欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1644-1653.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

优质面包小麦品种济南17和豫麦34灌浆期高温胁迫差异表达基因的分离

李浩1,2 , 张平平1,3, 查向东2 , 夏先春1, 何中虎1,4,*   

  1. (1 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/国家小麦改良中心/国家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程,北京100081;2 安徽大学生命科学学院/安徽省生态工程与生物技术重点实验室,安徽合肥230039;3 华中农业大学植物科技学院,湖北武汉430070;4 国际玉米小麦改良中心中国办事处,北京100081)
  • 收稿日期:2006-12-28 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-10-12 网络出版日期:2007-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 何中虎

Isolation of Differentially Expressed Genes from Wheat Cultivars Jinan 17 and Yumai 34 with Good Bread Quality under Heat Stress during Grain Filling Stage

LI Hao 1,2, ZHANG Ping-Ping 1,3, ZHA Xiang-Dong 2, XIA Xian-Chun 1, HE Zhong-Hu 1,4,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, National Wheat Improvement Center/The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 2 School of Life Sciences, Anhui University/Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-engineering and Bio-technique, Hefei 230039, Anhui; 3 College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei; 4 CIMMYT China Office, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2006-12-28 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-10-12 Published online:2007-10-12
  • Contact: HE Zhong-Hu1

摘要:

选用品质相对不稳定的小麦品种济南17和品质较稳定的品种豫麦34,于开花后15~18 d(灌浆中期)及30~33 d(灌浆后期)分别进行连续3 d的高温胁迫处理(昼夜温度为38℃,25℃)。提取籽粒总RNA,通过cDNA-AFLP分析获得差异条带。回收差异条带,再经过克隆、测序、BLAST比对,济南17、豫麦34分别获得85个和99个高温胁迫下差异表达基因片段的序列。经过反向Northern杂交验证后,济南17获得25个信号明显的序列,其中22个来自热诱导表达的基因,主要与小麦的胁迫响应基因、热激蛋白等同源;豫麦34获得31个信号明显的序列,其中25个来自热抑制表达的基因,主要与乙烯合成酶、吡咯啉-5-羧酸合成酶等同源。说明高温胁迫总体上诱导品质不稳定品种的基因表达,而抑制品质稳定品种的基因表达。济南17的序列有15个来自灌浆中期样本、10个来自灌浆后期样本,豫麦34的序列则分别有29个来自灌浆中期样本、2个来自灌浆后期样本,说明高温胁迫对灌浆中期基因表达的影响比灌浆后期显著,在品质稳定品种中则比品质不稳定品种中更为明显。2个品种在高温胁迫下的基因表达模式存在显著差异,济南17诱导表达胁迫响应基因,豫麦34抑制表达乙烯合成酶和吡咯啉-5-羧酸合成酶及胁迫响应基因,这可能是二者品质稳定性不同的重要原因。

关键词: 普通小麦, 灌浆期, 高温胁迫, cDNA-AFLP, 基因表达, 品质稳定性

Abstract:

