欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 226-237.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.02060

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻田土壤钾素表观平衡的互作效应

刘磊1(), 廖萍1, 邵华2, 刘劲松1, 杨星莲1, 王静1, 王海媛1, 张俊3, 曾勇军1, 黄山1,*()   

  1. 1江西农业大学教育部江西省作物生理生态与遗传育种重点实验室, 江西南昌 330045
    2江西省土壤肥料技术推广站, 江西南昌 330046
    3中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-28 接受日期:2021-06-16 出版日期:2022-01-12 网络出版日期:2021-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 黄山
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 13657909609@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31701383);国家重点研发计划项目资助(2016YFD0300903);国家重点研发计划项目资助(2018YFD0301102)

Interactive effects of liming and straw return on apparent soil potassium balance in a double rice cropping system

LIU Lei1(), LIAO Ping1, SHAO Hua2, LIU Jin-Song1, YANG Xing-Lian1, WANG Jing1, WANG Hai-Yuan1, ZHANG Jun3, ZENG Yong-Jun1, HUANG Shan1,*()   

  1. 1Ministry of Education and Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, China
    2Jiangxi Soil and Fertilizer Technology Extension Station, Nanchang 330046, Jiangxi, China
    3Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2020-08-28 Accepted:2021-06-16 Published:2022-01-12 Published online:2021-07-19
  • Contact: HUANG Shan
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31701383);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0300903);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD0301102)

RichHTML

18

PDF

994

摘要：

土壤酸化和钾素亏缺是制约南方酸性稻田生产力持续提升的重要因素。施石灰和秸秆还田分别是改良土壤酸化和补充钾素的有效措施, 但二者对土壤钾素盈亏平衡的互作效应还不甚清楚。于2015—2018年, 在江西省上高县开展施石灰和秸秆还田两因素田间定位试验, 共设置4个处理: (1) 秸秆不还田, 不施石灰; (2) 秸秆不还田, 仅2015年施一次石灰; (3) 每季秸秆全量还田, 不施石灰; (4) 每季秸秆全量还田, 仅2015年施一次石灰。结果表明, 秸秆还田显著提高了水稻钾素吸收, 施石灰仅显著增加了2016年晚稻钾素吸收。施石灰和秸秆还田仅对2016年晚稻钾素吸收有显著正向互作效应。在秸秆还田下, 施石灰使2016年晚稻钾素吸收增加了25.7%; 而在秸秆不还田下无显著影响。试验进行4年后, 施石灰和秸秆还田对土壤全钾含量无显著影响。但4年土壤钾素表观平衡估算表明, 在秸秆还田下土壤总累积钾素表观平衡表现为盈余, 秸秆不还田下则为亏缺, 而施石灰对其无显著影响。施石灰和秸秆还田对土壤总累积钾素表观平衡有显著的互作效应。在施石灰和不施石灰条件下, 秸秆还田分别使土壤累积钾素平均表观盈余19.5 kg hm-2 a-1和29.0 kg hm-2 a-1。秸秆还田下土壤累积钾素平均表观盈余24.3 kg hm-2 a-1, 秸秆不还田下则平均表观亏缺185.8 kg hm-2 a-1。因此, 在酸性双季稻田上, 施石灰和秸秆还田配施能够协同实现土壤酸化改良和维持钾素平衡, 有利于持续提升双季稻田的生产力。

关键词: 秸秆还田, 土壤酸化, 双季稻, 石灰, 钾素表观平衡

Abstract:

