欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1485-1490.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

大穗型粳稻籽粒相对充实度的化学调控及其与产量和品质的关系

赵全志;吕强;殷春渊;高桐梅;宁慧峰;乔江方;刘辉;陈静蕊   

  1. 河南农业大学/河南省作物生长发育调控重点实验室,河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-02 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-10-12 网络出版日期:2006-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵全志

Effects of Chemical Regulation on Grain Relative Plumpness and Its Relationship with Yield and Grain Quality of Large Panicle Japonica Rice

ZHAO Quan-Zhi,LÜ, Qiang,YIN Chun-Yuan,GAO Tong-Mei,NING Hui-Feng,QIAO Jiang-Fang,LIU Hui,CHEN Jing-Rui   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth and Development Regulation ,Henan Province / Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
  • Received:2005-11-02 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-10-12 Published online:2006-10-12
  • Contact: ZHAO Quan-Zhi

摘要:

以同一穗上弱势粒占强势粒千粒重的百分比表示籽粒相对充实度。2003-2004年在大田条件下,通过喷施植物生长调节剂,研究了籽粒灌浆、充实度和相对充实度的动态,探讨了籽粒相对充实度化学调控及其与水稻产量和品质的关系。结果表明,灌浆速率在灌浆初期(花后5~12 d),强势粒平均比弱势粒高256%;而在灌浆盛期(花后12~19 d)及后期(19~32 d),弱势粒平均分别比强势粒高16.67%、154.55%。PR1处理可明显促进弱势粒的起始灌浆速率,及早启动弱势粒的灌浆。籽粒相对充实度在花后5~12 d迅速降低,花后12~19 d迅速上升,花后19~32 d缓慢上升,呈先降后升的偏“V”型动态曲线。PR1处理在花后19 d籽粒相对充实度明显高于对照和其他处理。灌浆中、后期(花后19~32 d)的籽粒相对充实度基本上与平均千粒重、经济系数、理论产量和实际产量呈显著或极显著正相关,与强势粒和弱势粒的垩白粒率、垩白面积、垩白度呈显著或极显著负相关,与弱势粒的糙米率呈显著正相关,花后19 d的相对充实度与弱势粒的精米率、整精米率呈显著正相关。

关键词: 水稻, 籽粒相对充实度, 产量, 稻米品质, 化学调控

Abstract:

The poor grain plumpness is the general question in modern large panicle rice cultivars. The relationship of grain plumpness with grain yield and grain quality has not been reported. The field experiment was conducted in 2003–2004 to research the dynamic changes of grain filling rate, grain plumpness, relative plumpness and their relationship with grain yield and grain quality using the rice cultivar of Yujing 6 with chemical regulation treatments of T27, T23, PR1 and T30 (the check is water) at 5 days before heading. The grain relative plumpness is expressed by the percentage of 1000-grain weight of inferior grains to superior grains in one panicle of rice. The result indicated that the super-grain filling rate was 256% more than that of inferior-grain at early grain-filling stage (5–12 days after heading), and the filling rate of inferior-grain was 16.67% and 154.55% more than that of super-grain at mid-filling stage and later-filling stage respectively. The dynamic changes of grain plumpness and 1000-grain weight in superior grain were also different from those in inferior grain. The grain relative plumpness reduced rapidly at 5–12 day, rose rapidly at 12–19 days and rose slowly at 19–32 days after heading. The grain relative plumpness of PR1 treatment was higher than that of CK and other treatments obviously. There were significant positive correlation at P=0.05 or P=0.01 between grain relative plumpness and mean 1000-grain weight, economic coefficient, theoretical yield and true yield, brown rice percentage of inferior-grain, significant negative correlation at P=0.05 or P=0.01 between grain relative plumpness at 19–32 days after heading and chalky percentage, chalky area, chalkiness, and significant positive correlation between the grain relative plumpness at 19 days after heading and milled rice percentage, head rice percentage of inferior-grain. The results suggest that the Grain relative plumpness is a suitable index to express the relationship between super grain and inferior grain in one panicle.

Key words: Rice, Grain relative plumpness, Grain filling rate, Yield, Grain quality, Chemical regulation

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[6] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[7] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[8] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[9] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[10] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[11] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[12] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[13] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[14] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[15] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!