao-Hai1**,ZHENG Shi-Zong2,QI Zhi-Qiang1,HU Yue-Gao1*   

  1. 1 Pasture Engineering Research Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 2 Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary, Hangzhou 310020, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2006-06-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-04-12 Published online:2007-04-12
  • Contact: HU Yue-Gao

摘要:

利用生物测定和高效液相色谱方法研究紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)自毒性现象,并评价不同品种苜蓿自毒性差异。结果显示,苜蓿叶浸提物抑制受体苜蓿vector的胚根生长,对照与所有处理的差异均达到极显著水平(P<0.01)。50个苜蓿品种按自毒性强度可分为3大类9个小组,自毒性最弱的组只有一个品种,为Key;最强的组有GS20001X、超级阿波罗、射手、NS00-32、牧野、WL232HQ共5个;其余品种分布在上述两组之间。在苜蓿叶浸提物中检测到香豆素、邻香豆酸、间香豆酸和对香豆酸4种目标酚类物质。

关键词: 自毒性, 紫花苜蓿, 生物测定

Abstract:

Autotoxicity restricts the development of alfalfa industry. In North America researchers did some work on this field, but in China little work has been done about it. The objective of this research was to evaluate the differences of autotoxic compounds content in different alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars by bioassay and high performance liquid chromatography. The results indicated that alfalfa leaf extracts inhibited the radicel growth of ‘vector’, and the treated radicels of ‘vector’ were shorter than that of control significantly (P<0.01). Fifty cultivars of alfalfa showed difference in aotutoxicity, and were divided into three categories based on the autotoxicity of their leaf extracts. Alfalfa ‘Key’ exhibited the least aotutoxicity, while ‘GS2001X’, ‘Super Apollo’, ‘Archer’, ‘NS00-32’, ‘Muye’, and ‘WL232HQ’ showed strong autotoxicity. Coumarine, o-coumaric acid, m-coumaric acid, and p-coumaric acid were detected in leaf extracts of alfalfa by high performance liquid chromatography.

Key words: Autotoxicity, Alfalfa, Bioassay

[1] 郭彦军, 倪郁, 郭芸江, 韩龙, 唐华, 玉永雄. 水热胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶表皮蜡质组分及生理指标的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(05): 911-917.
[2] 朱见明, 严学兵, 史莹华, 王成章. 紫花苜蓿光敏色素B基因片段克隆及RNA干扰表达载体的构建[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(02): 374-379.
[3] 秦智慧,晁跃辉,杨青川,康俊梅,孙彦,王凭青,龙瑞才. 紫花苜蓿锌指蛋白基因RNAi表达载体的构建及在苜蓿的转化[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(4): 596-601.
[4] 宗毓铮,王雯玥,韩清芳,丁瑞霞,贾志宽,聂俊峰. 喷施硼肥对紫花苜蓿光合作用及可溶性糖源库间运转的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(4): 665-672.
[5] 白永琴,康俊梅,孙彦,杨青川,李燕. 紫花苜蓿LEA蛋白基因ihpRNA表达载体构建及烟草转化[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(09): 1484-1489.
[6] 龙明秀,高景慧,高阳,呼天明,史俊通,吴振,杨宏新. 12个国外引进苜蓿品种头茬单株干重与产量性状间的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(10): 1923-1929.
[7] 安宝燕;罗琰;李加瑞;乔卫华;张宪省;高新起. 紫花苜蓿Na+/H+ 逆向转运蛋白基因在拟南芥中表达提高转基因植株的耐盐性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(04): 557-564.
[8] 朱玉洁;冯利平;易 鹏;杨晓光;胡跃高. 紫花苜蓿光合生产与干物质积累模拟模型研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1682-1687.
[9] 刘志鹏;杨青川;呼天明;闫龙凤;王超. 用SSR标记研究不同耐盐特性四倍体紫花苜蓿的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(04): 630-632.
[10] 刘景辉;曾昭海;焦立新;胡跃高;王莹; 李海. 不同青贮玉米品种与紫花苜蓿的间作效应[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(01): 125-137.
[11] 毕玉芬;车伟光;李季蓉. 利用RAPD技术研究弱秋眠性紫花苜蓿遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(05): 647-652.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!