欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (07): 964-971.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

用“对话”试验探索植物组织培养机制并建立适用性广的小麦组织培养方法

王海波1; 范云六2   

  1. 1河北省农林科学院遗传与生理研究所,河北石家庄 050051;2中国农业科学院生物研究所,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2005-08-31 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-07-12 网络出版日期:2006-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 王海波

Researching the Mechanism in Plant in vitro Culture via “Communication” Experiment and to Establish the Methods Widely Used for Tissue Culture of Wheat

WANG Hai-Bo1,FAN Yun-Liu2   

  1. 1Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei; 2Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2005-08-31 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-07-12 Published online:2006-07-12
  • Contact: WANG Hai-Bo

摘要:

以小麦为试材,以揭示培养因素与培养结果之间的对应关系为目标,通过用类似“对话”试验的方法探索了基因型、外植体类型、培养基、培养条件等在植物组织培养中的作用和影响。结果表明,基因型不影响愈伤组织的形成,只影响和决定愈伤组织的质量。外植体既影响愈伤组织的形成,又影响愈伤组织的质量。由外植体类型造成的愈伤组织质量差异并不亚于由基因型所造成的差异,但其作用主要表现在离体培养的早期阶段。培养基除了向培养物提供营养外,不同培养基之间的差别更主要地表现为对愈伤组织质量的不同调控效应。一般情况下,2,4-D和NH4+对细胞分裂、愈伤组织生长表现为促进作用;细胞分裂素、NO3-对细胞分裂、愈伤组织生长表现为抑制作用。光照具有类似细胞分裂素的效应。温度变化对愈伤组织质量也具有调控作用。各培养因素的作用实际上均转化为生理生化效应。借助这种认识,所有培养因素的作用均可在生理生化水平得到解释。据此,植物组织培养的可预见性和可控性得到大幅度增强。通过本研究,为小麦组织培养建立了有较广泛适用意义的方法。

关键词: “对话”试验, 组织培养因素, 愈伤组织质量, 小麦组织培养

Abstract:

Plant in vitro culture has a history of more than one hundred years, but it is still unable to be predicted and inferred. There are 4 kinds of elements for plant in vitro culture: genotype (genetic elements), explant-type (physiological elements), medium (chemical elements), culture-conditions (physical elements). In order to find out the effects of these elements and the mechanisms in plant in vitro culture, a series of “communication” experiments aimed at revealing the relationship between culture- elements and culture-results were conducted. Wheat was used as the main materials (Table 1). Callus induction, subculture and callus quality improvement and evaluation were carried out with mature and immature embryos of different varieties on different media (MS, LS, N6, C17 etc.) under different conditions (Table 2, 3). The effects of genotype, explant-type, medium, culture-conditions to plant tissue culture were studied systematically. The results showed that: Genotype only determined the quality but did not limit the induction of callus. Explants affected both the formation of callus and its quality at early stage. The difference of callus quality originated from explants was no less than that from genotypes. Despite of providing nutrients, medium also played a very important role in regulating the quality of callus. Generally, 2,4-D, NH4+ usually accelerated cell division and the growth of callus but cytokinin, NO3- showed opposite effects. Light had the similar effects to cytokinins. Temperature variation played an influential role to callus too. These results were also improved with corn, rice, millet, cotton and so on. All the functions from these elements in in vitro culture can be considered or imagined as the effects at physiological and biochemical levels and they can be managed as coadjutant factors according to the needs of callus quality improvement. With this idea, plant in vitro culture comes to be more controllable. Through this study, a series of methods wildly used for wheat tissue culture was established.

Key words: Communication experiments, Tissue culture elements, Callus quality, Tissue culture of wheat

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 王晓英;贺明荣. 水氮耦合对济麦20籽粒蛋白质组分及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(01): 126-131.
[2] 姜春明;尹燕枰;刘霞;王振林. 不同耐热性小麦品种旗叶膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性对花后高温胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(01): 143-148.
[3] 高德荣;郭文善;程顺和;封超年;朱新开;彭永欣. 不同Wx蛋白缺失类型小麦穗发芽特性的初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1917-1919.
[4] 郭东伟;佘茂云;李连城;陈耀峰;陈明;徐兆师;马有志. 以小麦根尖分生组织细胞核及染色体制备高分子量DNA[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1920-1923.
[5] 王爱萍;毛新国;景蕊莲;昌小平;杨武德. TaMyb2-Ⅱ基因在普通小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)及其近缘种中的单核苷酸多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1809-1816.
[6] 张平平;陈东升;张勇;夏先春;何中虎. 春播小麦醇溶蛋白组成及其对品质性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1796-1801.
[7] 宁海龙;李文霞;李文滨. 大豆脂肪酸组分的胚、细胞质和母体遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1873-1877.
[8] 毛新国;汤继凤;周荣华;景蕊莲;贾继增. 基于全长cDNA序列的小麦cSNP发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1836-1840.
[9] 崔志富;林志珊;辛志勇;唐益苗;张增艳;卢勤. 应用GISH与STS标记鉴定小麦-中间偃麦草抗黄矮病端体系[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1855-1859.
[10] 程颖;宋伟;刘志勇;解超杰;倪中福;彭惠茹;聂秀玲;杨作民;孙其信. 小麦品种贵农21抗条锈病基因的SSR标记[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1867-1872.
[11] 王长有;吉万全;张改生;王秋英;薛秀庄. 普通小麦与Elymus rectisetus异附加系的分子细胞遗传学鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1898-1901.
[12] 石玉;于振文;王东;李延奇;王雪. 施氮量和底追比例对小麦氮素吸收转运及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1860-1866.
[13] 李根英;Susanne Dreisigacker;Marilyn L. Warburton;夏先春;何中虎;孙其信. 小麦指纹图谱数据库的建立及SSR分子标记试剂盒的研发[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1771-1778.
[14] 张凯鸣;马鸿翔;陆维忠;蔡志翔;陈怀谷;袁生. 小麦赤霉病与DON积累的抗性及其相关SSR位点差异[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1788-1795.
[15] 刘红梅;刘太国;徐世昌;刘大群;陈万权. 小麦抗源兴资9104抗条锈性遗传研究初报[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(11): 1742-1745.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!