欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12): 2471-2480.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02083

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

盐胁迫对水稻颖花形成及籽粒充实的影响

韦还和1(), 张徐彬1, 葛佳琳1, 陈熙2, 孟天瑶2, 杨洋3, 熊飞3, 陈英龙1, 戴其根1,2,*()   

  1. 1江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室 / 江苏省作物栽培生理重点实验室 / 江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心 / 扬州大学水稻产业工程技术研究院, 江苏扬州 225009
    2扬州大学教育部农业与农产品安全国际合作联合实验室 / 扬州大学农业科技发展研究院, 江苏扬州225009
    3扬州大学生物科学与技术学院, 江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-30 接受日期:2021-03-19 出版日期:2021-12-12 网络出版日期:2021-04-14
  • 通讯作者: 戴其根
  • 作者简介:E-mail: hhwei@yzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2019343);国家自然科学基金项目(32001466);国家自然科学基金项目(31901448);中国博士后面上项目(2020M671628);中国博士后面上项目(2020M671629);江苏省高等学校自然科学研究面上项目(19KJB210004);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目

Effects of salinity stress on spikelets formation and grains filling in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

WEI Huan-He1(), ZHANG Xu-Bin1, GE Jia-Lin1, CHEN Xi2, MENG Tian-Yao2, YANG Yang3, XIONG Fei3, CHEN Ying-Long1, DAI Qi-Gen1,2,*()   

  1. 1Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology / Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology Jiangsu / Co-innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops / Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
    2Joint International Research Laboratory of Agri-culture and Agro-product Safety, Ministry of Education / Institute of Agricultural Science and Technological Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
    3College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2020-11-30 Accepted:2021-03-19 Published:2021-12-12 Published online:2021-04-14
  • Contact: DAI Qi-Gen
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province(BE2019343);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32001466);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31901448);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2020M671628);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2020M671629);Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China(19KJB210004);Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要:

旨在探明盐胁迫对水稻颖花形成与籽粒充实性状的影响机制, 本研究以江苏沿海滩涂大面积种植的常规粳稻南粳9108和盐稻12为试材, 在盆栽条件下设置对照(check, CK, 盐浓度0%)、中盐(medium-salinity stress, MS, 盐浓度0.15%)和高盐(high-salinity stress, HS, 盐浓度0.3%), 分析盐胁迫对颖花分化与退化、花器官发育及籽粒充实的影响。结果表明, 与对照相比, (1) 盐胁迫下水稻产量显著下降, 中盐和高盐胁迫下南粳9108产量降幅分别为18.7%和54.5%, 盐稻12分别为24.3%和58.6%。(2) 盐胁迫显著降低了每穗粒数, 中盐和高盐胁迫下南粳9108每穗粒数较对照分别低8.6%和19.8%, 盐稻12较对照分别低8.0%和25.9%。此外, 中盐和高盐胁迫下南粳9108和盐稻12的结实率和粒重亦均显著低于对照。(3) 盐胁迫下水稻颖花分化数与现存数下降, 颖花退化数与退化率增加; 盐胁迫降低了一次和二次枝粳颖花分化数和现存数, 提高了一次和二次枝粳颖花退化数, 二次枝粳颖花分化数和现存数的下降幅度和颖花退化数的增加幅度均高于一次枝粳。(4) 盐胁迫下花药长度、宽度与体积降低, 花药开裂率、花粉活力以及颖花长度与宽度呈类似趋势。本研究表明, 盐胁迫抑制水稻颖花分化, 促进颖花退化, 导致每穗颖花数显著下降; 影响花器官正常发育, 并降低籽粒饱满度, 使籽粒充实性状明显变劣。

关键词: 水稻, 盐胁迫, 颖花形成, 籽粒充实

Abstract:

