欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 636-644.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00636

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

HSP70可提高干旱高温复合胁迫诱导的玉米叶片抗氧化防护能力

胡秀丽1,李艳辉1,杨海荣1,刘全军1,李潮海2,*   

  1. 1河南农业大学生命科学学院;2河南农业大学农学院,河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2009-08-26 修回日期:2009-12-22 出版日期:2010-04-12 网络出版日期:2010-02-05
  • 通讯作者: 李潮海, E-mail: Chaohai@371.net
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30800667),第44批中国博士后科学基金项目(20080440824),第2批中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(200902357)和河南省教育厅自然科学基金项目(2008A180011)资助。

Heat Shock Protein 70 May Improve the Ability of Antioxidant Defense Induced by the Combination of Drought and Heat in Maize Leaves

HU Xiu-Li1,LI Yan-Hui1,YANG Hai-Rong1,LIU Qun-Jun,LI Chao-Hai2,*   

  1. 1 College of Life Science, Henan Agricultural University; 2 College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
  • Received:2009-08-26 Revised:2009-12-22 Published:2010-04-12 Published online:2010-02-05
  • Contact: LI Chao-Hai,E-mail: Chaohai@371.net

摘要:

为确定热休克蛋白70 (HSP70)提高作物耐干旱高温复合胁迫的机制,对干旱、高温反应不同的4个玉米品种的生理特性进行了研究。结果显示:(1) 在干旱、高温、干旱高温复合胁迫条件下,叶片丙二醛(MDA)增加量以隆玉602最低,驻玉309最高;在干旱胁迫条件下,郑单958叶片MDA含量低于浚单20,而在高温胁迫条件下,浚单20叶片MDA含量低于郑单958(2) 在干旱、高温、干旱高温复合胁迫条件下,隆玉602、郑单958、浚单20三个品种叶片抗氧化防护系统如抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)、谷胱苷肽还原酶(GR)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性增加量均高于驻玉309在干旱条件下,郑单958叶片APXGRSODCAT活性增加量显著高于浚单20,在高温条件下,两个品种的表现则相反;在干旱高温复合胁迫条件下,隆玉602 叶片APXGRSOD活性增加量显著高于郑单958和浚单20(3) HSP70抑制剂斛皮素(Quercetin, Q)预处理显著抑制了3种胁迫诱导的4个品种叶片抗氧化酶活性的增加。这些研究结果暗示HSP70提高了干旱、高温、干旱高温复合胁迫诱导的抗氧化防护酶活性,且APXGRSOD 3个抗氧化防护酶活性可以作为评价作物耐干旱、高温和干旱高温复合胁迫的生化指标。

关键词: 玉米, 干旱, 高温, 复合胁迫, 热休克蛋白

Abstract:

In order to determine the mechanism of heat shock protein (HSP70) increasing crops endurance to the combination of drought and heat, we investigated the physiological characteristics of four maize varieties with different responses to drought and heat stresses. The results are as follows: (1) Under drought, heat, the combination of drought and heat, the increase of malondialdelehyde (MDA) content in leaf was the lowest in Zhuyu 309 without endurance to three stresses and the highest in Longyu 602 with endurance to three stresses; under drought, leaf MDA increase in Zhengdan958 with drought-endurance was less than that in Xundan 20 leaves with heat-endurance; under heat, leaf MDA increase was more in Zhengdan 958 than in Xundan20. (2) In Zhengdan958, Xundan20, Longyu602 leaves, the increase of ascorbate peroxidese (APX), glutathione reductase (GR), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) activities was more than that in Zhuyu 309 leaves under drought, heat, the combination of drought and heat; under drought, APX, GR, SOD, CAT activities of Zhengdan 958 leaves increased significantly more than those of Xundan 20’, but those were contrary under heat; under the combination of drought and heat, APX, GR, SOD activities of Longyu 602 leaves increased significantly more than those of Zhengdan 958 and Xundan 20. (3) The pretreatment with HSP70 inhibitor quercetin (Q) significantly inhibited the increase of antioxidant enzymes activities in leaves of 4 maize varieties exposed to the three stresses. These results suggested that HSP70 involved in the increase of antioxidant enzyme activity in leaves of 4 maize varieties exposed to drought, heat and their combination, and APX, GR, SOD activities could be used as chemical and biological indicators to evaluate the crop endurance to drought, heat, and the combination of drought and heat stresses.

