欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 904-911.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84131

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉花对初蕾期物理伤害的调节补偿效应

卢合全1,*,祁杰2,*,代建龙1,*,张艳军1,孔祥强1,李振怀1,李维江1,徐士振1,唐薇1,张冬梅1,罗振1,辛承松1,孙学振2,董合忠1,2,*   

  1. 1 山东棉花研究中心 / 山东省棉花栽培生理重点实验室, 山东济南 250100
    2 山东农业大学, 山东泰安 271018
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-17 接受日期:2019-01-12 出版日期:2019-06-12 网络出版日期:2019-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 卢合全,祁杰,代建龙,董合忠
  • 作者简介:卢合全, E-mail: hqlu780708@163.com|祁杰, E-mail: qijie8565@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-15-15);山东省现代农业产业技术体系创新团队建设项目(SDAIT-03-01);泰山学者攀登计划项目(Tspd20150213);山东省农业科学院科技创新工程(CXGC2016B05, CXGC2018E06);山东省农业科学院青年英才培养计划项目资助

Adjustment and compensation of cotton to physical damage at early squaring stage

He-Quan LU1,*,Jie QI2,*,Jian-Long DAI1,*,Yan-Jun ZHANG1,Xiang-Qiang KONG1,Zhen-Huai LI1,Wei-Jiang LI1,Shi-Zhen XU1,Wei TANG1,Dong-Mei ZHANG1,Zhen LUO1,Cheng-Song XIN1,Xue-Zhen SUN2,He-Zhong DONG1,2,*   

  1. 1 Cotton Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Shandong Key Lab for Cotton Culture and Physiology, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
    2 Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2018-10-17 Accepted:2019-01-12 Published:2019-06-12 Published online:2019-06-12
  • Contact: He-Quan LU,Jie QI,Jian-Long DAI,He-Zhong DONG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the China Agricultural Research System(CARS-15-15);the Modern Agro-industry Technological System of Shandong Province(SDAIT-03-01);the Special Fund for Taishan Scholars(Tspd20150213);from Shandong Province, Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences(CXGC2016B05, CXGC2018E06);SAAS Training Fund for Young Talents.

RichHTML

6

PDF

669

摘要：

黄河流域棉区棉花在蕾期常遭遇冰雹所致的物理伤害, 但棉花具有一定的调节补偿能力。明确棉花对不同程度物理伤害的补偿效应, 对灾后棉田管理具有指导意义。以山东主栽棉花品种K836为材料, 于2014—2015年棉花现蕾后第5天在山东省临清市设置去顶去叶(RTL)、去顶留1叶(RT+1LM)、去顶留叶(RT+ALM)、留顶去叶(TM+RL)、留顶留1叶(TM+1LM)以及未损伤的正常植株(CK) 6个处理, 研究不同程度损伤对棉花生长发育、叶面积动态、净光合速率、生物量、棉柴比、产量及产量构成的影响。结果表明, 对于棉花单株干物质量, TM+1LM处理在15 DAT和30 DAT (物理伤害后天数)分别比CK降低59.0%和12.1%, 但在45 DAT和60 DAT与CK无差异; 其余伤害处理在15~60 DAT均不同程度降低。叶面积指数变化动态与干物质积累趋势一致。处理45 DAT内, RTL、RT+1LM、RT+ALM和TM+RL的净光合速率均低于对照, 且高峰值出现时间推迟, TM+1LM的净光合速率变化趋势及高峰值出现时间与对照一致。TM+RL生物产量较CK降低18.2%, 而RTL、RT+1LM、RT+ALM和TM+1LM的生物产量与CK相当; RTL、RT+1LM、RT+ALM和TM+RL的棉柴比分别比CK降低52.6%、47.3%、36.8%和23.7%, 而TM+1LM的棉柴比与CK无明显差异。RTL、RT+1LM、RT+ALM和TM+RL单位面积铃数分别减少19.0%、7.2%、9.9%和15.6%, 单铃重分别降低23.2%、8.9%、8.9%和19.6%, 籽棉产量分别降低36.3%、17.5%、15.5%和31.9%, 而TM+1LM的铃数和单铃重没有显著降低, 籽棉产量与CK相当。据此, 把蕾期物理损伤分为轻度损伤(TM+1LM)、中度损伤(RT+1LM、RT+ALM)和重度损伤(RTL、TM+RL), 其减产幅度分别在5%以内、15%左右和30%以上。对于轻度和中度损伤棉田, 宜加强水肥管理促进棉花补偿性生长, 减少产量损失; 对于重度损伤棉田, 可以考虑改种其他短季作物。

关键词: 棉花, 物理伤害, 生长, 产量, 补偿

Abstract:

