欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 2078-2085.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02078

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国鲜面条耐煮特性及评价指标

张艳1，阎俊2，肖永贵1，王德森1，何中虎1,3,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/国家小麦改良中心, 北京 100081; 2中国农业科学院棉花研究所, 河南安阳 455112; 3国际玉米小麦改良中心(CIMMYT)中国办事处, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-03 修回日期:2012-06-20 出版日期:2012-11-12 网络出版日期:2012-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 何中虎, E-mail: zhhecaas@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31171547)和引进国际先进农业科学技术计划(948计划)重大国际合作项目(2011-G3)资助。

Characteristics and Evaluation Parameters Associated with Cooking Quality of Chinese Fresh Noodle

ZHANG Yan1,YAN Jun2,XIAO Yong-Gui1,WANG De-Sen1,HE Zhong-Hu1,3,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences / National Wheat Improvement Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2 Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China; 3 CIMMYT China Office, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2012-05-03 Revised:2012-06-20 Published:2012-11-12 Published online:2012-09-10
  • Contact: 何中虎, E-mail: zhhecaas@163.com

PDF

1683

被引次数

18

摘要：

以我国北部和黄淮冬麦区的46份主栽小麦品种和育成品系为材料, 分析了品质性状与煮熟面条冲洗水中总有机物含量(TOM)、干物质蒸煮损失率、面条吸水性和黏性等面条耐煮性指标的关系。结果表明, 小麦品种的磨粉品质、面团流变学特性、淀粉品质及TOM值、蒸煮损失率和黏性等面条耐煮性指标存在较大变异。拉伸面积和最大抗延阻力与TOM值呈显著负相关, 相关系数分别为-0.66 (P<0.01)和-0.56 (P <0.01); 稳定时间、拉伸面积和最大抗延阻力与面条煮6 min和10 min后鲜重的相关系数为-0.55~ -0.63 (P <0.01), 耐揉指数与二者的相关系数分别为0.67 (P<0.01)和0.69 (P<0.01); 糊化温度与面条煮10 min后鲜重呈极显著正相关(r = 0.60, P<0.01), 说明提高小麦面粉的蛋白质含量、面筋强度可以显著改善面条耐煮特性, 蛋白质特性是影响面条耐煮性的主要品质因子, 淀粉糊化参数对面条耐煮性也有一定影响。TOM值与面条煮6 min和10 min后鲜重呈显著正相关, 相关系数分别为0.66 (P<0.01)和0.69 (P<0.01); 面条煮6 min与煮10 min后鲜重也呈高度正相关(r = 0.86, P<0.01)。建议将10 g鲜面条煮10 min后的鲜重≤21.0 g作为优质鲜面条耐煮性的主要评价指标。

关键词: 普通小麦, 面筋质量, 面条耐煮特性, 面条煮后鲜重

Abstract:

Noodle cooking quality plays an important role in assessing processing quality of Chinese fresh noodle. Forty-six Chinese wheat cultivars and advanced lines from the Northern Plain and the Huang-Huai River Valleys Winter Wheat Regions were used to determine the relationship between wheat quality characters and evaluation parameters of Chinese fresh noodle cooking quality including total organic matter (TOM), cooking losses, water sorption, and noodle stickiness. The results indicated that large variations were observed in milling quality, dough rheology characteristics, starch properties, and noodle cooking quality parameters including TOM value, cooking losses, and noodle stickiness. Extensogram energy and maximum resistance contributed negatively to TOM value, with correlation coefficients of -0.66 (P<0.01) and -0.56 (P<0.01), respectively. Correlation coefficients between Farinogram stability, Extensogram energy and maximum resistance and cooked noodle weights with optimal cooking (6 min) and overcooking (10 min) ranged from -0.55 to -0.63 (P<0.01). Farinogram mixing tolerance index was significantly and positively correlated with cooked noodle weights for 6min and 10min, with correlation coefficients of 0.67 (P<0.01) and 0.69 (P<0.01), respectively. Starch pasting temperature was significantly and positively correlated with cooked noodle weights for 10 min (r = 0.60, P<0.01). This suggested that increased flour protein content and dough gluten strength contributed positively to noodle cooking quality, flour protein property was the major factor in determining noodle cooking quality, and noodle cooking quality was also affected slightly by starch pasting parameters. TOM value was significantly and positively correlated with cooked noodle weights for 6 min and 10 min, with correlation coefficients of 0.66 (P<0.01) and 0.69 (P<0.01), respectively. Correlation coefficient between cooked noodle weight with 6 min and 10 min cooking time was 0.86 (P<0.01). Therefore, it was recommended that cooked noodle weight for 10 min could be an important parameter for evaluation of noodle cooking quality. The cooked noodle weight for 10 min (10 g fresh noodle) should be no more than 21.0 g forgood noodle cooking quality in Chinese wheat samples.