Key words: Maize(Zea mays L.), Drought, Heat, Combination stress, HSP70

[1]Thomson A M, Brown R A, Rosenberg N J, Izaurralde R C, Benson V. Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: An integrated assessment. Part 3. Dryland production of grain and forage crops. Clim Change, 2005, 69: 43-65

[2]Bray E A, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E. Responses to abiotic stresses. In: Gruissem W, Buchannan B, Jones R, eds. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, 2000. pp 1158-249

[3]Pingali P L. CIMMYT 1999-2000 Facts and Trends. Meeting World Maize Needs: Technological Opportunities and Priorities for the Public Sector. Mexico: CIMMYT, 2001. pp 1-60

[4]Dat J F, Pellinen R, Beeckman T, Cotte B V D, Langebartels C, Kangasja J, Inze R, Breusegem F V. Changes in hydrogen peroxide homeostasis trigger an active cell death process in tobacco. Plant J, 2003,33: 621-632

[5]Neil S L, Desikan R, Hancock J T. Hydrogen peroxide signling. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2002, 5: 388-395

[6]Volkov R A, Panchuk I I, Mullineaux P M, Schöffl F. Heat stress-induced H2O2 is required for effective expression of heat shock genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol, 2006, 61: 733-46

[7]Hu X L, Jiang M Y, Zhang J H, Tan M P, Zhang A Y. Cross-talk between Ca2+/CaM and H2O2 in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defense in leaves of maize plants exposed to water stress. Plant Grow Regul, 2008, 55: 183-198

[8]Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2004, 55: 373-399

[9]Basha E, Lee G J, Demeler B, Vierling E. Chaperone activity of cytosolic small heat shock proteins. Eur J Biochem, 2004, 271: 1426-1436

[10]Oono Y, Seki M, Nanjo T, Narusaka M, Fujita M, Satoh R, Satou M, Sakurai T, Ishida J, Akiyama K, Iida K, Maruyama K, Satoh S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Monitoring expression profiles of Arabidopsisgene expression during rehydration process after dehydration using ca. 7000 full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J, 2003, 34: 868-887

[11] Rizhsky L, Hongjian L, Mittler R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130: 1143-1151

[12] Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol, 2004, 134: 1683-1696

[13] Cho E K, Choi Y J. Anuclear-localized HSP70 confers thermoprotective activity and drought-stress tolerance on plants. Biotechnol Lett, 2009, 31: 597-606

[14] Dat J, Vandenabeele S, VranováE, Van Montagu M, InzéD, Van Breusegem F. Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. CMLS Cell Mol Life Sci, 2000, 57: 779-795

[15] Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci, 2000, 7: 405-410

[16] Jiang M Y, Zhang J H. Water stress-induced abscisic acid accumulation triggers the increased generation of reactive and up-regulates the activies of antioxidant enzymes in maize leaves. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 2401-2410

[17] Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 1976, 72: 248-254

[18] Heath R L, Parker L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biophys, 1968, 25: 189-198

[19] Orozco-Cárdenas M L, Ryan C A. Hydrogen peroxide is generated systemically in plant leaves by wounding and systemin via the octadecanoid pathway.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96-6557: 6553

[20] Liang Y(梁颖), Wang S-G(王三根). The protection function of Ca2+ on the membrane of rice seedlings under low temperature stress. Acta Agron Sin 作物学报), 2001, 27(1): 59-63 (in Chinese with English abstract) 

[21] Ma S-Y(马淑英), Zhao M(赵明). Regulations of calcium on the salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(11): 1706-1711 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22] Rizhsky L, Hongjian L, Mittler R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130: 1143-1151

[23] Dat J F, Foyer C H, Scott I M. Changes in salicylic acid and antioxidants during induction of thermotolerance in mustard seedlings. Plant Physiol, 1998, 118: 1455-1461

[24] Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol, 1984, 105: 121-125

[25] Gulli M, Rampino P, Lupotto E, Marmiroli N, Perrotta C. The effect of heat stress and cadmium ions on the expression of a small hsp gene in barley and maize. J Cereal Sci, 2005, 42: 25-31

[26] Guo S H, Wharton W, Moseley P, Shi H L. Heat shock protein 70 regulates cellular redox status by modulating glutathione-related enzyme activities. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 2007, 12: 245-254

[27] Bukau B, Weissman J, Horwich A. Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell, 2006, 125: 443-451

[28] Voellmy R, Boellmann F. Chaperone regulation of the heat shock protein response. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2007, 594: 89-99

[29] Wang C R, Wang X R, Tian Y, Xue Y G, Xu X H, Sui Y X, Yu H X. Oxidative stress and potential biomarkers in tomato seedlings subjected to soil lead contamination. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2008, 71: 685-691

[30] Wang C R, Wang X R, Tian Y, Yu H X, Gu X Y, Du W C, Zhou H. Oxidative stress, defense response, and early biomarkers for lead-contaminated soil in Vicia faba seedlings. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2008, 27: 970-977
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[10] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[11] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[12] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[13] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[14] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[15] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!