欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 2099-2106.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.02099

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

苎麻核心种质构建方法

栾明宝,陈建华*,许英,王晓飞,孙志民   

  1. 中国农业科学院麻类研究所 / 农业部茎纤维生物质与工程微生物重点开放实验室, 湖南长沙 410205
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-03 修回日期:2010-08-05 出版日期:2010-12-12 网络出版日期:2010-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 陈建华,E-mail:cjhbt@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由农业部保种项目(NB09-2130135-41),国家自然科学基金项目(30900913)和中国农业科学院科技经费项目资助。

Method of Establishing Ramie Core Collection

LUAN Ming-Bao,CHEN Jian-Hua*,XU Ying,WANG Xiao-Fei,SUN Zhi-Min   

  1. Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key laboratory of Stem-Fiber Biomass and Engineering Microbiology, Ministry of Agriculture, Changsha 410205, China
  • Received:2010-04-03 Revised:2010-08-05 Published:2010-12-12 Published online:2010-10-14
  • Contact: 陈建华,E-mail:cjhbt@sina.com

摘要: 选用国家长沙苎麻圃的790份种质资源, 在已有的25个性状数据的基础上, 采用不同取样方法、不同系统聚类方法、不同遗传距离方法构建苎麻核心种质, 用质量性状的多样性指数均值、表型保留比率均值和数量性状均值差异百分率、方差差异百分率、极差符合率和变异系数变化率等6个指标评价不同方法组合(取样方法、聚类方法、遗传距离)构建核心种质的优劣。选出合适的构建方法, 构建苎麻核心种质。结果表明, 不同的取样方法对质量性状和数量性状的遗传多样性影响不同, 就质量性状的最大遗传多样性而言, 选择优先取样+多次聚类随机取样方法比较适宜, 而对数量性状的最大遗传多样性而言, 选择优先取样+多次聚类变异度取样方法则较适宜。用优先取样+多次聚类随机取样方法取样时, 采用最短距离法和重心法构建的核心种质最好, 用优先取样+多次聚类变异度取样时, 采用离差平方和法则是构建苎麻核心种质的最佳聚类方法。苎麻核心种质构建与质量性状的不同遗传距离无关, 但数量性状以欧氏距离最佳。

关键词: 苎麻, 核心种质, 取样方法, 聚类方法, 遗传距离

Abstract: Ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) is an important bast fiber crop. Its fiber, one of the best bast fibers, is widely used in textile industry and plays an indispensable and irreplaceable role in the national economy. Core collection is a representative subset of entire germplasm collection, consisting of introduced accessions with minimum genetic redundancy and retained most initial collection. To develop the method of establishing ramie core collection, based on 25 agrinomic traits data from 790 ramie germplasm of national ramie germplasm nursery, using software provided by professor Xu of Zhejiang university, we sampled a serials of subsets at 20% proportion, respectively, by six hierarchical clustering methods (single linkage, complete linkage, median method, centroid method, ward’s, unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means), three sampling methods (stepwise clustering with random sampling strategy and preferred sampling strategy, stepwise clustering with deviation sampling strategy and preferred sampling strategy, random sampling strategy), three genetic distances in disordered qualitative traits (simple matching, jaccard, nei and li), and three genetic distances in ordered qualitative traits and quantitative characteristics (mahalanobis distance, euclidean distance, principal component). The genetic variation among subsets was compared by evaluating the I (index of genetic diversity), RPR (ratio of phenotype retained) of qualitative traits and MD (mean difference percentage), VD (variance difference percentage), CR (coincidence difference percentage), VR (variable rate of coefficient of variation) of quantitative traits. The results showed that different sampling methods have different impacts on qualitative traits and quantitative traits. For the largest genetic diversity of qualitative traits, it is effective to choose stepwise clustering with random sampling strategy and preferred sampling strategy. For the largest genetic diversity of quantitative traits, it is effective to choose stepwise clustering with deviation sampling strategy and preferred sampling strategy. The ramie core collection is the best one constructed by centroid method, single linkage clustering way under stepwise clustering with random sampling strategy and preferred sampling strategy and constructed by ward’s clustering way under stepwise clustering with deviation sampling strategy and preferred sampling strategy. Core collection in ramie was not related with genetic distances of qualitative traits, whereas the core collection of ramie constructed by euclidean distance of quantitative traits was the best.