Soil acidification and potassium (K) deficit are two important factors limiting crop productivity in acidic paddy soils. Lime application and straw return are effective measures to alleviate soil acidification and improve soil K content, but their interaction effect on K balance is still unclear. A four-year field experiment including two factors (liming and straw return) was conducted in Shanggao, Jiangxi province from 2015 to 2018. Four treatments were arranged in this experiment: (1) Straw removal without liming; (2) Straw removal with lime application only once in 2015; (3) 100% straw return every season without liming; (4) Straw return combined with lime application only once in 2015. Straw return significantly improved rice K uptake, while liming only significantly increased K uptake in late rice in 2016. There were positive interactive effects between liming and straw return on K uptake in late rice in 2016. Liming significantly improved K uptake by 25.7% under straw return in late rice in 2016, but there was no significant effect under straw removal. Neither liming nor straw return significantly affected soil total K concentration. However, the apparent balance of soil K in four years indicated the apparent balance of soil total K was surplus under straw return, while it was deficit under straw removal not returning, and lime application had not significant effect on it. Straw return enhanced soil cumulative apparent K surplus by 19.5 kg hm-2 a-1 and 29.0 kg hm-2 a-1 with liming and without liming, respectively. Soil cumulative apparent K balance showed a surplus of 24.3 kg hm-2 a-1under straw return and a deficit of 185.8 kg hm-2 a-1under straw removal. In summary, lime application combined with straw return could simultaneously alleviate soil acidification and maintain K balance, which is conductive to continuously improve the productivity of double rice cropping in acidic paddy fields.

Key words: straw return, soil acidification, double rice, lime, apparent potassium balance

图1

施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻地上部生物量和钾素吸收的影响(2015-2018) CK、L、RS和L+RS分别表示对照、单施石灰、秸秆还田、秸秆还田配施石灰。误差线表示平均值的标准误差(n = 3)。不同小写字母表示在同一年份不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

表1

施石灰(L)和秸秆还田(RS)对双季稻生物量和钾素吸收的影响(F值)"

年份
Year		 变异来源
Source of variations		 生物量 Biomass 钾素吸收 K uptake
早稻 Early rice 晚稻 Late rice 早稻 Early rice 晚稻 Late rice
2015 石灰Liming (L) 8.42* 20.36** 0.68 1.38
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 11.92* 18.49** 33.23** 61.16**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 0.87 11.01* 5.10 1.36
2016 石灰Liming (L) 6.60* 24.93** 0.05 13.50*
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 23.45** 11.51* 64.70** 224.24**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 1.26 11.31* 3.77 19.49*
2017 石灰Liming (L) 24.41** 2.60 1.72 0.00
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 79.05** 0.09 265.32** 13.75*
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 0.45 1.26 3.47 0.82
2018 石灰Liming (L) 0.25 1.56 2.10 0.32
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 153.99** 7.06* 190.98** 19.89**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 0.00 0.47 1.23 0.37

图2

施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻各器官钾浓度的影响(2015-2018) 处理同图1。误差线表示平均值的标准误差(n = 3)。不同小写字母表示在同一年份不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

表2

施石灰(L)和秸秆还田(RS)对双季稻各器官钾浓度的影响(F值)"

类别
Type		 年份
Year		 变异来源
Source of variations		 茎
Stem		 叶
Leaf		 穗
Panicle
早稻钾浓度
K concentration in early rice		 2015 石灰Liming (L) 58.38** 4.21 1.80
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 89.86** 0.48 0.45
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 32.82** 0.01 2.35
2016 石灰Liming (L) 36.06** 49.27** 5.38
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 144.18** 25.16** 0.57
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 10.80* 0.56 26.40**
2017 石灰Liming (L) 43.70** 1.91 7.04*
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 404.41** 722.59** 18.83**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 26.92** 98.61** 0.77
2018 石灰Liming (L) 2.61 3.29 0.54
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 81.52** 39.53** 0.30
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 0.81 1.03 2.72
类别
Type		 年份
Year		 变异来源
Source of variations		 茎
Stem		 叶
Leaf		 穗
Panicle
晚稻钾浓度
K concentration in late rice		 2015 石灰Liming (L) 15.86** 1.35 0.04
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 57.73** 18.23** 1.97
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 0.80 0.05 0.27
2016 石灰Liming (L) 62.68** 1706.20** 0.98
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 2916.73** 9960.00** 1.68
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 3.25 233.32** 0.98
2017 石灰Liming (L) 7.44** 6.21* 0.05
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 33.86** 79.53** 4.90
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 0.23 5.67 0.09
2018 石灰Liming (L) 0.13 2.06 2.04
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 17.31** 182.08** 0.17
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 0.05 2.82 0.51

