氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.12018

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 667-681.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.12018

氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量

袁嘉琦(), 刘艳阳^*(), 许轲^*(), 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程

农业农村部长江流域稻作技术创新中心/江苏省作物栽培生理重点实验室/江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心/扬州大学水稻产业工程技术研究院, 江苏扬州225009

收稿日期:2021-03-03 接受日期:2021-06-16 出版日期:2022-03-12 网络出版日期:2021-07-30
通讯作者: 刘艳阳,许轲
作者简介:E-mail: 1065249601@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD030120102);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0300102);江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2017343);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目资助

Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice

YUAN Jia-Qi(), LIU Yan-Yang^*(), XU Ke^*(), LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng

Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze River Valley of Ministry of Agriculture/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China

Received:2021-03-03 Accepted:2021-06-16 Published:2022-03-12 Published online:2021-07-30
Contact: LIU Yan-Yang,XU Ke
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD030120102);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0300102);Key Research and Development Projects of Jiangsu(BE2017343);Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

苏中地区为稻麦两熟制地区, 近年来受气候变化和稻虾综合种养规模扩大的影响, 水稻迟播迟栽现象较为普遍, 使水稻品种的生长发育等与光、温资源不匹配, 成为制约水稻高产稳产的重要因素之一。本研究在迟播迟栽(6月12日播种、6月30日移栽)条件下, 采用毯苗机插方式, 设置4个纯氮施氮量(N₀: 0 kg hm^-2; N₂₄₀: 240 kg hm^-2; N₃₀₀: 300 kg hm^-2; N₃₆₀: 360 kg hm^-2)、3个穴栽苗株数(D₃: 3株苗、D₄: 4株苗、D₅: 5株苗)处理, 以适播适栽期(5月29日)常规施氮量和穴栽苗株数处理(N₃₀₀D₄)为对照(CK), 探究氮肥水平与穴栽苗数对迟播迟栽粳稻生长发育和产量形成的影响, 为提升苏中地区迟播迟栽粳稻产量潜力和资源利用效率提供依据。结果表明, 较CK相比, 迟播迟栽条件下各处理产量均下降, 主要原因是迟播迟栽处理群体颖花量显著降低, 2年最高群体颖花量分别较CK分别降低11.94%和8.12%; 迟播迟栽条件下温光资源利用率降低, 植株吸氮量和氮肥利用率降低, 导致干物质积累量降低。迟播迟栽条件下, 除处理N₃₆₀D₅外, 随着施氮量和穴栽苗株数的增加, 产量增加。主要原因是提高了群体颖花量, 抽穗期叶面积指数和高效叶比例, 延长了生育期, 从而提高了温光资源利用率, 进而提高了成熟期干物质积累量, 缓解产量下降; 另外, 氮肥利用率随施氮量增加呈先增加后下降趋势, N₃₀₀D₅处理氮肥利用率最大。因此, 迟播迟栽条件下应首先考虑增加穴栽苗数, 再适量增加氮肥施用量, 可以缓解产量损失, 并提高氮肥利用率。

关键词: 粳稻, 迟播迟栽, 施氮量, 温光资源, 氮肥利用效率, 产量

Abstract:

Recently, the phenomenon of late sowing and late transplanting in rice is becoming more and more common in central Jiangsu, a rice and wheat double cropping system area, which is caused by climate change and the expanding of comprehensive rice-and-shrimp planting model. It will lead to the mismatch of rice growth period with light and temperature resources, restricting the stable high yield of rice. This study was conducted under the condition of late sowing and late transplanting (sowing date was June 12th, transplanting date was June 30th) and the seedling was transplanted by machine. Four nitrogen application rates (N₀: 0 kg hm^-2; N₂₄₀: 240 kg hm^-2; N₃₀₀: 300 kg hm^-2; N₃₆₀: 360 kg hm^-2) and three density treatments (D₃: 3 seedlings per hole; D₄: 4 seedlings per hole; D₅: 5 seedlings per hole) were arranged, and the suitable sowing period (May 29), conventional nitrogen application rate, and the seedling number per hole (N₃₀₀D₄) were taken as the controls. Our goal is to explore the effects of nitrogen fertilizer and seedling number per hole on the growth and yield formation in late-sown japonica rice, and to provide theoretical basis for improving yield potential and resource use efficiency in late sowing and late transplanting japonica rice in central Jiangsu province. The results showed that compared with CK, the yield of each treatment decreased, mainly because of the significantly reduced spikelet number under the late sowing and late transplanting condition. The highest spikelet numbers were 11.94% and 8.12% lower than those of CK in the two years. In addition, the utilization rate of temperature and light resources, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen utilization rate decreased under late sowing and late transplanting treatment, leading to a decrease in dry matter accumulation and yield. The yield increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate and seedling number per hole under the late sowing and late transplanting condition, while there was no consistent with the trend under N₃₆₀D₅ treatment. We assumed that it was mainly due to the increased spikelet number, larger leaf area index at heading stage, the larger proportion of efficient leaf, and the extended growth period. In summary, the utilization of temperature and light resources and the dry matter accumulation at maturity stage was improved, and the decline in yield was alleviated. Nitrogen use efficiency increased first and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen rate, and N₃₀₀D₅ treatment reached the maximum. In general, under the late sowing and late transplanting condition, in order to alleviate the yield loss and reduce nitrogen fertilizer waste, we should increase the seedling number per hole and then increase the amount of nitrogen fertilizer.