Key words: Ramie, Core collection, Sampling method, Clustering method, Genetic distance

[1]Frankel O H, Brown A H D. Current Plant Genetic Resources—a Critical Appraisal. In: Genetics: New Frontiers. Vol. IV. New Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH Publishing, 1984. pp 1-11
[2]Brown A H D. Core collection: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome, 1989, 31: 818-824
[3]Hao C Y, Zhang X Y, Wang L F, Dong Y S, Shang X W, Jia J Z. Genetic diversity and core collection evaluations in common wheat germplasm from the northwestern spring wheat region in china. Mol Breed, 2006, 17: 69-77
[4]Yao Q-L(姚启伦), Fang P(方平), Yang K-C(杨克诚), Pan G-T(潘光堂). Methods of constructing a core collection of maize landraces in southwest China based on SSR data. J Hunan Agric Univ (Nat Sci)(湖南农业大学学报×自然科学版), 2009, 35(3): 225-228 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Zhang H-L(张洪亮), Li Z-C(李自超), Cao Y-S(曹永生), Qiu Z-E(裘宗恩), Yu P(余萍), Wang X-K(王象坤). Comparison of parameters for testing the rice core collection in phenotype. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(2): 252-257 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Ming J(明军), Zhang Q-X(张启翔), Lan Y-P(兰彦平). Core collection of Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc. J Beijing For Univ (北京林业大学学报), 2005, 27(2): 65-69 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Prakash N S, Combes M C, Dussert S, Naveen S, Lashermes P. Analysis of genetic diversity in Indian robusta coffee genepool (Coffea canephora) in comparison with a representative core collection using SSRs and AFLPs. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2005, 52: 333-343
[8]Li Y-X(李银霞), An L-J(安丽君), Jiang Q(姜全). Establishment and evaluation of the core collection of peach (Prunus persica L. Bat sch.) cultivars. J China Agric Univ (中国农业大学学报), 2007, 12(5): 22-28 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Wang X-C(王新超), Liu Z(刘振), Yao M-Z(姚明哲). Sampling strategy to establish a primary core collection of Chinese tea germplasms. J Tea Sci (茶叶科学), 2009, 29(2): 159-167 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Wei Z-G(魏志刚), Gao Y-C(高玉池), Yang C-P(杨传平). Sampling method for con structing germplasm core collections of Betula platyphylla. J Northeast For Univ (东北林业大学学报), 2009, 37(7): 1-4 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Lu H-R(卢浩然). Bast-Fiber Crops Cultivation Science in China (中国麻类作物栽培学). Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1992. pp 1-10 (in Chinese)
[12]Xiong H-P(熊和平). Bast-fiber Crops Breeding (麻类作物育种学). Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2008. pp 46-50 (in Chinese)
[13]Jie Y-C(揭雨成). Descriptors and Data Standard for Ramie (苎麻种质资源描述规范和数据标准). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007. pp 9-28 (in Chinese)
[14]Xu H-M(徐海明), Li X-L(李晓玲), Li J-Q(李金泉), Liu G-F(刘桂富), Hu J(胡晋). Study on the strategies of integrating qualitative and quantitative traits for constructing core collection. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric & Life Sci) (浙江大学学报×农业与生命科学版), 2005, 31(4): 362-367 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Hu J, Zhu J, Xu H M. Methods of constructing core collectionby stepwise clusterwith three samp ling strategies based on genotypic values of crops. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 101: 264-268
[16]Bar-Hen A, Charcosset A, Bourgoin M, Guiard J. Relationship between genetic markers and morphological traits in maize inbred lines collection. Euphytica, 1995, 84: 145-154