This study was conducted to explore the effects of salinity stress on spikelets formation and grains filling in rice. To analyze the effects of salinity stress on the differentiation and degradation of spikelets, development of floral organs, and grain-filling characteristics in rice, conventional japonica rice Nanjing 9108 and Yandao 12 were used with three salinity treatments under pot-cultivation conditions, control (CK, 0 salt concentration), medium-salinity stress (MS, 0.15% salt concentration), and high-salinity stress (HS, 0.3% salt concentration). As a result, compared with the CK, (1) rice grain yield was decreased under salinity stress. The grain yield of Nanjing 9108 was decreased by 18.7% and 54.5%, and Yandao 12 was decreased by 24.3% and 58.6%, under MS and HS treatments, respectively. (2) the number of spikelets per panicle was decreased under salinity stress. The number of spikelets per panicle of Nanjing 9108 was 8.6% and 19.8%, and Yandao 12 was 8.0% and 25.9% lower than that of CK under MS and HS treatments, respectively. Besides, the filled-grain percentage and grain weight of Nanjing 9108 and Yandao 12 under MS and HS were also significantly lower than CK. (3) the number of differentiated and survived spikelets was decreased, while the number of retrograded spikelets and its rate was increased under salinity stress. Salinity stress reduced the differentiated and survived spikelets on the primary and secondary branches, while increased retrograded spikelets. The decline in the number of differentiated and survived spikelets on the secondary branches were higher than those of primary branches, and the similar observations were also for the increase in the number of retrograded spikelets. (4) the length, width, and volume of anther were decreased under salinity stress, and the similar trends were also observed for dehiscence rate of anther, pollen vigor, and the length and width of spikelets. Our results suggested that, salinity stress could inhibit the differentiation of rice spikelets and promote the degradation of spikelets, resulting in a significant decrease in the number of spikelets per panicle; it adversely affected the development of floral organs and reduced the fullness of grains, which significantly deteriorated the characteristics of grain plumpness.

Key words: rice, salinity stress, spikelets formation, grains filling

表1

盐胁迫对水稻产量的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
实产Actual yield (g plot-1)
南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 盐稻12 Yandao 12
2019 对照 CK 126 a 121 a
中盐 MS 101 b 93 b
高盐 HS 55 c 51 c
2020 对照 CK 120 a 118 a
中盐 MS 99 b 88 b
高盐 HS 57 c 48 c

表2

盐胁迫对水稻主茎穗部性状的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 盐稻12 Yandao 12
单穗重
SPW (g)
每穗粒数
SPP
结实率
FGP (%)
粒重
GW (mg)
单穗重
SPW (g)
每穗粒数
SPP
结实率
FGP (%)
粒重
GW (mg)
2019 对照 CK 3.5 a 142.9 a 90.2 a 25.9 a 3.2 a 136.2 a 89.7 a 25.5 a
中盐 MS 2.9 b 131.7 b 88.3 b 24.5 b 2.7 b 127.1 b 87.4 b 24.2 b
高盐 HS 2.3 c 115.7 c 84.6 c 23.2 c 2.0 c 115.7 c 85.3 c 22.7 c
2020 对照 CK 3.7 a 150.4 a 90.7 a 26.2 a 3.4 a 143.8 a 90.2 a 25.7 a
中盐 MS 3.1 b 136.3 b 88.2 b 25.1 b 2.9 b 130.4 b 87.7 b 24.5 b
高盐 HS 2.4 c 119.4 c 85.7 c 23.7 c 2.1 c 105.7 c 85.1 c 23.0 c

表3

盐胁迫对水稻主茎穗部颖花分化与退化的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 盐稻12 Yandao 12
颖花分化数
DS
颖花退化数
RS
颖花现存数
SS
颖花退化率
PRS (%)
颖花分化数
DS
颖花退化数
RS
颖花现存数
SS
颖花退化率PRS (%)
2019 对照 CK 155.6 a 8.3 c 147.3 a 5.3 c 150.6 a 9.2 c 141.4 a 6.1 c
中盐 MS 150.1 ab 15.0 b 135.1 b 10.0 b 145.8 a 16.6 b 129.2 b 11.4 b
高盐 HS 138.1 b 22.6 a 115.5 c 16.4 a 128.8 b 22.4 a 106.4 c 17.4 a
2020 对照 CK 165.6 a 9.3 c 156.3 a 5.6 c 157.1 a 10.0 c 147.1 a 6.3 c
中盐 MS 157.0 ab 15.4 b 141.6 b 9.8 b 151.0 ab 16.8 b 134.2 b 11.1 b
高盐 HS 144.1 b 22.0 a 122.1 c 15.3 a 133.6 b 23.8 a 109.8 c 17.8 a