Hail-caused physical damage on cotton often occurs at squaring in Yellow River basin. Cotton is characterized as indeterminate growth habit as well as great compensatory ability. It is very important to determine the recovery potential after physical damage. A two-year (2014-2015) field experiment was carried out at Linqing of Shandong province with six treatments at five days after squaring, including removal of main-stem terminal and total leaves, RTL; removal of main-stem terminal but one leaf maintained, RT+1LM; removal of main-stem terminal but total leaves maintained, RT+ALM; main-stem terminal maintained but removal of total leaves, TM+RL; main-stem terminal and one leaf maintained, TM+1LM; and non-damaged, CK. A randomized blocks design was used for the study. Results showed that dry weight of single plant in RTL, RT+1LM, RT+ALM and TM+RL was significantly reduced at 15-60 days after treatment (DAT) as compared with that of CK. Dry weight of single plant in TM+1LM was reduced by 59.0% and 12.1% at 15 and 30 DAT, respectively, and slightly reduced at 45 and 60 DAT. LAI dynamics of six treatments were similar to those of biomass from 15 to 60 DAT. The leaf net photosynthetic rate of RTL, RT+1LM, RT+ALM and TM+RL was lower than that of control from 15 to 45 DAT, and the peak occurrence of Pn was delayed, while the Pn of TM+1LM and its peak period were similar to that of CK. Total biomass TM+RL was reduced by 18.2% in, but not changed in RTL, RT+1LM, RT+ALM, and TM+1LM compared with that of CK. Ratio of seedcotton to stalk of RTL, RT+1LM, RT+ALM, and TM+RL was decreased by 52.6%, 47.3%, 36.8%, and 23.7% compared with that of CK, but not significantly changes in TM+1LM. The number of bolls per unit land area in RTL, RT+1LM, RT+ALM, and TM+RL decreased by 19%, 7.2%, 9.9%, and 15.6%, boll weight decreased by 23.2%, 8.9%, 8.9%, and 19.6%, and thus seedcotton yield decreased by 36.3%, 17.5%, 15.5%, and 31.9%, respectively. However, TM+1LM did not significantly reduce the number of bolls and boll weight, and produced comparable yield to CK. The results of this study indicate that cotton plants have strong compensation effects on biological yield and economic yield owing to the indeterminate growth habit after physical damage at squaring stage, but the compensatory effects are varied by the extent of physical damage. Accordingly, the physical injury at squaring was divided into light injury (TM+1LM), moderate injury (RT+1LM, RT+ALM), and severe injury (RTL, TM+RL), in which the yield reduction was less than 5%, 15%, and more than 30%, respectively. For lightly and moderately damaged cotton fields, water and fertilizer management is strongly recommended to promote cotton compensatory growth and reduce yield losses, while for seriously damaged cotton fields, replanting other short-season crops could be considered.

Key words: cotton, physical damage, growth, yield, compensation

图1

去顶去叶(RTL)、去顶留1叶(RT+1LM)、去顶留所有叶(RT+ALM)、留顶去叶(TM+RL)、留顶留1叶(TM+1LM)及正常植株(CK) 6个处理"

图2

2014-2015年物理损伤对棉花单株生物量积累的影响缩写同图1。Abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

图3

2014-2015年物理损伤对棉花群体叶面积指数的影响缩写同图1。Abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 1."

图4

2014-2015年物理损伤对棉花净光合速率(Pn)的影响缩写同图1。"

表1

2014-2015年物理损伤对棉花生物产量和棉柴比的影响"

处理
Treatment		20142015平均Average
生物产量
Biological yield
(kg hm-2)		棉柴比Seedcotton/
stalk		生物产量
Biological yield
(kg hm-2)		棉柴比Seedcotton/
stalk		生物产量
Biological yield
(kg hm-2)		棉柴比Seedcotton/
stalk
RTL9902 cd0.33 e10158 b0.39 d10030 b0.36 d
RT+1LM12384 a0.40 d11130 a0.42 d11757 a0.40 d
RT+ALM11229 b0.45 c11105 a0.51 c11167 a0.48 c
TM+RL8422 d0.52 b7737 d0.65 b8079 c0.58 b
TM+1LM10100 c0.71 a10249 b0.71 ab10114 b0.71 a
CK10053 c0.72 a9699 c0.80 a9876 b0.76 a

表2

2014-2015年物理损伤对棉花产量、产量结构和早熟性的影响"

