作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 28-35.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00028
张德贵1,2,李新海2,李明顺2,谢传晓2,郝转芳2,白丽2,张世煌2
ZHANG De-Gui1,2,LI Xin-Hai2,LI Ming-Shun2,XIE Chuan-Xiao2,HAO Zhuan-Fang2,BAI Li2,ZHANG Shi-Huang2,PAN Guang-Tang1*
摘要:
通过两年两点试验,对4个热带亚热带群体的原始群体C0和经适应性改良后的各轮次群体(C1~C4)开花期性状的选择响应进行了研究。结果表明,海南点不同轮次多数开花性状差异不显著;在北京点,热带群体POB43和SUWAN-1的抽丝期分别从99.2 d和90.7 d缩短为79.5 d和76.2 d,平均每轮提前4.9 d和3.6 d,散粉期从90.8 d和77.8 d缩短为76.7 d和74.7 d,平均每轮提前3.5 d和0.8 d,抽丝散粉间隔(ASI)分别从8.3 d和12.8 d缩短为2.8 d和3.5 d,平均每轮缩短1.4 d和2.3 d;亚热带群体POB69和POB70的抽丝期分别从78.3 d和81.8 d缩短为69.2 d和69.0 d,平均每轮提前2.3 d和3.2 d,散粉期分别从71.0 d和72.5 d缩短为67.5 d和68.0 d,平均每轮提前0.9 d和1.1 d,抽丝至散粉间隔(ASI)分别从7.3 d和9.3 d缩短为1.7 d和2.7 d,平均每轮缩短为1.4 d和1.7 d。抽丝期和散粉期的选择响应幅度不同,散粉期提前的幅度较小,因而散粉至抽丝间隔(ASI)缩短。开花期性状的选择响应和RD值随改良轮次增加而减少,说明控制双亲授粉的混合选择法有效地改良了供试群体在温带的适应性。
[1] Oyervides-Garcia M, Halluaer A R, Cortez-Mendoza H. Evaluation of improved maize population in Mexico and the U. S. Corn Belt. Crop Sci, 1985, 25: 115-120 [2] Castillo-Gonzales F, Goodman M M. Agronomy evaluation of Latin American maize accessions. Crop Sci, 1989, 29: 853-861 [3] Struik P C, Doorgeest M, Boonman J G. Environmental effects on flowering characteristics and kernel set of maize (Zea mays L. ). Netherlands J Agric Sci, 1986, 34: 469-484 [4] Hallauer A R, Sears J H. Integrating exotic germplasm into Corn Belt maize breeding Programs. Crop Sci, 1972, 12: 203-206 [5] Genter C F. Mass selection in a composite of intercrosses of Mexican race of maize. Crop Sci, 1976, 16: 556-558 [6] Troyer A F, Brown W L. Selection for early flowering in corn: seven late synthetics. Crop Sci, 1976, 16: 767-772 [7] Troyer A F. Selection for early flowering in corn: 18 adapted F2 populations. Crop Sci, 1986, 26: 283-285 [8] Zhang S-H(张世煌), Shi D-Q(石德权), Xu J-S(徐家舜), Yang Y-F(杨引福), Kang J-W(康继伟), Wang L-M(汪黎明). Effects of mass selection on adaptive improvement of exotic quality protein maize populations: I. Direct response to selection for early silking. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1995, 21(3): 271-280 (in Chinese with English abstract) [9] Zhang S-H(张世煌), Shi D-Q(石德权), Xu J-S(徐家舜), Wang L-M(汪黎明), Kang J-W(康继伟), Yang Y-F(杨引福). Effects of mass selection on adaptive improvement of exotic quality protein maize populations: II. Correlated responses. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1995, 21(5): 513-519 (in Chinese with English abstract) [10]Chen Y-H(陈彦惠), Wu L-C(吴连成), Wu J-Y(吴建宇). Study on identifying tropical, subtropical populations of maize. Acta Agric Univ Henanensis (河南农业大学学报), 1999, 33(4): 321-325 (in Chinese with English abstract) [11] Xia J-C(夏九成), Yang K-C(杨克诚), Zhang H-Y(张怀渝). Effects of population improvement by mass selection on the tropical maize population MW964. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(10): 980-989 (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 库丽霞,孙朝辉,王翠玲,张君,张伟强,陈彦惠. 玉米光周期敏感相关性状发育动态QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(4): 602-611. |
[2] | 夏九成;杨克诚;张怀渝. 控制双亲的混合选择对热带玉米群体墨白964的改良效应[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(10): 980-989. |
[3] | 彭泽斌;刘新芝;孙福来. 中综3号玉米群体格子混合选择效果分析[J]. 作物学报, 2000, 26(05): 618-622. |
[4] | 李振武; 支萍; 孔令旗; 韩福光; 孟广艳. 甜高粱主要性状的遗传参数分析[J]. 作物学报, 1992, 18(03): 213-221. |
[5] | 杨竹平; 吴兆苏. 表型轮回选择和混合选择改良小麦群体效应的研究[J]. 作物学报, 1992, 18(01): 50-60. |
|