欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (03): 449-454.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00449

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米区域试验中误差方差的异质性及其对品种评价的影响

王春平1,*,胡希远2,*,沈琨仑2   

  1. 1河南科技大学农学院,河南洛阳471003; 2西北农林科技大学农学院,陕西杨凌712100
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-18 修回日期:2012-10-05 出版日期:2013-03-12 网络出版日期:2012-12-11
  • 通讯作者: 胡希远, E-mail: xiyuanhu@yahoo.com.cn; 王春平, E-mail: chunpingw@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由陕西省自然科学基金项目(2012JM3009)和河南科技大学人才基金项目(09001595)资助。

Heterogeneity of Error Variance and Its Effect on the Variety Evaluation in Corn Regional Trials

WANG Chun-Ping1,*,HU Xi-Yuan 2,*,SHEN Kun-Lun2   

  1.  1 College of Agronomy, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China; 2 College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China;
  • Received:2012-05-18 Revised:2012-10-05 Published:2013-03-12 Published online:2012-12-11
  • Contact: 胡希远, E-mail: xiyuanhu@yahoo.com.cn; 王春平, E-mail: chunpingw@163.com

摘要:

为了研究我国玉米区域试验中误差方差的异质性存在状况及其对品种评价的作用, 2003—2006年东北和华北16组玉米区域试验资料为依据,对玉米区域试验各环境试验误差方差差异状况及误差方差同质模型和异质模型的拟合效果进行了验证,并对品种效应差异显著性测验在误差同质模型和误差异质模型分析结果的差异状况进行了比较。结果表明,在分析的所有试验中,试验误差方差在环境间具有较大差异;误差方差异质模型比误差方差同质模型对试验数据拟合效果普遍较好;模型是否考虑误差方差的异质性对品种-环境交互效应测验结果有较大影响,而对品种主效应测验结果影响极小;误差方差异质模型比误差方差同质模型测验效率高

关键词: 玉米, 区域试验, 误差变异, 模型

Abstract:

In order to study the heterogeneity state of error variance and its effect on the variety evaluation in corn regional trials, based on the 16 data sets of the corn regional trials in the Northeast and North China from 2003 to 2006, we assessed the error variation between the environments and the fit-goodness of models for homogeneous and heterogeneous errors, and compared the statistical tests for trial effects from the two models. The results showed that the error variance largely varied between environments in all of the considered trials. The model for heterogeneous errors fitted the trial data better than the model for homogeneous errors. Whether the heterogeneity of error variance was considered in the models considerably impacted the test about variety-environment interaction effects and little did the test about variety effects. The model for heterogeneous errors had higher test efficiency than the model for homogeneous errors.

Key words: Corn, Regional trial, Error variation, Model

[1]Mo H-D(莫惠栋). Statistics for Agricultural Experiments (农业试验统计), 2nd edn. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 1992. pp 260−278 (in Chinese)



[2]Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Statistic Methods for Experiments (试验统计方法). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 120−124 (in Chinese)



[3]Wang G-S(王松桂), Chen M(陈敏), Chen L-P(陈立萍). Linear Statistical Model (线性统计模型). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007. pp 164−178 (in Chinese)  



[4]Casanoves F, Macchiavelli R, Balzarini M. Error variation in multienvironment peanut trials: within-trial spatial correlation and between-trial heterogeneity. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 1927−1933



[5]Zimmerman D L, Harville D A. A random field approach to the analysis of field-plot experiments and other spatial experiments. Biometrics, 1991, 47: 223−239



[6]Schabenberger O, Pierce F J. Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C.: CRC Press, 2002. pp 599−648



[7]Stroup W W. Power analysis based on spatial effects mixed models: a tool for comparing design and analysis strategies in the presence of spatial variability. J Agric Biol Environ Stat, 2002, 7: 491−511



[8]Hu X-Y(胡希远), Spilke J. Spatial variability and its statistical control in field experiment. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(4): 620−624 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Smith A B, Cullis B R, Thompson R. Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics, 2001, 57: 1138−1147



[10]Smith A B, Cullis B R, Thompson R. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J Agric Sci, 2005, 143: 449−462



[11]Little R C, Milliken G A, Stroup W W, Wolfinger R D. SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. 1996. pp 303−326



[12]Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models in Practice. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997. pp 185−210



[13]Henderson C R. Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph, AB, 1984



[14]Denis J B, Pipho H P, van Eeuwijk F A. Modeling expectation and variance for genotype by environment data. Heredity, 1997, 79: 162−171



[15]Brady T W, Kathleen B W, Andrzej T G. Linear Mixed Models. New York: CRC Press, 2002



[16]Bozdogan H. Akaike’s information criterion and recent developments in information complexity. J Math Psychol, 2000, 44: 62−91



[17]Wolfinger R. Covariance structure selection in general mixed models. Commu Stat Simul Comput, 1993, 22: 1079−1106



[18]Gauch H G. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics, 1988, 44: 705−715



[19]Gauch H G. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 1488−1500



[20]Finly K W, Wilkinson G N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Aust J Agric Res, 1963, 14: 742−754



[21]Eberhart S A, Russell W A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci, 1966, 6: 36−40



[22]Hu X-Y(胡希远), You H-L(尤海磊), Ren C-H(任长宏), Wu D(吴冬), Li J-P(李建平). Analysis of crop variety regional trials based on selection of covariance structures. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(11): 1981−1989 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Hu X Y, Spilke J. Variance–covariance structure and its influence on variety assessment in regional crop trials. Field Crops Res, 2011, 120: 1−8

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[7] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[8] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[9] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[10] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[11] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[12] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[15] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!