表4

盐胁迫对水稻主茎一次枝粳颖花分化与退化的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 盐稻12 Yandao 12
颖花分化数
DS
颖花退化数
RS
颖花现存数
SS
颖花退化率
PRS (%)
颖花分化数
DS
颖花退化数
RS
颖花现存数
SS
颖花退化率PRS (%)
2019 对照 CK 76.0 a 0.6 a 75.4 a 0.8 b 70.4 a 0.4 a 70.0 a 0.6 b
中盐 MS 73.0 a 2.4 a 70.6 a 3.3 b 69.1 a 2.8 a 66.3 a 4.0 a
高盐 HS 69.9 b 4.8 a 65.1 b 6.9 a 64.4 b 3.9 a 60.3 b 6.1 a
2020 对照 CK 79.1 a 0.5 a 78.6 a 0.6 b 73.5 a 0.5 a 73.0 a 0.7 b
中盐 MS 74.7 b 2.8 a 71.9 b 3.7 b 71.4 a 2.9 a 68.5 a 4.1 a
高盐 HS 72.5 b 4.6 a 67.9 b 6.4 a 60.3 b 4.2 a 56.1 b 6.9 a

表5

盐胁迫对水稻主茎二次枝粳颖花分化与退化的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 盐稻12 Yandao 12
颖花分化数
DS
颖花退化数
RS
颖花现存数
SS
颖花退化率
PRS (%)
颖花分化数
DS
颖花退化数
RS
颖花现存数
SS
颖花退化率PRS (%)
2019 对照 CK 79.6 a 7.7 c 71.9 a 9.7 c 80.2 a 8.8 c 71.4 a 10.9 c
中盐 MS 77.1 a 12.6 b 64.5 b 16.3 b 76.7 b 13.8 b 62.9 b 18.0 b
高盐 HS 68.2 b 17.8 a 50.4 c 26.1 a 64.4 c 18.5 a 45.9 c 28.7 a
2020 对照 CK 86.5 a 8.8 c 77.7 a 10.2 c 83.6 a 9.5 c 74.1 a 11.3 c
中盐 MS 82.3 ab 12.6 b 69.7 b 15.3 b 79.6 ab 13.9 b 65.7 b 17.4 b
高盐 HS 71.6 b 17.4 a 54.2 c 24.3 a 73.3 b 19.6 a 53.7 c 26.8 a

表6

盐胁迫对水稻主茎花药大小的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 盐稻12 Yandao 12
花药长度
Length of anther
(mm)
花药宽度
Width of anther
(mm)
花药体积
Volume of anther (mm2)
花药长度
Length of anther (mm)
花药宽度
Width of anther (mm)
花药体积
Volume of anther (mm2)
2019 对照 CK 1.82 a 0.46 a 0.13 a 1.91 a 0.48 a 0.15 a
中盐 MS 1.73 b 0.43 ab 0.11 ab 1.79 b 0.44 b 0.12 b
高盐 HS 1.62 c 0.41 b 0.09 b 1.65 c 0.42 b 0.10 b
2020 对照 CK 1.77 a 0.45 a 0.12 a 1.94 a 0.47 a 0.15 a
中盐 MS 1.69 b 0.43 ab 0.11 ab 1.81 b 0.43 b 0.11 b
高盐 HS 1.57 c 0.39 b 0.08 b 1.67 c 0.41 b 0.10 b

图1

盐胁迫对主茎花药开裂率的影响 处理同表1。处理间标以不同小写字母的值在0.05水平差异显著。"

图2

盐胁迫对主茎花粉活力的影响 处理同表1。处理间标以不同小写字母的值在0.05水平差异显著。"

表7

盐胁迫对水稻主茎穗颖花大小的影响"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 盐稻12 Yandao 12
长度
Length (mm)
宽度
Width (mm)
长度
Length (mm)
宽度
Width (mm)
2019 对照 CK 7.11 a 3.72 a 7.24 a 3.34 a
中盐 MS 6.93 b 3.61 b 7.03 b 3.15 b
高盐 HS 6.68 c 3.49 c 6.82 c 3.07 c
2020 对照 CK 7.07 a 3.71 a 7.21 a 3.32 a
中盐 MS 6.85 b 3.57 b 6.95 b 3.15 b
高盐 HS 6.58 c 3.49 c 6.69 c 3.03 c

表8

盐胁迫处理下水稻穗部性状的相关性分析"

