欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 191-202.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00191

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

我国黄淮和南方主要大豆育成品种家族产量和品质优异等位变异在系谱中遗传的研究

张军12,赵团结1,盖钧镒1*   

  1. 1南京农业大学大豆研究所/国家大豆改良中心/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室,江苏南京210095;2滨州职业学院,山东滨州256603
  • 收稿日期:2008-05-14 修回日期:2008-09-16 出版日期:2009-02-12 网络出版日期:2009-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 盖钧镒
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2006AA100104),国家重点基础研究发展规划(973规划)项目(2004CB7206,2006CB101708,2009CB118404),国家自然科学基金资助项目(30490250,30671266),高等学校创新引智计划(B08025)资助

Inheritance of Elite Alleles of Yield and Quality Traits in the Pedigrees of Major cultivar Families Released in Huanghuai Valleys and Southern China

ZHANG Jun12,ZHAO Tuan-Jie1,GAI Jun-YI1*   

  1. 1Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University/National Center for Soybean Improvement/National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, China;2Binzhou Vocational College,Binzhou 256603,China
  • Received:2008-05-14 Revised:2008-09-16 Published:2009-02-12 Published online:2009-02-12
  • Contact: GAI Jun-Yi

摘要:

以往研究育成品种间的遗传关系只能通过系谱追踪进行一般性分析, 分子标记的发掘则提供了在位点及其等位变异基础上分析育成品种间遗传关系的手段。本研究在黄淮和南方190份大豆育成品种的85个SSR标记与农艺性状关联分析基础上, 将其中163份品种按系谱祖先归为58-161、徐豆1号、齐黄1号、南农493-1、南农1138-2五个家族, 对产量和品质性状进行优异等位变异在系谱中传承情况的分析。所涉及的最佳位点, 产量9个、百粒重3个、蛋白质含量2个、脂肪含量4个, 总解释率分别为91%、36%、13%和31%。每位点考查2个最优等位变异, 家族系谱祖先具有各自的优异等位变异, 随着育种轮次的增加在后育成品种中有丢失; 在系谱祖先基础上新品种衍生过程中吸纳其他亲本, 5个家族趋向共有大部分优异等位变异, 但频率分布不同。5个家族的品种所含有产量最多优异等位变异数未达饱和, 9个位点中最高含7个优异等位变异, 平均每个品种2.23个, 产量有进一步改良潜力。供试条件下高产品种平均产量是低产的2.36倍, 平均优异等位变异数是低产的4.17倍, 高、低产品种优异等位变异构成差异明显, 但高产品种间优异等位变异构成并不相同。也有的品种高产而优异等位变异数并不多, 有的品种优异等位变异较多但产量并不高。大豆育种不断从不同亲本中累积目标性状优异等位变异, 同时有些也在丢失, 应重视保存过时品种的优异等位变异, 以备后用。

关键词: 大豆育成品种, 家族系谱, 优异等位变异, 遗传

Abstract:

It is commonly understand that molecular markers have provided an opportunity for plant breeders to trace genetic relationship precisely among released cultivars, while it can be done only roughly through pedigree analysis. In the present study, 163 released soybean cultivars of the five major family pedigrees in Huanghuai Valleys and Southern China, with 58-161, Xudou 1, Qihuang 1, Nannong 493-1, and Nannong 1138-2 as their respective pedigree ancestor, were analyzed for transition of elite alleles of yield and quality traits in each family pedigree based on the association analysis between 85 SSR loci and agronomic traits in 190 released cultivars in the same region. Two best alleles of each of the nine, three, two and four major loci, explaining 91%, 36%, 13%, and 31% of total phenotypic variation of the four traits, respectively, were traced for their transition in the five cultivar pedigrees. It was found that each pedigree ancestor had its own elite alleles which transited to its progenies, but some of them might be lost during the process. The five family pedigrees tended to share all the elite alleles but with different frequency distributions due to diverse parental materials used in the pedigrees. The cultivars in the pedigrees had different number of elite alleles for yield, where the highest elite allele number contained in a cultivar was seven but not the full of 9 and the average was only 2.33, indicating great yield potential in recombination and accumulation of elite alleles for future breeding. Under the experiment conditions, the average yield of high-yielding cultivars was 2.36 times of that of low-yielding cultivars while the average elite allele number of the former was 4.17 times of that of the latter, but the composition of elite alleles among the high-yielding cultivars was quite different. On the other hand, unusual cases of some cultivars with high yield but less elite alleles and some with low yield but more elite alleles were also observed. It is suggested for breeders to conserve carefully the old cultivars for future breeding since they might have some specific elite alleles in their genome.

