欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (02): 290-296.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00290

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

华北平原免耕冬小麦生长发育特征研究

李素娟;陈继康;陈阜;李琳;张海林*   

  1. 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院/农业部作物栽培与耕作学重点实验室, 北京100094

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-02-12 网络出版日期:2008-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 张海林

Characteristics of Growth and Development of Winter Wheat under Zero-tillage in North China Plain

LI Su-Juan,CHEN Ji-Kang,CHEN Fu,LI Lin,ZHANG Hai-Lin*

  

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University /Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100094, China

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-02-12 Published online:2008-02-12
  • Contact: ZHANG Hai-Lin

摘要:

2004—2006年在河北栾城中国科学院农业生态试验站开展了不同耕作方式下冬小麦生长发育特征及其影响因素的比较研究。冬小麦基本苗数和分蘖率在不同耕作方式间差异显著, 表现为免耕<旋耕<翻耕。免耕处理冬小麦分蘖成穗率高于翻耕和免耕处理, 但基本苗数低, 2004—2005生长季比翻耕和旋耕处理分别低28.9%和29.7%, 2005—2006生长季分别低11.7%和10.0%; 免耕处理冬小麦株高、叶面积指数、地上部干物质积累和产量均低于翻耕和旋耕处理, 其中叶面积指数在2004—2005和2005—2006生长季的最高值分别为2.9和6.0, 产量比翻耕降低30.1%和27.19%、比旋耕降低15.3%和25.20%。免耕可保持耕层较高的土壤水分含量, 总体上高于翻耕和旋耕处理; 免耕处理在冬小麦苗期和返青期表现出明显的“降温效应”, 耕层土壤日均温度低于翻耕和旋耕, 冬小麦出苗和返青较翻耕和旋耕分别晚1~3 d和4~5 d。

关键词:

免耕, 冬小麦, 生长发育, 华北平原

Abstract:

The agro-ecosystem in North China Plain is challenged by water shortage, environmental pollution with burning crop stalks and high cost. Practice of conservation tillage is very essential in North China Plain for saving water, reducing environment pollution and tillage cost, increasing the crop productivity and organic matter content of soil. With the extension of conservation techniques, zero-tillage arouses more and more attention in the area. Some investigators found yield increasing with zero-tillage, but some experiments indicated the weaker seedling and revival stage delaying of winter wheat under zero-tillage as compared with conventional tillage. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the growth and development of winter wheat under zero-tillage treatment in North China Plain and to explore the reason of the influence of zero-tillage. The experiment using the winter wheat cultivar “Kenong 9204” with three tillage treatments including conventional tillage with stubble incorporating (CT), rotary tillage with residue returning (RT), and zero-tillage with stubble direct drilling (ZT) was conducted in Luancheng Ecological Experimental Station of Chinese Academy of Sciences during 2004–2006 growth seasons. To keep similar rate of seedling emergence in all treatments, seeding rate was from 165.0 kg ha-1 (in CT and RT treatments) increased to 262.5 kg ha-1 in ZT treatment. In addition to the characteristics of growth and development of wheat, the plough layer temperature and soil water con-tent were measured. Soil temperature was measured by thermoelectric couple every day. Soil moisture was observed by TDR (plough layer soil) and neutron instrument (deeper than 20 cm) every 14 d during winter and every 7 d for the rest time. The basic seedling and tillers in three treatments ranked significantly as ZT<RT<CT (P≤0.05), but the percentage of seed-setting tillers in ZT treatment was higher than that in CT treatment. The number of basic seedling in ZT was lower than that in CT by 28.9% and 11.7% in 2004–2005 and 2005–2006 growth seasons, and lower than that in RT by 11.7% and 10.0%, respectively. The plant height, leaf area index, dry weight of wheat shoot and grain yield were the lowest in ZT treatment because of the deficient population. In ZT treatment, the maximum leaf area indices were 2.9 and 6.0 in two growth seasons, respectively. Grain yield of ZT reduced by 30.1% and 27.2% as compared with that of CT in the two growth seasons and decreased by 15.3% and 25.2% than that of RT, respectively. The water content in 0–30 cm soil layer in ZT treatment was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that in CT treatment during the whole growing period. The topsoil temperature was the lowest in ZT treatment from seedling to revival stages, indicating ZT had a “lower temperature effect”, which delays the emergence and revival of seedlings and reduce tillering rate in winter wheat. The time of seedling emergence and revival in ZT was late 1–3 and 4–5 d than that in CT and RT, respectively.

Key words:

Zero-tillage, Winter wheat, Growth and development, North China Plain

[1] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[2] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[3] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[4] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[5] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[6] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[7] 王娇, 白海霞, 韩语燕, 梁惠, 冯雅楠, 张东升, 李萍, 宗毓铮, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇. CO2浓度升高、升温及其交互作用对良星99冬小麦叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1061-1076.
[8] 李慧敏, 邢志鹏, 张海鹏, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 李光彦. 化学调控及其他栽培措施在小麦抗倒伏高产栽培中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 847-862.
[9] 郭冰, 秦家范, 李娜, 宋梦瑶, 王黎明, 李君霞, 马小倩. 谷子SHMT基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 586-5897.
[10] 丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[11] 张妍妍, 李迎, 刘栩辰, 黄超, 吕佳宁, 周海佳, 马守田, 秦安振, 高子乐, 吴光辉, 陈丹, 姬夏楠, 刘战东. 深松耕作条件下滴灌对冬小麦花后干物质积累及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3065-3079.
[12] 陈昊翔, 万鑫杰, 陈青, 王劲松, 董二伟, 王媛, 黄晓磊, 刘秋霞, 焦晓燕. 石灰性褐土条件下高粱与玉米耐瘠薄特性及对土壤肥力响应的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2775-2787.
[13] 张军, 胡川, 周起晖, 任开明, 董誓言, 刘傲寒, 吴金芝, 黄明, 李友军. 减氮及有机肥替代对旱地冬小麦干物质积累、转运、分配和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 207-220.
[14] 郭思语, 赵克勇, 代正罡, 邹华文, 吴忠义, 张春. 玉米N-乙酰转移酶ZmNAT1基因响应非生物胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2001-2013.
[15] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 王威, 孙娜, 颜国荣, 张胜军, 刘杰, 倪中福, 徐麟. 新疆冬小麦籽粒品质性状遗传差异与关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1394-1405.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!