作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 636-644.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00636
胡秀丽1,李艳辉1,杨海荣1,刘全军1,李潮海2,*
HU Xiu-Li1,LI Yan-Hui1,YANG Hai-Rong1,LIU Qun-Jun,LI Chao-Hai2,*
摘要:
为确定热休克蛋白70 (HSP70)提高作物耐干旱高温复合胁迫的机制,对干旱、高温反应不同的4个玉米品种的生理特性进行了研究。结果显示:(1) 在干旱、高温、干旱高温复合胁迫条件下,叶片丙二醛(MDA)增加量以隆玉602最低,驻玉309最高;在干旱胁迫条件下,郑单958叶片MDA含量低于浚单20,而在高温胁迫条件下,浚单20叶片MDA含量低于郑单958。(2) 在干旱、高温、干旱高温复合胁迫条件下,隆玉602、郑单958、浚单20三个品种叶片抗氧化防护系统如抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)、谷胱苷肽还原酶(GR)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性增加量均高于驻玉309;在干旱条件下,郑单958叶片APX、GR、SOD、CAT活性增加量显著高于浚单20,在高温条件下,两个品种的表现则相反;在干旱高温复合胁迫条件下,隆玉602 叶片APX、GR、SOD活性增加量显著高于郑单958和浚单20。(3) HSP70抑制剂斛皮素(Quercetin, Q)预处理显著抑制了3种胁迫诱导的4个品种叶片抗氧化酶活性的增加。这些研究结果暗示HSP70提高了干旱、高温、干旱高温复合胁迫诱导的抗氧化防护酶活性,且APX、GR、SOD 这3个抗氧化防护酶活性可以作为评价作物耐干旱、高温和干旱高温复合胁迫的生化指标。
| [1]Thomson A M, Brown R A, Rosenberg N J, Izaurralde R C, Benson V. Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: An integrated assessment. Part 3. Dryland production of grain and forage crops. Clim Change, 2005, 69: 43-65 [2]Bray E A, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E. Responses to abiotic stresses. In: Gruissem W, Buchannan B, Jones R, eds. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, 2000. pp 1158-249 [3]Pingali P L. CIMMYT 1999-2000 Facts and Trends. Meeting World Maize Needs: Technological Opportunities and Priorities for the Public Sector. Mexico: CIMMYT, 2001. pp 1-60 [4]Dat J F, Pellinen R, Beeckman T, Cotte B V D, Langebartels C, Kangasja J, Inze R, Breusegem F V. Changes in hydrogen peroxide homeostasis trigger an active cell death process in tobacco. Plant J, 2003,33: 621-632 [5]Neil S L, Desikan R, Hancock J T. Hydrogen peroxide signling. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2002, 5: 388-395 [6]Volkov R A, Panchuk I I, Mullineaux P M, Schöffl F. Heat stress-induced H2O2 is required for effective expression of heat shock genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol, 2006, 61: 733-46 [7]Hu X L, Jiang M Y, Zhang J H, Tan M P, Zhang A Y. Cross-talk between Ca2+/CaM and H2O2 in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defense in leaves of maize plants exposed to water stress. Plant Grow Regul, 2008, 55: 183-198 [8]Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2004, 55: 373-399 [9]Basha E, Lee G J, Demeler B, Vierling E. Chaperone activity of cytosolic small heat shock proteins. Eur J Biochem, 2004, 271: 1426-1436 [10]Oono Y, Seki M, Nanjo T, Narusaka M, Fujita M, Satoh R, Satou M, Sakurai T, Ishida J, Akiyama K, Iida K, Maruyama K, Satoh S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Monitoring expression profiles of Arabidopsisgene expression during rehydration process after dehydration using ca. 7000 full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J, 2003, 34: 868-887 [11] Rizhsky L, Hongjian L, Mittler R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130: 1143-1151 [12] Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol, 2004, 134: 1683-1696 [13] Cho E K, Choi Y J. Anuclear-localized HSP70 confers thermoprotective activity and drought-stress tolerance on plants. Biotechnol Lett, 2009, 31: 597-606 [14] Dat J, Vandenabeele S, VranováE, Van Montagu M, InzéD, Van Breusegem F. Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. CMLS Cell Mol Life Sci, 2000, 57: 779-795 [15] Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci, 2000, 7: 405-410 [16] Jiang M Y, Zhang J H. Water stress-induced abscisic acid accumulation triggers the increased generation of reactive and up-regulates the activies of antioxidant enzymes in maize leaves. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 2401-2410 [17] Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 1976, 72: 248-254 [18] Heath R L, Parker L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biophys, 1968, 25: 189-198 [19] Orozco-Cárdenas M L, Ryan C A. Hydrogen peroxide is generated systemically in plant leaves by wounding and systemin via the octadecanoid pathway.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96-6557: 6553 [20] Liang Y(梁颖), Wang S-G(王三根). The protection function of Ca2+ on the membrane of rice seedlings under low temperature stress. Acta Agron Sin 作物学报), 2001, 27(1): 59-63 (in Chinese with English abstract) [21] Ma S-Y(马淑英), Zhao M(赵明). Regulations of calcium on the salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(11): 1706-1711 (in Chinese with English abstract) [22] Rizhsky L, Hongjian L, Mittler R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130: 1143-1151 [23] Dat J F, Foyer C H, Scott I M. Changes in salicylic acid and antioxidants during induction of thermotolerance in mustard seedlings. Plant Physiol, 1998, 118: 1455-1461 [24] Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol, 1984, 105: 121-125 [25] Gulli M, Rampino P, Lupotto E, Marmiroli N, Perrotta C. The effect of heat stress and cadmium ions on the expression of a small hsp gene in barley and maize. J Cereal Sci, 2005, 42: 25-31 [26] Guo S H, Wharton W, Moseley P, Shi H L. Heat shock protein 70 regulates cellular redox status by modulating glutathione-related enzyme activities. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 2007, 12: 245-254 [27] Bukau B, Weissman J, Horwich A. Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell, 2006, 125: 443-451 [28] Voellmy R, Boellmann F. Chaperone regulation of the heat shock protein response. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2007, 594: 89-99 [29] Wang C R, Wang X R, Tian Y, Xue Y G, Xu X H, Sui Y X, Yu H X. Oxidative stress and potential biomarkers in tomato seedlings subjected to soil lead contamination. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2008, 71: 685-691 [30] Wang C R, Wang X R, Tian Y, Yu H X, Gu X Y, Du W C, Zhou H. Oxidative stress, defense response, and early biomarkers for lead-contaminated soil in Vicia faba seedlings. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2008, 27: 970-977 |
| [1] | 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901. |
| [2] | 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875. |
| [3] | 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801. |
| [4] | 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308. |
| [5] | 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325. |
| [6] | 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500. |
| [7] | 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590. |
| [8] | 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352. |
| [9] | 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572. |
| [10] | 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364. |
| [11] | 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180. |
| [12] | 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005. |
| [13] | 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021. |
| [14] | 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801. |
| [15] | 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779. |
|
||