欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (06): 861-866.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

土壤水分对冬小麦生长后期光能利用及水分利用效率的影响

房全孝1,2;陈雨海2; 李全起2;于舜章2;罗毅1;于强1;欧阳竹1   

  1. 1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101;2.山东农业大学,山东泰安 271018
  • 收稿日期:2005-05-26 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-06-12 网络出版日期:2006-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 陈雨海

Effects of Soil Moisture on Radiation Utilization during Late Growth Stages and Water Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat

FANG Quan-Xiao1 2,CHEN Yu-Hai2,LI Quan-Qi2,YU Shun-Zhang2,LUO Yi1,YU Qiang1 , OU-YANG Zhu1   

  1. 1 .Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2. Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2005-05-26 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-06-12 Published online:2006-06-12
  • Contact: CHEN Yu-Hai

摘要:

通过控制不同土壤水分条件形成不同的小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)群体结构,测定了抽穗到成熟期间小麦冠层光合有效辐射(PAR)截获及垂直分布、干物质积累和产量。研究表明,不同处理小麦冠层对PAR的截获量差异较小(小于15.7%),但冠层上部(60~80 cm)的PAR截获量和生长后期PAR转化效率差异明显(100.7%和63.7%),与产量和光能利用效率变化一致,可见土壤水分是通过改变小麦群体内PAR垂直分布及PAR转化效率对作物产量和光能利用效率产生影响。抽穗到成熟期间维持小麦冠层上部PAR截获率在50%左右是实现高产的重要保证。随着土壤水分改善,冬小麦光能利用率和产量持续增加,但水分利用效率却先于二者提前降低,说明改善水分利用效率是提高华北地区农业气候资源利用效率的关键。在底墒充足的条件下,分别在拔节和挑旗期灌水60 mm可获得较高的光能和水分利用效率及经济产量

关键词: 土壤水分, 冬小麦, 冠层结构, 光能和水分利用效率

Abstract:

Water stress is a frequent and critical limit to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in the North China Plain. It has been shown that photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) has close relation to crop production, and water stress affects the biosynthetic procedure remarkably. However, its mechanism is still not clear. An experiment was conducted at Yucheng ecological station in Shandong Province to investigate the interception and conversion efficiencies of PAR in the canopy from heading to maturity stages, and water use efficiency (WUE) of winter wheat at different soil moisture levels. The relationship between soil moisture level and PAR vertical distribution in wheat canopy, and its influences on grain yield, PAR use efficiency and WUE were evaluated. Different supplemental irrigation amounts from 0 to 180 mm and timings from jointing to grain filling stages were designed to attain various soil moisture levels, which resulted in different wheat populations and canopy structures. These soil moisture levels showed substantial influences on PAR interception and distributions in canopy from heading to maturity stages, and subsequent PAR and water use efficiencies. No great difference (less than 15.7%) in PAR intercepted by the wheat canopies was found between these soil moisture treatments during this period. While great differences in PAR intercepted by the top layer of the canopy (60–80 cm) (100.7%) and in PAR conversion efficiency (63.7%) were found between these treatments (Table 4 and Fig.4). This result was mainly caused by the changes in the vertical distributions of leaf area index (Fig.3) and in leaf photosynthesis capability caused by the different soil moisture levels. Maintaining about 50% PAR rate intercepted by the top canopy layer (60–80 cm) from heading to grain filling stages is very important for obtaining high grain yield and PAR use efficiency for winter wheat. With soil moisture improving, the PAR use efficiency during the late growth stages and grain yield were increased, but WUE decreased prior to the grain yield and PAR use efficiency (Fig.5), which indicated that improving WUE was essential to increasing other natural resources use efficiency in wheat growing season in the North China Plain. In current conditions with well initial soil moisture, two supplemental irrigations with 60 mm at jointing and booting stages could obtain high grain yield and WUE, and additional supplemental irrigations would not increase grain yield greatly but decrease WUE of winter wheat.

Key words: Soil moisture, Winter wheat, Canopy structure, PAR and water use efficiency

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[2] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[3] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[4] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[5] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[6] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[7] 王娇, 白海霞, 韩语燕, 梁惠, 冯雅楠, 张东升, 李萍, 宗毓铮, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇. CO2浓度升高、升温及其交互作用对良星99冬小麦叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1061-1076.
[8] 张妍妍, 李迎, 刘栩辰, 黄超, 吕佳宁, 周海佳, 马守田, 秦安振, 高子乐, 吴光辉, 陈丹, 姬夏楠, 刘战东. 深松耕作条件下滴灌对冬小麦花后干物质积累及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3065-3079.
[9] 张军, 胡川, 周起晖, 任开明, 董誓言, 刘傲寒, 吴金芝, 黄明, 李友军. 减氮及有机肥替代对旱地冬小麦干物质积累、转运、分配和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 207-220.
[10] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 王威, 孙娜, 颜国荣, 张胜军, 刘杰, 倪中福, 徐麟. 新疆冬小麦籽粒品质性状遗传差异与关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1394-1405.
[11] 黄宏胜, 张馨月, 居辉, 韩雪. 大气CO2浓度升高背景下冬小麦冠层光谱特征和地上生物量估算[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 991-1003.
[12] 赵荣荣, 丛楠, 赵闯. 基于Landsat 8影像提取豫中地区冬小麦和夏玉米分布信息的最佳时相选择[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 721-733.
[13] 谢炜, 贺鹏, 马宏亮, 雷芳, 黄秀兰, 樊高琼, 杨洪坤. 秋闲期秸秆覆盖与施磷对冬小麦氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 440-450.
[14] 刘雨杭, 赵书宏, 祝婷婷, 梁振宇, 贺大海, 陈佳博, 任勇, 黄林, 樊高琼, 伍碧华. 二氢赤霉素对不同增密条件下蜀麦133冠层光能截获和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2787-2800.
[15] 杨晓慧, 王碧胜, 孙筱璐, 侯靳锦, 徐梦杰, 王志军, 房全孝. 冬小麦对水分胁迫响应的模型模拟与节水滴灌制度优化[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2196-2209.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!