欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (02): 259-268.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.92013

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

秸秆还田与化肥配施对汉中盆地稻麦轮作农田土壤固碳及经济效益的影响

吴玉红1,郝兴顺1,*(),田霄鸿2,陈浩1,张春辉1,崔月贞1,秦宇航1   

  1. 1 汉中市农业科学研究所, 陕西汉中 723000
    2 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 721000
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-19 接受日期:2019-09-26 出版日期:2020-02-12 网络出版日期:2019-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 郝兴顺
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 382755569@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目(2015KTCL02-21);陕西省农业科技创新转化项目资助(NYKJ-2018-HZ01)

Effect of straw returning combined with NPK fertilization on soil carbon sequestration and economic benefits under rice-wheat rotation in Hanzhong basin

WU Yu-Hong1,HAO Xing-Shun1,*(),TIAN Xiao-Hong2,CHEN Hao1,ZHANG Chun-Hui1,CUI Yue-Zhen1,QIN Yu-Hang1   

  1. 1 Hanzhong Agricultural Research Institute, Hanzhong 723000, Shaanxi, China
    2 College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2019-03-19 Accepted:2019-09-26 Published:2020-02-12 Published online:2019-10-15
  • Contact: Xing-Shun HAO
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Innovation Project of Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province(2015KTCL02-21);the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation and Transformation Project of Shaanxi Province(NYKJ-2018-HZ01)

摘要:

为汉中盆地秸秆还田技术和合理化肥减量技术提供科学依据, 2015—2017年小麦和水稻生长季, 设置秸秆不还田+常规施肥(SN+NPK); 秸秆常规还田+常规施肥(S+NPK); 秸秆促腐还田+常规施肥(SD+NPK); 秸秆促腐还田+化肥减量15% (SD+85%NPK); 秸秆促腐还田+化肥减量30% (SD+70%NPK), 共5个处理, 研究其对土壤总有机碳(TOC)、活性有机碳(LOC)、碳储量(SCS)、作物产量及经济效益的影响。结果表明与秸秆不还田配施常规施肥处理(SN+NPK)相比, 秸秆还田配施不同比例化肥处理显著提高了稻田0~15 cm土层的TOC和LOC, 增幅分别为3.62%~25.07%和23.01%~46.79%; S+NPK和SD+NPK处理提高了0~30 cm碳储量, 增幅分别为4.67%和18.20%。而SD+85%NPK和 SD+70%NPK分别降低8.31%和9.83%。S+NPK和SD+NPK处理显著增加了小麦和水稻籽粒产量, 而SD+85%NPK和SD+70%NPK处理均降低了小麦和水稻产量, 周年产量2年平均增幅分别为3.47%、8.70%、-3.65%、-8.12%。与SN+NPK处理相比, S+NPK、SD+NPK、SD+85%NPK、SD+70%NPK处理周年经济效益2年平均增幅分别为16.91%、23.56%、6.02%、1.06%。土壤有机碳、作物产量和经济效益SD+NPK处理的最高, S+NPK 处理次之, SD+70%NPK处理最低, 与之相比, SD+85%NPK处理在小麦和水稻两季共减少化肥80 kg hm -2, 作物周年产量降低不明显, 经济效益略有增加。秸秆还田与常规化肥配施是提高汉中盆地稻麦轮作体系农田固碳、产量及经济效益的最佳措施, 两季作物全量还田条件下化肥用量减少15%是适宜该区域的绿色生产模式。

关键词: 稻麦轮作, 秸秆还田, 化肥减量, 土壤有机碳, 周年生产力

Abstract:

