欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 428-434.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00428

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用核心种质发挥及评价花生抗黄曲霉资源

姜慧芳1,任小平1,王圣玉1,张晓杰1,黄家权1,廖伯寿1,Corley C HOLBROOKA2,Hari D UPADHYAYA3   

  1. 1中国农业科学院油料作物研究所，湖北武汉 430062; 2 USDA-ARS, P O Box 748, Tifton, Georgia 31793, USA; 3 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, A P 502 324, India
  • 收稿日期:2009-07-09 修回日期:2009-10-02 出版日期:2010-03-12 网络出版日期:2009-12-21
  • 通讯作者: peanutlab@oilcrops.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国际科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD13B05-2），国家自然科学基金项目（30571132），国家科技基础条件平台项目（2005DKA21002-13）和农作物种质资源保护项目（NB05-070401-32）资助。

Development and Evaluation of Peanut Germplasm with Resistance to Aspergillus flavus from Core Collection

JIANG Hui-Fang1,REN Xiao-Ping1,WANG Sheng-Yu1,ZHANG Xiao-Jie1,HUANG Jia-Quan1，LIAO Bo-Shou1,Corley C HOLBROOKA2, Hari D UPADHYAYA3   

  1. 1 Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China; 2 USDA-ARS, PO Box 748, Tifton, Georgia 31793, USA; 3 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, AP 502 324, India
  • Received:2009-07-09 Revised:2009-10-02 Published:2010-03-12 Published online:2009-12-21
  • Contact: peanutlab@oilcrops.cn

PDF

1797

被引次数

8

摘要：

黄曲霉菌极大地限制全世界的花生生产和产业发展，且生产上抗性品种较少，我国花生育种和生产中的抗性资源缺乏，迫切需要发掘抗黄曲霉菌种质。本研究以中国花生核心种质561份和ICRISAT微核心种质155份，鉴定了黄曲霉侵染和产毒抗性，发掘出抗黄曲霉侵染和产毒种质各8份，包括具优良农艺性状的抗黄曲霉产毒种质51002-6。鉴定结果表明，ICRISAT花生微核心种质中抗黄曲霉侵染和产毒种质的频率高于中国花生核心种质；普通型花生资源中抗黄曲霉侵染种质的频率较高，龙生型资源中抗黄曲霉产毒种质的频率较高。根据SSR分析，鉴定出与生产上推广应用的优良品种中花5号、中花6号、中花12和远杂9102遗传距离较远的抗黄曲霉产毒种质ICG12625和抗侵染种质ICG4750，拓宽了我国花生品种改良的遗传基础。根据抗病基因产物的NBS类型保守域设计简并引物对抗黄曲霉种质的DNA进行PCR扩增、克隆、测序和分析，获得了1条RGA片段。

关键词: 花生核心种质, 抗黄曲霉资源, 农艺性状, SSR遗传多样性, RGA

Abstract:

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), one of the main oil and cash crops in the world, is easily susceptible to Aspergillus flavus, resulting huge loss in its quality, so Aspergillus flavus infection greatly limits peanut production and industry in China. Therefore, it is imperative to develop new peanut germplasm with resistance to Aspergillus flavus in breeding program. The core collection is well accepted as a useful way to improve the efficiency of crop germplasm evaluation and utilization, which contains a subset of accessions from the entire collection that covers the most of available genetic information. In the present study, a total of 561 accessions of Chinese peanut core collection and 155 accessions of ICRISAT mini core collection were identified. Eight varieties with resistance to Aspergillus flavus invasion and aflatoxin production each were developed, including one (51002-6) with elite agronomic traits. The peanut germplasm with resistance to Aspergillus flavus invasion and aflatoxin production in ICRISAT mini core were more than those in Chinese peanut core collection. In addition, the percentages of accessions with resistance to Aspergillus flavus invasion in var. hypogaea, and accessions resistant to aflatoxin production in var. hirsuta were relatively high in comparison with others. Genetic diversity in the resistant peanut selections was evaluated based on morphological traits and SSR approach. ICG12625 with resistance to aflatoxin production and ICG4750 with resistance to aflatoxin invasion were evaluated by SSR, the genetic distance of them with high-yielding cultivars such as Zhonghua 5, Zhonghua 6 and Zhonghua 12 and Yuanza 9102 was larger. The primers were designed based on the conserved NBS-LRR domains of the disease resistance genes sequence, one RGA (Resistance gene analog) from genomic DNA of six different peanuts with resistance to Aspergillus flavus was obtained through PCR.

Key words: Peanut core collection, Varieties with Resistance to Aspergillus flavus, Agronomic Traits, SSR genetic diversity, RGA


[1]         Liang X-Q(粱炫强), Pan R-Z(潘瑞炽), Bin J-H(宾金华). Progress on mechanism of resistance to Aspergillus infection in peanut. Chin Oil Crops Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2000, 22(3): 77–80 (in Chinese with an English abstract)


[2]         Liang X-Q(梁炫强), Pan R-Z(潘瑞炽), Bin J-H(宾金华). Factors related to preharvest resistance to Aspergillus infection in peanut. Chin Oil Crops Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2000, 22(4): 67–70 (in Chinese with an English abstract)


[3]         Xiao D-R(肖达人), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Qu Z(瞿桢). Progress on aflatoxin contamination of peanut. Peanut Sci Tech (花生科技), 1999, 28(suppl): 124–129 (in Chinese)


[4]         Xiao D-R(肖达人), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Zhang H-L(张洪玲). Rapid identifying method for resistance to aflatoxin production in peanut. Chin Oil Crops Sci (中国油料作物学报), 1999, 21(3): 72–76 (in Chinese with an English abstract)


