欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (08): 1375-1379.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米不同朝向叶片原初光化学反应日变化的差异

许珍1;李鹏民2;高辉远2;董树亭1,*;王空军1;张吉旺1   

  1. 1作物生物学国家重点实验室/山东农业大学农学院,2山东农业大学生命科学学院,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2006-11-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-08-12 网络出版日期:2007-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 董树亭

Difference in Diurnal Variations of Primary Photochemical Reactions in Maize Leaves Grown in Different Directions

XU Zhen1,LI Peng-Min2,GAO Hui-Yuan2,DONG Shu-Ting1*,WANG Kong-Jun1,ZHANG Ji-Wang1   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University; 2 College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2006-11-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-08-12 Published online:2007-08-12
  • Contact: DONG Shu-Ting

摘要: 利用快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学测定和JIP-test数据分析方法,研究了晴天条件下玉米不同朝向叶片原初光化学反应的日变化。上午朝西叶片的光合性能指数(PIABS)和PSⅡ最大量子效率(φPo)下降快,光抑制较严重;下午朝东叶片的光抑制相对较严重。一天中两组叶片的K相可变荧光占Fj-Fo振幅的比例(Wk)先上升后下降,朝东叶片捕获的激子将电子传递到电子传递链中QA-下游的其它电子受体的概率(Ψo)几乎没有变化,而朝西叶片的Ψo先下降后上升,表明不同朝向叶片PSⅡ受体侧和供体侧受到的伤害不同。从单位面积和单位反应中心热耗散(DIo/CS,DIo/RC)的日变化看出,上午朝西叶片过剩的激发能较多;下午朝东叶片过剩的激发能较多。与φPo相比,由JIP-test导出的其他参数如PIABS,能更好地反映光抑制的程度。且叶片的朝向不同对光抑制日变化的影响不同,在研究光合机构光抑制的日变化时,要注意叶片朝向的选择。

关键词: 玉米, 日变化, 不同朝向叶片, 原初光化学反应, 光抑制

Abstract:

Diurnal variations of primary photochemical reactions in maize (Zea mays L.) leaves grown in different directions were etudied by chlorophyll a fluorescence transient measurement and the relevantly analytical method, JIP-test on sunny day. The results showed that in the forenoon, the performance index on a basis of absorption (PIABS) and maximum quantum efficiency of PSⅡ (φPo) decreased more drastically, suggesting the severe photoinhibition in the leaves orienting to west. However, the photoinhibition was more severely in the leaves orienting to east in the afternoon. With the variation of photon flux density (PFD), ratio of variable fluorescence Fk to the amplitude Fj-Fo (Wk) increased firstly, then followed by a decrease in the two group leaves. In addition, efficiency that a trapped exciton can move an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA- (Ψo) hardly varied in the leaves orienting to east, whereas that in the leaves orienting to west decreased firstly, then followed by an increase. These results demonstrate that the donor and acceptor sides of PSⅡ were damaged differently in the leaves orienting to different directions. Dissipation per excited cross-section or per active reaction center indicates that the excessively excited energy per cross-section or per active reaction center was higher in the leaves orienting to west at noon while that was higher in the leaves orienting to east in the afternoon. Our results also exhibited that compared with φPo, other parameters derived from JIP-test such as PIABS, are more sensitive to the variation of PFD and can reflect degree of photoinhibition in maize leaves in more detail. When studying diurnal variations of photoinhibition in plant leaves, much attention should be paid on the selection for growing direction of leaves.

Key words: Maize, Diurnal change, Leaves grown in different directions, Primary photochemical reaction, Photoinhibition

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[14] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[15] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!