表3

施石灰(L)和秸秆还田(RS)对双季稻秸秆还田量和秸秆钾素投入的影响"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 秸秆投入量
Rate of straw returned into field (kg hm-2)		 秸秆钾素投入量
K input through straw return (kg hm-2)
早稻 Early rice 晚稻 Late rice 早稻 Early rice 晚稻 Late rice
2015 秸秆还田
Strew return (RS)		 4313 a 4141 b 119 a 179 a
秸秆还田配施石灰
Strew return combine with liming (L+RS)		 4313 a 4822 a 119 a 187 a
2016 秸秆还田Strew return (RS) 5163 a 4415 a 165 a 154 a
秸秆还田配施石灰
Strew return combine with liming (L+RS)		 5830 a 4802 a 170 a 159 a
2017 秸秆还田Strew return (RS) 3879 b 4097 a 137 b 157 a
秸秆还田配施石灰
Strew return combine with liming (L+RS)		 5149 a 4514 a 171 a 155 a
2018 秸秆还田Strew return (RS) 4314 a 4141 a 149 a 161 b
秸秆还田配施石灰
Strew return combine with liming (L+RS)		 4671 a 4261 a 153 a 172 a

表4

施石灰(L)和秸秆还田(RS)对双季稻土壤表观钾素平衡和速效钾含量的影响(F值)"

年份
Year		 变异来源
Source of variations		 土壤钾素表观平衡 Soil apparent K balance 土壤速效钾含量
Soil available K concentration
早稻
Early rice		 晚稻
Late rice		 周年
Annual
2015 石灰Liming (L) 0.66 0.04 0.45 1.82
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 174.32** 1817.50** 1214.69** 303.21**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 5.10 0.04 4.93 1.08
2016 石灰Liming (L) 0.00 8.14* 8.68* 0.28
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 189.75** 161.24** 983.79** 29.03**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 3.23 12.42* 36.48** 0.07
2017 石灰Liming (L) 1.96 0.01 0.99 0.10
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 101.37** 180.68** 424.19** 271.59**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 11.87* 0.84 3.19 0.05
2018 石灰Liming (L) 0.21 0.05 0.04 0.01
秸秆还田Straw return (RS) 131.26** 447.30** 324.05** 42.42**
石灰×秸秆还田 L×RS 0.09 0.03 0.01 0.69

图3

施石灰和秸秆还田对土壤速效钾含量(a, 2015-2018)和全钾含量(b, 2018)的影响 处理同图1。误差线表示平均值的标准误差(n = 3)。不同小写字母表示同一年份处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图4

施石灰和秸秆还田对早、晚稻季和周年钾素表观平衡(a~c, 2015-2018)及4年总累积钾素表观平衡(d)的影响 处理同图1。误差线表示平均值的标准误差(n = 3)。不同小写字母表示同一年份处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