A two-year field experiment was conducted to investigate the response of soil carbon sequestration, crop yield and economic benefit to rates of NPK application and straw returning under rice-wheat rotation from 2015 to 2017. The experiment included five treatments: application of NPK without straw returning (SN+NPK), application of NPK with straw returning (S+NPK), application of NPK with decayed straw returning (SD+NPK), application of NPK with 15% reduction plus decayed straw returning (SD+85%NPK) and application of NPK with 15% reduction plus decayed straw returning (SD+70%NPK). Compared with SN+NPK, total organic carbon (TOC) and active organic carbon (LOC) in 0-15 cm depth increased by 3.62%-25.07% and 23.01%-46.79% in the treatments of straw returning plus different returned NPK application, respectively. Both S+NPK and SD+NPK treatments increased organic carbon storage (SCS) in 0-30 cm soil layer by 4.67% and 18.20%, but SD+85%NPK and SD+70%NPK decreased the SCS by 8.31% and 9.83%, respectively. Compared with SN+NPK, both S+NPK and SD+NPK increased grain yields for wheat and rice. However, SD+85%NPK and SD+70%NPK treatments significantly reduced grain yields for wheat and rice. Compared with SN+NPK treatment, the increase in annual average yield was 3.47% for S+NPK, 8.70% for SD+NPK, -3.65% for SD+85%NPK, and -8.12% for SD+70%NPK, while the increase of annual net profit in two years was 16.91%, 23.56%, 6.02%, and 1.06%, respectively. Soil organic carbon, crop yield and efficiency were the highest in the SD+NPK treatment, but lowest in SD+70%NPK. Compared with SD+70%NPK treatment, SD+85%NPK did not affect the annual average yield, but slightly increased the annual net profit due to a cost reduction caused by less fertilizer application with a total reduction of 80 kg ha -1. In conclusion, the combination of straw returning with NPK fertilization is an effective farming practice to improve soil carbon sequestration, crop yield and economic benefits in Hanzhong basin. Considering the environment and economic effects, decayed straw returning with 15% reduction in NPK application is more suitable to achieve the fertilizer reduction and green production.

Key words: rice-wheat rotation, straw return, fertilizer reduction, soil organic carbon, annual productivity

表1

小麦、水稻秸秆还田方式及田间操作"

秸秆类型
Straw type
还田方式
Returning method
田间操作
Field operation
小麦秸秆
Wheat straw
不还田
No straw returning (SN)
小麦秸秆不还田
Wheat straws removed
常规还田
Straw returning (S)
小麦秸秆全量旋耕还田
All wheat straws returned with rotary tillage
促腐还田
Decayed straw returning (SD)
小麦秸秆添加腐熟剂全量旋耕还田
All wheat straws returned and applied straw compositing agents with rotary tillage
水稻秸秆
Rice straw
不还田
No straw returning (SN)
水稻秸秆不还田
Ricet straws removed
常规还田
Straw returning (S)
水稻秸秆全量旋耕还田
All rice straws returned with rotary tillage
促腐还田
Decayed straw returning (SD)
水稻秸秆添加腐熟剂全量旋耕还田
All rice straws returned and applied straw compositing agents with rotary tillage

表2

不同秸秆还田下的土壤有机碳和活性有机碳含量"

处理
Treatment
0-15 cm 15-30 cm
土壤有机碳
TOC (g kg-1)
土壤活性有机碳
LOC (g kg-1)
土壤有机碳
TOC (g kg-1)
土壤活性有机碳
LOC (g kg-1)
SN+NPK 10.49 e 2.65 e 5.51 c 2.08 c
S+NPK 12.25 b 3.82 b 5.85 b 2.51 b
SD+NPK 13.12 a 3.89 a 6.53 a 2.95 a
SD+85%NPK 11.87 c 3.67 c 4.87 d 1.59 d
SD+70%NPK 10.87 d 3.26 d 4.74 d 1.50 e

表3

不同秸秆还田处理对土壤碳储量及碳库管理指数的影响"

处理
Treatment
0-15 cm 15-30 cm 0-30 cm
容重
Soil bulk
density
(g cm-3)
碳储量
SCS
(×103 kg hm-2)
碳库管理
指数
CPMI
容重
Soil bulk
density
(g cm-3)
碳储量
SCS
(×103 kg hm-2)
碳库管理
指数
CPMI
碳储量
SCS
(×103 kg hm-2)
SN+NPK 1.39 21.71 c 100.00 e 1.74 14.38 b 100.00 c 36.20
S+NPK 1.27 23.33 b 152.49 b 1.67 14.61 b 131.36 b 37.89
SD+NPK 1.31 25.98 a 164.07 a 1.73 16.95 a 161.00 a 42.79
SD+85%NPK 1.19 21.08 d 148.37 c 1.64 11.94 c 70.29 d 33.19
SD+70%NPK 1.28 20.86 d 131.47 d 1.66 11.77 c 65.63 e 32.64