Key words: Bread wheat, Gluten quality, Noodle cooking quality, Cooked noodle weight

[1]Wei Y-M(魏益民), Zhang G-Q(张国权), Ou-Yang S-H(欧阳韶晖), Xi M-L(席美丽), Hu X-Z(胡新中), Sietz W. Influence of processing parameters on quality properties of Spaghetti. J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc (中国粮油学报), 1998, 13(5): 42–45 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Liu J-J(刘建军), He Z-H(何中虎), Zhao Z-D(赵振东), Liu A-F(刘爱峰), Song J-M(宋建民), Peña R J. Investigation on relationship between wheat quality traits and quality parameters of dry white Chinese noodles. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(6): 738–742 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]He Z-H(何中虎), Xia X-C(夏先春), Chen X-M(陈新民), Zhang Y(张艳), Zhang Y(张勇), Wang D-S(王德森), Xia L-Q(夏兰琴), Zhuang Q-S(庄巧生). Wheat quality improvement: history, progress, and prospects. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(suppl-1): 91–98 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Li S-B(李硕碧), Shan M-Z(单明珠), Wang Y(王怡), Li B-Y(李必运), Zhang S-G(张蜀光). Evaluation of wheat quality for wet noodle making. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 279(3): 334–339 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Lei J(雷激), Zhang Y(张艳), Wang D-S(王德森), Yan J(闫俊), He Z-H(何中虎). Methods for evaluation of quality characteristics of dry white Chinese noodles. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(12): 2000–2005 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Zhang Y(张艳), Yan J(阎俊), Yoshida H, Wang D-S(王德森), Chen D-S(陈东升), Nagamine T, Liu J-J(刘建军), He Z-H(何中虎). Standardization of laboratory processing of Chinese white salted noodle and its sensory evaluation system. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2007, 27(10): 158–165 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Dexter J E, Matsuo R R, MacGregor A W. Relationship of instrumental assessment of spaghetti cooking quality to the type and the amount of material rinsed from cooked spaghetti. J Cereal Sci, 1985, 3: 39–53



[8]D’Egidio M G, Mariani B M, Nardi S, Novaro P, Cubadda R. Chemical and technological variables and their relationships: a predictive equation for pasta cooking quality. Cereal Chem, 1990, 67: 275–281



[9]Malcolmson L J, Matsuo R R, Balshaw R. Textural optimization of spaghetti using response surface methodology: effects of drying temperature and durum protein level. Cereal Chem, 1993, 70: 417–423



[10]Del Nobile M A, Baiano A, Conte A, Mocci G. Influence of protein content on spaghetti cooking quality. J Cereal Sci, 2005, 41: 347–356



[11]Soh H N, Sissons M J, Turner M A. Effect of starch size distribution and elevated amylose content on durum dough rheology and spaghetti cooking quality. Cereal Chem, 2006, 83: 513–519



[12]Zhang L(张玲), Wang X-Z(王宪泽), Yue Y-S(岳永生). TOM being a new assessment method for Chinese noodle cooking quality and effects of wheat quality characteristics on it. J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc (中国粮油学报), 1998, 13(1): 49–53 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Zhao Z-D(赵振东), Liu J-J(刘建军), Dong J-Y(董进英), Zhang L(张玲), Li Q(李群). The relation between TOM and cooking quality of Chinese noodle. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(6): 738–741 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Zhang G-Q(张国权), Wei Y-M(魏益民), Ou-Yang S-H(欧阳韶晖), Xi M-L(席美丽), Hu X-Z(胡新中), Sietz W. Noodle quality characters of wheat varieties. J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc (中国粮油学报), 2000, 15(3): 5–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Zhang J(张剑), Li M-Q(李梦琴), Gong X-Z(龚向哲), Jiang L-Y(姜琳瑶). Relationship between wheat flour traits and quality indexes of fresh-wet noodles. J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc (中国粮油学报), 2008, 23(2): 20–24 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Yin S-W(尹寿伟), Lu Q-Y(陆启玉), Yang X-G(杨秀改). Study on effect of damaged starch on cooking quality of noodles. Food Sci Technol (食品科技), 2005, (10): 68–70 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Wang X-X(王晓曦), Lei H(雷宏), Qu Y(曲艺), Liu X(刘鑫), Shi J-F(史建芳). Effect of starch composition in flour on noodle cooking quality. J Henan Univ Technol (Nat Sci Edn) (河南工业大学学报•自然科学版), 2010, 31(2): 24–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Batey I L, Curtin B M, Moore S A. Optimization of Rapid Visco Analyser test conditions for predicting Asian noodle quality. Cereal Chem, 1997, 74: 497–501