处理
Treatment		20142015
籽棉
Seedcotton
(kg hm-2)		铃数
Bolls m-2		铃重
Boll weight
(g)		早熟性
Earliness
(%)		籽棉
Seedcotton
(kg hm-2)		铃数
Bolls m-2		铃重
Boll weight
(g)		早熟性
Earliness
(%)
RTL2646 f60.5 e4.3 c52.5 e2907 e73.4 d4.0 e65.8 f
RT+1LM3438 d69.4 b5.1 b79.9 c3310 c78.5 b4.2 d80.9 d
RT+ALM3510 c67.3 c5.1 b84.4 b3705 b77.1 c4.3 d83.6 b
TM+RL2826 e63.1 d4.5 c57.8 d3066 d76.9 c4.5 c75.5 e
TM+1LM4017 ab72.6 a5.5 a80.0 c4219 a80.7 a5.1 b82.9 c
CK4152 a74.7 a5.6 a90.4 a4306 a81.8 a5.4 a91.1 a
[1] Dai J L, Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M, Li Z H, Lu H Q, Eneji A E, Dong H Z.Manipulation of dry matter accumulation and partitioning with plant density in relation to yield stability of cotton under intensive management.Field Crops Res, 2015, 180: 207-215.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.06.008
[2] Bednarz C W, Bridges D C, Brown S M.Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities.Agron J, 2000, 92: 128-135.
doi: 10.1007/s100870050015
[3] Dong H Z, Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M, Li Z H.Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China.Field Crops Res, 2006, 98: 106-115.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.12.008
[4] 卢合全, 李振怀, 董合忠, 李维江, 唐薇, 张冬梅. 播种期对2个不同类型棉花品种产量和产量构成的影响. 棉花学报, 2012, 24: 312-317.
Lu H Q, Li Z H, Dong H Z, Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M.Effect of planting date on yield and yield components of two different cotton genotypes.Cotton Sci, 2012, 24: 312-317 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Dai J L, Luo Z, Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M, Lu H Q, Li Z H, Xin C X, Kong X Q, Eneji A E, Dong H Z.A simplified pruning method for profitable cotton production in the Yellow River Valley of China. Field Crops Res, 2014, 164: 22-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.010
[6] Dong H Z, Niu Y H, Kong X Q, Luo Z.Effects of early-fruit removal on endogenous cytokinins and abscisic acid in relation to leaf senescence in cotton.Plant Growth Regul, 2009, 59: 90-101.
doi: 10.1007/s10725-009-9392-x
[7] 牛曰华, 董合忠, 李维江, 粟红梅. 去早果枝对抗虫棉产量、品质和早衰的影响. 棉花学报, 2007, 19: 52-56.
Niu Y H, Dong H Z, Li W J, Su H M.Effects of removal of early fruiting branches on yield, fiber quality and premature senescence in Bt transgenic cotton.Cotton Sci, 2007, 19: 52-56 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] Dong H Z, Kong X Q, Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M.Effects of plant density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization on cotton yield and uptake of major nutrients in two fields with varying fertility.Field Crops Res, 2010, 119: 106-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.06.019
[9] Dong H Z, Li W J, Eneji A E, Zhang D M.Nitrogen rate and plant density effects on yield and late-season leaf senescence of cotton raised on a saline field.Field Crops Res, 2012, 126: 137-144.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.10.005
[10] Dai J L, Li W J, Zhang D M, Tang W, Li Z H, Lu H Q, Kong X Q, Luo Z, Xu S Z, Xin C S, Dong H Z.Competitive yield and economic benefits of cotton achieved through a combination of extensive pruning and a reduced nitrogen rate at high plant density. Field Crops Res, 2017, 209: 65-72.
[11] Lu H Q, Dai J L, Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M, Eneji A E, Dong H Z.Yield and economic benefits of late planted short-season cotton versus full-season cotton relayed with garlic.Field Crops Res, 2017, 200: 80-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.10.006
[12] 张艳军, 董合忠. 棉花对淹水胁迫的适应机制. 棉花学报, 2015, 27: 80-88.
Zhang Y J, Dong H Z.Mechanisms for adapting to waterlogging stress in cotton.Cotton Sci, 2015, 27: 80-88 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] Zhang Y J, Song X Z, Yang G Z, Li Z H, Lu H Q, Kong X Q, Eneji A E, Dong H Z.Physiological and molecular adjustment of cotton to waterlogging at peak-flowering in relation to growth and yield.Field Crops Res, 2015, 179: 164-172.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.001
[14] Zhang Y Z, Chen Y Z, Lu H Q, Kong X Q, Dai J L, Li Z H, Dong H Z.Growth, lint yield and changes in physiological attributes of cotton under temporal waterlogging.Field Crops Res, 2016, 194: 83-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.006
[15] Sadras V O, Wilson L J.Recovery of cotton crops after early season damage by thrips (Thysanoptera). Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 399-409.
doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(97)00110-5
[16] Terry L I.Effect of early season insecticide use and square removal on fruiting patterns and fiber quality of cotton.J Econ Entomol, 1992, 85: 1402-1412.