Key words: japonica rice, late sowing and late transplanting, nitrogen application rate, temperature and radiation resources, nitrogen use efficiency, yield

袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.

YUAN Jia-Qi, LIU Yan-Yang, XU Ke, LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.12018

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2022/V48/I3/667

图/表 10

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

不同处理对迟播迟栽粳稻产量及其构成因素的影响"

年份 Year	处理 Treatment			产量 Yield (t hm^-2)	穗数 Panicles (×10⁶ hm^-2)	每穗颖花数 Spikelets per panicle	群体颖花量 Population spikelets (×10⁶ hm^-2)	结实率 Grain filling percentage (%)	千粒重 1000-grain weight (g)	收获指数 Harvest index
2018	CK			12.06 a	4.10 a	136.90 a	560.66 a	89.55 a	25.50 ab	0.515 a
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	D₃	7.06 g	2.65 f	124.20 de	329.09 j	88.69 a	25.65 a	0.467 i
			D₄	7.33 fg	2.81 f	120.75 ef	338.59 i	88.42 a	25.60 a	0.470 h
			D₅	7.66 f	3.02 e	117.40 f	353.35 h	88.21 a	25.35 bc	0.481 g
		N₂₄₀	D₃	8.84 e	3.17 e	129.30 bcd	409.45 g	86.78 b	25.25 cd	0.501 e
			D₄	9.24 e	3.44 d	125.20 cde	430.22 f	86.05 bc	25.05 de	0.507 c
			D₅	9.80 d	3.53 d	124.85 cde	440.24 e	85.27 bc	24.95 e	0.514 a
		N₃₀₀	D₃	9.90 d	3.63 cd	132.65 ab	480.60 d	85.99 bc	25.00 e	0.504 d
			D₄	10.54 c	3.81 bc	129.05 bcd	491.53 bc	85.67 bc	25.00 e	0.510 b
			D₅	11.03 b	3.87 b	127.85 bcd	493.72 b	85.16 c	24.90 e	0.511 b
		N₃₆₀	D₃	10.36 c	3.76 bc	130.30 bc	489.68 c	85.05 c	25.00 e	0.499 e
			D₄	10.80 bc	3.84 b	128.40 bcd	492.64 b	84.55 c	24.85 ef	0.500 e
			D₅	10.61 bc	3.89 b	126.10 cd	489.89 c	84.50 c	24.65 f	0.495 f
2019	CK			11.39 a	3.79 a	135.96 a	514.60 a	89.69 c	25.58 b	0.521 ab
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	D₃	6.86 i	2.41 h	122.42 de	295.22 k	92.90 a	26.58 a	0.496 h
			D₄	7.19 h	2.65 g	120.17 e	318.01 j	91.27 b	26.63 a	0.499 g
			D₅	7.41 h	2.87 f	114.15 f	326.86 i	90.49 bc	26.45 a	0.502 f
		N₂₄₀	D₃	8.44 g	3.09 e	127.73 bc	394.37 h	87.12 d	25.65 b	0.518 d
			D₄	8.84 f	3.24 de	125.18 cd	404.51 g	86.75 de	25.66 b	0.520 bcd
			D₅	9.29 e	3.38 cd	124.47 cde	420.38 f	86.52 de	25.54 b	0.521 ab
		N₃₀₀	D₃	9.60 d	3.38 cd	130.58 b	440.51 e	86.30 def	25.45 b	0.519 cd
			D₄	10.00 c	3.55 bc	128.96 bc	468.74 c	86.17 def	25.38 b	0.520 abc
			D₅	10.38 b	3.73 ab	127.33 bcd	472.82 b	86.13 def	25.10 bc	0.521 a
		N₃₆₀	D₃	9.87 c	3.53 bc	129.11 bc	455.32 d	85.75 def	25.33 bc	0.502 f
			D₄	10.28 b	3.68 ab	128.32 bc	472.12 b	85.40 ef	24.98 bc	0.509 e
			D₅	9.99 c	3.73 ab	126.05 bcd	469.75 c	84.90 f	24.67 c	0.491 i
方差分析 ANOVA	年度Year (Y)			43.652^**	37.159^**	3.52^ns	47.742^**	47.491^**	98.552^**	—
方差分析 ANOVA	施氮水平Nitrogen (N)			513.011^**	232.446^**	67.05^**	380.885^**	138.705^**	89.482^**	—
	穴栽苗数Density (D)			103.58^**	60.174^**	16.538^**	13.407^**	7.775^**	10.631^**	—
	Y×N			1.521^ns	0.227^ns	0.374^ns	0.225^ns	10.881^**	12.744^**	—
	Y×D			1.524^ns	0.586^ns	0.392^ns	0.692^ns	0.083^ns	0.128^ns	—
	N×D			9.956^**	4.384^*	0.894^ns	5.77^*	0.422^ns	0.766^ns	—
	Y×N×D			0.317^ns	0.524^ns	0.110^ns	0.336^ns	0.988^ns	0.586^ns	—

