烤烟6个农艺性状的QTL定位

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01407

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于烟草的分子标记开发和遗传图谱构建十分困难，迄今烟草中有关数量性状基因座(QTL)的定位研究仍非常有限。本研究利用一个由207个株系组成的烤烟DH群体及基于该群体所构建的含有24个连锁群、611个SSR标记，总长为1 882.1 cM的遗传图谱，采用复合区间作图方法，对株高(PH)、茎围(SG)、节距(IL)、叶片数(LN)、最大腰叶长(LWL)和最大腰叶宽(WWL) 6个与叶片产量有关的农艺性状进行QTL定位分析。共检测到69个QTL，大部分QTL的效应值较小，仅有4个具有较大的效应值，可解释大约15%~20%的表型变异。6个性状之间大多彼此相关。与此相符，在基因组中发现存在许多小区域，每个区域包含两个或两个以上紧密连锁的不同性状的QTL。

关键词: 烤烟, 数量性状基因座, 遗传作图, 加倍单倍体, 产量

Abstract: Studies of genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in tobacco have still been very limited up to date due to the difficulty of molecular marker development and genetic map construction in this species. In this study, with a doubled haploid (DH) population of flue-cured tobacco and a genetic map consisting of 611 SSR markers on 24 linkage groups (LGs) and spanning a total length of 1 882.1 cM constructed based on this population, QTL mapping was performed using the method of composite interval mapping for six agronomic traits related to leaf yield, including plant height (PH), stem girth (SG), internode length (IL), leaf number (LN), length of the largest waist leaf (LWL) and width of the largest waist leaf (WWL). A total of 69 QTLs were detected. Most of the QTLs had small effects, but there were four with relatively large effects, explaining 15–20% of the phenotypic variation in the DH population. The six traits were largely correlated with each other. Consistent with this, many small regions harboring two or more closely linked QTLs of different traits were found in the genome.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), Quantitative trait locus (QTL), Gene

童治军，焦芳婵，吴兴富，王丰青，陈学军，李绪英，高玉龙，张谊寒，肖炳光，吴为人. 烤烟6个农艺性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(08): 1407-1415.

TONG Zhi-Jun,JIAO Fang-Chan,WU Xing-Fu,WANG Feng-Qing,CHEN Xue-Jun,LI Xu-Ying,GAO Yu-Long,ZHANG Yi-Han,XIAO Bing-Guang,WU Wei-Ren. Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci Underlying Six Agronomic Traits in Flue-Cured Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(08): 1407-1415.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01407

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2012/V38/I08/1407

参考文献

[1]Legg P D, Collins G B. Genetic parameters in a Ky 14 × Ky Ex 42 burley population of Nicotiana tabacum L. Theor Appl Genet, 1975, 45: 264–267

[2]White F H, Pandeya R S, Dirks V A. Correlation studies among and between agronomic, chemical, physical and smoke characteristics in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabaccum L.). Can J Plant Sci, 1979, 59:111–120

[3]Honarnejed R, Shoai-Deylami M. Gene effect, combining ability and correlation of characterstics in F2 populations of burley tobacco. J Sci Technol Agric Nat Resour, 2004, 8: 135–148

[4]Xiao B G, Zhu J, Lu X P, Bai Y F, Li Y P. Analysis on genetic contribution of agronomic traits to total sugar in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Field Crops Res, 2007, 102: 98–103

[5]Mohan M, Nair S, Bhagwat A, Krishna T G, Yano M, Bhatia C R, Sasaki T. Genome mapping, molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants. Mol Breed, 1997, 3: 87–103

[6]Ren N, Timko M P. ALFP analysis of genetic polymorphism and evolutionary relationships among cultivated and wild Nicotiana species. Genome, 2001, 44: 559–571

[7]Rossi L, Bindler G, Pijnenburg H, Isaac P G, Giraud-Henri I, Mahe M, Orvain C, Gadani F. Potential of molecular marker analysis for variety identification in processed tobacco. Plant Varieties Seeds, 2001, 14: 89–101

[8]Moon H S, Nicholson J S, Lewis R S. Use of transferable Nicotiana tabacum L. microsatellite markers for investigating genetic diversity in the genus Nicotiana. Genome, 2008, 51: 547–559

[9]Moon H S, Nicholson J S, Heineman A, Lion K, der Hoeven R V, Hayes A J, Lewis R S. Changes in genetic diversity of U.S. Flue-Cured tobacco germplasm over seven decades of cultivar development. Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 498–506

[10]Moon H S, Nifong J M, Nicholson J S, Heineman A, Lion K, der Hoeven R V, Hayes A J, Lewis R S. Microsatellite-based analysis of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) genetic resources. Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 2149–2157

[11]Bai D, Reeleder R, Brandle J E. Identification of two RAPD markers tightly linked with the Nicotiana debneyi gene for resistance to black root of tobacco. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 91: 1184–1189