Studies of gene expression patterns under heat stress during grain filling stage will provide important information for breeding wheat cultivars with high quality. In the present study, two wheat cultivars, Jinan 17 and Yumai 34 with different quality stability under various environments, were used to in the influence of high temperature on gene expression. The wheat plants were exposed to high temperature (38℃/25℃ day/night) for three days in the middle (from 15 to 18 days post-anthesis) and late stage (from 30 to 33 days post-anthesis) of grain filling in a climate chamber. Spikelets in middle of heads were harvested, and RNA of kernels was extracted with a combined technique of cold phenolic and Trizol single-step methods. cDNA was obtained by the reverse transcription of total RNA, and differential bands were detected subsequently in cDNA-AFLP analysis. In total, 410 and 316 differential bands were detected from Jinan 17 and Yumai 34, respectively. The differential fragments were cloned, sequenced and blasted in NCBI, and 85 and 99 positive fragments of differentially expressed genes under heat stress were obtained from Jinan 17 and Yumai 34, respectively. After the positive fragments were validated by reverse Northern blotting, 25 positive fragments isolated from Jinan 17 showed intense signal, and 22 of them were induced under heat stress, which were notablely homologous to stress response genes and heat shock protein of wheat. Meanwhile, 31 positive fragments showed intense signal were observed from Yumai 34, and 25 of them were suppressed, which were notablely homologous to stress response genes, ethylene forming enzyme, pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase. The rusults indicated that gene expression was more induced under heat stress in Jinan17, whereas suppressed more in Yumai 34, which might lead to differences in heat tolerance and quality stability. Five fragments from Jinan 17, and two fragments from Yumai 34 did not have any homology sequences in the BLAST analysis, while other fragments have homology protein or nucleic acid sequences in wheat or other crops. Two fragments induced in response to heat stress were notablely homologous to the storage protein genes, which might induce the expression of transcripts related to storage protein under heat stress. Fifteen differential fragments were detected from medium stage of grain filling in Jinan 17, whereas those from late stage were 10, while 29 and 2 differential fragments in Yumai 34 were observed in medium and late stages, respectively. This indicated that gene expression was more significantly affected by heat stress in medium stage than in late stage of grain filling, especially in Yumai 34. The difference of gene expression patterns between two wheat cultivars were observed, stress response genes were induced in Jinan 17, ethylene forming enzyme and pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase as well as stress response genes were suppressed in Yumai 34, which may result in the different responses in heat tolerance and quality stability. The identification and characterization of heat stress responsive genes in wheat may provide a molecular biological understanding of gene expression patterns and regulation involved in the heat stress in wheat.

Key words: Common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Grain filling period, Heat stress, cDNA-AFLP, Gene expression, Quality stability

[1] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[2] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
[3] 詹戈锐, 余文, 李锋, 武明珠, 徐馨, 罗朝鹏, 巫升鑫, 杨军, 张智强, 王中. 烟草NtWRKY6基因响应ABA表达及其调控多酚合成的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 446-458.
[4] 景秀清, 蔡永朵, 邓宁, 赵晓东, 翟飞红, 曾群. 藜麦RopGEF家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 28-43.
[5] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[6] 张恒, 冯雅岚, 田文仲, 郭彬彬, 张均, 马超. 小麦TaSnRK基因家族鉴定及在局部根区干旱下的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 632-649.
[7] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
[8] 肖明昆, 严炜, 宋记明, 张林辉, 刘倩, 段春芳, 李月仙, 姜太玲, 沈绍斌, 周迎春, 沈正松, 熊贤坤, 罗鑫, 白丽娜, 刘光华. 卷叶木薯及其突变体叶片的比较转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2143-2156.
[9] 高维东, 胡城祯, 张龙, 张艳艳, 张沛沛, 杨德龙, 陈涛. 小麦泛素结合酶TaUBC16基因的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 1971-1988.
[10] 王亚琪, 徐海风, 李曙光, 傅蒙蒙, 余希文, 赵志鑫, 杨加银, 赵团结. 大豆类病变皱叶突变体NT301遗传分析和2对基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 808-819.
[11] 琚吉浩, 马超, 王添宁, 吴毅, 董钟, 方美娥, 陈钰姝, 张均, 付国占. 小麦TaPOD家族的全基因组鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 779-792.
[12] 李万, 李成, 程敏, 吴芳. 磷转运蛋白StPHO1.2提高马铃薯耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 394-402.
[13] 殷祥贞, 赵健鑫, 郝翠翠, 潘丽娟, 陈娜, 许静, 姜骁, 赵旭红, 王恩琪, 曹欢, 禹山林, 迟晓元. 花生转录因子基因AhWRI1的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 3155-3164.
[14] 王子然, 鲁一薇, 杨婧怡, 王成龙, 宋亚萍, 马金虎. 外源水杨酸对镉胁迫下大豆生理特性和抗逆基因表达的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2883-2895.
[15] 孙尚文, 束红梅, 杨长琴, 张国伟, 王晓婧, 孟亚利, 王友华, 刘瑞显. 低温下环丙酸酰胺调控棉花内源激素促进噻苯隆脱叶的机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 187-198.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!