欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (07): 1273-1279.

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

喷施和土施镧对圆叶决明生长影响的比较

姜照伟1,2;翁伯琦3,*;黄元仿1,*;王义祥3;应朝阳3   

  1. 1 中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京100094; 2 福建省农业科学院水稻研究所, 福建福州350019; 3 福建省农业科学院农业生态研究所, 福建福州350013
  • 收稿日期:2007-08-27 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-12 网络出版日期:2008-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 黄元仿

Comparison of Effects of Lanthanum Application on Growth by Spraying and Soil Dressing in Chamaecrista rotundifolia

JIANG Zhao-Wei12,WENG Bo-Qi3*,HUANG Yuan-Fang1*,WANG Yi-Xiang3,YING Zhao-Yang3   

  1. 1 College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 2 Rice Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350019, Fujian; 3 Agriculture Ecology Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, Fujian, China
  • Received:2007-08-27 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-07-12 Published online:2008-07-12
  • Contact: HUANG Yuan-Fang

PDF

1153

被引次数

19

摘要： 以豆科牧草圆叶决明为材料, 采用盆栽试验比较喷施和土施镧对材料生长的影响。结果表明, 施镧能显著增加圆叶决明叶片的叶绿素含量、叶面积和干物重。在各取样时期, 圆叶决明地上部的干物重, 喷施处理以Y2 (500 mg L-1)最高, 比对照增加15.91%~20.03% (P＜0.05); 土施处理以Y8 (1 000 mg L-1)最高, 比对照增加14.28%~17.42% (P＜0.05)。在各取样时期, 圆叶决明根干物重, 喷施处理以Y2最高, 比对照增加19.88%~25.34% (P＜0.05); 土施处理以Y8最高, 比对照增加21.41%~27.03% (P＜0.05)。在同一施镧水平上, 喷施的干物质积累和土施的并无显著差异, 并且最高干物质积累的Y2和Y8处理之间也无显著差异。由此看来, 喷施效果更好, 使用量小, 更加经济和环保, 土施量比喷施量提高1~2倍即可。随着镧施用量的增加, 圆叶决明植株各部位的镧含量也增加。但土壤中镧的背景浓度较高, 施用量相对非常低, 圆叶决明吸收的量不多, 故施用前后土壤镧含量变化不大。

关键词: 镧, 圆叶决明, 生长, 生理特性

Abstract: Few studies have been concerned in physiological effects of REEs on forages, and the mechanism of action by rare earth elements (REEs) is still not clear. The studies on the action of REEs soil application to crop are still rare. A pot experiment was conducted to study the effects of spray application and soil application of lanthanum (La) on growth of leguminous grass Chamaecrista rotundifolia in order to provide theoretical reference for reasonable applications of REEs in agriculture. The results showed that both methods obviously increased the chlorophyll content of leaf, leaf area and dry matter weight of C. rotundifolia. At each sampling date, the shoot dry matter weight of Y2 treatment was the highest for spray application, with 15.91–20.03% (P<0.05) higher than the control. The shoot dry matter weight of Y8 treatment was the highest for soil application, with 14.28–17.42% (P<0.05) higher than the control. At each sampling date, the root dry matter weight of Y2 treatment was the highest for spray application, with 19.88–25.34% (P<0.05) higher than the control. The root dry matter weight of Y8 treatment was the highest for soil application, with 21.41–27.03% (P<0.05) higher than the control. At the same La application rate, the dry matter accumulation showed no significant difference between spray application and soil application. Furthermore, the highest dry matter accumulation also showed no significant difference between Y2 and Y8 treatments. Judging from this, spray application was more effective with lower application rate, lower cost and more environmental protection than soil application. The reasonable La ap-plication rate for soil application REEs was 1–2 times of that for spray application. The concentration of La in each part of C. rotundifolia plant increased with the increase of La application rate. The concentration of La in soil changed little, because the background concentration was high, the application rate was very low and the uptake rate by C. rotundifolia was low.

中图分类号: 

  • 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01273
[1] 周静远, 孔祥强, 张艳军, 李雪源, 张冬梅, 董合忠. 基于种子萌发出苗过程中弯钩建成和下胚轴生长的棉花出苗壮苗机制与技术[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[2] 雷新慧, 万晨茜, 陶金才, 冷佳俊, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 王鹏科, 杨清华, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 褪黑素与2,4-表油菜素内酯浸种对盐胁迫下荞麦发芽与幼苗生长的促进效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221.
[3] 袁大双, 邓琬玉, 王珍, 彭茜, 张晓莉, 姚梦楠, 缪文杰, 朱冬鸣, 李加纳, 梁颖. 甘蓝型油菜BnMAPK2基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 840-850.
[4] 孔垂豹, 庞孜钦, 张才芳, 刘强, 胡朝华, 肖以杰, 袁照年. 不同施肥水平下丛枝菌根真菌对甘蔗生长及养分相关基因共表达网络的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 860-872.
[5] 秦琴, 陶有凤, 黄帮超, 李卉, 高云天, 钟晓媛, 周中林, 朱莉, 雷小龙, 冯生强, 王旭, 任万军. 杂交水稻机插制种的亲本穗茎生长与花期特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 988-1004.
[6] 谢呈辉, 马海曌, 许宏伟, 徐郗阳, 阮国兵, 郭峥岩, 宁永培, 冯永忠, 杨改河, 任广鑫. 施氮量对宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种糜子生长、产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 463-477.
[7] 张海燕, 解备涛, 姜常松, 冯向阳, 张巧, 董顺旭, 汪宝卿, 张立明, 秦桢, 段文学. 不同抗旱性甘薯品种叶片生理性状差异及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 518-528.
[8] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[9] 张明聪, 何松榆, 秦彬, 王孟雪, 金喜军, 任春元, 吴耀坤, 张玉先. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下春大豆品种绥农26形态、光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1791-1805.
[10] 王慰亲, 唐启源, 陈元伟, 贾巍, 罗友谊, 王小卉, 郑华斌, 熊娇军. 水稻机械精量有序抛秧栽培的产量形成和生长发育特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 942-951.
[11] 吕冬梅, 朱广龙, 王玥, 施雨, 卢发光, 任桢, 刘昱茜, 顾立峰, 卢海潼, Irshad Ahmad, 焦秀荣, 孟天瑶, 周桂生. 苗期重金属胁迫下蓖麻生长、生理和重金属积累效应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 728-737.
[12] 罗凯, 谢琛, 汪锦, 王甜, 何舜, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 外源喷施植物生长调节剂对套作大豆碳氮代谢和花荚脱落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 752-760.
[13] 卢合全, 唐薇, 罗振, 孔祥强, 李振怀, 徐士振, 辛承松. 商品有机肥替代部分化肥对连作棉田土壤养分、棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2511-2521.
[14] 王飞, 郭彬彬, 孙增光, 尹飞, 刘领, 焦念元, 付国占. 增温增CO2浓度对玉米||花生体系玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2220-2231.
[15] 王诗雅, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 梁喜龙, 项洪涛, 冯胜杰, 靳丹, 刘美玲, 牟保民. 植物生长调节剂S3307对苗期淹水胁迫下大豆生理特性和显微结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1988-2000.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2