[1] 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 周兴, 谢坚, 杨曾平. 长期施肥红壤性水稻土磷素演变特征及对磷盈亏的响应. 土壤学报, 2017, 54:1471-1485.
Lu Y H, Liao Y L, Nie J, Zhou X, Xie J, Yang Z P. Evolution of soil phosphorus in reddish paddy soil under long-term fertilization varying in formulation and its response to P balance. Acta Pedol Sin, 2017, 54:1471-1485 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Xu R K, Zhao A Z, Li Q M, Kong X L, Ji G L. Acidity regime of the red soils in a subtropical region of southern China under field conditions. Geoderma, 2003, 115:75-84.
[3] Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, Shen J L, Han W X, Zhang W F, Christie P, Goulding K W, Zhang F S. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010, 327:1008-1010.
[4] Miao Y X, Stewart B A, Zhang F S. Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient management in China: a review. Agron Sustain Dev, 2011, 31:397-414.
[5] 易杰祥, 吕亮雪, 刘国道. 土壤酸化和酸性土壤改良研究. 华南热带农业大学学报, 2006, 12(1):23-28.
Yi J X, Lyu L X, Liu G D. Research on soil acidification and acidic soil's melioration. J South China Univ Trop Agric, 2006, 12(1):23-28 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] Jiang Y, Meng J J, Zhang L L, Cai M L, Li C F, Zhang M, Wang J P, Wang B F, Mohamed I, Cao C G. Non-target effects of Bt transgenes on grain yield and related traits of an elite restorer rice line in response to nitrogen and potassium applications. Field Crops Res, 2014, 169:39-48.
[7] He P, Yang L P, Xu X P, Zhao S C, Chen F, Li S T, Tu S H, Jin J Y, Johnston A M. Temporal and spatial variation of soil available potassium in China (1990-2012). Field Crops Res, 2015, 173:49-56.
[8] 全国农业技术推广服务中心, 中国农科院农业资源与区划所. 耕地质量演变趋势研究——国家级耕地土壤监测数据整编. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2008.
The National Agro-tech Extension and Service Center (NATESC), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Research of the evolution of arable land quality-summary of national arable land soil monitoring. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2008 (in Chinese).
[9] 张晗, 赵小敏, 朱美青, 欧阳真程, 郭熙, 匡丽花, 叶英聪, 黄聪, 汪晓燕, 李伟峰. 近30年南方丘陵山区耕地土壤养分时空演变特征——以江西省为例. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(2):58-65.
Zhang H, Zhao X M, Zhu M Q, Ouyang Z C, Guo X, Kuang L H, Ye Y C, Huang C, Wang X Y, Li W F. Characteristics of spatiotemporal variability of cultivated soil nutrients in the southern hilly area of China in the past 30 years—A case study of Jiangxi province. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2018, 25(2):58-65 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 武际, 郭熙盛, 鲁剑巍, 万水霞, 王允青, 许征宇, 张晓玲. 不同水稻栽培模式下小麦秸秆腐解特征及对土壤生物学特性和养分状况的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33:565-575.
Wu J, Guo X S, Lu J W, Wan S X, Wang Y Q, Xu Z Y, Zhang X L. Decomposition characteristics of wheat straw and effects on soil biological properties and nutrient status under different rice cultivation. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33:565-575 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 柴如山, 安之冬, 马超, 王擎运, 章力干, 郜红建. 我国主要粮食作物秸秆钾养分资源量及还田替代钾肥潜力. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26:201-211.
Chai R S, An Z D, Ma C, Wang Q Y, Zhang L G, Gao H J. Potassium resource quantity of main grain crop straw and potential for straw return to substitute potassium fertilizer in China. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26:201-211 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 赵欢, 芶久兰, 赵伦学, 吴清英, 何佳芳, 赵平英, 王正银, 李振轮, 肖厚军. 贵州旱作耕地土壤钾素状况与钾肥效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22:277-285.
