欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (07): 1293-1302.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01293

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同株型和化感作用特性水稻对3种稻田主要杂草的干扰控制作用

徐正浩1,2,*,谢国雄3,周宇杰4,高屾1   

  1. 1 浙江大学环境与资源学院 / 浙江省亚热带土壤与植物营养重点研究实验室, 浙江杭州 310058;2 浙江省湖州市农业科学研究院, 浙江湖州 313000;3 杭州市植保土肥总站, 浙江杭州 310016;4 浙江省诸暨市农业技术推广中心, 浙江诸暨 311800
  • 收稿日期:2012-12-11 修回日期:2013-03-11 出版日期:2013-07-12 网络出版日期:2013-04-23
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项,中国博士后科学基金(2003034522),浙江省科技计划项目(2008C23010),浙江省教育厅科研计划项目(Y201224845),杭州市科技计划项目(20101032B03, 20101032B21)和诸暨市科技计划项目(2011BB7461)资助。

Interference of Different Morphological Types and Allelopathic Rice Materials with Three Principal Paddy Weeds

XU Zheng-Hao1,2,*,XIE Guo-Xiong3,ZHOU Yu-Jie4,GAO Shen1   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Subtropic Soil and Plant Nutrition, College of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 2Huzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huzhou 313000, China; 3General Station of Plant Protection and Soil Fertility in Hangzhou District, Hangzhou 312000, China; 4Zhuji Agricultural Technology Extension Centre in Zhejiang Province, Zhuji 311800, China?
  • Received:2012-12-11 Revised:2013-03-11 Published:2013-07-12 Published online:2013-04-23

摘要:

采用裂区试验设计, 以接种无芒稗、水莎草和鸭舌草等3种田间主要杂草和不接种杂草为主处理, 10份不同株型和化感作用特性的水稻材料为副处理, 研究不同株型和化感作用特性水稻对3种杂草的干扰控制作用。结果表明, 水稻化感种质吓一跳对无芒稗地上部分干重的抑制作用最强, 早杂中9A/602、早籼浙101TN1也表现较好的抑制作用。中早22对水莎草的干扰控制作用最强, 早籼浙101和吓一跳对水莎草也表现较好的干扰控制效果, 中早27对水莎草的抑制作用较弱。中9A/602、早籼浙101、吓一跳、IR644-1-63-1-1对鸭舌草的干扰控制作用较强, 谷梅2号和中早27对鸭舌草的干扰控制作用较弱。吓一跳对3种供试杂草的地上部分总干重抑制作用在50%以上, IR644-1-63-1-1PI312777TN1和谷梅2号的抑制作用差异显著。早杂中9A/602和早籼浙1013种供试杂草地上部分总干重的抑制作用达40%以上, 显示了较强的干扰控制能力, 与谷梅2号差异显著。杂草竞争干扰与无草对照间水稻株高、有效穗数、穗长、每穗总粒数差异显著, 但结实率和千粒重差异不显著。与无草对照相比, 吓一跳在3种杂草竞争干扰下, 株高增加3.64%, 而中9A/7491TN1和谷梅2号的株高比无草对照降低10%以上。3种杂草竞争干扰下, 10份供试水稻材料的有效穗数与无草对照相比均降低, 其中TN1、谷梅2号、PI312777、中早22、中早27、中9A/602有效穗数均降低50%以上, 吓一跳降低幅度最小, 16.86%3种杂草竞争干扰导致水稻有效穗数显著降低, 是水稻减产的主要原因。

关键词: 水稻株型, 化感, 3种稻田主要杂草, 干扰控制, 水稻穗部性状

Abstract:

