欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01): 143-148.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同耐热性小麦品种旗叶膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性对花后高温胁迫的响应

姜春明1;尹燕枰1;刘霞1,2;王振林1,*   

  1. 1山东农业大学农学院/农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室/山东省作物生物学重点实验室,山东泰安271018;2山东省农业科学院玉米研究所,山东济南250100
  • 收稿日期:2005-10-25 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-01-12 网络出版日期:2007-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 王振林

Response of Flag Leaf Lipid Peroxidation and Protective Enzyme Activity of Wheat Cultivars with Different Heat Tolerance to High Temperature Stress after Anthesis

JIANG Chun-Ming1,YIN Yan-Ping1, LIU Xia12,WANG Zhen-Lin1*   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University/ Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture/ Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2Institute of Maize, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
  • Received:2005-10-25 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-01-12 Published online:2007-01-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Lin

摘要:

以2个耐热性不同的冬小麦品种山农1391和藁城8901为材料,用塑料薄膜制成增温棚,分别于花后8~10 d (T1)和花后15~17 d (T2)进行高温处理,研究了花后不同时期高温胁迫对小麦旗叶丙二醛(MDA)含量、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和过氧化物酶(POD)活性的影响。结果表明,T1处理的旗叶内活性氧防卫系统能更有效地启动,使膜脂过氧化水平有所下降,而T2处理造成的伤害不可恢复。花后28 d,与藁城8901相比,山农1391各处理MDA含量较低。T1处理的SOD和CAT活性明显上升,但CAT活性的上升期晚于SOD,它们协同起保护作用,延缓旗叶的衰老,其中山农1391SOD活性的上升幅度较大,而且CAT活性的恢复性增加的能力较强;T2处理的SOD活性未见上升,甚至有所下降,CAT活性虽然高于对照,却未能有效减轻膜脂过氧化程度,表明SOD在酶保护系统中起核心作用。T1处理降低了POD清除H2O2的能力;T2处理的POD活性大幅上升,可能对叶片起到了伤害作用,加速了旗叶的衰老。因此,小麦的耐热性随花后生育进程而下降,应特别加强灌浆中后期的田间管理,减轻高温的伤害。

关键词: 冬小麦, 旗叶, 高温胁迫, 膜脂过氧化, 衰老, 保护酶活性

Abstract:

In order to elucidate the antioxidation mechanism of wheat subjected to post-anthesis high temperature stress, changes of MDA content and protective enzyme activity under high temperature stress at different grain filling stages were studied by using two different heat-tolerance winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars SN1391 and GC8901. High temperature stresses were made from the 8th to 10th day after anthesis (T1) and from the 15th to 17th day after anthesis (T2) respectively by plastic sheds. Antioxidant system in flag leaf could be more efficiently operated in T1 to reduce lipid peroxidation, while the injury of T2 couldn’t be recovered. In T1, the activity of SOD and CAT significantly increased, the increasing time of CAT was later than that of SOD, the two enzymes cooperated with each other so that they could retard the senescence of flag leaf. On the 28th day after anthesis, the MDA content of SN1391 was lower than that of GC8901 in corresponding treatment. The SOD activity increasing extent of SN1391 was much bigger than that of GC8901, and the recovery capability of CAT activity was greater in SN1391 than in GC8901. In T2, the activity of SOD decreased. Although the activity of CAT was higher than that of CK, it couldn’t abate the degree of flag leaf lipid peroxidation efficiently. This indicated that SOD played an essential role in protective enzyme system. The ability of POD eliminating H2O2 was diminished in T1 and the activity of POD significantly increased in T2, which probably damaged the leaves and accelerated their senescence. According to the results above we concluded that with the post-anthesis development, the wheat heat tolerance is deteriorated, so field management should be enhanced especially in middle and late grain filling stages in order to ease the injury of high temperature stress.

Key words: Winter wheat, Flag leaf, High temperature stress, Membrane lipid peroxidation, Senescence, Activity of protective enzyme

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[2] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[3] 赵文青, 徐文正, 杨锍琰, 刘玉, 周治国, 王友华. 棉花叶片响应高温的差异与夜间淀粉降解密切相关[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1680-1689.
[4] 张矞勋, 齐拓野, 孙源, 璩向宁, 曹媛, 吴梦瑶, 刘春虹, 王磊. 高分六号遥感影像植被特征及其在冬小麦苗期LAI反演中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2532-2540.
[5] 胡鑫慧, 谷淑波, 朱俊科, 王东. 分期施钾对不同质地土壤麦田冬小麦干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2258-2267.
[6] 周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 韩玉玲, 马玮, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853.
[7] 雒文鹤, 师祖姣, 王旭敏, 李军, 王瑞. 节水减氮对土壤硝态氮分布和冬小麦水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 924-936.
[8] 刘震宇,王桂霞,李丽楠,蔡泽洲,梁潘潘,吴莘玲,张祥,陈德华. 高温胁迫终止后Bt棉蕾杀虫蛋白的恢复特征及相关生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 440-447.
[9] 马艳明, 冯智宇, 王威, 张胜军, 郭营, 倪中福, 刘杰. 新疆冬小麦品种农艺及产量性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1997-2007.
[10] 鲁海琴, 陈丽, 陈磊, 张盈川, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-novel-miR311-HSC70-1模块调控甘蓝型油菜响应热胁迫的机制[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1474-1484.
[11] 马正波, 董学瑞, 唐会会, 闫鹏, 卢霖, 王庆燕, 房孟颖, 王琦, 董志强. 四甲基戊二酸对夏玉米光合生产特征的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1617-1627.
[12] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 陈朝燕, 肖菁, 徐麟, 倪中福, 刘杰. 新疆冬小麦地方品种与育成品种基于SNP芯片的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1539-1556.
[13] 王素芳,薛惠云,张志勇,汤菊香. 棉花根系生长与叶片衰老的协调性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 93-101.
[14] 张力,陈阜,雷永登. 近60年河北省冬小麦干旱风险时空规律[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1407-1415.
[15] 吴亚鹏,贺利,王洋洋,刘北城,王永华,郭天财,冯伟. 冬小麦生物量及氮积累量的植被指数动态模型研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1238-1249.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!