表4

表5

表6

表7

不同处理对迟播迟栽粳稻干物质量及阶段干物质积累量的影响"

年份 Year	处理 Treatment			拔节期 Jointing (t hm^-2)	抽穗期 Heading (t hm^-2)	成熟期 Maturity (t hm^-2)	阶段积累量Accumulation
年份 Year	处理 Treatment			拔节期 Jointing (t hm^-2)	抽穗期 Heading (t hm^-2)	成熟期 Maturity (t hm^-2)	播种-拔节期 Seeding- Jointing (t hm^-2)	占比 Ratio (%)	拔节-抽穗期 Jointing- Heading (t hm^-2)	占比 Ratio (%)	抽穗-成熟期 Heading- Maturity (t hm^-2)	占比 Ratio (%)
2018	CK			4.95 a	14.42 a	23.39 a	4.95 a	21.19	9.46 a	40.44	8.98 a	38.37
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	D₃	2.47 i	8.80 i	15.12 g	2.47 i	16.30	6.34 e	41.92	6.32 j	41.77
			D₄	2.52 i	9.15 hi	15.59 g	2.52 i	16.80	6.53 e	41.89	6.44 ij	41.31
			D₅	2.69 hi	9.35 h	15.92 g	2.69 hi	16.91	6.66 e	41.82	6.57 i	41.27
		N₂₄₀	D₃	2.92 ghi	10.59 g	17.66 f	2.92 ghi	16.54	7.67 d	43.40	7.08 h	40.06
			D₄	3.07 gh	10.93 g	18.22 f	3.07 gh	16.84	7.87 d	43.14	7.30 g	40.02
			D₅	3.23 fg	11.44 f	19.06 e	3.23 fg	16.91	8.22 cd	43.11	7.62 f	39.98
		N₃₀₀	D₃	3.38 efg	12.02 e	19.66 e	3.38 efg	17.17	8.65 bc	43.99	7.64 f	38.84
			D₄	3.63 ef	12.65 d	20.67 d	3.63 ef	17.56	9.02 ab	43.63	8.02 cd	38.81
			D₅	3.81 de	13.21 bc	21.57 bc	3.81 de	17.66	9.39 ab	43.54	8.37 b	38.80
		N₃₆₀	D₃	4.15 cd	12.89 cd	20.76 cd	4.15 cd	20.01	8.73 abc	42.08	7.87 de	37.91
			D₄	4.46 bc	13.55 b	21.62 b	4.46 bc	20.62	9.10 ab	42.05	8.07 c	37.33
			D₅	4.66 ab	13.64 b	21.41 bcd	4.66 ab	21.75	8.99 ab	41.97	7.77 ef	36.29
2019	CK			4.35 a	13.13 a	21.87 a	4.35 a	19.90	8.78 a	40.13	8.75 a	39.97
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	D₃	2.09 k	8.08 j	13.83 j	2.09 k	15.14	5.99 h	43.34	5.74 i	41.52
			D₄	2.22 j	8.43 i	14.39 i	2.22 j	15.43	6.20 g	43.12	5.97 h	41.45
			D₅	2.36 i	8.72 h	14.75 i	2.36 i	15.97	6.36 g	43.10	6.04 h	40.93
		N₂₄₀	D₃	2.53 h	9.49 g	16.28 h	2.53 h	15.53	6.97 f	42.80	6.79 g	41.67
			D₄	2.73 g	9.93 f	17.01 g	2.73 g	16.01	7.21 e	42.36	7.08 f	41.63
			D₅	2.89 f	10.44 e	17.85 f	2.89 f	16.18	7.55 d	42.30	7.41 e	41.51
		N₃₀₀	D₃	3.15 e	11.15 d	18.50 e	3.15 e	17.03	8.00 c	43.26	7.35 e	39.71
			D₄	3.36 d	11.88 c	19.66 c	3.36 d	17.09	8.52 b	43.33	7.79 c	39.58
			D₅	3.59 c	12.17 c	20.09 b	3.59 c	17.85	8.59 b	42.74	7.92 b	39.42
		N₃₆₀	D₃	3.50 c	11.95 c	19.24 d	3.50 c	18.22	8.44 b	43.87	7.30 e	37.90
			D₄	4.01 b	12.52 b	20.18 b	4.01 b	19.87	8.51 b	42.17	7.66 d	37.96
			D₅	4.34 a	12.86 a	19.91 bc	4.34 a	21.79	8.52 b	42.80	7.05 f	35.41

