欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1760-1765.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01760

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家大豆区域试验品种(系) SSR位点纯合度分析

关荣霞1,方宏亮2,何艳琴3,常汝镇1,邱丽娟1,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农作物基因资源与遗传改良国家重大科学工程 / 农业部北京大豆生物学重点实验室,北京100081;2蚌埠医学院,安徽蚌埠 233030;3农业部全国农业技术推广服务中心,北京 100026
  • 收稿日期:2012-01-06 修回日期:2012-06-10 出版日期:2012-10-12 网络出版日期:2012-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net, Tel: 010-82105843
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30971801)和国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2009CB118400)资助。

Molecular Homozygosity Analysis of Soybean Varieties in Regional Test of China by Using SSR Markers

GUAN Rong-Xia1,FANG Hong-Liang2,HE Yan-Qin3,CHANG Ru-Zhen1,QIU Li-Juan1,*   

  1. 1 National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2 Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, China; 3 National Agriculture Technology Extension Center, Agriculture Ministry, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2012-01-06 Revised:2012-06-10 Published:2012-10-12 Published online:2012-07-27
  • Contact: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net, Tel: 010-82105843

摘要:

利用30对SSR引物,检测2005—2009年参加国家区域试验的1 068份大豆品种(系)的位点纯合度。每年区试品种(系)的平均纯合度为94.9%~97.6%,纯合度高于85%和90%的品种(系)所占比例分别为95%和91.4%,纯合度低于85%的品种(系)有42份(占3.93%),主要为北方春大豆和黄淮夏大豆。位点纯合度低于85%的参试品种(系)的产量比较表明,只有11份品种(系)比对照增产5%以上,20份比对照减产0.04%~13.08%;与纯合度为100%的材料比较发现,位点纯合度较低的材料在区试中产量也较低。建议国家区试品种(系)纯合度标准不低于90%,以保证审定品种的特征特性,为大豆新品种的持续推广利用提供科技支撑。

关键词: 区域试验, 大豆, SSR位点, 纯合度

Abstract:

Genomic homozygosity of seeds is very important for protection of breeder’s right and sustainable production of agriculture. Highly informative microsatellite (SSR) markers, widely used in soybean genetic mapping and genetic diversity research, are useful for soybean genomic analysis. Thirty pairs of SSR primers were used to test the DNA of 1 068 soybean varieties (lines) from regional trials of China. The average SSR locus homozygosity was 94.9–97.6% each year. Among the 1 068 varieties (lines) in China regional test screened in five years, the soybean varieties (lines) with homozygosity higher than 85% and 90% accounted for 95% and 91.4%, respectively. Only 42 (3.93%) of the varieties (lines) had homozygosity less than 85%, which were mostly from North spring and Huanghuai summer soybean planting areas. Among the 42 varieties (lines) with homozygosity less than 85% only 11 had the yield 5% more than the controls, 20 had a yield reduction of 0.04% to 13.08%. Compared with those with 100% homozygosity, varieties with lower SSR homozygosity also had lower yield in regional trials. It is suggested that criterion of soybean homozygosity in the national regional test should not be less than 90% so as to insure the protection and sustainable utilization of new soybean varieties (lines) in production.

Key words: Regional test, Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], SSR loci, Homozygosity

[1]Mao C X, Virmani S S, Kumar I. Technological innovations to lower the costs of hybrid rice seed production. In: Virmani S S, Siddiq E A, Muralidharam K, eds. Advances in Hybrid Rice Technology. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Hybrid Rice, Hyderabad, India, 14–16 November 1996. pp 111–128



[2]Bai O(白鸥), Huang R-D(黄瑞冬). Comparison of plant height, light distributing and yield in different purity populations of maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2007, 15(3): 59–61 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Guan R-X(关荣霞), Liu Y(刘燕), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Purity identification of soybean varieties with SSR technique. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2003, 1(3): 357–360 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Li Y-H(李英慧), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). The strategy for maintaining genetic integrity of soybean germplasms—selecting pure lines based on SSR markers. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2010, 43(19): 3930–3936 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Yan L(闫龙), Nelson R L, Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). The strategy for keeping soybean germplasm genetic integrity: I. Re-evaluate genebank accessions based on optimizing the phenotype descriptor. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2010, 11(6): 678–682 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Guan R-X(关荣霞), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Rapid isolation of soybean DNA used for SSR analysis. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2003, 22(1): 73–74 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Xie H(谢华), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Cao Y-S(曹永生), Zhang M-H(张明辉), Feng Z-F(冯中孚), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Selection of core SSR loci by using Chinese autumn soybean. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(4): 360–366 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Zhang X-Y(张雪原), Zhao P-F(赵攀峰), Wang F-G(王凤格), Sun S-X(孙世贤), Wang S-C(王守才). Comparison between the results of uniformity using SSR molecular technique and morphological traits with maize varieties. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2009, 17(1):40–45, 50 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Yashitolaa J, Thirumuruganb T, Sundaramb R M, Naseerullahc M K, Rameshab M S, Sarmab N P, Sonti R V. Assessment of purity of rice hybrids using microsatellite and STS markers. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 1369–1373



