欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1967-1973.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01967

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

密集烘烤过程中烤烟细胞生理和质地变化

宋朝鹏1,2,宫长荣2,武圣江2,刘文博3,贺帆2,刘闯2,张勇刚2,张卫建1,4,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学农学院，南京 210095；2 河南农业大学烟草学院，河南郑州 450002；3 浙江中烟工业公司，浙江杭州 310000；4 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所，北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-12 修回日期:2010-06-28 出版日期:2010-11-12 网络出版日期:2010-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 张卫建, E-mail: zhangweij@caas.net.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家烟草专卖局项目(3300806156)和河南省教育厅自然科学研究项目(2010B210013)资助。

Changes of Cell Physiology and Texture of Tobacco Leaf during Bulk Flue- Curing

SONG Zhao-Peng1,2,GONG Chang-Rong2,WU Sheng-Jiang2,LIU Wen-Bo3,HE Fan2,LIU Chuan2,ZHANG Yong-Gang2,ZHANG Wei-Jiang1,4,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 College of Tobacco Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 3 China Tobacco Industrial Company of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310000, China; 4 Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2010-01-12 Revised:2010-06-28 Published:2010-11-12 Published online:2010-08-30
  • Contact: ZHANG Wei-Jian,E-mail:zhangweij@caas.net.cn

PDF

1500

被引次数

17

摘要： 采用河南农业大学设计的电热式温湿自控密集烤烟箱，以中烟100上部叶为材料，研究了烘烤过程中烟叶细胞生理和质地变化的规律。结果表明，烘烤中烟叶的呼吸强度在38℃时达到高峰，箱内CO2含量为1.80%，48℃以后烟叶的呼吸作用减弱。烘烤中果胶酯酶和纤维素酶在38~54℃活性较高，其中果胶甲酯酶(PME)和纤维素酶活性42℃最高，多聚半乳糖醛酸酶(PG)活性48℃最高，PG与PME共同促进了原果胶的水解进程，烘烤中原果胶、总果胶和纤维素含量不断降低。烟叶质地(除黏聚性)在38~48℃之间发生显著变化，其中42℃硬度和咀嚼性值最大，38℃拉力和剪切力值最大，48℃黏聚性、拉力和剪切力值最小。相关分析表明，可溶性果胶与回复性呈显著负相关(P<0.05)；原果胶、总果胶及纤维素与回复性、拉力均呈显著或极显著正相关(P<0.05)。这些结果说明烘烤过程中烟叶质地的绵软在某种程度上是细胞壁物质不断降解的结果。研究表明，烘烤中烟叶剪切力的动态变化较为直观，回复性和拉力可以作为探讨烟叶细胞生理变化的参数，而烟叶细胞生理变化是导致质地差异显著的主要因素。

关键词: 烘烤, 烤烟, 细胞生理, 质地

Abstract: During recent years, the bulk curing barn has rapidly developed and greatly promoted the production of flue-cured tobacco in China. However, some problems, such as the lightening colours, the smoothness and close structure of tobacco leaf, occurred along with the popularizing of flue-curing barn application. In order to meet the quality requirement of the raw material of Chinese-style cigarette, it has been urgent to solve those problems for the tobacco production with high-quality. The changes of the cell wall hydrolases and components play an important role in affecting the physiological changes of post-harvest plant. The differences in the texture of tobacco leaves would affect the organizational structure, morphostructure, internal components and usability. In order to optimize flue-curing technology and to improve the usability of tobacco leaves, we conducted the experiment to investigate the changes of cell physiology and texture of upper tobacco leaves of Zhongyan 100 along with wet and dry bulb temperatures during flue-curing using the electric-heated flue-curing barn designed and made by Henan Agricultural University. The results showed that the respiration rate of tobacco leaf peaked at 38℃ with a value of carbon dioxide content of about 1.80% during curing, and then the respiration rate progressively decreased since 48℃. The activities of pectinesterase and cellulase were higher during 38~54℃ than other temperature conditions. The pectin methylesterases (PME) and cellulase activities were the highest at 42℃, while the polygalacturonase activity (PG) was highest at 48℃. The PG and PME promoted the hydrolysis process of protopectin. Meanwhile, the protopectin, the total pectin and cellulose contents steadily decreased during curing. Texture testing parameters (except cohesiveness) of tobacco leaves changed significantly at the temperatures from 38℃ to 48℃. Among them hardness and chewiness had a maximum value at 42℃, tensile and shear force got their maximum values at 38℃. Cohesiveness, tensile and shear force reached the minimum value at 48℃ during flue-curing. The correlation between the soluble pectin and resilience was significantly negative while the correlations of protopectin, the total pectin, cellulose with resilience, tensile were significantly or highly significantly positive (P<0.05). These results indicated that the texture of tobacco leaves became mealy just due to the decrease of the cell binding force in a way during flue-curing. In other words, it could be resulted from the constant degradation of cell wall substances. This research indicated that dynamic change of shear force parameter was more intuitive. Resilience and tensile could be used as texture parameters to study the change of cell physiology of tobacco leaves. The main factors to make a significant difference in texture of tobacco leaves were the changes of cell physiology during flue-curing.