Key words: Soybean released cultivar, Family pedigree, Elite allele, Inheritance

[1] Board J E, Modali H. Dry matter accumulation predictors for optimal yield in soybean. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 1790–1799
[2] Yan W K, Rajcan I. Prediction of cultivar performance based on single- versus multiple-year tests in soybean. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 549–555
[3] Xiong D-J(熊冬金), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Geo-graphical sources of germplasm and their nuclear and cytoplas-mic contribution to soybean cultivars released during 1923 to 2005 in China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(2): 175–183(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] Zhou X L, Carter Jr T E, Cui Z L, Miyazaki S, Burto J W. Ge-netic diversity patterns in Japanese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 1331–1342
[5] Cui Z L, Carter Jr T E, Burton J W. Genetic diversity patterns in Chinese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1780–1793
[6] Breseghello F, Sorrells M E. Association mapping of kernel size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Genetics, 2006, 172: 1165–1177
[7] Flint-Garcia S A, Thuillet A C, Yu J M, Pressoir G, Romero S M, Mitchell S E, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Goodman M M, Buckler E S. Maize association population: A high resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant J, 2005, 44: 1054–1064
[8] Ivandic1 V, Hackett C A, Nevo E, Keith R, Thomas W T B, Forster B P. Analysis of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in wild barley from the Fertile Crescent: Associations with ecology, geo- graphy and flowering time. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48: 511–527
[9] Wilson L M, Whitt S R, Ibá?ez A M, Rocheford T R, Goodman M M, Buckler E S. Dissection of maize kernel composition and starch production by candidate gene association. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 2719–2733
[10] Agrama H A, Eizenga G C, Yan W. Association mapping of yield and its components in rice cultivars. Mol Breed, 2007, 19: 341–356
[11] Zhang J(张军), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Association analysis of agronomic trait QTLs with SSR markers in released soy-bean cultivars. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(12): 1–11(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Guan R-X(关荣霞), Guo J-J(郭娟娟), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Marker-based evidence of broadening the genetic base of Chinese soybeans by using introduced soybeans. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(9): 1393–1398(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Zhang B(张博), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟), Chang R-Z(常汝镇). Diversity comparison and genetic relationship analysis between awarded soybean cultivars and their ancestors in China. J Agric Biotechnol (农业生物技术学报), 2003, 11(4): 351–358(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] Qin J(秦君), Chen W-Y(陈维元), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Jiang C-X(姜成喜), Li Y-H(李英惠), Fu Y-S(付亚书), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Genetic contribution of foreign germplasm to elite Chinese soy-bean (Glycine max) cultivars revealed by SSR markers. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2006, 51(6): 686–692(in Chinese)
[15] Fu Y B, Peterson G W, Scoles G, Rossnagel B, Schoen D J, Richards K W. Allelic diversity changes in 96 Canadian oat culti-vars released from 1886 to 2001. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 1989–1995
[16] Reif J C, Hamrit S, Heckenberger M, Schipprack W, Maurer H P, Bohn M, Melchinger A E. Trends in genetic diversity among European maize cultivars and their parental components during the past 50 years. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 111: 838–845
[17] Fu Y B, Peterson G W, Richards K W, Somers D, DePauw R M, Clarke J M. Allelic reduction and genetic shift in the Canadian hard red spring wheat germplasm released from 1845 to 2004. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110: 1505–1516
[1] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[2] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[3] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[4] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[5] 孙辰硕, 张月, 田泽锴, 晏立英, 康彦平, 陈玉宁, 王欣, 淮东欣, 王前前, 姜慧芳, 罗怀勇, 黄莉, 廖伯寿, 王志慧, 雷永. 花生种质果柄强度的遗传分化与主要影响因子分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 118-130.
[6] 梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[7] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[8] 邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735.
[9] 吕国锋, 范金平, 吴素兰, 张晓, 赵仁慧, 李曼, 王玲, 高德荣, 别同德, 刘健. 早熟小麦品种扬麦37主要目标性状的遗传构成分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1538-1547.
[10] 杨思杰, 杜启迪, 柴守玺, 熊宏春, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 郭会君, 刘录祥. 小麦小旗叶突变性状基因定位与遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1548-1557.
[11] 孟祥宇, 刁邓超, 刘雅睿, 李云丽, 孙玉晨, 吴玮, 赵雯, 汪妤, 吴建辉, 李春莲, 曾庆东, 韩德俊, 郑炜君. 小麦新品种西农877高产稳产的遗传特性解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1261-1276.
[12] 宋松泉, 唐翠芳, 程红焱, 王程亮, 袁良兵, 左胜. 谷类作物的胚乳发育及其对种子休眠与萌发的作用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1133-1155.
[13] 谢伶俐, 李永铃, 许本波, 张学昆. 油菜耐渍机理解析及遗传改良研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 287-300.
[14] 王哲, 胡燕灵, 龚方仪, 易睿, 赵书宏, 刘睿琴, 刘雨杭, 张甜, 张亚洲, 郑有良, 刘登才, 黄林, 伍碧华. 基于16K芯片的野生二粒小麦渗入系BAd7-209籽粒蛋白含量QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3238-3250.
[15] 罗珍, 杨妮, 尚晓晖, 余心城, 朱婧怡, 杨光, 胡笑涛. 基于Planet Scope卫星及无人机多光谱影像的宝鸡峡灌区种植结构信息提取[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3317-3330.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!