[10]Sundaram R M, Naveenkumar B, Biradar S K, Balachandran S M, Mishra B, IlyasAhmed M, Viraktamath B C, Ramesha M S, Sarma N P. Identification of informative SSR markers capable of distinguishing hybrid rice parental lines and their utilization in seed purity assessment. Euphytica, 2008, 163: 215–224



[11]Song X-Y(宋贤勇), Bao Y-H(包月红), Yang J-T(杨俊涛), Guan R-Z(管荣展), Liu G-C(刘桂超). Purity identification of Brassica Qinyou No. 11 using SSR markers. Mol Plant Breed (子植物育种), 2010, 8(3): 497–500 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Ott A J, Trautschold B, Sandhu D. Using microsatellites to understand the physical distribution of recombination on soybean. PLoS One, 2011, 6(7): e22306. DOI: 10.1371



[13]Shi H-B(石海波), Wang L-X(王立新), Li H-B(李宏博), Zhang F-T(张风廷), Ma Q(马庆), Zhao C-P(赵昌平). Division of seeds motley and SSR loci impurity in wheat cultivar using SSR markers. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2006, 4(4): 513–519 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Guan R-X(关荣霞), Zhang L(张磊), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Relationship analysis of soybean cultivars breeded by intra-cultivar selection or pollen tube pathway and parents by simple sequence repeat markers. Chin Bull Bot (植物学报), 2010, 45(1): 36–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Wang J(王俊), Wang L-L(王林林), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Jin L-G(金龙国), Li Y-H(李英慧), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Luo S-P(罗淑萍), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Genetic structure and conservation of soybean landraces. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2008, 27(3): 361–365 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 陈玲玲, 李战, 刘亭萱, 谷勇哲, 宋健, 王俊, 邱丽娟. 基于783份大豆种质资源的叶柄夹角全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[2] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[3] 王炫栋, 杨孙玉悦, 高润杰, 余俊杰, 郑丹沛, 倪峰, 蒋冬花. 拮抗大豆斑疹病菌放线菌菌株的筛选和促生作用及防效研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1546-1557.
[4] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[5] 李阿立, 冯雅楠, 李萍, 张东升, 宗毓铮, 林文, 郝兴宇. 大豆叶片响应CO2浓度升高、干旱及其交互作用的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[6] 彭西红, 陈平, 杜青, 杨雪丽, 任俊波, 郑本川, 罗凯, 谢琛, 雷鹿, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 减量施氮对带状套作大豆土壤通气环境及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[7] 王好让, 张勇, 于春淼, 董全中, 李微微, 胡凯凤, 张明明, 薛红, 杨梦平, 宋继玲, 王磊, 杨兴勇, 邱丽娟. 大豆突变体ygl2黄绿叶基因的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
[8] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[9] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[10] 周悦, 赵志华, 张宏宁, 孔佑宾. 大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶基因GmPAP14启动子克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 590-596.
[11] 王娟, 张彦威, 焦铸锦, 刘盼盼, 常玮. 利用PyBSASeq算法挖掘大豆百粒重相关位点与候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[12] 董衍坤, 黄定全, 高震, 陈栩. 大豆PIN-Like (PILS)基因家族的鉴定、表达分析及在根瘤共生固氮过程中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 353-366.
[13] 张国伟, 李凯, 李思嘉, 王晓婧, 杨长琴, 刘瑞显. 减库对大豆叶片碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 529-537.
[14] 禹桃兵, 石琪晗, 年海, 连腾祥. 涝害对不同大豆品种根际微生物群落结构特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1690-1702.
[15] 宋丽君, 聂晓玉, 何磊磊, 蒯婕, 杨华, 郭安国, 黄俊生, 傅廷栋, 汪波, 周广生. 饲用大豆品种耐荫性鉴定指标筛选及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1741-1752.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!