表7

表8

图2

参考文献 43

[1]	李杰, 张洪程, 董洋阳, 倪晓诚, 杨波, 龚金龙, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同生态区栽培方式对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44:2661-2672.
	Li J, Zhang H C, Dong Y Y, Ni X C, Yang B, Gong J L, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of cultivation methods on yield, growth stage and utilization of temperature and illumination of rice in different ecological regions. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44:2661-2672 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2]	高尔明, 林同保. 河南省沿黄稻区麦茬水稻晚播的研究. 河南农业大学学报, 1987, 21:271-274.
	Gao E M, Lin T B. Study on late sowing of wheat stubble rice along yellow rice area in Henan province. J Henan Agric Univ, 1987, 21:271-274 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3]	杨守仁, 陈秋柏, 董春田. 水稻晚播晚插栽培的研究. 辽宁农业科学, 1964, (6):22-27.
	Yang S R, Chen Q B, Dong C T. Study on late sowing and late transplanting cultivation of rice. Liaoning Agric Sci, 1964, (6):22-27 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	许轲, 孙圳, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程, 刘俊, 宋云生, 杨大柳, 魏海燕, 吴爱国, 王显, 吴冬冬. 播期、品种类型对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46:4222-4233.
	Xu K, Sun Z, Huo Z Y, Dai Q G, Zhang H C, Liu J, Song Y S, Yang D L, Wei H Y, Wu A G, Wang X, Wu D D. Effects of seeding date and variety type on yield, growth stage and utilization of temperature and sunshine in rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46:4222-4233 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	朱大伟, 郭保卫, 张洪程, 刘国涛, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 播期对优质米“南粳9108”生长特性及积温光照利用的影响. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33:3010-3017.
	Zhu D W, Guo B W, Zhang H C, Liu G T, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of sowing date on the growth characteristics and utilization of temperature and illumination of high quality japonica rice “Nanjing 9108” in different ecological regions. Chin J Ecol, 2014, 33:3010-3017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6]	谢正荣, 郭秧全, 沈小妹, 朱秀芳, 陈群, 景学义, 黄筱敏, 王吉方, 徐清华. 太湖农区水稻不同类型品种及播期对生育期与实产的影响初探. 上海农业学报, 2000, 16(1):28-32.
	Xie Z R, Guo Y Q, Shen X M, Zhu X F, Chen Q, Jing X Y, Huang X M, Wang J F, Xu Q H. Preliminary study on influences of various rice and sowing dates on growth periods and actual yield in Taihu farming region. Acta Agric Shanghai, 2000, 16(1):28-32 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7]	陈露, 张伟杨, 王志琴, 张耗, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 施氮量对江苏不同年代中粳稻品种产量与群体质量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40:1412-1423.
	Chen L, Zhang W Y, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C. Effects of nitrogen application rate on grain yield and population quality of mid-season japonica rice cultivars at different decades in Jiangsu province. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40:1412-1423 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8]	曾山, 黄忠林, 王在满, 罗锡文, 唐湘如. 不同密度对精量穴直播水稻产量的影响. 华中农业大学学报, 2014, 33(3):12-18.
	Zeng S, Huang Z L, Wang Z M, Luo X W, Tang X R. Effects of different planting density on grain yield of precision hill-drop drilling rice. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2014, 33(3):12-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9]	胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 龚金龙, 刘国涛, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 罗学超, 刘国林. 钵苗机插水稻群体动态特征及高产形成机制的探讨. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47:865-879.
	Hu Y J, Xing Z P, Gong J L, Liu G T, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Luo X C, Liu G L. Study on population characteristics and formation mechanisms for high yield of pot-seedling mechanical transplanting rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47:856-879 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10]	周永进. 温度与氮肥对水稻生长与产量的影响及其生理机制. 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2018.
	Zhou Y J. Effects of Temperature and Nitrogen on Growth and Grain Yield of Rice and its Physiological Mechanism. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11]	徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 孙静文, 王秀斌, 何萍, 徐芳森, 余喜初. 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21:763-772.
	Xu X P, Zhou W, Liang G Q, Sun J W, Wang X B, He P, Xu F S, Yu X C. Effects of nitrogen and density interactions on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-rice systems. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2015, 21:769-772 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12]	Peng S, Tang Q, Zou Y. Current status and challenges of rice production in China. Plant Prod Sci, 2008, 12:3-8. doi: 10.1626/pps.12.3
[13]	刘海东, 唐湘如, 赵烈, 田华, 莫钊文, 段美洋, 潘圣刚. 不同施肥深度对直播水稻氮素积累与转移的影响. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(5):216-221.
	Liu H D, Tang X R, Zhao L, Tian H, Mo Z W, Duan M Y, Pan S G. Influences of different nitrogen application depths on nitrogen accumulation and transfer in direct-seeded rice. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2016, 31(5):216-221 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14]	张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45:915-924.
	Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, Cui Z L, Ma W Q, Chen X P, Jiang R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedol Sin, 2008, 45:915-924 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15]	曹小闯, 李晓艳, 朱练峰, 张均华, 禹盛苗, 吴良欢, 金千瑜. 水分管理调控水稻氮素利用研究进展. 生态学报, 2016, 36:3882-3890.