[19]Ye Y-L(叶一力), He Z-H(何中虎), Zhang Y(张艳). Effect of different water addition levels on Chinese white noodle quality. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2010, 43(4): 795–804 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Matsuo R R, Dexter J E, Boudreau A, Daun J K. The role of lipids in determining spaghetti cooking quality. Cereal Chem, 1986, 63: 484–489



[21]Du W(杜巍), Wei Y-M(魏益民), Zhang G-Q(张国权). Study on the effect of wheat character to noodle quality. Food Sci Technol (食品科技), 2001, (2): 54–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]Huang S D, Liu J J, Quail K. Effect of starch quality and gluten and starch fortification on noodles’ resistance to softening. In: Proceeding of the 61st Australian Cereal Chemistry Conference, Royal Australian Chemistry Institute, Gold Coast, Australia, 2012 (in press)
[1] 靳义荣, 刘金栋, 刘彩云, 贾德新, 刘鹏, 王雅美. 普通小麦氮素利用效率相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 394-404.
[2] 张平平,姚金保,王化敦,宋桂成,姜朋,张鹏,马鸿翔. 江苏省优质软麦品种品质特性与饼干加工品质的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 491-502.
[3] 杨芳萍,刘金栋,郭莹,贾奥琳,闻伟鄂,巢凯翔,伍玲,岳维云,董亚超,夏先春. 普通小麦‘Holdfast’条锈病成株抗性QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(12): 1832-1840.
[4] 王林生,张雅莉,南广慧. 普通小麦-大赖草易位系T5AS-7LrL·7LrS分子细胞遗传学鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(10): 1442-1447.
[5] 赵德辉, 张勇, 王德森, 黄玲, 陈新民, 肖永贵, 阎俊, 张艳, 何中虎. 北方冬麦区新育成优质品种的面包和馒头品质性状[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(05): 697-705.
[6] 苗永杰, 阎俊, 赵德辉, 田宇兵, 闫俊良, 夏先春, 张勇, 何中虎. 黄淮麦区小麦主栽品种粒重与籽粒灌浆特性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(02): 260-267.
[7] 肖永贵,Susanne DREISIGACKER,Claudia NU?EZ-RíOS,胡卫国,夏先春,何中虎. 基于FLUOstar平台的小麦dsDNA荧光定量与基因型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(07): 947-953.
[8] 董雪,刘梦,赵献林,冯玉梅,杨燕. 普通小麦近缘种低分子量麦谷蛋白亚基Glu-A3基因的分离和鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(06): 829-838.
[9] 刘凯,邓志英,张莹,王芳芳,刘佟佟,李青芳,邵文,赵宾,田纪春*,陈建省*. 小麦茎秆断裂强度相关性状QTL的连锁和关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(04): 483-495.
[10] 宫希,蒋云峰,徐彬杰,乔媛媛,华诗雨,吴旺,马建,周小鸿,祁鹏飞,兰秀锦. 利用普通六倍体小麦和西藏半野生小麦杂交衍生的重组自交系定位小麦芒长QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(04): 496-500.
[11] 王鑫,马莹雪,杨阳,王丹峰,殷慧娟,王洪刚. 小麦矮秆种质SN224的鉴定及农艺性状QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(08): 1134-1142.
[12] 孔欣欣,张艳,赵德辉,夏先春,王春平,何中虎. 北方冬麦区新育成优质小麦品种面条品质相关性状分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(08): 1143-1159.
[13] 刘凯,邓志英,李青芳,张莹,孙彩铃,田纪春*,陈建省*. 利用高密度SNP 遗传图谱定位小麦穗部性状基因[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(06): 820-831.
[14] 李文爽，夏先春，何中虎. 普通小麦类胡萝卜素组分的超高效液相色谱分离方法[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(05): 706-713.
[15] 岳爱琴，李昂，毛新国，昌小平，柳玉平，李润植，景蕊莲. 小麦果聚糖合成酶基因6-SFT-D多态性及其与6-SFT-A2的累加效应[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(01): 11-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2