作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1760-1765.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01760
关荣霞1,方宏亮2,何艳琴3,常汝镇1,邱丽娟1,*
GUAN Rong-Xia1,FANG Hong-Liang2,HE Yan-Qin3,CHANG Ru-Zhen1,QIU Li-Juan1,*
摘要:
利用30对SSR引物,检测2005—2009年参加国家区域试验的1 068份大豆品种(系)的位点纯合度。每年区试品种(系)的平均纯合度为94.9%~97.6%,纯合度高于85%和90%的品种(系)所占比例分别为95%和91.4%,纯合度低于85%的品种(系)有42份(占3.93%),主要为北方春大豆和黄淮夏大豆。位点纯合度低于85%的参试品种(系)的产量比较表明,只有11份品种(系)比对照增产5%以上,20份比对照减产0.04%~13.08%;与纯合度为100%的材料比较发现,位点纯合度较低的材料在区试中产量也较低。建议国家区试品种(系)纯合度标准不低于90%,以保证审定品种的特征特性,为大豆新品种的持续推广利用提供科技支撑。
[1]Mao C X, Virmani S S, Kumar I. Technological innovations to lower the costs of hybrid rice seed production. In: Virmani S S, Siddiq E A, Muralidharam K, eds. Advances in Hybrid Rice Technology. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Hybrid Rice, Hyderabad, India, 14–16 November 1996. pp 111–128[2]Bai O(白鸥), Huang R-D(黄瑞冬). Comparison of plant height, light distributing and yield in different purity populations of maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2007, 15(3): 59–61 (in Chinese with English abstract) [3]Guan R-X(关荣霞), Liu Y(刘燕), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Purity identification of soybean varieties with SSR technique. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2003, 1(3): 357–360 (in Chinese with English abstract)[4]Li Y-H(李英慧), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). The strategy for maintaining genetic integrity of soybean germplasms—selecting pure lines based on SSR markers. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2010, 43(19): 3930–3936 (in Chinese with English abstract)[5]Yan L(闫龙), Nelson R L, Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). The strategy for keeping soybean germplasm genetic integrity: I. Re-evaluate genebank accessions based on optimizing the phenotype descriptor. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2010, 11(6): 678–682 (in Chinese with English abstract)[6]Guan R-X(关荣霞), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Rapid isolation of soybean DNA used for SSR analysis. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2003, 22(1): 73–74 (in Chinese with English abstract)[7]Xie H(谢华), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Cao Y-S(曹永生), Zhang M-H(张明辉), Feng Z-F(冯中孚), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Selection of core SSR loci by using Chinese autumn soybean. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(4): 360–366 (in Chinese with English abstract)[8]Zhang X-Y(张雪原), Zhao P-F(赵攀峰), Wang F-G(王凤格), Sun S-X(孙世贤), Wang S-C(王守才). Comparison between the results of uniformity using SSR molecular technique and morphological traits with maize varieties. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2009, 17(1):40–45, 50 (in Chinese with English abstract)[9]Yashitolaa J, Thirumuruganb T, Sundaramb R M, Naseerullahc M K, Rameshab M S, Sarmab N P, Sonti R V. Assessment of purity of rice hybrids using microsatellite and STS markers. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 1369–1373[10]Sundaram R M, Naveenkumar B, Biradar S K, Balachandran S M, Mishra B, IlyasAhmed M, Viraktamath B C, Ramesha M S, Sarma N P. Identification of informative SSR markers capable of distinguishing hybrid rice parental lines and their utilization in seed purity assessment. Euphytica, 2008, 163: 215–224[11]Song X-Y(宋贤勇), Bao Y-H(包月红), Yang J-T(杨俊涛), Guan R-Z(管荣展), Liu G-C(刘桂超). Purity identification of Brassica Qinyou No. 11 using SSR markers. Mol Plant Breed (子植物育种), 2010, 8(3): 497–500 (in Chinese with English abstract)[12]Ott A J, Trautschold B, Sandhu D. Using microsatellites to understand the physical distribution of recombination on soybean. PLoS One, 2011, 6(7): e22306. DOI: 10.1371[13]Shi H-B(石海波), Wang L-X(王立新), Li H-B(李宏博), Zhang F-T(张风廷), Ma Q(马庆), Zhao C-P(赵昌平). Division of seeds motley and SSR loci impurity in wheat cultivar using SSR markers. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2006, 4(4): 513–519 (in Chinese with English abstract)[14]Guan R-X(关荣霞), Zhang L(张磊), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Relationship analysis of soybean cultivars breeded by intra-cultivar selection or pollen tube pathway and parents by simple sequence repeat markers. Chin Bull Bot (植物学报), 2010, 45(1): 36–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)[15]Wang J(王俊), Wang L-L(王林林), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Jin L-G(金龙国), Li Y-H(李英慧), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Luo S-P(罗淑萍), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Genetic structure and conservation of soybean landraces. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2008, 27(3): 361–365 (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 陈玲玲, 李战, 刘亭萱, 谷勇哲, 宋健, 王俊, 邱丽娟. 基于783份大豆种质资源的叶柄夹角全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345. |
[2] | 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487. |
[3] | 王炫栋, 杨孙玉悦, 高润杰, 余俊杰, 郑丹沛, 倪峰, 蒋冬花. 拮抗大豆斑疹病菌放线菌菌株的筛选和促生作用及防效研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1546-1557. |
[4] | 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102. |
[5] | 李阿立, 冯雅楠, 李萍, 张东升, 宗毓铮, 林文, 郝兴宇. 大豆叶片响应CO2浓度升高、干旱及其交互作用的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118. |
[6] | 彭西红, 陈平, 杜青, 杨雪丽, 任俊波, 郑本川, 罗凯, 谢琛, 雷鹿, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 减量施氮对带状套作大豆土壤通气环境及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209. |
[7] | 王好让, 张勇, 于春淼, 董全中, 李微微, 胡凯凤, 张明明, 薛红, 杨梦平, 宋继玲, 王磊, 杨兴勇, 邱丽娟. 大豆突变体ygl2黄绿叶基因的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 791-800. |
[8] | 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951. |
[9] | 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571. |
[10] | 周悦, 赵志华, 张宏宁, 孔佑宾. 大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶基因GmPAP14启动子克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 590-596. |
[11] | 王娟, 张彦威, 焦铸锦, 刘盼盼, 常玮. 利用PyBSASeq算法挖掘大豆百粒重相关位点与候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 635-643. |
[12] | 董衍坤, 黄定全, 高震, 陈栩. 大豆PIN-Like (PILS)基因家族的鉴定、表达分析及在根瘤共生固氮过程中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 353-366. |
[13] | 张国伟, 李凯, 李思嘉, 王晓婧, 杨长琴, 刘瑞显. 减库对大豆叶片碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 529-537. |
[14] | 禹桃兵, 石琪晗, 年海, 连腾祥. 涝害对不同大豆品种根际微生物群落结构特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1690-1702. |
[15] | 宋丽君, 聂晓玉, 何磊磊, 蒯婕, 杨华, 郭安国, 黄俊生, 傅廷栋, 汪波, 周广生. 饲用大豆品种耐荫性鉴定指标筛选及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1741-1752. |
|