	Cao X C, Li X Y, Zhu L F, Zhang L F, Zhang J H, Yu S M, Wu L H, Jin Q Y. Effects of water management on rice nitrogen utilization: a review. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36:3882-3890 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16]	李思平, 丁效东, 向丹, 曾路生, 张玉晓, 解军蕊, 黄信诚, 高发瑞. 氮肥水平与栽植密度互作对不同生育期水稻生长及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(4):174-182.
	Li S P, Ding X D, Xiang D, Zeng L S, Zhang Y X, Xie J R, Huang X C, Gao F R. Effects of interaction between nitrogen application level and planting density on growth and yield of rice at different growth stages. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2019, 34(4):174-182 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17]	杨羡敏, 曾燕, 邱新法, 姜爱军. 1960-2000年黄河流域太阳总辐射气候变化规律研究. 应用气象学报, 2005, 16:243-248.
	Yang X M, Zeng Y, Qiu X F, Jiang A J. The climatic change of global solar radiation over the yellow river basin during 1960-2000. J Appl Meteor Sci, 2005, 16:243-248 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18]	Zhou B Y, Yue Y, Sun X F, Wang X B, Wang Z M, Ma W, Zhao M. Maize grain yield and dry matter production responses to variations in weather conditions. Agron J, 2016, 108:196-204. doi: 10.2134/agronj2015.0196
[19]	Liu Y, Wang E L, Yang X G. Contributions of climatic and crop varietal changes to crop production in the North China Plain since 1980s. Glob Chang Biol, 2010, 16:2287-2299. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2010.16.issue-8
[20]	李秀芬, 贾燕, 黄元才, 臧鑫. 播栽期对水稻产量和产量构成因素及生育期的影响. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(5):98-100.
	LI X F, Jia Y, Huang Y C, Zang X. Effects of seeding time on grain yield components and growth duration in different rice varieties. Chin J Ecol, 2004, 23(5):98-100 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21]	霍中洋, 姚义, 张洪程, 夏炎, 倪晓诚, 戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同生育期温光条件对直播稻产量的影响. 核农学报, 2012, 26:1043-1052.
	Huo Z Y, Yao Y, Zhang H C, Xia Y, Ni X C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of temperature and sunlight conditions on the yield of direct seeding rice in different growth stages. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2012 26:1043-1052 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22]	邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 张强, 王文婷, 李德剑, 刘国林, 刘国涛, 朱佳炜. 迟播迟栽对不同类型粳稻品种机插产量及生育期的影响. 中国稻米, 2014, 20(3):11-16.
	Xing Z P, Hu Y J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Zhang Q, Wang W T, Li D J, Liu G L, Liu G T, Zhu J W. Effect of late sowing and late transplanting on yield and period of duration of different types of mechanical transplanting rice. China Rice, 2014, 20(3):11-16 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23]	姚义, 霍中洋, 张洪程, 夏炎, 倪晓诚, 戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同生态区播期对直播稻生育期及温光利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45:633-647.
	Yao Y, Huo Z Y, Zhang H C, Xia Y, Ni X C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of sowing date on growth stage and utilization of temperature and illumination of direct seeding rice in different ecological regions. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45:633-647 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24]	吴培. 施氮量和直播密度互作对优质食味水稻产量和品质的影响. 扬州大学硕士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2019.
	Wu P. Effect of Interaction Between Nitrogen Application Rate and Direct-sowing Density on Yield and Rice Quality of Rice with Good Eating Quality. MS Thesis of Yangzhou University. Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2019 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25]	王夫玉, 张洪程, 赵新华, 段祥茂, 丁艳锋, 黄丕生, 鲁光荣, 王根球. 温光对水稻籽粒充实度的影响. 中国农业科学, 2001, 34:396-402.
	Wang F Y, Zhang H C, Zhao X H, Duan X M, Ding Y F, Huang P S, Lu G R, Wang G Q. Study on the effects of temperature and illumination on grade of filled grain in rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2001, 34:396-402 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26]	张在金, 马玉银, 周炳庆, 柏银传. 不同播期对迟熟中粳稻扬20238产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36:12132-12133.
	Zhang Z J, Ma Y Y, Zhou B Q, Bai Y C. Effects of different sowing date on yield of late-maturing middle japonica rice Yang 20238. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2008, 36:12132-12133 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27]	姚义, 霍中洋, 张洪程, 夏炎, 倪晓诚, 戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕, 肖跃成, 王显. 播期对麦茬直播粳稻产量及品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44:3098-3107.
	Yao Y, Huo Z Y, Zhang H C, Xia Y, Ni X C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y, Xiao Y C, Wang X. Effects of sowing date on yield and quality of direct seeding rice of different types and varieties. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44:3098-3107 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28]	任晓佳. 苏南地区晚播晚栽机插水稻的群体发育特征及其栽培对策研究. 扬州大学硕士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2018.
	Ren X J. Population Development Characteristics and Cultivation Strategies of Late-sowing and Late-planting Rice Transplanted by Machine in Southern Jiangsu Province. MS Thesis of Yangzhou University. Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29]	李霞, 戴传超, 程睿, 陈婷, 焦德茂. 不同生育期水稻耐冷性的鉴定及耐冷性差异的生理机制. 作物学报, 2006, 32:76-83.
