欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (04): 632-640.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00632

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦花后弱光对籽粒淀粉积累和相关酶活性的影响

李文阳;尹燕枰;闫素辉;戴忠民;李勇;梁太波;耿庆辉;王振林*   

  1. 山东农业大学农学院作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室, 山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2007-08-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-04-12 网络出版日期:2008-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 王振林

Effect of Shading after Anthesis on Starch Accumulation and Activities of the Related Enzymes in Wheat Grain

LI Wen-Yang,YIN Yan-Ping,YAN Su-Hui,DAI Zhong-Min,LI Yong,LIANG Tai-Bo,GENG Qing-Hui,WANG Zhen-Lin*   

  1. National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2007-08-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-04-12 Published online:2008-04-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Lin

摘要: 2005—2007年选用小麦品种济麦20和山农1391, 在大田试验条件下研究了花后不同阶段弱光对籽粒淀粉积累、淀粉粒分布及相关酶活性的影响。结果表明, 花后不同阶段弱光显著降低成熟期籽粒淀粉积累量, 但提高了籽粒直链淀粉含量。花后不同阶段弱光使籽粒A型淀粉粒比例显著增加, B型淀粉粒比例显著降低。不同阶段弱光处理对籽粒淀粉积累的影响程度不同, 灌浆中期的效应大于灌浆前期。Logistic方程拟合籽粒淀粉积累进程发现, 花后弱光对籽粒淀粉积累量的影响, 主要是通过影响其平均积累速率与活跃期积累速率, 而不是积累持续期。花后弱光显著降低小麦磷酸蔗糖合酶(SPS)、蔗糖合酶(SS)和腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)的活性。灌浆前期弱光使束缚态淀粉合酶(GBSS)、可溶性淀粉合酶(SSS)活性高于对照或与对照无显著差异, 而灌浆中期弱光使这两种酶的活性均显著低于对照。灌浆前期弱光减少了淀粉合成底物的供应, 系旗叶SPS活性、籽粒SS及AGPase活性下降所致; 而灌浆中期弱光除淀粉合成底物减少外, 籽粒淀粉合酶活性亦降低。

关键词: 冬小麦, 弱光, 淀粉, 淀粉粒, 酶活性

Abstract: Low light intensity as a result of cloudy or rainy days often occurs during the grain filling of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Huanghuai region of China, largely affecting grain yield and starch accumulation. Many investigators have de-
monstrated the effects of shading on photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation, grain yield and its components of winter wheat. However, there are few reports on the effects of shading on starch synthesis in wheat grain. In the present experiment, two wheat cultivars Jimai 20 and Shannong 1391 were used for the mechanism study on starch synthesis response to shading in grains. The black nets were over the wheat canopy to reduce light intensity to 10% in the early (6–9 d after anthesis, S1) and middle (16–19 d after anthesis, S2) grain filling stages. The starch accumulation, starch granule distribution, and activities of enzymes involved in starch synthesis were examined during grain development of winter wheat. The results showed that shading after anthesis remarkably reduced starch accumulation, and significantly increased the amylose content in ripe grains. The amount of starch accumulation showed an order of control (CK)>S1>S2. Shading significantly increased and reduced the volume percents of A-type starch granule and B-type starch granule, respectively. Logistic simulation and correlation analysis showed that it was mean starch accumulation rate and the starch accumulation rate in actively-increasing period, but not starch accumulation duration affected by shading to reduce grain starch accumulation. The activities of sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), sucrose synthase (SS) and adnosine diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) in shading treatments were significantly lower than those in control. The activities of granule bounded starch synthase (GBSS) and soluble starch synthase (SSS) under shading stress at early grain filling were higher than those in control or no significant difference with those in control. However, the activities of GBSS and SSS under shading stress at middle grain filling were significantly lower than those in control. The results suggested that there are less the substrate for starch accumulation, caused by low activities of SPS, SS, and AGPase in S1 treatment, and both less the substrate and the low activities of starch synthase (GBSS and SSS) in S2 treatment.

Key words: Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Shading, Starch, Starch granule, Enzyme activity

[1] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[2] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[3] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[4] 陈云, 刘昆, 张宏路, 李思宇, 张亚军, 韦佳利, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 机插密度和穗肥减量对优质食味水稻品种籽粒淀粉合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1540-1550.
[5] 张骁, 闫岩, 王文辉, 郑恒彪, 姚霞, 朱艳, 程涛. 基于小波分析的水稻籽粒直链淀粉含量高光谱预测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1563-1580.
[6] 杨帆, 钟晓媛, 李秋萍, 李书先, 李武, 周涛, 李博, 袁玉洁, 邓飞, 陈勇, 任万军. 再生稻次适宜区迟播栽对不同杂交籼稻淀粉RVA谱的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 701-713.
[7] 董二伟, 王劲松, 武爱莲, 王媛, 王立革, 韩雄, 郭珺, 焦晓燕. 行距和密度对高粱籽粒灌浆、淀粉及氮磷钾累积特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2459-2470.
[8] 张矞勋, 齐拓野, 孙源, 璩向宁, 曹媛, 吴梦瑶, 刘春虹, 王磊. 高分六号遥感影像植被特征及其在冬小麦苗期LAI反演中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2532-2540.
[9] 胡鑫慧, 谷淑波, 朱俊科, 王东. 分期施钾对不同质地土壤麦田冬小麦干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2258-2267.
[10] 黄素华, 林席跃, 雷正平, 丁在松, 赵明. 强再生力水稻品种碳氮营养与激素生理特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2278-2289.
[11] 周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 韩玉玲, 马玮, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853.
[12] 赵春芳,岳红亮,田铮,顾明超,赵凌,赵庆勇,朱镇,陈涛,周丽慧,姚姝,梁文化,路凯,张亚东,王才林. 江苏和东北粳稻稻米理化特性及WxOsSSIIa基因序列分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 878-888.
[13] 雒文鹤, 师祖姣, 王旭敏, 李军, 王瑞. 节水减氮对土壤硝态氮分布和冬小麦水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 924-936.
[14] 马艳明, 冯智宇, 王威, 张胜军, 郭营, 倪中福, 刘杰. 新疆冬小麦品种农艺及产量性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1997-2007.
[15] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 陈朝燕, 肖菁, 徐麟, 倪中福, 刘杰. 新疆冬小麦地方品种与育成品种基于SNP芯片的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1539-1556.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!