欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (07): 1214-1218.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

利用不同实时定量PCR方法分析相对基因表达差异

余舜武1;刘鸿艳1;罗利军1,2,*   

  1. 1 上海市农业生物基因中心/作物遗传改良国家重点实验室种质资源分室(上海),上海201106;2 华中农业大学,湖北武汉430070
  • 收稿日期:2006-08-23 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-07-12 网络出版日期:2007-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 罗利军

Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Using Different Real-time Quantitative PCR

YU Shun-Wu1,LIU Hong-Yan1,LUO Li-Jun12*   

  1. 1 Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center / Germsperm Resources Division (Shanghai), National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Shanghai 201106; 2 Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2006-08-23 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-07-12 Published online:2007-07-12
  • Contact: LUO Li-Jun

摘要:

利用实时荧光定量PCR方法分析目标基因转录本之间的表达差异,目前常用的分析实验数据的有绝对定量和相对定量方法。为了克服绝对定量方法的繁琐和简化相对定量的分析方法,分别利用2-ΔΔCT、2-ΔCT和标准曲线法对水稻OsRDB1基因在不同化学试剂和激素处理下的表达差异进行了分析,发现2-ΔΔCT必须引入标准的看家基因作为参考,计算方法繁琐,计算结果受扩增效率影响;而利用2-ΔCT和标准曲线法计算方便,节省定量PCR试剂,但其结果易受到RNA浓度测量准确率的影响,其中标准曲线法引入斜率消除扩增效率的影响,最能测得实际的原始拷贝数差异。

关键词: 相对定量, 标准曲线, 实时荧光定量PCR, OsRDB1

Abstract:

Real-time quantitative PCR is often used to analyze the target gene expression variation. The most commonly used methods to analyze data from real-time quantitative PCR include two types: absolute quantification and relative quantification. To avoid the complex of absolute quantification and simplify the relative quantification, the methods of 2-ΔΔCT, 2-ΔCT and standard curve were used to analyze the OsRDB1 expression variation under different chemical and hormone treatments in this study. The ratio of gene expression variation was calculated with the slope of standard curve. The results revealed that the 2-ΔΔCT method had to be introduced a housekeep gene as a control, with a complicated calculation and the relative ratio was deviated by PCR amplification efficiency. The 2-ΔCT and standard curve methods were convenient and saved chemicals used in the quantitative PCR, but the results were liable to the effect of the veracity of the RNA concentration. The modified method of standard curve introduced the curve slope to eliminate the effect of amplification efficiency, and the result of standard curve method most closely revealed the diversity of original copy.

Key words: Relative quantification, Standard curve, Real-time quantitative PCR, OsRDB1

[1] 李增强, 丁鑫超, 卢海, 胡亚丽, 岳娇, 黄震, 莫良玉, 陈立, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 铅胁迫下红麻生理特性及DNA甲基化分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1031-1042.
[2] 卢海, 李增强, 唐美琼, 罗登杰, 曹珊, 岳娇, 胡亚丽, 黄震, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 红麻DNA甲基化响应镉胁迫及甲基化差异基因的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2324-2334.
[3] 郑清雷,余陈静,姚坤存,黄宁,阙友雄,凌辉,许莉萍. 甘蔗Rieske Fe/S蛋白前体基因ScPetC的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 844-857.
[4] 高世武,傅志伟,陈云,林兆里,许莉萍,郭晋隆. 甘蔗热带种金属硫蛋白家族基因的克隆及响应重金属胁迫的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 166-178.
[5] 孙婷婷,王文举,娄文月,刘峰,张旭,王玲,陈玉凤,阙友雄,许莉萍,李大妹,苏亚春. 甘蔗脂氧合酶基因ScLOX1的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1002-1016.
[6] 王作敏,刘瑾,孙士超,张新宇,薛飞,李艳军,孙杰. 彩色棉多药和有毒化合物输出蛋白MATE家族基因的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1380-1392.
[7] 王玲,刘峰,戴明剑,孙婷婷,苏炜华,王春风,张旭,毛花英,苏亚春,阙友雄. 甘蔗ScWRKY4基因的克隆与表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1367-1379.
[8] 段方猛, 罗秋兰, 鲁雪莉, 齐娜伟, 刘宪舜, 宋雯雯. 玉米油菜素甾醇生物合成关键酶基因ZmCYP90B1的克隆及其对逆境胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(03): 343-356.
[9] 苏亚春,黄珑,凌辉,王竹青,刘峰,苏炜华,黄宁,吴期滨,高世武,阙友雄. 甘蔗CDK基因的cDNA全长克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(01): 42-50.
[10] 苏炜华,刘峰,黄珑,苏亚春,黄宁,凌辉,吴期滨,张华,阙友雄. 甘蔗Ca2+/H+反向运转体基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(07): 1074-1082.
[11] 刘峰,苏炜华,黄珑,肖新换,黄宁,凌辉,苏亚春,张华,阙友雄. 甘蔗Na+/H+逆转运蛋白基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(04): 501-512.
[12] 贾双伟,高英,赵开军. 芥菜锌指蛋白转录因子基因Bj26的克隆与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(07): 1174-1181.
[13] 朱斌,陆俊杏,彭茜,翁昌梅,王淑文,余浩,李加纳,卢坤,梁颖. 甘蓝型油菜MAPK7基因家族及其启动子的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(05): 789-805.
[14] 罗茂,彭华,宋锐,高健,潘光堂,张志明. 玉米纹枯病胁迫相关miRNA功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(05): 837-844.
[15] 闫贵欣,陈碧云,许鲲,高桂珍,吕培军,伍晓明,李锋,李俊. 不同施氮水平下甘蓝型油菜发育种子中基因表达谱差异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(11): 2052-2060.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!