The present study was carried out to investigate the allelopathic abilities of the tested rice materials on the three main paddy field weeds using split design with three replications. Two weed planting patterns, using relay transplanting three weeds, Echinochloa crs-galli, Juncellus serotinus, and Monochoria vaginalis, and without weed infestation, were taken as two main treatments, along with ten different morphological type and allelopathic rice materials as split treatments. The results showed that the superb allelopathic rice material, Xiayitiao, had the strongest ability to suppress the aboveground dry weight of barnyardgrass. Early indica hybrid rice Zhong 9A/602 and early rice Zaoxianzhe 101, also exhibited inhibitory effect on the aboveground dry weight of barnyardgrass. Rice allelopathic material, TN1, having allelopathic effect on several weeds, Echinochloa crs-galli, Trianthema portulacastrum, Heteranthera limosa and Ammannia coccinea, also could control the aboveground dry weight of barnyardgrass effectively. The allelopathic effects of different morphological as well allelopathic rice materials on plant height of barnyardgrass were not significantly different. This indicated that rice materials could inhibit effectively the aboveground dry weight of barnyardgrass mainly by suppressing its tillering ability. Rice allelopathic material, TN1, could not control the growth of Juncellus serotinus effectively, however, rice material, Zhongzao 22 had the strongest ability to control the growth of the weed effectively among the tested rice materials. Rice material, Zaoxianzhe 101, along with the superb allelopathic rice material, Xiayitiao, also suppressed Juncellus serotinus effectively while rice material, Zhongzao 22, could not inhibit the weed growth effectively, despite of conferring taller plant height. Early indica hybrid rice, Zhong 9A/602, and early indica rice Zaoxianzhe 101, along with rice allelopathic materials, Xiayitiao and IR644-1-633-1-1 showed significant inhibitory effects on Monochoria vaginalis, while rice allelopathic material, Gumei 2, and rice material, Zhongzao 27, did not suppress the weed significantly. The inhibitory effects of different morphological and allelopathic rice materials on the overall aboveground dry weight of the three weeds were significantly different. The superb allelopathic rice material, Xiayitiao, reduced the aboveground dry weight of the three weeds more than 50%, which was significantly different from those of four other allelopathic rice materials, IR644-1-63-1-1, PI312777, TN1, and Gumei 2 who did not show significantly adverse effects. Rice materials, early indica hybrid rice Zhong 9A/602 and early indica rice Zaoxianzhe 101 reduced the total aboveground dry weight of the tested weeds over 40% compared with the control. The plant height, number of efficient panicle, panicle length and total spikelets per panicle of rice materials showed a significant difference between treatments of weed competition and without weed infestation. The seed setting rate and 1000 grain weight were not remarkably different between treatments of weed competition and without weed disturbance. Compared with the control without weed interference, the plant height of elite allelopathic rice material Xiayitiao increased 3.64% under the disturbance of three weeds, while on the contrary, those of indica hybird rice Zhong 9A/9791 and allelopathic rice materials IN1 and Gumei 2 decreased more than 10%. The efficient panicles of all of the rice materials tested under weed competition reduced significantly than those of the control, among them those of TN1, Gumei 2, PI312777, Zhongzao 22, Zhongzao 27, and Zhong 9A/602 decreased more than 50%. The peculiar rice allelopathic material Xiayitiao only showed 16.86% decreases. All kinds of weed competition decreased panicle number of the tested rice materials significantly; suggesting the main reason for declining rice productivity.

Key words: Different morphological types, Allelopathy, Three principal paddy weeds, Interference, Panicle characteristics of rice

[1]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), Wang Y-P(王一平), Yu L-Q(余柳青), Mortimer A M. Effects of rice transplanting density and early irrigation management on barnyardgrass ecological control. Chin J Ecol (生态学杂志), 2004, 23(4): 41–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Wang D-L(王大力), Ma R-X(马瑞霞), Liu X-F(刘秀芬). A preliminary studying on rice allelopathy germplasm. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2000, 33(3): 94–96 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), Chen Z-L(陈再廖), Lin Y-B(林云彪), Chen W-M(陈为民), Zhu Y-W(朱有为). Invasive species and their control in Zhejiang Province (浙江入侵生物及防治). Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2011 (in Chinese)



[4]Ma Q-X(马奇祥), Zhao Y-Q(赵永谦). Identification and Control of Paddy Field Weed (农田杂草识别与防治). Beijing: Jindun Press, 2004 (in Chinese)



[5]Yuan P-R(袁平荣), Sun C-Q(孙传清), Yang C-D(杨从党), Zhou N(周能), Ying J-F(应继峰), Peng S, He Q-R(贺庆瑞), Wang X-K(王象坤). Analysis on grain yield and yield components of the 15 t/hm2 high-yielding indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Yunnan. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(6): 756–762 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Zhang C-X(张朝贤), Ni H-W(倪汉文), Wei S-H(魏守辉), Huang H-J(黄红娟), Liu Y(刘延), Cui H-L(崔海兰), Sui B-F(隋标峰), Zhang M(张猛), Guo F(郭峰). Current advances in research on herbicide resistance. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(4): 1274–1289 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), Yu L-Q(余柳青), Zhao M(赵明). Rice allelopathy to barnyardgrass. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(3): 737–740 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Bhadora P B S. Allelopathy: a natural way towards weed management. Am J Exp Agric, 2011, 1: 7–20



[9]James R V. Allelochemicals as leads for new herbicides and agrochemicals. Tetrahedron, 2002, 58: 1631–1646



[10]Zhang Z P. Development of Chemical Weed Control and Integrated Weed Management in China. Weed Biol Manag, 2003, 3: 197–203



[11]Xuan T D, Tsuzuki E, Terao H, Matsuo M, Khanh T D, Murayama S, Kong N H. Alfalfa, Rice By-products and Their Incorporation for Weed Control in Rice. Weed Biol Manag, 2003, 3: 137–144



[12]Hong N H, Xuan T D, Eiji T, Khanh T D. Paddy weed control by higher plants from Southeast Asia. Crop Prot, 2004, 23: 255–261



[13]Fujii Y. Screening and future exploitation of allelopathic plants as alternative herbicides with special reference to hairy vetch. J Crop Prod, 2001, 4: 257–275



[14]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), Yu L-Q(余柳青), Zhao M(赵明), Zhang X(张旭), Fang H-M(方洪民), Wei X-H(魏兴华), Zheng K-L(郑康乐), Guo L-B(郭龙彪), Ye Y-L(叶元林). Competition and allelopathy of rice with barnyardgrass. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2003, 17(1): 67–72 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Dilday R H, Lin J, Yan W. Identification of allelopathy in the USDA-ARS rice germplasm collection. Australian J Exp Agric, 1994, 34: 907–910



[16]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), Yu L-Q(余柳青). Ecological control of barnyardgrass by different morphological type rice. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2000, 14(3): 125–128 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Li G(李贵), Wu J-L(吴竞仑), Wang Y-Z(王一专), Kiu L-P(刘丽萍). Inhibitory effect of different rice varieties on weeds in paddy field. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2008, 22(6): 669–672 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), He Y(何勇), Zhu C-Q(诸常青), Yu G-S(俞谷松). Inhibitor Effects of allelopathic rice materials on Echinochloa crus-galli and related field weeds. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(4): 958–962 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Kong C H, Hu F, Wang P, Wu J L. Effect of allelopathic rice varieties combined with cultural management options on paddy field weeds. Pest Management Sci, 2008: 64: 276–282



[20]Olofsdotter M. Rice: a step toward use of allelopathy. Agron J, 2001, 93: 3–8



[21]Olofsdotter M, Jensen L_B and Courtois B. Review: improving crop competitive ability using allelopathy—an example from rice. Plant Breed, 2002, 121: 1–9



[22]Tang Q-Y(唐启义), Feng M-G(冯明光). Practical Statistics Analyses and Computer Platform (实用统计分析和计算机平台). Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1979 (in Chinese)