	Li X, Dai C C, Cheng R, Chen T, Jiao D M. Identification for cold tolerance at different growth stages in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and physiological mechanism of differential cold tolerance. Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32:76-83 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30]	苏祖芳, 郭宏文, 李永丰, 张洪程, 张海泉. 水稻群体叶面积动态类型的研究. 中国农业科学, 1994, 27(4):23-30.
	Su Z F, Guo W H, Li Y F, Zhang H C, Zhang H Q. Studies on the types of leaf area dynamics of population in rice. Sci Agric Sin, 1994, 27(4):23-30 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31]	段爱旺. 作物群体叶面积指数的测定. 灌溉排水, 1996, 15(1):50-53.
	Duan A W. Determination of leaf area index of crop population. J Irrig Drain, 1996, 15(1):50-53 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32]	龙文飞, 傅志强, 钟娟, 苏姗, 李康丽. 节水灌溉条件下氮密互作对双季晚稻丰源优299物质生产特性的影响. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(2):185-193.
	Long W F, Fu Z Q, Zhong J, Su S, Li K L. Effects of nitrogen application and planting density on late rice Fengyuanyou 299 material production characteristics under the condition of water saving irrigation. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2017, 32(2):185-193 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33]	敬树忠, 刘然金, 李旭毅, 池忠志, 柯江, 欧阳裕元, 郑家国, 姜心禄. 氮肥水平和移栽密度对新品杂交稻‘蜀优217’产量性状的影响. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(29):8-12.
	Jing S Z, Liu R J, Li X Y, Chi Z Z, Ke J, Ouyang Y Y, Zheng J G, Jiang X L. Nitrogen rate and transplanting density: effect on yield traits of hybrid rice ‘Shuyou 217’. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2018, 34(29):8-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34]	凌启鸿. 作物群体质量. 上海: 上海科学出版社, 2000. pp 44-58.
	Ling Q H. The Quality of Crop Population. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2000. pp 44-58(in Chinese).
[35]	邹应斌, 黄见良, 屠乃美, 李合松, 黄升平, 张杨珠. “旺壮重”栽培对双季杂交稻产量形成及生理特性的影响. 作物学报, 2001, 27:343-350.
	Zou Y B, Huang J L, Tu N M, Li H S, Huang S P, Zhang Y Z. Effects of the VSW cultural method on yield formation and physiological characteristics in double cropping hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2001, 27:343-350 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36]	苏祖芳, 周培南, 许乃霞, 张亚洁. 密肥条件对水稻氮素吸收和产量形成的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15:42-47.
	Su Z F, Zhou P N, Xu N X, Zhang Y J. Effects of nitrogen and planting density on N-absorption and yield of rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2001, 15:42-47 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[37]	张洪程, 王秀芹, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 施氮量对杂交稻两优培九产量、品质及吸氮特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36:800-806.
	Zhang H C, Wang X Q, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K. Effects of N-application rate on yield, quality and characters of nitrogen uptake of hybrid rice variety Liangyoupeijiu. Sci Agric Sin, 2003, 36:800-806 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38]	万靓军, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 林忠成, 戴其根, 许轲, 张军. 氮肥运筹对超级杂交粳稻产量、品质及氮素利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33:175-182.
	Wan L J, Zhang H C, Huo Z Y, Lin Z C, Dai Q G, Xu K, Zhang J. Effects of nitrogen application regimes on yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency of super japonica hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33:175-182 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39]	魏海燕, 王亚江, 孟天瑶, 葛梦婕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 机插超级粳稻产量、品质及氮肥利用率对氮肥的响应. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25:488-496.
	Wei H Y, Wang Y J, Meng T Y, Ge M J, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K. Response of yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer from mechanical transplanting super japonica rice. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014, 25:488-496 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40]	Ota T, Kiyosawa H, Kazuhiko K, Suzuki K. The capability of the rice cultivation and their relationship. Part 10: the capability of the number of seedlings of the rice transplanted by rice transplanter. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1971, 40:29-30 (in Japanese).
[41]	彭长青, 李世峰, 卞新民, 吴九林, 周宇, 刘蓉蓉. 机插水稻高产栽培关键技术的适宜值. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17:1619-1623.
	Peng C Q, Li S F, Bian X M, Wu J L, Zhou Y, Liu R R. Appropriate parameters for high-yielding cultivation of machine- transplanted rice. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 17:1619-1623 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[42]	钱银飞, 张洪程, 吴文革, 陈烨, 李杰, 郭振华, 张强, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 机插穴苗数对不同穗型粳稻品种产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35:1698-1707.
	Qian Y F, Zhang H C, Wu W G, Chen Y, Li J, Guo Z H, Zhang Q, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of seedlings number per hill on grain yield and quality in different panicle types of mechanical transplanted japonica rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35:1698-1707 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[43]	朱相成, 张振平, 张俊, 邓艾兴, 张卫建. 增密减氮对东北水稻产量、氮肥利用效率及温室效应的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27:453-461.
	Zhu X C, Zhang Z P, Zhang J, Deng A X, Zhang W J. Effects of increased planting density with reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on rice yield, N use efficiency and greenhouse gas emission in northeast China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 27:453-461 (in Chinese with English abstract).

