欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (04): 572-577.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同时期水稻主要恢复系、不育系的遗传差异变化研究

查仁明1;杨正林1;赵芳明1;钟秉强1;彭涛1;谢戎2;何光华1*   

  1. 1 西南大学水稻研究所,农业部生物技术与作物品质改良重点开放实验室,重庆 400716; 2 四川省农业科学院水稻高粱研究所,四川泸州 646100
  • 收稿日期:2006-06-26 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-04-12 网络出版日期:2007-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 何光华

Genetic Difference Changes of Main Restorer and Sterile Lines in Different Stages of Hybrid Rice (Oryza sativa spp. indica L.)

ZHA Ren-Ming1,YANG Zheng-Lin1,ZHAO Fang-Ming1,ZHONG Bing-Qiang1,PENG Tao1,XIE Rong2,HE Guang-Hua1*   

  1. 1 Rice Research Institute, Southwest University, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Crop Quality Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Chongqing 400716; 2 Rice and Sorghum Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Science, Luzhou 646100, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2006-06-26 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-04-12 Published online:2007-04-12
  • Contact: HE Guang-Hua

摘要:

用AFLP技术分析了我国不同年代广泛应用的野败型杂交水稻19个恢复系和13个不育系的遗传差异,同时基于其农艺性状进行了聚类,结果表明:(1)基于标记和性状两种聚类在不育系和恢复系的区分上一致,而在恢复系内和不育系内的遗传差异检测上有较大差异;(2)我国水稻亲本间的遗传差异较大,且在不育系与恢复系间>恢复系内>不育系内;(3)恢复系内的遗传差异以早期小于中期、近期,其与不育系间的遗传差异也存在同样的关系,这与20世纪80年代中、后期我国杂交水稻产量大幅度提高,90年代后一直徘徊不前的变化趋势一致;(4)不育系内的遗传差异后期大于前期,但它与恢复系间的遗传差异前、后期不显著;(5)不同年代恢复系的分子标记遗传差异变化趋势与杂交水稻产量变化趋势一致,分子标记揭示的遗传差异可为杂交育种中恢复系的选择提供参考。

关键词: 杂交水稻, 遗传差异, AFLP, 农艺性状

Abstract:

Heterosis of F1 hybrid is correlative to genetic distance between its parents, the sterile and the restorer lines, at certain extent. Study on genetic diversity dynamics of widely used sterile and restorer lines of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa spp. indica L.) at different stages will help to choose parents efficiently and to improve hybrid yield. In present research, 31 pairs of AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) primers were used to detect genetic distances of 19 restorers and 13 sterile lines of WA-type hybrid rice that were widely used at different stages. All polymorphic bands were recorded by 0/1 method. Genetic distances (GD) of Nei & Li between all possible pairs of parents were calculated using AFLP data. Chi-square genetic distances between parents were calculated based on the standardized values of 15 agronomic traits of 32 parents. 32 rice parents were clustered based on GD values and on Chi-square distances by UPGMA respectively. The results were as follows: (1) A total of 535 clear polymorphic bands were detected among 32 parents, and on average 17.3 distinguishable bands were observed after amplification with each primer pair. (2) The result of dendrogram based on AFLP markers was similar to that on agronomic traits analyses in grouping of 32 parents of sterile and restorer lines, but a few differences between two dendrograms were detected in diversity among sterile or restorer lines. (3) There were relatively larger genetic differences among 32 parents, and the GDs between sterile and restorer lines were larger than those among restorers as well as among sterile lines. (4) The GDs among early-stage restorers were lower than those among middle-stage and late-stage restorers. Similar trend was observed on the GDs between sterile lines and restorers in 3 stages. These trends were positively correlated with the yield trend of hybrid rice, i.e. the yield of hybrid rice was largely improved in the middle-to-late 1980s and was stunted after 1990s. (5) The GDs among late-stage sterile lines were larger than those among early-stage sterile lines, but the GDs between early-stage sterile lines and restorers showed no significant difference from those between the late-stage sterile lines and restorers. (6) The trend of GDs based on AFLP markers of restorers in 3 stages was similar to yield trend of hybrid rice cultivars. GDs based on molecular makers can be used as one reference in choosing restorers in hybrid crossing.

Key words: Hybrid rice (Oryza sativa spp. indica L.), Genetic difference, AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism), Agronomic traits

[1] 赵婧, 孟凡钢, 于德彬, 邱强, 张鸣浩, 饶德民, 丛博韬, 张伟, 闫晓艳. 不同磷效率大豆农艺性状与磷/铁利用率对磷素的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1824-1833.
[2] 邓妍, 王娟玲, 王创云, 赵丽, 张丽光, 郭虹霞, 郭红霞, 秦丽霞, 王美霞. 生物菌肥与无机肥配施对藜麦农艺性状、产量性状及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1383-1390.
[3] 张力岚, 张列梅, 牛焕颖, 徐益, 李玉, 祁建民, 陶爱芬, 方平平, 张立武. 黄麻SSR标记与纤维产量性状的相关性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1905-1913.
[4] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 陈朝燕, 肖菁, 徐麟, 倪中福, 刘杰. 新疆冬小麦地方品种与育成品种基于SNP芯片的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1539-1556.
[5] 向丽媛,徐凯,苏静,吴超,袁雄,郑兴飞,刁英,胡中立,李兰芝. 基于通路分析剖析水稻农艺性状配合力和杂种优势[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1319-1326.
[6] 贾小平,全建章,王永芳,董志平,袁玺垒,张博,李剑峰. 不同光周期环境对谷子农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1119-1127.
[7] 徐益,张列梅,郭艳春,祁建民,张力岚,方平平,张立武. 黄麻核心种质的遴选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1672-1681.
[8] 孙现军,姜奇彦,胡正,张惠媛,徐长兵,邸一桓,韩龙植,张辉. 水稻资源全生育期耐盐性鉴定筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1656-1663.
[9] 翟俊鹏,李海霞,毕惠惠,周思远,罗肖艳,陈树林,程西永,许海霞. 普通小麦主要农艺性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1488-1502.
[10] 徐益,张列梅,祁建民,苏梅,方书生,张力岚,方平平,张立武. 黄麻纤维产量与主要农艺性状的相关分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 859-866.
[11] 江红,孙石,宋雯雯,吴存祥,武婷婷,胡水秀,韩天富. 不同地理来源MGIII组大豆品种生育期结构分析及E基因型鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(10): 1448-1458.
[12] 简大为, 周阳, 刘宏伟, 杨丽, 买春艳, 于立强, 韩新年, 张宏军, 李洪杰. 利用功能标记揭示新疆小麦改良品种与地方品种的遗传变异[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(05): 657-671.
[13] 张征,张雪丽,莫博程,代志军,胡中立,李兰芝,郑兴飞. 籼型杂交水稻农艺性状的配合力研究[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(10): 1448-1457.
[14] 沈杭琪,胡伟民,林程,关亚静,刘宏友,安建宇,胡晋. 不同脱水剂对杂交水稻制种种子质量及基因表达的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1308-1318.
[15] 郑立飞,尚一斐,李学军,冯浩,魏永胜. 结构方程模型在冬小麦农艺性状与产量关系分析中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1395-1400.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!