Zhao H, Gou J L, Zhao L X, Wu Q Y, He J F, Zhao P Y, Wang Z Y, Li Z L, Xiao H J. Analysis on status of soil potassium and the effects of potassium fertilizer in dry land soil in Guizhou. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2016, 22:277-285 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 葛玮健, 常艳丽, 刘俊梅, 张树兰, 孙本华, 杨学云. 塿土区长期施肥对小麦-玉米轮作体系钾素平衡与钾库容量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18:629-636.
Ge W J, Chang Y L, Liu J M, Zhang S L, Sun B H, Yang X Y. Potassium balance and pool as influenced by long-term fertilization under continuous winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in a manural loess soil. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012, 18:629-636 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] Srinivasrao C, Kundu S, Ramachandrappa B K, Reddy S, Lal R, Venkateswarlu B, Sahrawat K L, Naik R P. Potassium release characteristics, potassium balance, and fingermillet (Eleusine coracana G.) yield sustainability in a 27-year long experiment on an Alfisol in the semi-arid tropical India. Plant Soil, 2014, 374:315-330.
[15] 王志勇, 白由路, 杨俐苹, 卢艳丽, 王磊, 王贺. 低土壤肥力下施钾和秸秆还田对作物产量及土壤钾素平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18:900-906.
Wang Z Y, Bai Y L, Yang L P, Lu Y L, Wang L, Wang H. Effects of application of potassium fertilizer and straw returning on crop yields and soil potassium balance in low-yielding fields. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012, 18:900-906 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 关焱, 宇万太, 李建东. 长期施肥对土壤养分库的影响. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(6):131-137.
Guan Y, Yu W T, Li J D. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil nutrient pool. Chin J Ecol, 2004, 23(6):131-137 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 孟红旗, 刘景, 徐明岗, 吕家珑, 周宝库, 彭畅, 石孝均, 黄庆海, 王伯仁. 长期施肥下我国典型农田耕层土壤的pH演变. 土壤学报, 2013, 50:1109-1116.
Meng H Q, Liu J, Xu M G, Lyu J L, Zhou B K, Peng C, Shi X J, Huang Q H, Wang B R. Evolution of pH in top soils of typical Chinese croplands under long-term fertilization. Acta Pedol Sin, 2013, 50:1109-1116 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 曾研华, 吴建富, 曾勇军, 范呈根, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 机收稻草全量还田减施化肥对双季晚稻养分吸收利用及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44:454-462.
Zeng Y H, Wu J F, Zeng Y J, Fan C G, Tan X M, Pan X H, Shi Q H. Effects of straw return with reducing chemical fertilizers on nutrient absorption and utilization and grain yield of double-cropping late rice under mechanical harvest. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44:454-462 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 徐仁扣, 李九玉, 周世伟, 徐明岗, 沈仁芳. 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33:160-167.
Xu R K, Li J Y, Zhou S W, Xu M G, Shen R F. Scientific issues and controlling strategies of soil acidification of croplands in China. China Acad J Electr Publ House, 2018, 33:160-167 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Holland J E, Bennett A E, Newton A C, Whtte P J, McKenzie BM, George T S, Pakeman R J, Bailey J S, Fornara D A, Hayes R C. Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: a review. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 610:316-332.
[21] Liao P, Huang S, van Gestel N C, Zeng Y J, Wu Z M, van Groenigen K J. Liming and straw retention interact to increase nitrogen uptake and grain yield in a double rice-cropping system. Field Crops Res, 2018, 216:217-224.
[22] 闫志浩, 胡志华, 王士超, 槐圣昌, 武红亮, 王瑾瑜, 邢婷婷, 余喜初, 李大明, 卢昌艾. 石灰用量对水稻油菜轮作区土壤酸度、土壤养分及作物生长的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52:285-4295.
Yan Z H, Hu Z H, Wang S C, Huai S C, Wu H L, Wang J Y, Xing T T, Yu X C, Li D M, Lu C A. Effects of lime content on soil acidity, soil nutrients and crop growth in rice-rape rotation system. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52:4285-4295 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 易琼, 杨少海, 黄巧义, 黄旭, 蒋瑞平, 唐拴虎. 改良剂对反酸田土壤性质与水稻产量的影响. 土壤学报, 2014, 51:176-183.
Yi Q, Yang S H, Huang Q Y, Huang X, Jiang R P, Tang S H. Effect of soil ameliorants on soil properties and rice yield of acid sulfate paddy field. Acta Pedol Sin, 2014, 51:176-183 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 廖育林, 郑圣先, 鲁艳红, 杨曾平, 聂军, 谢坚. 长期施用化肥和稻草对红壤性水稻土钾素固定的影响. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(1):70-73.
Liao Y L, Zheng S X, Lu Y H, Yang Z P, Nie J, Xie J. Effect of long-term application of fertilizer and rice strew on potassium fixation of reddish paddy soil. J Soil Water Conserv, 2011, 25(1):70-73 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 程文龙, 韩上, 武际, 李敏, 石祖梁, 王慧, 唐杉, 胡鹏, 黄惠. 连续秸秆还田替代钾肥对作物产量及土壤钾素平衡的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019, (5):72-78.
Cheng W L, Han S, Wu J, Li M, Shi Z L, Wang H, Tang S, Hu P, Huang H. Effect of continuous straw return substitute for K-fertilizer on crop yield and soil potassium balance. Soils Fert Sci China, 2019, (5):72-78 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 李秀双, 师江澜, 王淑娟, 田霄鸿. 长期秸秆还田对农田土壤钾素形态及空间分布的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(3):109-117.
Li X S, Shi J L, Wang S J, Tian X H. Effect of long-term strew returning on form and spatial distribution of potassium in agricultural soil. J Northwest Agric For Univ(Nat Scie Edn), 2016, 44(3):109-117 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 周玲红, 黄晶, 王伯仁, 李冬初, 柳开楼, 韩天富, 张会民. 南方酸化红壤钾素淋溶对施石灰的响应. 土壤学报, 2020, 57:457-467.
Zhou L H, Huang J, Wang B R, Li D C, Liu K L, Han T F, Zhang H M. Response of acidifying red soil to liming in potassium leaching in south China. Acta Pedol Sin, 2020, 57:457-467 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 廖萍, 刘磊, 何宇轩, 唐刚, 张俊, 曾勇军, 吴自明, 黄山. 施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻产量和氮素吸收的互作效应. 作物学报, 2020, 46:84-92.
Liao P, Liu L, He Y X, Tang G, Zhang J, Zeng Y J, Wu Z M, Huang S. Interactive effects of liming and straw return on yield and nitrogen uptake in a double rice cropping system. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46:84-92 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008.
Bao S D. Soil Agrochemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2008 (in Chinese).
[30] Zhang X, Eric A D, Denise L M, Timothy D S, Patrice D, Shen Y. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature, 2015, 528:51-59.
[31] 李昊昱, 孟兆良, 庞党伟, 陈金, 侯永坤, 崔海兴, 金敏, 王振林, 李勇. 周年秸秆还田对农田土壤固碳及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45:893-903.
Li H Y, Meng Z L, Pang D W, Chen J, Hou Y K, Cui H X, Jin M, Wang Z L, Li Y. Effect of annual straw return model on soil carbon sequestration and crop yields in winter wheat-summer maize rotation farmland. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45:893-903 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 王忍, 黄璜, 伍佳, 吕广动, 隆斌庆, 吴涛, 谷婕. 稻草还田对土壤养分及水稻生物量和产量的影响. 作物研究, 2020, 34:8-15.
Wang R, Huang H, Wu J, Lyu G D, Long B Q, Wu T, Gu J. Effects of rice Straw returning on soil nutrients, rice biomass and yield. Crop Res, 2020, 34:8-15 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 孙凯, 刘振, 胡恒宇, 李耕, 刘文涛, 杨柳, 宁堂原, 王彦玲. 有机培肥与轮耕方式对夏玉米田土壤碳氮和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45:401-410.
Sun K, Liu Z, Hu H Y, Li G, Liu W T, Yang L, Ning T Y, Wang Y L. Effect of organic fertilizer and rotational tillage practices on soil carbon and nitrogen and maize yield in wheat-maize cropping system. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45:401-410 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] Xu D H, Carswell A, Zhu Q C, Zhang F S, Vries W D. Modelling long-term impacts of fertilization and liming on soil acidification at Rothamsted Experimental Station. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 713:136249.
[35] Goulging K W T. Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use Manage, 2016, 32:390-399.
[36] Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Hammerle I, Fuchslueger L, Hofhandslf, Knoltsch A, Schnecker J, Taktiti M, Watzka M, Wild B, Keiblinger K M, Boltenstern S Z, Richter A, Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon: nitrogen imbalances regulates soil nitrogen cycling. Nat Commun, 2014, 5:3694.
[37] Singh B, Shan Y H, Johnson B S E, Singh Y, Buresh R J. Crop residue management for lowland rice-based cropping systems in Asia. Adv Agron, 2008, 98:117-199.
[38] Wang X, Jing Z H, He C, Liu Q Y, Zhang H L. Temporal variation of SOC storage and crop yield and its relationship: a fourteen year field trial about tillage practices in a double paddy cropping system, China. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 759:143494.
[39] 曾研华, 范呈根, 吴建富, 曾勇军, 周春火, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 等养分条件下稻草还田替代双季早稻氮钾肥比例的研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23:658-668.
Zeng Y H, Fan C G, Wu J F, Zeng Y J, Zhou C H, Tan X M, Pan X H, Shi Q H. Replacement ratio of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer by straw incorporation in early rice under the same nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium input. J Plant Nutr Ferti, 2017, 23:658-668 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[40] 陈竹君, 王益权, 周建斌, 刘晓军, 周博. 日光温室栽培土壤供钾状况及K-Ca吸附交换特性研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15:1078-1084.
Chen Z J, Wang Y Q, Zhou J B, Liu X J, Zhou B. Quantity and intensity of potassium and its exchange relationship with calcium in sunlight greenhouse soils. Plant Nutr Ferti Sci, 2009, 15:1078-1084 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[2] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[3] 朱家宝, 王先领, 樊友众, 王宗铠, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜茎秆质量和抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 233-248.
[4] 杨颖聪, 张俊豪, 唐一哲, 乔唱唱, 王鹏博, 黄明, 徐国伟, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对旱地小麦籽粒淀粉及其合成相关酶活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2467-2484.
[5] 樊友众, 王先领, 王宗铠, 王春云, 王天尧, 谢捷, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 赵杰, 周广生. 秸秆还田耦合氮肥运筹对稻茬油菜光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2139-2151.
[6] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[7] 李翔宇, 季欣杰, 王雪莲, 龙安燃, 王峥宇, 杨子慧, 宫香伟, 姜英, 齐华. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对春玉米产量和籽粒品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 696-712.
[8] 王鹏博, 张冬霞, 乔唱唱, 黄明, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对豫西旱地小麦土壤酶活性和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 534-547.
[9] 朱荣昱, 赵蒙杰, 姚云凤, 李艳红, 李向东, 刘兆新. 秸秆还田方式与播种深度对夏直播花生土壤物理性状与出苗特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2106-2121.
[10] 胡明明, 丁峰, 彭志芸, 向开宏, 李郁, 张宇杰, 杨志远, 孙永健, 马均. 多元化种植模式下秸秆还田配合水氮管理对水稻产量形成与氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1236-1252.
[11] 刘成敏, 门雅琦, 秦都林, 闫晓宇, 张乐, 孟浩, 苏寻雅, 孙学振, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田下施氮量对棉花产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1043-1052.
[12] 车品高, 陈国徽, 曹国军, 高冰可, 陈艳芳, 熊文, 应治宏, 周庆友. 稻油轮作下秸秆还田对土壤养分和作物产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 3118-3128.
[13] 杨博文, 梁修仁, 秦明广, 曹英健, 熊航, 展茗. 基于能量效率与碳效率的长江中游不同水旱轮作系统可持续性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2801-2817.
[14] 李盼, 陈桂平, 苟志文, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 柴强. 绿洲灌区春小麦光能利用与水分生产效益对秸秆还田方式的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1316-1326.
[15] 李荣, 勉有明, 侯贤清, 李培富, 王西娜. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对土壤性质及玉米水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2820-2832.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2