[12]Yi H Y, Rufty R C, Wernsman E A. Mapping the root-knot nematode resistance gene (Rk) in tobacco with RAPD markers. Plant Dis, 1998, 82: 1319–1322

[13]Noguchi S, Tajima T, Yamamoto Y, Ohno T, Kubo T. Deletion of a large genomic segment in tobacco varieties that are resistant to potato virus Y (PVY). Mol Gen Genet, 1999, 262: 822–829

[14]Johnson E S, Wolff M F, Wernsmann E A. Marker assisted selection for resistance to black shank disease in tobacco. Plant Dis, 2002, 12: 1303–1309

[15]Julio E, Denoyes R B, Verrier J L, de Borne F D. Detection of QTLs linked to leaf and smoke properties in Nicotiana tabacum based on a study of 114 recombinant inbred lines. Mol Breed, 2006, 18: 69–91

[16]Julio E, Verrier J L, de Borne F D. Development of SCAR markers linked to three disease resistances based on AFLP within Nicotiana tabacum L. Theor Appl Genet, 2006b,112: 335–346.

[17]Bindler G, Plieske J, Bakaher N, Gunduz I, Ivanov N, der Hoeven R V, Ganal M, Donini P. A high density genetic map of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) obtained from large scale microsatellite marker development. Theor Appl Genet, 2011, 123: 219–230

[18]Nishi T, Tajima T, Noguchi S, Ajisaka H, Negishi H. Identification of DNA markers of tobacco linked to bacterial wilt resistance. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 106: 765–770

[19]Vontimitta V, Lewis R S. Mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting resistance to Phytophthora nicotianae in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) line Beihart-1000. Mol Breed, 2012, 29: 89–98

[20]Vontimitta V, David A, Danehower, Steede T, Moon H S, Lewis R S. Analysis of a Nicotiana tabacum L. genomic region controlling two leaf surface chemistry traits. Agric Food Chem, 2010, 58: 294–300

[21]Vontimitta V, Lewis R S. Growth chamber evaluation of a tobacco ‘Beinhart 1000’ × ‘Hicks’ mapping population for quantitative trait loci affecting resistance to multiple races of Phytophthora nicotianae. Crop Sci, 2012, 52: 91–98

[22]Milla S R, Levin J S, Lewis R S, Rufty R C. RAPD and SCAR markers linked to an introgressed gene conditioning resistance to Peronospora tabacina D.B. Adam. in tobacco. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 2346–2354

[23]Lewis R S, Milla S R, Kernodle S P. Analysis of an introgressed Nicotiana tomentosa genomic region affecting leaf number and correlated traits in Nicotiana tabacum. Theor Appl Genet, 2007, 114: 841–854

[24]Cai C-C(蔡长春), Chai L-G(柴利广), Wang Y(王毅), Xu F-S(徐芳森), Zhang J-J(张俊杰), Lin G-P(林国平). Construction of genetic linkage map of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) and genetic dissection of partial traits. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(9): 1646–1654 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]Xiao B-G(肖炳光), Lu X-P(卢秀萍), Jiao F-C(焦芳蝉), Li Y-P(李永平), Sun Y-H(孙玉合), Guo Z-K(郭兆奎). Preliminary QTL analysis of several chemical components in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(10): 1762–1769 (in Chinese with English absract)

[26]Chen X-J(陈学军), Peng S-Y(彭双玉), Luo J-R(罗建蓉), Yang Y-M(杨彦明), Xiao B-G(肖炳光). Culture of regenerated seedlings from anthers and construction of DH populations of six cross combinations of Nicotiana tabacum. J Plant Resour & Environ (植物资源与环境学报), 2011, 20(1): 65–68 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27]Murry H G, Thomspon W F. Rapid isolation of weight DNA. Nucl Acids Res, 1980, 8: 4321–4322

[28]Xu S-B(许绍斌), Tao Y-F(陶玉芬), Yang Z-Q(杨昭庆), Chu J(褚嘉). A simple and rapid methods used for silver staining and gel preservation. Heredtas (遗传), 2002, 24(3): 335–336 (in Chinese wit English abstract)

[29]Van Ooijen J W. JoinMap 4.0, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma B V, Wageningen

[30]Zeng Z B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 1994, 136: 1457–1468

[31]Doerge R W, Churchill G A. Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics, 1996, 142: 285–294

[32]McCouch S R, Cho Y G, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Morishima H, Kinoshita T. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet Newsl, 14: 11–13

[33]Voorrips R E. MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered, 2002, 93: 77–78

相关文章 15

[1]	胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2]	马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3]	张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4]	张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5]	张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6]	闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7]	刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8]	王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9]	张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10]	王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11]	赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12]	郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13]	蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14]	崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15]	杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed