欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 1277-1283.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

CIMMYT普通小麦籽粒硬度等位变异的检测

陈锋;何中虎;Morten Lillemo;夏先春   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学所/国家小麦改良中心,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2004-10-22 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-10-12 网络出版日期:2005-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 夏先春

Detection of Allelic Variation for Grain Hardness in CIMMYT Common Wheats

CHEN Feng;HE Zhong-Hu;Morten Lillemo;XIA Xian-Chun   

  1. Institute of Crop Science/National Wheat Improvement Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2004-10-22 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-10-12 Published online:2005-10-12
  • Contact: XIA Xian-Chun

摘要:

籽粒硬度主要由5D染色体短臂的一对主效基因Ha控制,研究籽粒硬度等位变异有助于提高小麦的磨粉和食品加工品质。本试验对国际玉米小麦改良中心(CIMMYT)的138份历史品种和代表性高代品系的硬度基因型进行了研究。在用SDS-PAGE鉴定Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a时,用10%甘油代替水配制分离胶,用PDA代替甲叉配制分离胶和浓缩胶,增强了PINA和PINB两种蛋白带型的分辨率。结果表明,与其他国家硬质麦中Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b类型偏多的特点明显不同,CIMMYT硬质小麦中puroindoline a(PINA)蛋白缺失类型(或称Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a)较多,为118个,占85.5%;Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a(野生型)为11个,占8.0%;Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b类型有9个,占6.5%。其中,PINA缺失对小麦籽粒硬度的影响最大,与其他2种基因型硬度值之间差异达5%显著水平。先前研究结果表明,PINA蛋白缺失类型的磨粉品质和面包烘烤品质均劣于Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b类型,因此,建议CIMMYT多引进一些其他硬度变异类型的小麦种质,如Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b类型等,以改善其硬度基因型过度单一的局面,从而减少PINA蛋白缺失带来的不利影响。同时,也提醒我国以其他用途如抗病、抗旱等为目的,引种CIMMYT小麦时,还应充分考虑PINA蛋白缺失对磨粉和加工品质的不利影响,以更合理引进和有效利用CIMMYT种质资源。

关键词: 普通小麦, 籽粒硬度, 等位变异, puroindoline蛋白, STS标记

Abstract:

Kernel hardness, controlled by a major gene Ha on the short arm of chromosome 5D, has a profound influence on milling performance and end-use quality of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). puroindoline protein, expressed by Ha gene and including puroindoline a and b (PINA and PINB), sets up the molecular and genetics basis of wheat kernel hardness. Evaluation of the allelic variation of grain hardness is beneficial to wheat quality improvement. A total of 138 CIMMYT historical cultivars and lines from 23rd Elite Spring Wheat Yield Trial (ESWYT) and 10th Semiarid Wheat Yield Trial (SAWYT) were examined by Single Kernel Characterization System (SKCS) and STS (sequence tagged site) marker to understand the distribution of grain hardness and its puroindoline alleles. Modified SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) of Triton X-114 soluble protein, 10% glycerol substituting of water for resolving gels and PDA (piperiazine diacrylamide) substituting of N,N’-methylene bisacrylamide for gels, were used to distinguish PINA and PINB proteins for identifying Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a allele (a null mutation of puroindoline a). Both serine-codon specific and non-specific primers were used to identify Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b allele for confirming results of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) amplification of genome DNA. The results indicated that Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a was the most popular genotype in the CIMMYT common wheats, and the percentages of Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a, Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b and Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a (wild type) were 85.5%, 6.5% and 8.0% in the surveyed wheats, respectively. SKCS hardness index for Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a and Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b genotypes were much higher than that for wild type Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a. Genotype with Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a allele showed significantly higher grain hardness than Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b allele. It was previously reported that Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b genotype was more desirable for milling and end products quality than Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a genotype. Therefore, it is recommend that other types of puroindoline allele mutation for reducing the negative influence of the Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a genotype on processing quality should be introduced in CIMMYT wheat breeding program. Meanwhile, when we introduce cultivars from CIMMYT for the purpose of improving some wheat characters, it is necessary to fully consider the negative effect of the Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a genotype on milling and baking quality.

Key words: Common wheat, Kernel hardness, Allelic variation, puroindoline protein, STS maker

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[2] 王建鹏, 焦灰敏, 程宇坤, 马孟瑶, 耿洪伟. 新疆小麦籽粒SOD活性测定及TaSOD-B2位点等位变异检测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2705-2712.
[3] 刘鑫源, 程宇坤, 王丽丽, 战帅帅, 马孟瑶, 郭玲, 耿洪伟. 新疆小麦过氧化物酶活性基因TaPod-A1、TaPod-A3和TaPod-D1等位变异及分布规律[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 68-78.
[4] 田春艳, 边芯, 郎荣斌, 俞华先, 桃联安, 安汝东, 董立华, 张钰, 经艳芬. 甘蔗3个育种性状与SSR标记的关联分析及优异等位变异发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 310-324.
[5] 南金生, 安江红, 柴明娜, 蒋屿潋, 朱志强, 杨燕, 韩冰. 淀粉特性及其表面结合蛋白与裸燕麦籽粒硬度的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2552-2561.
[6] 刘佳, 龚方仪, 刘亚西, 颜泽洪, 钟晓英, 陈厚霖, 黄林, 伍碧华. 野生二粒小麦主要农艺特性融入普通小麦的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1184-1196.
[7] 怀园园, 张晟瑞, 武婷婷, 李静, 孙石, 韩天富, 李斌, 孙君明. 大豆主要营养品质性状相关分子标记的育种应用潜力评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 1957-1976.
[8] 张钰坤, 陆赢, 崔看, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 芥菜种子颜色调控基因TT8的等位变异及其地理分布分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1325-1332.
[9] 秦文萱, 鲍建喜, 王彦博, 马雅杰, 龙艳, 李金萍, 董振营, 万向元. 玉米叶夹角性状的全基因组关联分析与关键位点优异等位变异挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(11): 2691-2705.
[10] 靳义荣, 刘金栋, 刘彩云, 贾德新, 刘鹏, 王雅美. 普通小麦氮素利用效率相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 394-404.
[11] 黄义文, 代旭冉, 刘宏伟, 杨丽, 买春艳, 于立强, 于广军, 张宏军, 李洪杰, 周阳. 小麦多酚氧化酶基因Ppo-A1和Ppo-D1位点等位变异与穗发芽抗性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2080-2090.
[12] 张福彦, 程仲杰, 陈晓杰, 王嘉欢, 陈锋, 范家霖, 张建伟, 杨保安. 黄淮麦区小麦粒重基因等位变异的分子鉴定及育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2091-2098.
[13] 刘培勋,马小飞,万洪深,郑建敏,罗江陶,蒲宗君. 两个不同籽粒硬度小麦的比较蛋白组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8): 1275-1282.
[14] 张平平,姚金保,王化敦,宋桂成,姜朋,张鹏,马鸿翔. 江苏省优质软麦品种品质特性与饼干加工品质的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 491-502.
[15] 杨芳萍,刘金栋,郭莹,贾奥琳,闻伟鄂,巢凯翔,伍玲,岳维云,董亚超,夏先春. 普通小麦‘Holdfast’条锈病成株抗性QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(12): 1832-1840.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!