欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1870-1876.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01870

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

北方稻区国家水稻品种区域试验精确度分析

王洁1,3,廖琴2,胡小军2,万建民1,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农作物基因资源与基因改良国家重大科学工程,北京100081;2全国农业技术推广服务中心,北京100125;3中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院, 北京100193
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-26 修回日期:2010-07-05 出版日期:2010-11-12 网络出版日期:2010-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 万建民, E-mail: wanjm@caas.net.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由农业部国家水稻区试项目(1999—2008)资助。

Precision Evaluation of the Rice Variety Regional Trials in Northern China

WANG Jie1,3,LIAO Qin2,HU Xiao-Jun2,WAN Jian-Min1,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081,China; 2 National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, Beijing 100125, China; 3 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2010-04-26 Revised:2010-07-05 Published:2010-11-12 Published online:2010-08-30
  • Contact: WANG Jian-Min,E-mail:wanjm@caas.net.cn

摘要: 以1999—2008年北方稻区国家水稻品种区域试验(共计463个点次) 10年数据为依据,在一年一点和一年多点两个层次上对北方稻区国家水稻品种区域试验的精确度进行了研究。结果表明: (1)一年一点试验层面上,所有试点平均试验误差变异系数(CV)为4.3%,平均相对最小显著差数(RLSD)为7.4%,绝大多数试点的CV和RLSD控制得较好,试验精确度和品种比较精确度均较高。(2)一年多点试验层面上,绝大多数组别的CV在5%以内,RLSD在3%以内,试验精确度较高,品种比较精确度能够满足国家品种审定的要求。(3)在现有试验方案下,降低试验误差是提高一年一点试验精确度的主要途径;除降低试验误差外,适当增加试点数是提高一年多点试验精确度的有效选择。

关键词: 区域试验, 变异系数, 相对最小显著差数, 试验精确度, 品种比较精确度

Abstract: Crop variety regional trial is the basis of variety registration. The precision of regional trial directly influences the merits of approved varieties. According to new national certification standards, new rice varieties should yield more than 3% compared with the control, requiring much higher precision of the experiments. Since 1999, the national rice regional trials in northern China have been implemented for 10 years. It is extremely important for the variety approval committee to known that whether or not the experiments precision can reach the national registration requirements. Based on the data from rice variety regional trials in northern China from 1999 to 2008, we analyzed the experiment error precision (EP) and variety comparison precision (VCP) at two experiment levels. The results was as follows: (1)The average coefficient of variation (CV) and relative LSD (RLSD) in one-location-one-year experiments were 4.3% and 7.4% respectively, indicating the trials were well controlled. Both EP and VCP in one-location-one-year experiments were desirable. (2)The average CV and RLSD in most of multi-location-one-year experiments were lower than 5% and 3% respectively. The EP and VCP in multi-location-one-year experiments were desirable and met the requirements of the State Variety Approval. (3) Under the existing design of experiments,reducing experimental errors in the trials is the main way to improve the accuracy of one-location-one-year experiment. In addition to reducing experimental errors in the trials, the appropriate increase in the number of experiment sites is also a very effective choice to improve the accuracy of multi-location-one-year experiments.

Key words: Regional trial, Coefficient of variation, Relative LSD, Experiment precision, Variety comparison precision