表4

不同秸秆还田下小麦和水稻籽粒产量、秸秆还田量及周年产量"

处理
Treatment
2016年作物籽粒产量
Crop yield in 2016
(kg hm-2)
2016年地上部分秸秆还田量
Rrate of straw returned to the field in 2016 (kg hm-2)
2017年作物籽粒产量
Crop yield in 2017
(kg hm-2)
2017年地上部分秸秆还田量
Rate of straw returned to the field in 2017 (kg hm-2)
周年产量
Two seasons yield
(kg hm-2)
小麦
Wheat yield
水稻
Rice yield
水稻秸秆
Rice straw
小麦秸秆Wheat straw 小麦
Wheat yield
水稻
Rice yield
水稻秸秆
Rice straw
小麦秸秆
Wheat straw
2015-2016 2016-2017
SN+NPK 3900.0 a 9248.4 ab 0 0 5550.0 b 9062.4 a 0 0 13148.4 a 14612.4 b
S+NPK 4291.7 a 9288.5 ab 9288.5 4720.9 5866.5 b 9280.2 a 9280.2 6453.2 13580.1 a 15146.7 ab
SD+NPK 4008.3 a 9923.1 a 9923.1 4409.1 6817.5 a 9467.6 a 9467.6 7499.3 13931.4 a 16285.1 a
SD+85%NPK 3394.5 b 8955.2 b 8955.2 3733.9 5500.5 b 8932.5 a 8932.5 6050.6 12349.7 b 14433.0 b
SD+70%NPK 3191.7 b 8644.5 b 8644.5 3510.8 4950.0 c 8746.4 b 8746.4 5445.0 11836.2 c 13696.4 c

表5

稻麦轮作体系下不同秸秆还田处理对周年经济效益的影响"