Key words: Flue-curing, Flue-cured tobacco, Cell physiology, Texture

[1]Wang W-F(王卫峰), Chen J-H(陈江华), Song Z-P(宋朝鹏), Gong C-R(宫长荣). The research progress on bulk curing barn. Chin Tob Sci (中国烟草科学), 2005, 26(3): 12–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Xu X-H(徐秀红), Sun F-S(孙福山), Wang Y(王永), Zhao B(赵兵), Liu J-Y(刘建永), Deng Q-Q(邓启强), Ding Z-Y(丁志勇). Current situation and further direction on research and application of bulk curing barn in China. Chin Tob Sci (中国烟草科学), 2008, 29(4): 54–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Hang Y(黄勇), Zhou J-H(周冀衡), Yang H-Q(杨虹琦), Liu J-L(刘建利), Wang Y(王勇), Zhou Y-H(周义和), Huang Y(黄琰), He X-L(何小力). Cytological observation of leaf and chloroplast during the flue-cured tobacco maturation. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(11): 1767–1770 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Wang Y-L(王艳丽), Liu G-S(刘国顺). Effects of phosphorus fertilizer rates on cell wall matter content and thickness of tobacco leaf. Tob Sci Technol (烟草科技), 2005, (5): 41–44 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Goulao L F, Santos J, Sousa I, Oliveira C M. Patterns of enzymatic activity of cell wall-modifying enzymes during growth and ripening of apples. Postharvest Biol Tec, 2007, 43: 307–318
[6]Deng Y, Wu Y, Li Y F. Changes in firmness, cell wall composition and cell wall hydrolases of grapes stored in high oxygen atmospheres. Food Res Int, 2005, 38: 769–776
[7]Wang R-X(王瑞新). Tobacco Chemistry (烟草化学). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003. pp 26–44, 156–167 (in Chinese)
[8]Yan K-Y(闫克玉), Yan H-X(闫洪洋), Li X-B(李兴波), Mao W-L(毛文龙), Bo Y-C(薄云川). Comparative analysis of cell wall substances in flue-cured tobacco leaf. Tob Sci Technol (烟草科技), 2005, (10): 6–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Yan K-Y(闫克玉), Liu F-Z(刘凤珠). Degrading enzyme in cell wall substances of tobacco. Biotechnol (生物技术), 2001, 11(4): 19–22 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Li W-F(李卫芳), Zhang M-N(张明农), Lin P-Z (林培章), Li H-L(李汉玲). Varation of the respiratory rate and drying rate during the flue curing of tobacco. J Nanjing Norm Univ (Nat Sci) (南京师大学报·自然科学版), 2000, 23(4): 112–115 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Zhang X-Y(张晓远), Bi Q-W(毕庆文), Wang J(汪健), Wang H-M(王海明), Li G(黎根), Liu G-S(刘国顺). Effects of temperature, humidity, and duration of yellowing stage on respiration rate and chemistry of upper leaves. Tob Sci Technol (烟草科技), 2009, (6): 56–59 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Wang N-R(王能如), Li Z-H(李章海), Xu Z-H(徐增汉), Li W-F(李卫芳), Xu Q-K(徐庆凯). Changes of thickness and dissecting structure of upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco during curing. Tob Sci Technol (烟草科技), 2005, (9): 29–31 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Pan X-J(潘秀娟), Tu K(屠康). Comparison of texture properties of post-harvested apples using texture profile analysis. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2005, 21(3): 166–170 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Jin C H, Suo B, Kan J, Wang H M, Wang Z J. Changes in cell wall polysaccharide of harvested peach fruit during storage. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 2006, 32: 657–664
[15]Lin F-D(林芳栋), Jiang Z-J(蒋珍菊), Liao S(廖珊), You J(游娟), Li C-X(李朝学). The summary of texture analyzer and its application in the evaluation for food quality. Life Sci Instr (生命科学仪器), 2009, 7(5): 61–63 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Rastogi V K, Nguyen L T, Balasubramanian V M. Effect of pretreatments on carrot texture after thermal and pressure-assisted thermal processing. J Food Eng, 2008, 88: 541–547