[1]Cochran W G, Cox G M. Experimental Designs, 2nd edn. London: John Wiley, 1957
[2]Lin C S, Binns M R. The precision of cultivar trials within eastern cooperative tests. Can J Plant Sci, 1984, 64: 587–591
[3]Yu S-R(俞世蓉),Wu Z-S(吴兆苏). Discussions on some problems in the regional tests of wheat cultivars. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1986, 19(3): 20- 25 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Yu S-R(俞世蓉), Wu Z-S(吴兆苏). Studies on the precision of cultivar regional tests. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1987, 20(6): 10–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Yu S-R(俞世蓉), Lu Z-M(陆作嵋), Zhou Y-Z(周毓珍), Zhu L-X(朱连先). Regional evaluation of cultivars in wheat cultivar registration. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1995, 28(3): 87–93 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Kong F-L(孔繁玲), Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Yang F-X(杨付新), Guo H-M(郭恒敏). Studies on the precision of regional cotton variety trials. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(5): 602–607 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Kong F-L(孔繁玲), Liao Q(廖琴), Yang F-X(杨付新), Wang L(王磊). Evaluation system and methods for regional crop trials. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture (农业系统科学与综合研究), 2000, 16(2): 81–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Kong F-L(孔繁玲), Yang F-X(杨付新). Evaluation of the precision of regional crop trials in China. J China Agric Univ (中国农业大学学报), 2001, 6(1): 43–50 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Kong F-L(孔繁玲), Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Ge Z-N(葛知男), Yang F-X(杨付新), Zhang D-G(张德贵), Liu W-X(刘文欣). Experiment precision and variety comparison precision in regional crop trials. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2001, 34(3): 266–271 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Chen Y-Z(陈应志), Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Kong F-L(孔繁玲). Studies on the accuracy of national soybean variety regional trials. Soybean (大豆通报), 2006, 80(1): 9-15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Cao W-M(曹雯梅), Zhang G-F(张根峰), Zhao H(赵虹), Zhao W(赵威), Li X-H(李学会). Evaluation of experiment precision and variety comparison precision in national wheat variety regional trials. China Seed Indust (中国种业), 2009, (6): 32–34 (in Chinese)
[12]Chen Z-D(陈志德), Zhong W-G(仲维功), Wang C-L(王才林), Yang J(杨杰), Zhang H-S(张红生). Precision evaluation of rice regional trials in Jiangsu province. Jiangsu J Agric Sci (江苏农业学报), 2006, 22(3): 199–204 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Yu Q-Y(俞琦英). Study on precision and variety comparison precision in table maize regional trials in Zhejiang province. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis (浙江农业学报), 2006, 18(4): 207–211 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Chen H-M(陈洪梅), Yang J-Y(杨峻芸), Tan J(谭静). Analysis of experimental precision and grey integrative evaluation of varieties in maize regional trials. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2004, 17(suppl): 228–232 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Kong F-L(孔繁玲), Yang F-X(杨付新). Models and methods for estimating variety means in regional crop trials—comparisons of arithmetic mean, weighted least squares estimates and BLUPs. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(6): 884–891 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Kong F-L(孔繁玲). Comparison of statistical models for regional crop trial analysis. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(4): 365–371 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Kong F-L(孔繁玲), Yang F-X(杨付新). Comparison of the predictive accuracy of arithmetic means and BLUPs and AMMI estimates in regional crop trials. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(4): 428–433 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]Zhang Q-Y(张群远), Kong F-L(孔繁玲), Yang F-X(杨付新). Optimizing the experimental design of regional crop trial by nonlinear program. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2000, 33(4): 25–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 张毅,许乃银,郭利磊,杨子光,张笑晴,杨晓妮. 我国北部冬麦区小麦区域试验重复次数和试点数量的优化设计[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8): 1166-1173.
[2] 许乃银,金石桥,李健. 我国棉花品种区域试验重复次数和试点数量的设计[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(01): 43-50.
[3] 许乃银,李健. 棉花区试中品种多性状选择的理想试验环境鉴别[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(11): 1936-1945.
[4] 王春平,胡希远,沈琨仑. 玉米区域试验中误差方差的异质性及其对品种评价的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(03): 449-454.
[5] 许乃银,张国伟,李健,周治国. 基于HA-GGE双标图的长江流域棉花区域试验环境评价[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(12): 2229-2236.
[6] 吴存祥,李继存,沙爱华,曾海燕,孙石,杨光明,周新安,常汝镇,年海,韩天富. 国家大豆品种区域试验对照品种的生育期组归属[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(11): 1977-1987.
[7] 关荣霞,方宏亮,何艳琴,常汝镇,邱丽娟. 国家大豆区域试验品种(系) SSR位点纯合度分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(10): 1760-1765.
[8] 胡希远,尤海磊,任长宏,吴冬,李建平. 基于协方差阵结构优选的作物品种区域试验分析[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(11): 1981-1989.
[9] 濮绍京;金文林;白琼岩;张连平;陈立军;赵波;钟连全. 基于玉米区试的籽粒产量抽样方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(06): 991-998.
[10] 金骏培;张天真. 陆地棉超高产轮回选择群体创建及其选择[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1080-1085.
[11] 张群远;孔繁玲;杨付新. 作物品种区域试验中品种均值估计的模型和方法--算术平均值、加权最小二乘估值和BLUP的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 884-891.
[12] 张群远;孔繁玲;杨付新. 品种区域试验中算术平均值、 BLUP和AMMI估值的精度比较[J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(04): 428-433.
[13] 金文林. 作物区试中品种稳定性评价的秩次分析模型[J]. 作物学报, 2000, 26(06): 925-930.
[14] 金文林;白琼岩. 作物区试中品种产量性状评价的秩次分析法[J]. 作物学报, 1999, 25(05): 632-638.
[15] 郭银燕;张云康;胡明训;胡秉民;陈昆荣. 浙江省早籼稻蒸煮品质的品种、地点、品种×地点互作效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 1999, 25(04): 499-503.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!