doi: 10.1093/jee/85.4.1402
[17] Brook K D, Hearn A B, Kelly C F.Response of cotton,Gossypium hirsutum L., to damage by insect pests in Australia: manual simulation of damage. J Econ Entomol, 1992, 85: 1368-1377.
[18] Bednarz C W, Roberts P M.Spatial yield distribution in cotton following early-season floral bud removal.Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 1800-1808.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.1800
[19] Pettigrew W T, Heitholt J J, Meredith W R.Early season floral bud removal and cotton growth, yield, and fiber quality.Agron J, 1992, 84: 209-214.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400020017x
[20] Stewart S D, Layton M B, Williams M R, Ingram D, Maily W.Response of cotton to pre-bloom square loss.J Econ Entomol, 2001, 94: 388-396.
doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-94.2.388 pmid: 11332830
[21] Kerby T A, Buxton D R.Competition between adjacent fruiting forms in cotton.Agron J, 1981, 73: 867-871.
[22] Kletter E, Wallach D.Effects of fruiting form removal on cotton reproductive development.Field Crops Res, 1982, 5: 69-84.
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(82)90007-7
[23] Kerns D L, Fromme D D, Baugh B A, Doederlein T.Ability of cotton on the Texas High Plains to compensate for pre-bloom square loss and impact on yield and fiber quality.J Cotton Sci, 2016, 20: 103-115.
[24] Mo J H, McDougall S, Beaumont S, Munro S, Stevens M. Effects of simulated seedling defoliation on growth and yield of cotton in southern New South Wales. Crop Pasture Sci, 2018, 69: 915-925.
[25] Zhang D M, Li W J, Tang W, Dong H Z.Fruiting-branch removal enhances endotoxin expression and lint yield in Bt cotton.Acta Agric Scand, 2009, 59: 424-430.
doi: 10.1080/09064710802322147
[26] 杨举善, 戴敬. 雹灾对棉花生育的影响及其补救措施的效应研究. 耕作与栽培, 1995, (4): 25-27.
Yang J S, Dai J.Study on the effects of hail impact on cotton growth and remedial measures.Till Cultiv, 1995, (4): 25-27 (in Chinese).
[27] 李明正, 赵凤仙. 不同程度雹灾对棉花生长和产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34: 649-673.
Li M Z, Zhao F X.Effects of different degree hail on growth and yield of cotton.Anhui Agric Sci, 2006, 34: 649-673 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 杨媛媛, 徐文修, 张巨松. 冰雹灾害对不同棉花品种(系)生长发育及产量的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2004, 41: 402-406.
Yang Y Y, Xu W X, Zhang J S.Effects of hail calamity on growth and yield of different breeds of cotton.Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2004, 41: 402-406 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 赵金涛, 岳耀杰, 王静爱, 尹圆圆, 冯红英. 1950-2009年中国大陆地区冰雹灾害的时空格局分析. 中国农业气象, 2015, 36: 83-92.
Zhao J T, Yue Y J, Wang J A, Yin Y Y, Feng H Y.Study on spatio-temporal pattern of hail disaster in China mainland from 1950 to 2009.Chin J Agrometeorol, 2015, 36: 83-92 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 马红彬, 谢应忠. 不同放牧强度下荒漠草原植物的补偿性生长. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 3645-3650.
Ma H B, Xie Y Z.Plant compensatory growth under different grazing intensities in desert steppe.Sci Agric Sin, 2008, 41: 3645-3650 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 赵丽英, 邓西平, 山仑. 水分亏缺下作物补偿效应类型及机制研究概述. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15: 523-526.
Zhao L Y, Deng X P, Shan L.A review on types and mechanism of compensation effect of crops under water deficit.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15: 523-526 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 王志贤, 李新裕, 贺志强. 不同密度长绒棉蕾期受害后的产量补偿能力模拟试验. 湖北农业科学, 2006, 45: 302-304.
Wang Z X, Li X Y, He Z Q.Imitative test on the output compensation ability of long-staple cotton with the different density after suffering injury in the bud period. Hubei Agric Sci, 2006, 45: 302-304 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] Wilson L J, Sadras V O, Heimoana S C, Gibb D.How to succeed by doing nothing: cotton compensation after simulated early season pest damage.Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 2125-2134.
[34] Wilson L J, Lei T T, Sadras V O, Wilson L T, Heimoana S C.Undamaged cotton plants yield more if their neighbour is damaged: implications for pest management.Bull Entomol Res, 2009, 99: 467-478.
doi: 10.1017/s0007485308006500 pmid: 19203400
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[6] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[7] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[8] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[11] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[12] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[13] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[14] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2