[5]         Mehan V K, McDonald D. Research on the aflatoxin problem in groundnut at ICRISAT. Plant Soil, 1984, 79: 255–260


[6]         Mehan V K, McDonald D, Rasagopalan K. Resistance of peanut genotypes to seed infection by Aspergillus flavus in field trials in India. Peanut Sci, 1987, 14: 17–21


[7]         Mehan V K, McDonald D, Haravu L J, Jayanthi S. The groundnut aflatoxin problem: Review and literature database. ICRISAT Press, 1991


[8]         Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Ren X-P(任小平). Reaction of groundnut germplasm to Aspergillus flavus invasion. Chin Oil Crops Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2002, 24: 23–25 (in Chinese with an English abstract)


[9]         Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Ren X-P(任小平), Wang S-Y(王圣玉). Evaluation for resistance to invasion and aflatoxin contamination caused by Aspergillus flavus in groundnut. Chin Oil Crops Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2005, 27(3): 21–25 (in Chinese with an English abstract)


[10]      JiangH-F(姜慧芳), Ren X-P(任小平), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Liao B-S(廖伯寿). Durability of resistance to Aspergillus flavus infection and effect of intact testa without injury on Aflatoxin production in peanut. Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2006, 32(6): 851–855 (in Chinese with an English abstract)


[11]      Mixon A C. Peanut accessions resistance to seed infection by Aspergillus flavus. Agron J, 1973, 65: 560–562


[12]      Mixon A C. Reducing Aspergillus species infection of peanut seed using resistant genotypes. J Environ Qual, 1986, 15: 101–103


[13]      Holbrook C C, Anderson W F. Evaluation of a core collection to identify resistance to late leaf spot in peanut. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1700–1702


[14]      Holbrook C C, Timper P, Xue H Q. Evaluation of the core collection approach for identifying resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria in peanut. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1172–1175


[15]      Anderson W F, Holbrook C C, Culbreath A K. Screening the core collection for resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus. Peanut Sci, 1996, 23: 57–61


[16]      Isleib T G, Beute M K, Rice P W, Hollowell J E. Screening the peanut core collection for resistance to Cylindrocladium black rot and early leaf spot. Proc Am Peanut Res Edu Soc, 1995, 27: 25


[17]      Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Ren X-P(任小平), Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Huang J-Q(黄家权), Lei Y(雷永), Chen B-Y(陈本银), Guo B Z, Holbrook C C, Upadhyaya H D. Peanut core collection established in china and compared with ICRISAT mini core collection. Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2008, 34(1): 25–30 (in Chinese with an English abstract)


[18]      Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), duan N-X(段乃雄). Descriptors and data standard for peanut (Arachis spp.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. pp 11–36 (in Chinese)


[19]      Lei Y(雷永), Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Li D(李栋), Jiang H-F(姜慧芳). Identification of AFLP markers for resistance to seed infection by Aspergillus flavus in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2005, 31: 1349–1353 (in Chinese with an English abstract)


[20]      Mace E S, Phong D T. SSR analysis of cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm resistant to rust and late leaf spot diseases. Euphytica, 2006, 152: 317–330
[1] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[2] 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630.
[3] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117.
[5] 陈于婷, 丁晓雨, 许本波, 张学昆, 徐劲松, 殷艳. 气候变暖对冬油菜产量、品质及重要农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 516-525.
[6] 李琰, 李雨晨, 于爱萍, 陈爱萍. 8份无芒雀麦种质资源的草产量与营养品质的综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3377-3386.
[7] 蒋昂辰, 李琰, 李雨晨, 张晶, 陈爱萍. 21份无芒雀麦种质农艺性状及种子产量的综合评价与优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2958-2970.
[8] 桂灵星, 凌溪铁, 唐兆成, 罗文臻, 朱盼珍, 仇泽宇, 张保龙. 宁麦36抗甲氧咪草烟矮秆突变体的鉴定及农艺性状分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2923-2932.
[9] 姜骁, 赵健鑫, 毕竞男, 许静, 殷祥贞, 赵旭红, 潘丽娟, 陈娜, 马俊卿, 韩鹏, 杨珍, 迟晓元. 中国北方主产区主要地理和气候因子对花生农艺性状和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2805-2820.
[10] 聂波涛, 刘德泉, 陈健, 崔正果, 侯云龙, 陈亮, 邱红梅, 王跃强. 北方春大豆品种农艺和品质性状分析与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[11] 李长喜, 董占鹏, 关永虎, 刘金伟, 李航, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉农艺性状与皮棉产量性状的遗传贡献及决策系数分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1486-1502.
[12] 刘园园, 董建科, 应静文, 梅文祥, 程刚, 郭晶晶, 焦文标, 宋波涛. 利用野生种Solanum boliviense创制马铃薯抗寒种质[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1384-1393.
[13] 梁星伟, 杨文亭, 金雨, 胡莉, 傅小香, 陈先敏, 周顺利, 申思, 梁效贵. 玉米穗轴的颜色变化, 是偶然还是与农艺性状存在关联?——以历年国审普通品种为例[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 771-778.
[14] 薛亚鹏, 辛旭霞, 王若楠, 于筱菡, 刘少雄, 王瑞云, 刘敏轩. 国内外谷子资源农艺、品质性状差异分析以及遗传多样性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2468-2482.
[15] 刘佳, 龚方仪, 刘亚西, 颜泽洪, 钟晓英, 陈厚霖, 黄林, 伍碧华. 野生二粒小麦主要农艺特性融入普通小麦的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1184-1196.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2