欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 361-368.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00361

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆抗筛豆龟蝽Megacota cribraria (Fabricius)的QTL分析

邢光南1,**; 周斌1,**; 赵团结1; 喻德跃1; 邢邯1; 陈受宜2; 盖钧镒1,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学大豆研究所/国家大豆改良中心/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室, 江苏南京210095; 2 中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所, 北京100101
  • 收稿日期:2007-05-31 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-12 网络出版日期:2008-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 盖钧镒

Mapping QTLs of Resistance to Megacota cribraria (Fabricius) in Soybean

XING Guang-Nan1**,ZHOU Bin1**,ZHAO Tuan-Jie1,YU De-Yue1,XING Han1,HEN Shou-Yi2,GAI Jun-Yi1*   

  1. 1 Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University/ National Center for Soybean Improvement/ National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China; 2 Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2007-05-31 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-03-12 Published online:2008-03-12
  • Contact: GAI Jun-Yi

摘要:

筛豆龟蝽是我国南方大豆的主要害虫之一,本研究旨在定位筛豆龟蝽抗性QTL,分析其稳定性,为大豆抗筛豆龟蝽育种提供参考。以科丰1号×南农1138-2组合衍生的184个重组自交系群体NJRIKY(简称KY)和皖82-178×通山薄皮黄豆甲组合衍生的142个重组自交系群体NJRIWT(简称WT)为材料,2004—2006在田间自然虫源下鉴定了筛豆龟蝽抗性。不同年份内以黑霉程度为指标的方差分析结果表明家系间差异在每年都达极显著水平,遗传变异系数都相当大,遗传率中等偏高。利用Windows QTL Cartographer Version 2.5的复合区间作图法(CIM),KY群体的抗性QTL主要位于D1a和C2连锁群,WT群体的抗性QTL主要位于H和D1b连锁群。KY群体3年均检测出的qRMC-d1a-1位于D1a连锁群,贡献率为7.6%~31.4%;2005和2006两年均检测出的qRMC-c2-1位于C2连锁群,与环境有互作,效应相对较小;抗性等位基因来自南农1138-2;qRMC-d1a-1和qRMC-h-1在2005年和2006年存在显著的互作。WT群体连锁群H上的qRMC-h-1在3年中都被检测到,贡献率为16.3%~36.2%;D1b连锁群上的qRMC-d1b-2在2004和2005年被检测到,效应相对较小;抗性等位基因来自通山薄皮黄豆甲。虽然WT群体D1b和H连锁群上的这2个QTL在KY群体中也有一年被检测到,但2个群体抗性位点基本上是不同的。QTL在不同环境被重复检出,说明大豆对筛豆龟蝽的抗性由稳定的主效QTL所控制,其2侧邻近标记有希望用于标记辅助选择育种。

关键词: 大豆[Glycine max (L.) Merr.], 筛豆龟蝽[Megacota cribraria (Fabricius)], 抗虫性, QTL定位

Abstract:

Globular stink bug [Megacota cribraria (Fabricius)] is one of the important pests for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in the central and southern China. However, very few reports on soybean resistant to M. cribraria were found in the literature. The objectives of the present study were to find QTLs associated with resistance to M. cribraria in soybean and to analyze the stability of mapped QTLs among years by using two RIL populations, NJRIKY (or KY) and NJRIWT (or WT) derived from the crosses of Kefeng 1 × Nannong 1138-2 and Wan 82-178 × Tongshanbopihuangdoujia, respectively. The 184 lines of KY and 142 lines of WT were tested and the percentage of black mildew on stem and purple spots on leaves was used as indicator to evaluate their resistance to M. cribraria under natural infestation during 2004–2006. There existed significant differences among lines in the two RIL populations during the three years, with heritability of 66.5%–88.8% in KY and 61.3%–84.8% in WT. The composite interval mapping (CIM) of the software Windows QTL Cartographer Version 2.5 was used to map QTLs. The linkage group D1a and C2 in KY and the linkage group H and D1b in WT were found to be related with resistance to L. indicata. The QTL qRMC-d1a-1 on Linkage group D1a was detected consistently associated with reaction to M. cribraria in KY during the three years, which accounted for 7.6%–31.4% of phenotypic variation; the QTL qRMC-c2-1 on linkage group C2 was detected in 2005–2006, which accounted for less phenotypic variation than the former one; the resistance alleles were from Nannong 1138-2. There appeared significant interactions between qRMC-d1a-1 and qRMC-h-1 in KY in 2005 and 2006. The QTL qRMC-h-1 on linkage group H was detected also consistently associated with reaction to M. cribraria in WT during the three years, which accounted for 16.3%–36.2% of phenotypic variation; the QTL qRMC-d1b-2 on linkage group D1b was detected in 2004-2005, which accounted for less phenotypic variation than the former one; the resistant alleles were from Tongshanbopihuangdoujia. Therefore, different QTLs conferred resistance to M. cribraria in KY and WT basically although the two QTLs in the latter population were also identified in one year in the former population. The fact that the QTLs were repeatedly detected in different environments indicated the resistance was controlled stably by the main QTLs. Based on the results, it is inferred that the markers linked to the detected QTLs should be useful for marker-assisted selection for resistance to M. cribraria in soybean.

Key words: Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr, Globular stink bug [Megacota cribraria (Fabricius)], Resistance to insects, QTL Mapping

[1] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[2] 刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[3] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[4] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[5] 邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735.
[6] 张金泽, 周庆国, 肖莉晶, 金海润, 欧阳青静, 龙旭, 晏中彬, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜不同组织硫苷含量的QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1166-1177.
[7] 郭淑慧, 潘转霞, 赵战胜, 杨六六, 皇甫张龙, 郭宝生, 胡晓丽, 录亚丹, 丁霄, 吴翠翠, 兰刚, 吕贝贝, 谭逢平, 李朋波. 陆地棉D11染色体一个纤维长度主效位点的遗传解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 383-394.
[8] 王哲, 胡燕灵, 龚方仪, 易睿, 赵书宏, 刘睿琴, 刘雨杭, 张甜, 张亚洲, 郑有良, 刘登才, 黄林, 伍碧华. 基于16K芯片的野生二粒小麦渗入系BAd7-209籽粒蛋白含量QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3238-3250.
[9] 徐晓伟, 冯晶, 王凤涛, 童朝阳, 张建周, 李春盈, 蔺瑞明. 小麦地方品种蚕老麦成株抗条锈病QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2933-2943.
[10] 杨景发, 余鑫莲, 姚有华, 姚晓华, 王蕾, 吴昆仑, 李新. 青稞分蘖角度的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 260-272.
[11] 韩丽, 汤胜胜, 李佳, 胡海斌, 刘龙龙, 吴斌. 燕麦SNP高密度遗传图谱构建及β-葡聚糖含量QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1710-1718.
[12] 毕俊鸽, 曾占奎, 李琼, 洪壮壮, 颜群翔, 赵越, 王春平. 两个RIL群体中小麦籽粒品质相关性状QTL定位及KASP标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1669-1683.
[13] 秦娜, 叶珍言, 朱灿灿, 付森杰, 代书桃, 宋迎辉, 景雅, 王春义, 李君霞. 谷子籽粒类黄酮含量和粒色的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1719-1727.
[14] 郑雪晴, 王兴荣, 张彦军, 龚佃明, 邱法展. 玉米果穗相关性状QTL定位及重要候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1435-1450.
[15] 张月, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 刘念, 姜慧芳, 廖伯寿, 雷永. 花生含油量的遗传基础与QTL定位研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 529-542.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!