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

年份Year	处理 Treatment		播种-拔节期 Seed-Jointing		拔节-抽穗期 Jointing-Heading		抽穗-成熟期 Heading-Maturity		全生育期 Growth stage
年份Year	处理 Treatment		日均温 Daily mean temperature (℃)	有效积温 Effective accumulated temperature (℃ d)	日均温 Daily mean temperature (℃)	有效积温 Effective accumulated temperature (℃ d)	日均温 Daily mean temperature (℃)	有效积温Effective accumulated temperature (℃ d)	日均温 Daily mean temperature (℃)	有效积温 Effective accumulated temperature (℃ d)
2018	CK		27.32	1056.60	28.66	615.90	19.61	595.90	25.20	2268.40
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	28.55	1001.80	27.68	495.10	19.93	566.10	25.39	2063.00
		N₂₄₀	28.55	1001.80	27.33	520.00	19.56	544.80	25.15	2066.60
		N₃₀₀	28.55	1001.80	27.03	544.90	18.99	530.70	24.86	2077.40
		N₃₆₀	28.55	1001.80	26.88	557.20	18.92	526.10	24.78	2085.10
2019	CK		25.73	975.50	27.62	581.40	20.18	631.10	24.51	2188.00
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	26.71	919.10	26.48	477.80	20.28	575.40	24.49	1972.30
		N₂₄₀	26.71	919.10	26.38	491.40	20.06	573.60	24.38	1984.10
		N₃₀₀	26.71	919.10	26.22	519.00	19.86	581.60	24.26	2019.70
		N₃₆₀	26.71	919.10	26.17	533.70	19.47	558.90	24.12	2011.70

年份 Year	处理 Treatment		播种-拔节期 Seeding-Jointing		拔节-抽穗期 Jointing-Heading		抽穗-成熟期 Heading-Maturity		全生育期 Whole growth stage
年份 Year	处理 Treatment		日均辐射量 Daily mean radiation (MJ m^-2 d^-1)	辐射量 Radiation (MJ m^-2)	日均辐射量 Daily mean radiation (MJ m^-2 d^-1)	辐射量 Radiation (MJ m^-2)	日均辐射量 Daily mean radiation (MJ m^-2 d^-1)	辐射量 Radiation (MJ m^-2)	日均辐射量 Daily mean radiation (MJ m^-2 d^-1)	辐射量 Radiation (MJ m^-2)
2018	CK		21.45	1308.67	21.80	719.30	15.95	988.81	19.73	3016.77
	迟播迟栽Late sowing	N₀	21.93	1184.04	20.67	578.67	15.99	911.19	19.53	2673.90
		N₂₄₀	21.93	1184.04	20.58	617.44	15.93	907.99	19.48	2709.47
		N₃₀₀	21.93	1184.04	20.54	657.41	15.64	922.88	19.37	2764.33
		N₃₆₀	21.93	1184.04	20.24	667.88	15.58	919.38	19.25	2771.30
2019	CK		19.41	1203.59	21.19	699.26	15.47	959.35	18.69	2862.19
	迟播迟栽Late sowing	N₀	18.42	1013.00	19.58	567.71	15.67	877.77	17.89	2458.48
		N₂₄₀	18.42	1013.00	19.42	582.74	15.76	898.10	17.87	2493.83
		N₃₀₀	18.42	1013.00	19.05	609.50	15.81	932.61	17.76	2555.10
		N₃₆₀	18.42	1013.00	19.19	633.43	15.67	924.67	17.76	2571.10

年份 Year	处理 Treatment			拔节期 Jointing	抽穗期 Heading	成熟期 Maturity	抽穗期高效叶占比 High-efficiency leaf ratio at heading stage (%)
2018	CK			4.33 a	8.18 a	4.26 a	70.13 a
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	D₃	3.23 h	6.01 g	2.60 f	66.55 cde
			D₄	3.41 g	6.10 g	2.68 f	67.95 bcd
			D₅	3.57 f	6.39 f	2.97 e	68.27 bc
		N₂₄₀	D₃	4.03 e	7.00 e	3.50 d	62.71 f
			D₄	4.08 de	7.22 d	3.64 cd	64.76 e
			D₅	4.13 cde	7.37 d	3.75 c	65.30 e
		N₃₀₀	D₃	4.16 bcde	7.69 c	3.98 b	65.19 e
			D₄	4.19 bcd	7.82 bc	4.08 ab	66.12 de
			D₅	4.26 ab	7.99 ab	4.25 a	68.96 ab
		N₃₆₀	D₃	4.24 abc	7.87 bc	4.12 ab	59.17 g
			D₄	4.27 ab	7.89 bc	4.14 ab	58.09 g
			D₅	4.36 a	7.94 b	4.16 ab	55.52 h
2019	CK			4.22 ab	7.73 a	3.71 a	70.79 a
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	D₃	3.04 h	5.27 f	1.77 e	66.45 abc
			D₄	3.13 h	5.36 f	1.85 e	67.98 ab
			D₅	3.32 g	5.45 f	1.93 e	69.22 ab
		N₂₄₀	D₃	3.76 f	5.94 e	2.34 d	57.08 de
			D₄	3.80 ef	6.14 de	2.54 d	57.74 de
			D₅	3.97 de	6.39 d	2.72 cd	58.62 cde
		N₃₀₀	D₃	4.02 cd	6.99 c	3.10 bc	60.69 bcde
			D₄	4.11 abcd	7.27 bc	3.41 ab	63.04 abcd
			D₅	4.15 abcd	7.48 ab	3.62 a	66.32 abc
		N₃₆₀	D₃	4.06 bcd	7.24 bc	3.31 ab	56.50 de
			D₄	4.19 abc	7.27 bc	3.45 ab	55.69 de
			D₅	4.27 a	7.36 abc	3.53 ab	53.47 e