处理
Treatment
肥料成本
Fertilizer cost
腐秆剂成本
Straw-decomposing inoculant cost
秸秆处理劳动力成本
Labor cost of straw treatment
其他成本
Other costs
产值Output value 净收益Net income
2015-2016 2016-2017 2015-2016 2016-2017
SN+NPK 4202.85 0 3000 8400 35155.20 39193.44 19552.35 23590.59
S+NPK 4202.85 0 450 8400 36019.73 40501.62 22966.88 27448.77
SD+NPK 4202.85 450 450 8400 37385.07 42984.56 23882.22 29481.71
SD+85%NPK 3781.80 450 450 8400 33315.15 38691.75 20233.35 25609.95
SD+70%NPK 3360.90 450 450 8400 31997.73 37013.84 19336.83 24352.94
[1] 朱兆良, 金继运 . 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19:259-273.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201
Zhu Z L, Jin J Y . Fertilizer use and food security in China. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2013,19:259-273 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201
[2] 刘金山, 戴健, 刘洋, 郭雄, 王朝辉 . 过量施氮对旱地土壤碳、氮及供氮能力的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21:112-120.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0112
Liu J S, Dai J, Liu Y, Guo X, Wang Z H . Effects of excessive nitrogen fertilization on soil organic carbon and nitrogen and nitrogen supply capacity in dryland. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2015,21:112-120 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0112
[3] 赵亚南, 宿敏敏, 吕阳, 况福虹, 陈轩敬, 张跃强, 石孝均 . 减量施肥下小麦产量、肥料利用率和土壤养分平衡. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23:864-873
Zhao Y N, Su M M, Lyu Y, Kuang Z H, Chen X J, Zhang Y Q, Shi X J . Wheat yield, nutrient use efficiencies and soil nutrient balance under reduced fertilizer rate. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2017,23:864-873 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 薛利红, 杨林章, 施卫明, 王慎强 . 农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践—源头减量技术. 农业环境科学学报, 2013,32:881-888.
Xue L H, Yang L Z, Shi W M, Wang S Q . Reduce-retain-reuse-restore technology for controlling the agricultural nonpoint pollution in countryside in China: source reduction technology. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2013,32:881-888 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 门倩, 海江波, 岳忠娜, 薛少平, 王庆 . 化肥减量对玉米田土壤酶活性及微生物量的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,40(6):135-140.
Men Q, Hai J B, Yue Z N, Xue S P, Wang Q . Effects on maize field soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass of chemical fertilizer reduction. Nat Sci J Northwest A&F Univ, 2012,40(6):135-140 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 姜世英, 韩鹏, 贾振邦, 毛小玲, 司今, 叶芳芳 . 南水北调中线丹江口库区农业面源污染PSR评价与基于GIS的空间特征分析. 农业环境科学学报, 2010,29:2153-2162.
Jiang S Y, Han P, Jia Z B, Mao X L, Si J, Ye F F . Evaluation with PSR model and GIS analysis of agricultural non-point source pollution in Danjiangkou reservoir of the mid-route of the south-to-north water transfer project. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2010,29:2153-2162 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 田霄鸿, 陈艳龙, 张春辉, 陈浩, 李厚华, 秦宇航, 赵胜利 . 秸秆还田与化肥减量配施对稻茬麦土壤养分、酶活性及产量影响. 西南农业学报, 2018,31:998-1005.
Wu Y H, Hao X S, Tian X H, Chen Y L, Zhang C H, Chen H, Li H H, Qin Y H, Zhao S L . Effects of reduction of NPK fertilizer application rates plus rice straw return on soil nutrient, enzyme activities and wheat yield in rice-wheat rotation system. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2018,31:998-1005 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 田霄鸿, 陈艳龙, 张春辉, 陈浩, 李厚华, 秦宇航, 黄重 . 秸秆还田对汉中盆地稻田土壤有机碳组分、碳储量及水稻产量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2017,31(4):325-331.
Wu Y H, Hao X S, Tian X H, Chen Y L, Zhang C H, Chen H, Li H H, Qin Y H, Huang C . Effects of straw returning on the contents of soil organic fractions, carbon storage and crop yield of paddy field in Hanzhong basin. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2017,31(4):325-331 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 袁嫚嫚, 邬刚, 胡润, 孙义祥 . 秸秆还田配施化肥对稻油轮作土壤有机碳组分及产量影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23:27-35
Yuan M M, Wu G, Hu R, Sun Y X . Effects of straw returning plus fertilization on soil organic carbon components and crop yields in rice-rapeseed rotation system. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2017,23:27-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 吴得峰, 姜继韶, 孙棋棋, 王蕊, 李如剑, 王志齐, 刘洪星, 崔全红, 郭胜利, 党廷辉, 巨晓棠 . 减量施氮对雨养区春玉米产量和环境效应的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2016,35:1202-1209.
Wu D F, Jiang J S, Sun Q Q, Wang R, Li J R, Wang Z Q, Liu H X, Cui Q H, Guo S L, Dang T H, Ju X T . Effect of reduced nitrogen fertilization on spring maize production and environmental impacts in rain-fed areas. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2016,35:1202-1209 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 田雁飞 . 秸秆还田与减量施肥对作物产量及土壤养分的影响研究. 安徽农业大学硕士学位论文, 安徽合肥, 2012.
Tian Y F . Effect of Returning Straw and Reduced Nitrogen Fertilization on Crop Yield and Soil Fertility. MS Thesis of Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 黄容, 高明, 万毅林, 田冬, 陶睿, 王芳丽 . 秸秆还田与化肥减量配施对稻鄄菜轮作下土壤养分及酶活性的影响. 环境科学, 2016,37:4446-4453.
Huang R, Gao M, Wan Y L, Tian D, Tao R, Wang F L . Effects of straw in combination with reducing fertilization rate on soil nutrients and enzyme activity in the paddy-vegetable rotation soils. Environ Sci, 2016,37:4446-4453 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 梁涛, 廖敦秀, 陈新平, 王帅, 付登伟, 陈轩敬, 石孝均 . 重庆稻田基础地力水平对水稻养分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51:3106-3116.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.16.007
Liang T, Liao D X, Chen X P, Wang S, Fu D W, Chen X J, Shi X J . Effect of paddy inherent soil productivity on nutrient utilization efficiency of rice in Chongqing. Sci Agric Sin, 2018,51:3106-3116 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.16.007
[14] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农业化学分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. pp 30-34.
Bao S D. Analysis of Soil and Agricultural Chemistry. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 30-34(in Chinese).
[15] 于荣, 徐明岗, 王伯仁 . 土壤活性有机质测定方法的比较. 土壤肥料, 2005, ( 2):49-52.
Yu R, Xu M G, Wang B R . Study on methods for determining labile organic matter of soils. Soils Fert, 2005, ( 2):49-52 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 李硕, 李有兵, 王淑娟, 师江澜, 田霄鸿 . 关中平原作物秸秆不同还田方式对土壤有机碳和碳库管理指数的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015,26:1215-1222.
Li S, Li Y B, Wang S J, Shi J L, Tian X H . Effects of different straw-returning regimes on soil organic carbon and carbon pool management index in Guanzhong Plain, Northwest China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015,26:1215-1222 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 刘禹池, 曾祥忠, 冯文强, 秦鱼生, 王昌全, 涂仕华, 陈道全 . 稻-油轮作下长期秸秆还田与施肥对作物产量和土壤理化形状的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20:1450-1459.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0615
Liu Y C, Zeng X Z, Feng W Q, Qin Y S, Wang C Q, Tu S H, Chen D Q . Effects of long-term straw mulch and fertilization on crop yields and soil physical and chemical properties under rice-rapeseed rotation. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2014,20:1450-1459 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0615
[18] 赵亚南, 柴冠群, 张珍珍, 谢军, 李丹萍, 张跃强, 石孝均 . 稻麦轮作下紫色土有机碳活性及其长期不同施肥的响应. 中国农业科学, 2016,49:4398-4407.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.012
Zhao Y N, Chai G Q, Zhang Z Z, Xie J, Li D P, Zhang Y Q, Shi X J . Soil organic carbon lability of purple soil as affected by long-term fertilization in a rice-wheat cropping system. Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49:4398-4407 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.012
[19] 马超, 周静, 刘满强, 郑学博, 崔键, 李辉信, 康炳龙 . 秸秆促腐还田对土壤养分及活性有机碳的影响. 土壤学报, 2013,50:915-921.
Ma C, Zhou J, Liu M Q, Zheng X B, Cui J, Li H X, Kang B L . Effects of incorportion of pre-treated straws into field on soil nutrients and labile organic carbon in Shajiang black soil. Acta Pedol Sin, 2013,50:915-921 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 张均华, 刘建立, 张佳宝, 赵夫涛, 程亚南, 王伟鹏 . 施氮量对稻麦干物质转运与氮肥利用的影响. 作物学报, 2010,36:1736-1742.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01736
Zhang J H, Liu J L, Zhang J B, Zhao F T, Cheng Y N, Wang W P . Effect of nitrogen application rates on translocation of dry matter and utilization of nitrogen in rice and wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2010,36:1736-1742 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01736
[21] 刘学军, 巨晓棠, 张福锁 . 减量施氮对东小麦-夏玉米种植体系中氮肥利用与平衡的影响. 应用生态学报, 2004,15:458-462.
Liu X J, Ju X T, Zhang F S . Effect of reduced N application on N utilization and balance in winter wheat-summer maize cropping system. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004,15:458-462 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 段然, 汤月丰, 文炯, 吴翠霞, 彭长城, 白玲玉, 曾希柏 . 减量施肥对湖垸旱地作物产量及氮磷径流损失的影响. 中国农业生态学报, 2013,21:536-543.
Duan R, Tang Y F, Wen J, Wu C X, Peng C C, Bai LY, Zeng X B . Effect of reducing fertilizer application on crop yield and nitrogen and phosphorus loss in runoff from embankment upland in Dongting Lake Region. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2013,21:536-543 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 李忠芳, 张水清, 李慧, 孙楠, 逄焕成, 娄翼来, 徐明岗 . 长期施肥下我国水稻土基础地力变化趋势. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21:1394-1402.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0603
Li Z F, Zhang S Q, Li H, Sun N, Pang H C, Lou Y L, Xu M G . Trends of basic soil productivity in paddy soil under long-term fertilization in China. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2015,21:1394-1402 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0603
[24] 梁涛, 陈轩敬, 赵亚南, 黄兴成, 李鸿, 石孝均, 张跃强 . 四川盆地水稻产量对基础地力与施肥的响应. 中国农业科学, 2015,48:4759-4768.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.23.017
Liang T, Chen X J, Zhao Y N, Huang X C, Li H, Shi X J, Zhang Y Q . Response of rice yield to inherent soil productivity of paddies and fertilization in Sichuan basin. Sci Agric Sin, 2015,48:4759-4768 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.23.017
[25] 丁文成, 李书田, 黄绍敏 . 氮肥管理和秸秆腐熟剂对 15N标记玉米秸秆氮有效性与去向的影响 . 中国农业科学, 2016,49:2725-2736.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.14.007
Ding W C, Li S T, Huang S M . Bioavailability and fate of nitrogen from 15N-labeled corn straw as affected by nitrogen management and straw microbial inoculants . Sci Agric Sin, 2016,49:2725-2736 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.14.007
[26] 于建光, 常志州, 黄红英, 叶小梅, 马艳, 钱玉婷 . 秸秆腐熟剂对土壤微生物及养分的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2010,29:563-570.
Yu J G, Chang Z Z, Huang H Z, Ye X M, Ma Y, Qian Y T . Effect of microbial inoculants for straw decomposing on soil microorganisms and nutrients. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2010,29:563-570 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 张电学, 韩志卿, 刘微, 高书国, 候东军, 李国舫, 常连生 . 不同促腐条件下玉米秸秆直接还田的生物学效应研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005,11:742-749.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2005.0606
Zhang D X, Han Z Q, Liu W, Gao S G, Hou D J, Li G F, Chang L S . Biological effect of maize stalk return to field directly under different accretion decay conditions. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2005,11:742-749 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2005.0606
[28] 宋大利, 侯胜鹏, 王秀斌, 梁国庆, 周卫 . 中国秸秆养分资源数量及替代化肥潜力. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24:1-21.
Song D L, Hou S P, Wang X B, Liang G Q, Zhou W . Nutrient resource quantity of crop straw and its potential of substituting. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2018,24:1-21 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[2] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[3] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[4] 刘磊, 廖萍, 邵华, 刘劲松, 杨星莲, 王静, 王海媛, 张俊, 曾勇军, 黄山. 施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻田土壤钾素表观平衡的互作效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 226-237.
[5] 廖萍,刘磊,何宇轩,唐刚,张俊,曾勇军,吴自明,黄山. 施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻产量和氮素吸收的互作效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 84-92.
[6] 李昊昱,孟兆良,庞党伟,陈金,侯永坤,崔海兴,金敏,王振林,李勇. 周年秸秆还田对农田土壤固碳及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 893-903.
[7] 陈玉章,柴守玺,程宏波,柴雨葳,杨长刚,谭凯敏,常磊. 秸秆还田结合秋覆膜对旱地冬小麦耗水特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 256-266.
[8] 白伟,张立祯,逄焕成,孙占祥,牛世伟,蔡倩,安景文. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对东北春玉米光合性能和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12): 1845-1855.
[9] 陈金,庞党伟,韩明明,尹燕枰,郑孟静,骆永丽,王振林*,李勇*. 耕作模式对土壤生物活性与养分有效性及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(08): 1245-1253.
[10] 秦都林,王双磊,刘艳慧,聂军军,赵娜,毛丽丽,宋宪亮,孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田对土壤理化性质及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(07): 1030-1042.
[11] 庞党伟,陈金,唐玉海,尹燕枰,杨东清,崔正勇,郑孟静,李勇,王振林. 玉米秸秆还田方式和氮肥处理对土壤理化性质及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(11): 1689-1699.
[12] 刘艳慧,王双磊,李金埔,秦都林,张美玲,聂军军,毛丽丽,宋宪亮,孙学振. 棉花秸秆还田对土壤速效养分及微生物特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(07): 1037-1046.
[13] 殷文**,冯福学**,赵财,于爱忠,柴强*,胡发龙,郭瑶. 小麦秸秆还田方式对轮作玉米干物质累积分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(05): 751-757.
[14] 宋光雷,睢宁,余超然,张凡,孟亚利,陈兵林,赵文青,王友华. 秸秆还田替代化学钾肥对棉麦轮作中棉仁油分累积的效应[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(10): 1548-1556.
[15] 殷文,赵财,于爱忠,柴强,胡发龙,冯福学. 秸秆还田后少耕对小麦/玉米间作系统中种间竞争和互补的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(04): 633-641.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!