项目
Item
实产
Actual yield
每穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle
结实率
Filled-grain percentage
粒重
Grain weight
颖花
Spikelets
长度 Length 0.89** 0.74** 0.88** 0.80**
宽度 Width 0.53 0.65* 0.51 0.61*
一次枝粳
Primary branches
颖花分化数 DS 0.74** 0.88** 0.74* 0.82**
颖花退化数 RS -0.95** -0.86** -0.97** -0.92**
颖花现存数 SS 0.86** 0.95** 0.86** 0.92**
颖花退化率 PRS -0.98** -0.91** -0.98** -0.95**
二次枝粳
Secondary branches
颖花分化数 DS 0.86** 0.92** 0.89** 0.92**
颖花退化数 RS -0.99** -0.94** -0.98** -0.98**
颖花现存数 SS 0.95** 0.97** 0.96** 0.98**
颖花退化率 PRS -0.98** -0.97** -0.98** -0.98**
花药长度 Length of anther 0.81** 0.68* 0.80** 0.73**
花药宽度 Width of anther 0.81** 0.72** 0.86** 0.80**
花药开裂率 Dehiscence rate of anther 0.97** 0.92** 0.97** 0.95**
花粉活力 Pollen activity 0.98** 0.94** 0.97** 0.97**
[1] 王才林, 张亚东, 赵凌, 路凯, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 赵春芳, 梁文化, 孙明法, 严国红. 耐盐碱水稻研究现状、问题与建议. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1):1-6.
Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhao L, Lu K, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Yao S, Zhou L H, Zhao C H, Liang W H, Sun M F, Yan G H. Research status, problems and suggestions on salt-alkali tolerant rice. China Rice, 2019, 25(1):1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Liu L, Chen J, Tan Y N, Zhou T S, Ouyang N, Zeng J, Yuan D Y, Duan M J. Increasing fatty acids in rice root improves silence of rice seedling to salt stress. Rice Sci, 2019, 26:339-342.
doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2019.01.005
[3] 沙汉景, 胡文成, 贾琰, 王新鹏, 田雪飞, 于美芳, 赵宏伟. 外源水杨酸、脯氨酸和γ-氨基丁酸对盐胁迫下水稻产量的影响. 作物学报, 2017, 43:1677-1688.
Sha H J, Hu W C, Jia Y, Wang X P, Tian X F, Yu M F, Zhao H W. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid, proline, and γ-aminobutyric acid on yield of rice under salt stress. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43:1677-1688 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Munns R, Gilliham M. Salinity tolerance of crops-what is the cost. New Phytol, 2015, 208:668-673.
doi: 10.1111/nph.13519 pmid: 26108441
[5] Zhang J F. Salinity affects the proteomics of rice roots and leaves. Proteomics, 2014, 14:1711-1712.
doi: 10.1002/pmic.v14.15
[6] 周根友, 翟彩娇, 邓先亮, 张蛟, 张振良, 戴其根, 崔士友. 盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32:146-154.
Zhou G Y, Zhai C J, Deng X L, Zhang J, Zhang Z L, Dai Q G, Cui S Y. Performance of yield, photosynthesis and grain quality of japonica rice cultivars under salinity stress in micro-plots. Chin J Rice Sci, 2018, 32:146-154 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Wang X X, Wang W C, Huang J L, Peng S B, Xiong D L. Diffusional conductance to CO2 is the key limitation to photosynthesis in salt-stressed leaves of rice (Oryza sativa). Physiol Plant, 2018, 163:45-58.
doi: 10.1111/ppl.2018.163.issue-1
[8] 韦还和, 葛佳琳, 张徐彬, 孟天瑶, 陆钰, 李心月, 陶源, 丁恩浩, 陈英龙, 戴其根. 盐胁迫下粳稻品种南粳9108分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系. 作物学报, 2020, 46:1238-1247.
Wei H H, Ge J L, Zhang X B, Meng T Y, Lu Y, Li X Y, Tao Y, Ding E H, Chen Y L, Dai Q G. Tillering characteristics and its relationships with population productivity of japonica rice Nanjing 9108 under salinity stress. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46:1238-1247 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] Wang J J, Dai Q X, Shang J L, Jin X L, Sun Q, Zhou G S, Dai Q G. Field-scale rice yield estimation using sentinel-1A synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data in coastal saline region of Jiangsu province, China. Remote Sens, 2019, 11:2274.
doi: 10.3390/rs11192274
[10] 彭既明. 耐盐(碱)水稻研发的建议. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1):7-9.
Peng J M. Suggestions for developing saline-alkaline tolerant rice. China Rice, 2019, 25(1):7-9 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Zhang Y, Li Q, Dai Q G, Kang Y J. Microbial mechanism underlying high and stable methane oxidation rates during mudflat reclamation with long-term rice cultivation: illumine high-throughput sequencing-based data analysis. J Hazard Mater, 2019, 371:332-341.
doi: S0304-3894(19)30287-0 pmid: 30856444
[12] 徐晨, 凌风楼, 徐克章, 武志海, 刘晓龙, 安久海, 赵兰坡. 盐胁迫对不同水稻品种光合特性和生理生化特性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27:280-286.
