欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (08): 1375-1379.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米不同朝向叶片原初光化学反应日变化的差异

许珍1;李鹏民2;高辉远2;董树亭1,*;王空军1;张吉旺1   

  1. 1作物生物学国家重点实验室/山东农业大学农学院,2山东农业大学生命科学学院,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2006-11-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-08-12 网络出版日期:2007-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 董树亭

Difference in Diurnal Variations of Primary Photochemical Reactions in Maize Leaves Grown in Different Directions

XU Zhen1,LI Peng-Min2,GAO Hui-Yuan2,DONG Shu-Ting1*,WANG Kong-Jun1,ZHANG Ji-Wang1   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University; 2 College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2006-11-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-08-12 Published online:2007-08-12
  • Contact: DONG Shu-Ting

摘要: 利用快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学测定和JIP-test数据分析方法,研究了晴天条件下玉米不同朝向叶片原初光化学反应的日变化。上午朝西叶片的光合性能指数(PIABS)和PSⅡ最大量子效率(φPo)下降快,光抑制较严重;下午朝东叶片的光抑制相对较严重。一天中两组叶片的K相可变荧光占Fj-Fo振幅的比例(Wk)先上升后下降,朝东叶片捕获的激子将电子传递到电子传递链中QA-下游的其它电子受体的概率(Ψo)几乎没有变化,而朝西叶片的Ψo先下降后上升,表明不同朝向叶片PSⅡ受体侧和供体侧受到的伤害不同。从单位面积和单位反应中心热耗散(DIo/CS,DIo/RC)的日变化看出,上午朝西叶片过剩的激发能较多;下午朝东叶片过剩的激发能较多。与φPo相比,由JIP-test导出的其他参数如PIABS,能更好地反映光抑制的程度。且叶片的朝向不同对光抑制日变化的影响不同,在研究光合机构光抑制的日变化时,要注意叶片朝向的选择。

关键词: 玉米, 日变化, 不同朝向叶片, 原初光化学反应, 光抑制

Abstract:

Diurnal variations of primary photochemical reactions in maize (Zea mays L.) leaves grown in different directions were etudied by chlorophyll a fluorescence transient measurement and the relevantly analytical method, JIP-test on sunny day. The results showed that in the forenoon, the performance index on a basis of absorption (PIABS) and maximum quantum efficiency of PSⅡ (φPo) decreased more drastically, suggesting the severe photoinhibition in the leaves orienting to west. However, the photoinhibition was more severely in the leaves orienting to east in the afternoon. With the variation of photon flux density (PFD), ratio of variable fluorescence Fk to the amplitude Fj-Fo (Wk) increased firstly, then followed by a decrease in the two group leaves. In addition, efficiency that a trapped exciton can move an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA- (Ψo) hardly varied in the leaves orienting to east, whereas that in the leaves orienting to west decreased firstly, then followed by an increase. These results demonstrate that the donor and acceptor sides of PSⅡ were damaged differently in the leaves orienting to different directions. Dissipation per excited cross-section or per active reaction center indicates that the excessively excited energy per cross-section or per active reaction center was higher in the leaves orienting to west at noon while that was higher in the leaves orienting to east in the afternoon. Our results also exhibited that compared with φPo, other parameters derived from JIP-test such as PIABS, are more sensitive to the variation of PFD and can reflect degree of photoinhibition in maize leaves in more detail. When studying diurnal variations of photoinhibition in plant leaves, much attention should be paid on the selection for growing direction of leaves.

Key words: Maize, Diurnal change, Leaves grown in different directions, Primary photochemical reaction, Photoinhibition

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 崔连花, 詹为民, 杨陆浩, 王少瓷, 马文奇, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平, 杨青华. 2个玉米ZmCOP1基因的克隆及其转录丰度对不同光质处理的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[8] 许静, 高景阳, 李程成, 宋云霞, 董朝沛, 王昭, 李云梦, 栾一凡, 陈甲法, 周子键, 吴建宇. 过表达ZmCIPKHT基因增强植物耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
[9] 刘磊, 詹为民, 丁武思, 刘通, 崔连花, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平. 玉米矮化突变体gad39的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[10] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[11] 徐宁坤, 李冰, 陈晓艳, 魏亚康, 刘子龙, 薛永康, 陈洪宇, 王桂凤. 一个新的玉米Bt2基因突变体的遗传分析和分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[12] 宋仕勤, 杨清龙, 王丹, 吕艳杰, 徐文华, 魏雯雯, 刘小丹, 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王永军, 王立春. 东北主推玉米品种种子形态及贮藏物质与萌发期耐冷性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[13] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
[14] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[15] 苏达, 颜晓军, 蔡远扬, 梁恬, 吴良泉, MUHAMMAD AtifMuneer, 叶德练. 磷肥对甜玉米籽粒植酸和锌有效性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 203-214.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!