欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (04): 572-577.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同时期水稻主要恢复系、不育系的遗传差异变化研究

查仁明1;杨正林1;赵芳明1;钟秉强1;彭涛1;谢戎2;何光华1*   

  1. 1 西南大学水稻研究所,农业部生物技术与作物品质改良重点开放实验室,重庆 400716; 2 四川省农业科学院水稻高粱研究所,四川泸州 646100
  • 收稿日期:2006-06-26 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-04-12 网络出版日期:2007-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 何光华

Genetic Difference Changes of Main Restorer and Sterile Lines in Different Stages of Hybrid Rice (Oryza sativa spp. indica L.)

ZHA Ren-Ming1,YANG Zheng-Lin1,ZHAO Fang-Ming1,ZHONG Bing-Qiang1,PENG Tao1,XIE Rong2,HE Guang-Hua1*   

  1. 1 Rice Research Institute, Southwest University, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Crop Quality Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Chongqing 400716; 2 Rice and Sorghum Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Science, Luzhou 646100, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2006-06-26 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-04-12 Published online:2007-04-12
  • Contact: HE Guang-Hua

摘要:

用AFLP技术分析了我国不同年代广泛应用的野败型杂交水稻19个恢复系和13个不育系的遗传差异,同时基于其农艺性状进行了聚类,结果表明:(1)基于标记和性状两种聚类在不育系和恢复系的区分上一致,而在恢复系内和不育系内的遗传差异检测上有较大差异;(2)我国水稻亲本间的遗传差异较大,且在不育系与恢复系间>恢复系内>不育系内;(3)恢复系内的遗传差异以早期小于中期、近期,其与不育系间的遗传差异也存在同样的关系,这与20世纪80年代中、后期我国杂交水稻产量大幅度提高,90年代后一直徘徊不前的变化趋势一致;(4)不育系内的遗传差异后期大于前期,但它与恢复系间的遗传差异前、后期不显著;(5)不同年代恢复系的分子标记遗传差异变化趋势与杂交水稻产量变化趋势一致,分子标记揭示的遗传差异可为杂交育种中恢复系的选择提供参考。

关键词: 杂交水稻, 遗传差异, AFLP, 农艺性状

Abstract:

Heterosis of F1 hybrid is correlative to genetic distance between its parents, the sterile and the restorer lines, at certain extent. Study on genetic diversity dynamics of widely used sterile and restorer lines of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa spp. indica L.) at different stages will help to choose parents efficiently and to improve hybrid yield. In present research, 31 pairs of AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) primers were used to detect genetic distances of 19 restorers and 13 sterile lines of WA-type hybrid rice that were widely used at different stages. All polymorphic bands were recorded by 0/1 method. Genetic distances (GD) of Nei & Li between all possible pairs of parents were calculated using AFLP data. Chi-square genetic distances between parents were calculated based on the standardized values of 15 agronomic traits of 32 parents. 32 rice parents were clustered based on GD values and on Chi-square distances by UPGMA respectively. The results were as follows: (1) A total of 535 clear polymorphic bands were detected among 32 parents, and on average 17.3 distinguishable bands were observed after amplification with each primer pair. (2) The result of dendrogram based on AFLP markers was similar to that on agronomic traits analyses in grouping of 32 parents of sterile and restorer lines, but a few differences between two dendrograms were detected in diversity among sterile or restorer lines. (3) There were relatively larger genetic differences among 32 parents, and the GDs between sterile and restorer lines were larger than those among restorers as well as among sterile lines. (4) The GDs among early-stage restorers were lower than those among middle-stage and late-stage restorers. Similar trend was observed on the GDs between sterile lines and restorers in 3 stages. These trends were positively correlated with the yield trend of hybrid rice, i.e. the yield of hybrid rice was largely improved in the middle-to-late 1980s and was stunted after 1990s. (5) The GDs among late-stage sterile lines were larger than those among early-stage sterile lines, but the GDs between early-stage sterile lines and restorers showed no significant difference from those between the late-stage sterile lines and restorers. (6) The trend of GDs based on AFLP markers of restorers in 3 stages was similar to yield trend of hybrid rice cultivars. GDs based on molecular makers can be used as one reference in choosing restorers in hybrid crossing.

Key words: Hybrid rice (Oryza sativa spp. indica L.), Genetic difference, AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism), Agronomic traits

[1] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[2] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[3] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[5] 展宗冰, 靳奇峰, 刘迪, 吕迎春, 郭莹, 张雪婷, 虎梦霞, 王尚, 杨芳萍. 甘肃省小麦农家种老芒麦分子鉴定及其重要性状评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 609-620.
[6] 陈于婷, 丁晓雨, 许本波, 张学昆, 徐劲松, 殷艳. 气候变暖对冬油菜产量、品质及重要农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 516-525.
[7] 李琰, 李雨晨, 于爱萍, 陈爱萍. 8份无芒雀麦种质资源的草产量与营养品质的综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3377-3386.
[8] 蒋昂辰, 李琰, 李雨晨, 张晶, 陈爱萍. 21份无芒雀麦种质农艺性状及种子产量的综合评价与优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2958-2970.
[9] 桂灵星, 凌溪铁, 唐兆成, 罗文臻, 朱盼珍, 仇泽宇, 张保龙. 宁麦36抗甲氧咪草烟矮秆突变体的鉴定及农艺性状分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2923-2932.
[10] 姜骁, 赵健鑫, 毕竞男, 许静, 殷祥贞, 赵旭红, 潘丽娟, 陈娜, 马俊卿, 韩鹏, 杨珍, 迟晓元. 中国北方主产区主要地理和气候因子对花生农艺性状和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2805-2820.
[11] 聂波涛, 刘德泉, 陈健, 崔正果, 侯云龙, 陈亮, 邱红梅, 王跃强. 北方春大豆品种农艺和品质性状分析与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[12] 李长喜, 董占鹏, 关永虎, 刘金伟, 李航, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉农艺性状与皮棉产量性状的遗传贡献及决策系数分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1486-1502.
[13] 刘园园, 董建科, 应静文, 梅文祥, 程刚, 郭晶晶, 焦文标, 宋波涛. 利用野生种Solanum boliviense创制马铃薯抗寒种质[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1384-1393.
[14] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 王威, 孙娜, 颜国荣, 张胜军, 刘杰, 倪中福, 徐麟. 新疆冬小麦籽粒品质性状遗传差异与关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1394-1405.
[15] 梁星伟, 杨文亭, 金雨, 胡莉, 傅小香, 陈先敏, 周顺利, 申思, 梁效贵. 玉米穗轴的颜色变化, 是偶然还是与农艺性状存在关联?——以历年国审普通品种为例[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 771-778.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!