[17]Segade S R, Rolle L, Gerbi V, Orriols I. Phenolic ripeness assessment of grape skin by texture analysis. J Food Compos Anal, 2008, 21: 644–649
[18]Bai B-Z(白宝璋), Kong X-S(孔祥生), Wang Y-K(王玉昆). Plant Physiology—Experiment Course II (植物生理学——实验教程下). Beijing: China Agricultural Technology Press, 1996. p 13 (in Chinese)
[19]Ning Z-X(宁正祥). Food Ingredient Analysis (食品成分分析手册). Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 1998. pp 45–49, 690–693 (in Chinese)
[20]Han Y-S(韩雅珊). A Laboratory Guidance of Food Chemistry (食品化学实验指导). Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1996. pp 4–5, 32–41, 109–111 (in Chinese)
[21]Hagerman A E, Austin P J. Continuous spectrophotometric assay for plant pectinmethylesterase. J Agric Food chem, 1986, 34: 440–444
[22]Fischer R L, Bennett A B. Role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit ripening. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1991, 42: 675–703
[23]Wei H-P(魏和平), Li R Q(利容千), Wang J B(王建波), Wu G L(吴甘霖), Wu Y(吴彦). Ultrastructural localization of cellulase activity in lytic root cortical cell during aerenchyma formation of flooded maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(1): 84–87 (in English with Chinese abstract)
[24]Gong C-R(宫长荣), Zhou Y-H(周义和), Yang H-W(杨焕文). Introduction for three stage curing of flue-cured tobacco (烤烟三段式烘烤导论). Beijing: Science Press, 2005. pp 92–94, 62–185 (in Chinese)
[25]Holcroft D M, Lin H T, Ketsa S. Harvesting and storage. In: Menzel C, Mitra S K, Waite G eds. Litchi and Longan: Botany, Cultivation and Uses. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 2005. pp 273–295
[1] 刘青丽,蒋雨洲,邹焱,张云贵,张恒,石俊雄,李志宏. 烟田生态系统碳收支研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8): 1258-1265.
[2] 李成江,李大肥,周桂夙,许龙,徐天养,赵正雄. 不同种类生物炭对植烟土壤微生物及根茎病害发生的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 289-296.
[3] 周健飞,武云杰,薛刚,张安乾,田培,彭玉富,杨铁钊. 烤烟成熟期烟叶GS同工酶活性与氮素运转的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(1): 111-117.
[4] 沈杰,蔡艳,何玉亭,李启权,杜宣延,王昌全,罗定棋. 基于归一化法的烤烟干物质积累建模与特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(03): 442-453.
[5] 宋兆云,赵阳,王东*,谷淑波. 拔节期补灌对两种土壤质地上冬小麦旗叶衰老特性和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(12): 1834-1843.
[6] 涂勇,杨文钰,刘卫国,雍太文,江连强,王小春. 大豆与烤烟不同套作年限对根际土壤微生物数量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(05): 733-742.
[7] 肖炳光, 邱杰,曹培健,桂毅杰,卢秀萍,李永平,樊龙江. 利用基因组简约法开发烟草SNP标记及遗传作图[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(03): 397-404.
[8] 刘青丽,陈阜,张云贵,李志宏,焦永鸽,谷海红. 我国西南烟区典型植烟土壤烤烟氮素的吸收规律[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(03): 486-493.
[9] 童治军，焦芳婵，吴兴富，王丰青，陈学军，李绪英，高玉龙，张谊寒，肖炳光，吴为人. 烤烟6个农艺性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(08): 1407-1415.
[10] 张吉顺，王仁刚，杨春元，吴春，史跃伟，王志红，王轶，任学良. 国内外烤烟品种农艺性状的遗传多样性及与SRAP标记的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(06): 1029-1041.
[11] 云菲，刘国顺，史宏志. 光氮互作对烟草气体交换和部分碳氮代谢酶活性及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(3): 508-516.
[12] 彭云，赵正雄，李忠环，董艳，陈荣平，王胱霖，王永，杨自控. 不同前茬对烤烟生长、产量和质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(2): 335-340.
[13] 武德传，周冀衡，樊在斗，李文璧，张一扬，杨程，徐发华，朱 凯，段凤云，王德勋. 云南烤烟多酚含量空间变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(1): 141-146.
[14] 左丽娟,赵正雄,杨焕文,段凤云,王德勋,徐发华,吕芬. 增加施钾量对红花大金元烤烟部分生理生化参数及“两黑病”发生的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(05): 856-862.
[15] 张艳，王彦飞，陈新民，王德森，Humieres G D，冯建军，何中虎. Mixolab参数与粉质、拉伸参数及面包烘烤品质的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(9): 1738-1743.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2