Xu C, Ling F L, Xu K Z, Wu Z H, Liu X L, An J H, Zhao L P. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics and physiological and biochemical traits of different rice varieties. Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27:280-286 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 付永琦, 向妙莲, 蒋海燕, 何永明, 曾晓春. 水稻颖花开放前浆片转录组变化. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49:1017-1033.
Fu Y Q, Xiang M L, Jiang H Y, He Y M, Zeng X C. Transcriptome profiling of lodicules before floret opening in Oryza sativa L. Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49:1017-1033 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] Kato Y, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J. Preflowering abortion reduces spikelet number in upland rice ( Oryza sativa L.) under water stress. Crop Sci, 2008, 48:2389-2395.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.11.0627
[15] Bai J T, Zhu X D, Wang Q, Zhang J, Chen H Q, Dong G J, Zhu L, Zheng H K, Xie Q J, Nian J Q, Chen F, Fu Y, Qian Q, Zuo J R. Rice TUTOU1 encodes a suppressor of cAMP receptor-like protein that is important for actin organization and panicle development. Plant Physiol, 2015, 169:1179-1191.
doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00229
[16] 王亚梁, 张玉屏, 朱德峰, 向镜, 武辉, 陈惠哲, 张义凯. 水稻穗分化期高温胁迫对颖花退化及籽粒充实的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42:1402-1410.
Wang Y L, Zhang Y P, Zhu D F, Xiang J, Wu H, Chen H Z, Zhang Y K. Effect of heat stress on spikelet degeneration and grain filling at panicle initiation period of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42:1402-1410 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 陈培峰, 韩立宇, 顾俊荣, 乔中英, 王文青, 董明辉. 灌溉方式与施氮量对杂交粳稻颖花形成及籽粒充实的影响. 核农学报, 2017, 31:1604-1611.
Chen P F, Han L Y, Gu J R, Qiao Z Y, Wang W Q, Dong M H. Effects of irrigation pattern and nitrogen applications on spikelets formation and grain filling in hybrid japonica rice. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2017, 31:1604-1611 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 董明辉, 顾俊荣, 陈培峰, 韩立宇, 乔中英. 麦秸还田与氮肥互作对大穗型杂交粳稻不同部位枝梗和颖花形成的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48:4437-4449.
Dong M H, Gu J R, Chen P F, Han L Y, Qiao Z Y. Effects of interaction of wheat straw residue with field and nitrogen applications on branches and spikelets formation at different positions in large panicle hybrid rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48:4437-4449 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 张荣萍, 马均, 蔡光泽, 孙永健. 开花期低温胁迫对四川攀西稻区水稻开花结实的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38:1734-1742.
Zhang R P, Ma J, Cai G Z, Sun Y J. Effects of low temperature stress during flowering stage on flowering and seed setting of rice in Panxi region, Sichuan province. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38:1734-1742 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Gay F, Maraval I, Roques S, Gunata Z, Boulanger R, Audebert A, Mestres C. Effect of salinity on yield and 2-acetyl-1- pyrroline content in the grains of three fragrant rice cultivars ( Oryza sativa L.) in Camargue (France). Field Crops Res, 2010, 117:154-160.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.02.008
[21] 孙现军, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 张惠媛, 徐长兵, 邸一桓, 韩龙植, 张辉. 水稻资源全生育期耐盐性鉴定筛选. 作物学报, 2019, 45:1656-1663.
Sun X J, Jiang Q Y, Hu Z, Zhang H Y, Xu C B, Di Y H, Han L Z, Zhang H. Screening and identification of salt-tolerant rice germplasm in whole growth period. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45:1656-1663 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 胡博文, 谷娇娇, 贾琰, 沙汉景, 张君颜, 黄书勤, 赵宏伟. 盐胁迫对寒地粳稻籽粒淀粉形成积累及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(1):115-123.
Hu B W, Gu J J, Jia Y, Sha H J, Zhang J Y, Huang S Q, Zhao H W. Effect of salt stress on starch formation and yield of japonica rice in cold-region. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2019, 34(1):115-123 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 荆培培, 崔敏, 秦涛, 周在中, 戴其根. 土培条件下不同盐分梯度对水稻产量及其生理特性的影响. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(4):26-33.
