欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01): 143-148.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同耐热性小麦品种旗叶膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性对花后高温胁迫的响应

姜春明1;尹燕枰1;刘霞1,2;王振林1,*   

  1. 1山东农业大学农学院/农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室/山东省作物生物学重点实验室,山东泰安271018;2山东省农业科学院玉米研究所,山东济南250100
  • 收稿日期:2005-10-25 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-01-12 网络出版日期:2007-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 王振林

Response of Flag Leaf Lipid Peroxidation and Protective Enzyme Activity of Wheat Cultivars with Different Heat Tolerance to High Temperature Stress after Anthesis

JIANG Chun-Ming1,YIN Yan-Ping1, LIU Xia12,WANG Zhen-Lin1*   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University/ Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture/ Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2Institute of Maize, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
  • Received:2005-10-25 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-01-12 Published online:2007-01-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Lin

摘要:

以2个耐热性不同的冬小麦品种山农1391和藁城8901为材料,用塑料薄膜制成增温棚,分别于花后8~10 d (T1)和花后15~17 d (T2)进行高温处理,研究了花后不同时期高温胁迫对小麦旗叶丙二醛(MDA)含量、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和过氧化物酶(POD)活性的影响。结果表明,T1处理的旗叶内活性氧防卫系统能更有效地启动,使膜脂过氧化水平有所下降,而T2处理造成的伤害不可恢复。花后28 d,与藁城8901相比,山农1391各处理MDA含量较低。T1处理的SOD和CAT活性明显上升,但CAT活性的上升期晚于SOD,它们协同起保护作用,延缓旗叶的衰老,其中山农1391SOD活性的上升幅度较大,而且CAT活性的恢复性增加的能力较强;T2处理的SOD活性未见上升,甚至有所下降,CAT活性虽然高于对照,却未能有效减轻膜脂过氧化程度,表明SOD在酶保护系统中起核心作用。T1处理降低了POD清除H2O2的能力;T2处理的POD活性大幅上升,可能对叶片起到了伤害作用,加速了旗叶的衰老。因此,小麦的耐热性随花后生育进程而下降,应特别加强灌浆中后期的田间管理,减轻高温的伤害。

关键词: 冬小麦, 旗叶, 高温胁迫, 膜脂过氧化, 衰老, 保护酶活性

Abstract:

In order to elucidate the antioxidation mechanism of wheat subjected to post-anthesis high temperature stress, changes of MDA content and protective enzyme activity under high temperature stress at different grain filling stages were studied by using two different heat-tolerance winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars SN1391 and GC8901. High temperature stresses were made from the 8th to 10th day after anthesis (T1) and from the 15th to 17th day after anthesis (T2) respectively by plastic sheds. Antioxidant system in flag leaf could be more efficiently operated in T1 to reduce lipid peroxidation, while the injury of T2 couldn’t be recovered. In T1, the activity of SOD and CAT significantly increased, the increasing time of CAT was later than that of SOD, the two enzymes cooperated with each other so that they could retard the senescence of flag leaf. On the 28th day after anthesis, the MDA content of SN1391 was lower than that of GC8901 in corresponding treatment. The SOD activity increasing extent of SN1391 was much bigger than that of GC8901, and the recovery capability of CAT activity was greater in SN1391 than in GC8901. In T2, the activity of SOD decreased. Although the activity of CAT was higher than that of CK, it couldn’t abate the degree of flag leaf lipid peroxidation efficiently. This indicated that SOD played an essential role in protective enzyme system. The ability of POD eliminating H2O2 was diminished in T1 and the activity of POD significantly increased in T2, which probably damaged the leaves and accelerated their senescence. According to the results above we concluded that with the post-anthesis development, the wheat heat tolerance is deteriorated, so field management should be enhanced especially in middle and late grain filling stages in order to ease the injury of high temperature stress.

Key words: Winter wheat, Flag leaf, High temperature stress, Membrane lipid peroxidation, Senescence, Activity of protective enzyme

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[2] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[3] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[4] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
[5] 田甲春, 葛霞, 李守强, 李梅, 田世龙, 张亚倩, 程建新, 李玉梅. 低O2高CO2贮藏环境延缓马铃薯块茎衰老的作用机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 262-278.
[6] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[7] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[8] 杨思杰, 杜启迪, 柴守玺, 熊宏春, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 郭会君, 刘录祥. 小麦小旗叶突变性状基因定位与遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1548-1557.
[9] 张世博, 李宏岩, 李培富, 任瑞华, 路海东. 自然条件下气温升高3℃至4℃对地膜玉米根-冠衰老和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1599-1617.
[10] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[11] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[12] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[13] 王娇, 白海霞, 韩语燕, 梁惠, 冯雅楠, 张东升, 李萍, 宗毓铮, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇. CO2浓度升高、升温及其交互作用对良星99冬小麦叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1061-1076.
[14] 张妍妍, 李迎, 刘栩辰, 黄超, 吕佳宁, 周海佳, 马守田, 秦安振, 高子乐, 吴光辉, 陈丹, 姬夏楠, 刘战东. 深松耕作条件下滴灌对冬小麦花后干物质积累及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3065-3079.
[15] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!