[23]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), He Y(何勇), Wang Y-P(王一平), Yu G-S(俞谷松). Interference of allelopathic rice cultivars on barnyardgrass under different water irrigation and rice plant density. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2004, 15(9): 1580–1584 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Zhang F-D(张付斗), Duo Y-Q(郭怡卿), Yu L-Q(余柳青), Tao D-Y(陶大云). Evaluation and screening of resistance to barnyardgrass in germplasm of wild rice (Oryza sativa) and african cultivar. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(11): 1140–1144 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[25]Han H-H(韩豪华), Zhou Y-J(周勇军), Chen X(陈欣), Yu L-Q(余柳青). Inhibitory effects of mixed-planting of rice varieties with different weed-tolerant potentials on Echinochloa crus-galli. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(3): 319–322 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]Chung I M, Kim K H, Ahn J K, Chun S C, Kim S C, Kim J T, Kim S H. Screening of allelochemicals on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) and identification of potentially allelopathic compounds from rice (Oryza sativa) variety hull extracts. Crop Prot, 2002, 21: 913–920



[27]Ruan R-C(阮仁超), Han L-Z(韩龙植), Cao G-L(曹桂兰), An Y-P(安永平), Zhang Y-Y(张媛媛), Zhang Y-R(张艳蕊), Qu Y-P(曲英萍), Qi D-L(祁栋灵), Sun M-M(孙明茂). Evaluation of allelopathic potential for different type of rice germplasm on barnyardgrass. J Plant Gene Res (植物遗传资源学报), 2005, 6(4): 365–372 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]Wu J-L(吴竞仑), Li Y-F(李永丰), Chen Z-S(陈志石), Wang Y-Z(王一专). Interference of allelopathic rice Huakangcao 78 on weeds under different ecological conditions. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(9): 1645–1648 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Jensen L B, Courtois B, Shin L, Li Z K, Olofsdotter M, Mauleon R P. Locating genes controlling allelopathic effects against barnyardgrass in upland rice. Agron J, 2001, 93: 21–26



[30]Ebana K, Yan W, Dilday R_H, Namai H, Okuno K. Analysis of QTL associated with the allelopathic effect of rice using water-soluble extracts. Breed Sci, 2001, 51: 47–51



[31]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), He Y(何勇), Cui S-R(崔绍荣), Zhao M(赵明), Zhang X(张旭), Li D(李迪). Genes mapping on rice allelopathy against barnyardgrass. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(12): 2258–2260 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[32]Lin W-X(林文雄), He H-Q(何华勤), Dong Z-H(董章杭), Shen L-H(沈荔花), Duo Y-C(郭玉春), Liang Y-Y(梁义元), Chen F-Y(陈芳育), Liang K-J(梁康迳). Study on developmental inheritance of allelopathy in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different environment. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(4): 348–353 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[33]Xu Z-H(徐正浩), Guo D-P(郭得平), Yu L-Q(余柳青), Zhao M(赵明), Zhang X(张旭), Li D(李迪), Zheng K-L(郑康乐), Ye Y-L(叶元林). Molecular biological study on the action mechanism of rice allelochemicals against weeds. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(5): 829–833 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[34]Seal A N, Pratley J, Haig T, An M. Identification and quantitation of compounds in series of allelopathic and non-allelopathic rice root exudates. J Chem Ecol, 2004, 30: 1647–1661



[35]Olofsdotter M, Rebulanan M, Madrid A, Dali W, Navarez D, Olk D C. Why phenolic acids are unlikely primary allelochemicals in rice. J Chem Ecol, 2002, 28: 229–242



[36]Hisashi K N, Takeshi I. Rice seedlings release momilactone b into the environment. Phytochemistry, 2003, 63: 551–554