[17]Islam F M A, Basford K E, Redden R J, Gonzalez A V, Kroonenberg P M, Beebe S. Genetic variability in cultivated common bean beyond the two major genes. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2002, 49: 271-283
[18]Xu H-M(徐海明). Study on Methods of Constructing Core Collection of Germplasm and Their Applications in Core Construction (种质资源核心库的构建方法的研究及其应用). Zhejiang: Zhejiang University, 2005. pp 26-71 (in Chinese)
[19]Li Z-C(李自超), Zhang H-L(张洪亮), Zeng Y-W(曾亚文), Yang Z-Y(杨忠义). Study on sampling schemes of core collection of local varieties of rice in Yunnan, China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 33(5): 1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Liu X-L(刘新龙), Cai Q(蔡青), Ma L(马丽), Wu C-W(吴才文). Strategy of sampling for pre-core collection of sugarcane hybrid. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(7): 1209-1216 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Zhang X, Zhao Y, Cheng Y. Establishment of sesame germplasm core collection in China. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2000, 47: 273-279
[22]Li C T, Shi C H, Wu J Q. Methods of developing core collections based on the predicted genotypic value of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Gene, 2004, 108: 1172-1176
[23]Wei Z-G(魏志刚), Gao Y-C(高玉池), Liu G-J(刘关君). Study on the clustering method of constructing core collection in Betula platyphylla germplasm. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2009, 10(3): 405-410 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]Zhang Q-P(章秋平), Liu W-S(刘威生) Liu N(刘宁). Establishment and evaluation of primary core collection of apricot (Armeniaca vulgaris) germplasm. J Fruit Sci (果树学报), 2009, 26(6): 819-825 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 刘海波, 张蕾, 王立琦, 石晓丽, 周文莹, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 苎麻BnGCL1基因响应干旱胁迫的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 14-27.
[2] 梁红凯, 赵苏蒙, 陆琼, 周鹏, 智慧, 刁现民, 贺强. 谷子微核心种质的构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1435-1444.
[3] 管圣, 廖澳, 王立琦, 李茜, 卢建宁, 荣晶, 崔国贤, 杨瑞芳, 佘玮. 6-BA调控增强苎麻抗旱性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 823-834.
[4] 丁艺冰, 辛旭霞, 冯智尊, 曹越, 郭娟, Dipak K SANTRA, 王瑞云, 陈喜明. 东北春播区糜子核心种质及其DNA分子身份证构建[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1181-1192.
[5] 宋兆建, 冯紫旖, 屈天歌, 吕品苍, 杨晓璐, 湛明月, 张献华, 何玉池, 刘育华, 蔡得田. 四倍体水稻回复二倍体品系的籼粳属性鉴定和杂种优势利用初探[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2039-2050.
[6] 王倩, 张立媛, 许月, 李海, 刘少雄, 薛亚鹏, 陆平, 王瑞云, 刘敏轩. 黍稷高基元EST-SSR标记开发及200份核心种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2308-2318.
[7] 陈伊航, 唐朝臣, 张雄坚, 姚祝芳, 江炳志, 王章英. 基于表型性状和SSR分子标记构建甘薯核心种质[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1249-1261.
[8] 夏秀忠, 张宗琼, 杨行海, 荘洁, 曾宇, 邓国富, 宋国显, 黄欲晓, 农保选, 李丹婷. 广西水稻地方品种核心种质芽期耐盐性全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2007-2015.
[9] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[10] 唐映红, 刘芳, 陈建荣, 毛凯权, 李辉, 万海清. 苎麻CCRs基因家族3类成员的生化特性与表达差异[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(10): 2546-2559.
[11] 王倩, 刘少雄, 柴晓娇, 李海, 张芬, 陆平, 王瑞云, 刘敏轩. 中国不同省(市、自治区)糯高粱籽粒酚类物质含量差异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(10): 2505-2516.
[12] 李富, 王延周, 严理, 朱四元, 刘头明. 苎麻茎皮环状RNA表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1020-1030.
[13] 郭艳春, 张力岚, 陈思远, 祁建民, 方平平, 陶爱芬, 张列梅, 张立武. 黄麻应用核心种质的DNA分子身份证构建[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 80-93.
[14] 付虹雨, 崔国贤, 李绪孟, 佘玮, 崔丹丹, 赵亮, 苏小惠, 王继龙, 曹晓兰, 刘婕仪, 刘皖慧, 王昕惠. 基于无人机遥感图像的苎麻产量估测研究[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1448-1455.
[15] 徐益,张列梅,郭艳春,祁建民,张力岚,方平平,张立武. 黄麻核心种质的遴选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1672-1681.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!