欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (08): 1255-1261.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

小冰麦(Triticum aestivum -Agropyron intermedium)对盐胁迫和碱胁迫的生理响应

杨春武1;李长有2;尹红娟1;鞠淼1;石德成1,*   

  1. 1 东北师范大学教育部植被生态重点实验室,吉林长春130024;2 吉林师范大学生命科学学院,吉林四平136000
  • 收稿日期:2006-10-30 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-08-12 网络出版日期:2007-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 石德成

Physiological Response of Xiaobingmai (Triticum aestivum -Agropyron intermedium) to Salt-Stress and Alkali-Stress

YANGChun-Wu1,LI Chang-You2,YIN Hong-Juan1,JU Miao1,SHI De-Cheng1*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, Jilin; 2School of Life Science, Jilin Normal University, Siping 136000, Jilin, China
  • Received:2006-10-30 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-08-12 Published online:2007-08-12
  • Contact: SHI De-Cheng

摘要:

将两种中性盐(NaCl和Na2SO4)和两种碱性盐(NaHCO3和Na2CO3)按摩尔质量比1∶1混合,在60~300 mmol L-1盐浓度内模拟出5种强度的盐胁迫条件,在30~180 mmol L-1盐浓度内模拟出6种强度的碱胁迫条件,并以此对小冰麦苗胁迫处理12 d。测定相对生长率(RGR)、含水量、丙二醛(MDA)、电解质外渗率、叶绿素、类胡萝卜素6项胁变指标和Na+、K+、脯氨酸、甜菜碱、有机酸5种溶质含量。结果表明,碱胁迫下小冰麦的各项胁变反应均明显大于盐胁迫下。在本试验条件下,小冰麦可耐受的最高盐胁迫浓度为300 mmol L-1,而碱胁迫仅为150 mmol L-1。碱胁迫造成小冰麦光合色素含量急剧下降,可能是其危害甚于盐胁迫的原因之一。碱胁迫下有机酸大量积累可能是小冰麦响应碱胁迫的特殊生理机制。试验结果证明盐、碱胁迫是两种性质不同的胁迫,不仅对植物的作用机制不同,而且植物的适应机制也不同。

关键词: 小冰麦, 盐胁迫, 碱胁迫, 生理响应

Abstract:

Land salinization-alkalization is a widespread environmental problem. The problem can be further classified, in terms of the salt characteristics, into salt-stress and alkali-stress. In fact, the destructive effects caused by alkali-stress is more serious than that by salt-stress. However, the information about alkali-stress is little up to the present. The resistance to salt and alkali stresses is stronger in Xiaobingmai (Triticum aestivum -Agropyron intermedium) than in other varieties of wheat. The cultivar Xiaobingmai 33 has been planted over some salt-alkalized areas, but its resistance to salt and alkali stresses is few studied yet. Therefore, Xiaobingmai 33 was chosen as the experimental materials to explore its physiological response to salt and alkali stresses and the difference between salt-stress and alkali-stress.The seedlings of Xiaobingmai 33 were treated for 12 days under five conditions of salt-stress and six conditions of alkali-stress, which were established by mixing NaCl and Na2SO4 or NaHCO3 and Na2CO3 at 1:1 molar ratio respectively. The concentration range of treatments was from 60 to 300 mmol L-1 for the salt-stress, and 30 to 180 mmol L-1 for the alkali-stress. Six strain indices including relative growth rate (RGR), water content, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, electrolyte leakage rate, chlorophyll content, and carotenoid content, and the contents of five solute including Na+, K+, proline, betain and organic acid, were determined. The physiological responses of Xiaobingmai 33 to salt-stress and alkali-stress were analyzed and compared in order to further identify the difference of both stresses.
The results showed that the decrease extents of RGR and water content and the increase extents of MDA and electrolyte leakage rate under-alkali stress were greater than those under salt-stress with increasing stress intensity. The contents of chlorophyll and carotenoid didn’t change under salt stress, but decreased sharply under alkali-stress. Under both stresses, the contents of Na+ , proline, and betain increased, while K+ content decreased, and the changing degree under salt-stress was higher than that under alkali stress. In addition, organic acid content increased significantly under alkali-stress, but decreased slightly under salt-stress. In conclusion, all the strain responses to alkali-stress were more marked than those to salt-stress. The maximum concentration for Xiaobingmai 33 in resistance to salt-stress was 300 mmol L-1, and that to alkali-stress was only 150 mmol L-1 under the present experimental conditions. Alkali-stress caused great decrease of photosynthetic pigment content, which might be one of the reasons that the effect of alkali-stress was more severe than that of salt-stress. The accumulation of organic acids might be a special physiological mechanism of Xiaobingmai response to alkali-stress. The present study indicate that salt-stress and alkali-stress are two different stresses, not only in their effects on plant, but also in the response of plant to them.

Key words: Xiaobingmai (Triticum aestivum -Agropyron intermedium), Alkali-stress, Salt-stress, Physiological response

[1] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[2] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[3] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[4] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[5] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[6] 王佳婕, 王正楠, BATOOL Maria, 王旺年, 文静, 任长忠, 何峰, 武优悠, 徐正华, 王晶, 蒯婕, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 油菜和小麦响应盐碱胁迫的生理特性比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1215-1229.
[7] 李雪婷, 任昊, 王洪章, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘莹, 姚海燕, 刘鹏. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型玉米品种叶片光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1091-1101.
[8] 潘炬忠, 韦萍, 朱德平, 邵胜雪, 陈珊珊, 韦雅倩, 高维维. 水稻转录因子OsERF104的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 900-913.
[9] 霍如雪, 葛祥菡, 石嘉, 李雪蕊, 戴圣杰, 刘振宁, 李宗芸. 甘薯组氨酸激酶蛋白IbHK5响应干旱和盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 650-666.
[10] 赵慧霞, 郭彦丽, 郑渝泠, 何棱, 陈锐, 王珊珊, 曾长立, 邹珺, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 刘小云, 万何平. 甘蓝型油菜响应碱胁迫的基因表达差异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3105-3118.
[11] 孟凡花, 刘敏, 沈傲, 刘炜. 脂质转移蛋白SiLTP1基因参与谷子耐盐响应初探[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 58-67.
[12] 李闻娟, 王利民, 齐燕妮, 赵玮, 谢亚萍, 党照, 赵丽蓉, 李雯, 徐晨梦, 王琰, 张建平. 亚麻LuWRI1a在旱盐胁迫响应中的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1750-1761.
[13] 折萌, 郑登俞, 柯照, 吴忠义, 邹华文, 张中保. 玉米ZmGRAS13基因的克隆及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1420-1434.
[14] 王龙, 李静, 钱晨, 林国冰, 李亦扬, 杨光, 左青松. 盐胁迫对油菜生理特征和菜籽产量品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1597-1607.
[15] 韦还和, 张翔, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 马唯一, 左博源, 孟天瑶, 高平磊, 陈英龙, 许轲, 戴其根. 盐胁迫对水稻籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 734-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!