年份 Year	处理 Treatment			吸收利用 Recovery efficiency (%)	农学利用率 Agronomic efficiency (kg kg^-1)	生理利用率 Physiological efficiency (kg kg^-1)	偏生产力 Partial factor productivity (kg kg^-1)
2018	CK			43.64 ab	11.95 a	28.52 a	38.24 c
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N0	D3	—	—	—	47.24 b
			D4	—	—	—	47.55 b
			D5	—	—	—	49.21 a
		N240	D3	39.19 fg	7.45 h	19.00 g	36.34 e
			D4	40.65 def	7.97 g	19.59 f	36.71 e
			D5	42.49 bc	8.92 f	20.99 e	38.04 cd
		N300	D3	39.90 ef	9.48 de	23.77 d	36.80 e
			D4	42.21 bcd	10.72 c	25.40 b	37.56 d
			D5	44.61 a	11.25 b	25.21 b	38.12 cd
		N360	D3	37.66 g	9.17 ef	24.34 c	36.35 e
			D4	39.67 ef	9.67 d	24.37 c	36.40 e
			D5	41.19 cde	8.20 g	19.92 f	34.92 f
2019	CK			41.10 a	10.10 a	26.33 a	38.55 g
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N0	D3	—	—	—	55.06 a
			D4	—	—	—	54.81 a
			D5	—	—	—	52.38 b
		N240	D3	36.86 de	6.59 f	17.88 h	39.62 cde
			D4	37.85 cd	6.89 ef	18.21 h	39.84 cd
			D5	39.62 abc	7.85 d	19.81 f	39.28 def
		N300	D3	38.01 bcd	9.13 b	24.01 c	40.22 c
			D4	39.72 ab	9.38 b	23.61 cd	39.96 cd
			D5	40.38 a	9.89 a	24.50 b	39.51 cde
		N360	D3	35.63 e	8.37 c	23.49 de	39.04 efg
			D4	37.27 de	8.58 c	23.01 e	38.73 fg
			D5	38.27 bcd	7.18 e	18.76 g	35.79 h

氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量

Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice

RichHTML

PDF

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 43

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

年份 Year	处理 Treatment		播种-拔节期 Seed-Jointing		拔节-抽穗期 Jointing-Heading		抽穗-成熟期 Heading-Maturity		全生育期 Growth stage
年份 Year	处理 Treatment		天数 Days	缩短天数 Shorten days	天数 Days	缩短天数 Shorten days	天数 Days	缩短天数 Shorten days	天数 Days	缩短天数 Shorten days
2018	CK		60	—	33	—	62	—	155	—
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	53	7	29	4	56	6	138	17
		N₂₄₀	53	7	30	3	57	5	140	15
		N₃₀₀	53	7	32	1	59	3	144	11
		N₃₆₀	53	7	33	0	59	3	145	10
2019	CK		61	—	33	—	62	—	156	—
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	54	7	29	4	56	6	139	17
		N₂₄₀	54	7	30	3	57	5	141	15
		N₃₀₀	54	7	32	1	59	3	145	11
		N₃₆₀	54	7	33	0	59	3	146	10

年份 Year	处理 Treatment			高峰苗 Maximum seedling number (×10⁶ hm^-2)	有效穗 Panicles (×10⁶ hm^-2)	成穗率 Percentage of productive tiller (%)
2018	CK			5.87 cd	4.01 a	69.85 a
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	D₃	4.09 i	2.65 f	64.72 bcd
			D₄	4.37 h	2.81 f	63.67 cde
			D₅	4.70 g	3.02 e	63.43 cde
		N₂₄₀	D₃	4.77 g	3.17 e	66.34 b
			D₄	5.28 f	3.44 d	65.15 bc
			D₅	5.46 ef	3.53 d	64.62 bcd
		N₃₀₀	D₃	5.65 de	3.63 cd	64.08 cde
			D₄	5.99 bc	3.81 bc	63.68 cde
			D₅	6.16 ab	3.87 b	62.72 def
		N₃₆₀	D₃	5.98 bc	3.76 bc	62.87 cdef
			D₄	6.20 ab	3.84 b	61.92 ef
			D₅	6.35 a	3.89 b	61.15 f
2019	CK			5.33 c	3.79 a	71.00 a
	迟播迟栽 Late sowing	N₀	D₃	3.77 g	2.41 h	64.12 cd
			D₄	4.13 f	2.65 g	64.36 bcd
			D₅	4.50 e	2.87 f	63.63 cd
		N₂₄₀	D₃	4.69 e	3.09 e	65.92 b
			D₄	5.00 d	3.24 de	64.64 bc
			D₅	5.26 cd	3.38 cd	64.23 bcd
		N₃₀₀	D₃	5.27 cd	3.38 cd	64.00 cd
			D₄	5.56 bc	3.55 bc	63.84 cd
			D₅	5.95 a	3.73 ab	62.76 de
		N₃₆₀	D₃	5.56 bc	3.53 bc	63.38 cd
			D₄	5.82 ab	3.68 ab	63.29 cde
			D₅	6.05 a	3.73 ab	61.60 e

[1]	胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2]	高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[3]	马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4]	张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5]	张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[6]	王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[7]	赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[8]	郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[9]	张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[10]	闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[11]	刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[12]	王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[13]	张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[14]	侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[15]	尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.