[37]Kong C-H(孔垂华), Xu X-H(徐效华), Hu F(胡飞), Chen X-H(陈雄辉), Ling B(凌冰), Tan Z-W(谭中文). Using specific secondary metabolites as markers to evaluate allelopathic potential of rice varieties and their individual plants. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2002, 47(3): 203–206 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[38]Chung I M, Ahn J K, Yun S J. Identification of allelopathic compounds from rice (Oryza sativa L.) straw and their biological activity. Can J Plant Sci, 2001, 81: 815–819



[39]Chou C H, Lin H J. Autotoxication mechanism of Oryza sativa: I. Phytotoxic effects of decomposing rice residues in soil. J Chem Ecol, 1976, 2: 353–367



[40]Rimando A M, Olofsdotter M, Dayan F E, Duke S O. Searching for rice allelochemicals: an example of bioassay-guided isolation. Agron J, 2001, 93: 16–20



[41]Kong C H, Xu X H, Zhou B, Hu F, Zhang C X, Zhang M X. Two compounds from allelopathic rice accession and their inhibitory activity on weeds and fungal pathogens. Phytochemistry, 2004, 65: 1123–1128



[42]Kato-Noguchi H, Ino T, Sata N, Yamamura S. Isolation and identification of a potent allelopahtic substance in rice root exudates. Physiol Plant, 2002, 115: 401–405



[43]Kong C H, Liang W J, Xu X H, Hu F, Wang P, Jiang Y. Release and activity of allelochemicals from allelopathice rice seedlings. J Agric Food Chem, 2004, 52: 2861–2865



[44]Mahmoodzadeh H, Abbasi F, Ghobzadeh Y. Allelopathic effects of root exudate and leaching of rice seedlings on hedgemustard (Sisybrium officinale). Res J Environ Sci, 2011, 5: 486–492



[45]Salam M A, Morokuma M, Teruya T, Suenaga K, Kato-Noguchi H. Isolation and identification of a potent allelopathic substance in bangladesh rice. Plant Growth Regul, 2009, 58: 137–140



[46]Xiong J(熊君), Lin W-X(林文雄), Zhou J-J(周军建), Wu M-H(吴敏鸿), Chen X-X(陈祥旭), He H-Q(何华勤), Guo Y-C(郭玉春), Liang Y-Y(梁义元). Allelopathy and resources competition of rice under different nitrogen supplies. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(5): 885–889 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[47]Li G(李贵), Wu J-L(吴竞仑), Wang Y-Z(王一专), Liu L-P(刘丽萍). Effect of transplanting density and water depth on interference of allelopathic rice in weeds. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Agric Sci)(上海交通大学学报•农业科学版), 2007, 25(6): 561–565 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 李兰兰, 母丹, 严雪, 杨陆可, 林文雄, 方长旬. OsPAL2;3对水稻化感抑制稗草能力的调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 197-209.
[2] 沈荔花,李碧凉,任勇杰,李程勋,钟永嘉,方长旬,林文雄. OsMYB调控化感水稻酚酸类物质合成及其抑草作用[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(04): 531-538.
[3] 林文雄. 化感水稻抑草作用的根际生物学特性与研究展望[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(06): 951-960.
[4] 徐正浩,谢国雄,周宇杰,高屾. 三种栽植方式下不同株型和化感特性水稻对无芒稗的干扰控制作用[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(03): 537-548.
[5] 张付斗, 徐高峰, 李天林, 陶大云, 徐鹏, 张玉华. 水氮互作下长雄野生稻化感作用与田间抑草效果[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(01): 170-176.
[6] 聂呈荣;曾任森;骆世明;黎华寿;洪明祺;程莉琼. 三裂叶蟛蜞菊对水稻化感作用的初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(09): 942-946.
[7] 林文雄;何华勤;董章杭;沈荔花;郭玉春;梁义元;陈芳育;梁康迳. 不同环境下水稻对受体植物化感作用的动态遗传研究[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(04): 348-353.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!