Jing P P, Cui M, Qin T, Zhou Z Z, Dai Q G. Effects of different saline stress on yield and physiological properties of rice in soil culture. China Rice, 2017, 23(4):26-33 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] Wang Z Q, Zhang W Y, Yang J C. Physiological mechanism underlying spikelet degeneration in rice. J Integr Agric, 2018, 17:1475-1481.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)61981-1
[25] Zhang W Y, Zhu K Y, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Gu J F, Liu L J, Yang J C, Zhang J H. Brassinosteroids function in spikelet differentiation and degeneration in rice. J Integr Plant Biol, 2019, 61:943-963.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.v61.8
[26] Sharma I, Ching E, Saini S, Bhardwaj R, Pati P K. Exogenous application of brassinosteroid offers tolerance to salinity by altering stress responses in rice variety Pusa Basmati-1. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2013, 69:17-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.04.013
[27] Zhang H, Tan G L, Yang L N, Yang J C, Zhang J H, Zhao B H. Hormones in the grains and roots in relation to post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in japonica/indica hybrid rice. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2009, 47:195-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.11.012
[28] Moradi F, Ismail A M. Responses of photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and ROS-scavenging systems to salt stress during seedling and reproductive stages in rice. Ann Bot, 2007, 99:1161-1173.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm052
[29] Gregorio G B, Senadhira D, Mendoza R D, Manigbas N L, Roxas J P, Guerta C Q. Progress in breeding for salinity tolerance and associated abiotic stresses in rice. Field Crops Res, 2002, 76:91-101.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00031-X
[30] 王亚梁, 张玉屏, 曾研华, 武辉, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张义凯, 朱德峰. 水稻穗分化期高温胁迫对颖花分化及退化的影响. 中国农业气象, 2015, 36:724-731.
Wang Y L, Zhang Y P, Zeng Y H, Wu H, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y K, Zhu D F. Effect of high temperature stress on rice spikelet differentiation and degeneration during panicle initiation stage. Chin J Agrometeorol, 2015, 36:724-731 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 张桂莲, 张顺堂, 肖浪涛, 武小金, 肖应辉, 陈立云. 花期高温胁迫对水稻花药生理特性及花粉性状的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39:177-183.
Zhang G L, Zhang S T, Xiao L T, Wu X J, Xiao Y H, Chen L Y. Effect of high temperature stress on physiological characteristics of anther and pollen traits of rice at flowering stage. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39:177-183 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 王余龙, 姚友礼, 李昊云, 蔡建中. 水稻籽粒有关性状与粒重关系的初步探讨. 作物学报, 1995, 21:573-578.
Wang Y L, Yao Y L, Li T Y, Cai J Z. An inquiring into grain characters and their relations with grain weight in rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin, 1995, 21:573-578 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 付景, 刘洁, 曹转勤, 王志琴, 张耗, 杨建昌. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对2个超级稻品种结实率和粒重的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40:1056-1065.
Fu J, Liu J, Cao Z Q, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Yang J C. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation during grain filling on the seed-setting rate and grain weight of two super rice cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40:1056-1065 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] Wungrampha S, Joshi R, Singla-Pareek S L, Pareek A. Photosynthesis and salinity: are these mutually exclusive? Photosynthetica, 2018, 56:366-381.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-017-0763-7
[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[5] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[6] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[7] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[8] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[9] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[10] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[11] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[12] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[13] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[14] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[15] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!