欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (05): 751-757.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00751

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦秸秆还田方式对轮作玉米干物质累积分配及产量的影响

殷文**,冯福学**,赵财,于爱忠,柴强*,胡发龙,郭瑶   

  1. 甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室 / 甘肃农业大学农学院,甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-07 修回日期:2016-03-02 出版日期:2016-05-12 网络出版日期:2016-03-11
  • 通讯作者: 柴强, E-mail: chaiq@gsau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31360323),国家公益性行业(农业)科研项目(201503125-3)和国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD14B10)资助。

Effects of Wheat Straw Returning Patterns on Characteristics of Dry Matter Accumulation, Distribution and Yield of Rotation Maize

YIN Wen**,FENG Fu-Xue**,ZHAO Cai,YU Ai-Zhong,CHAI Qiang*,HU Fa-Long,GUO Yao   

  1. Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science / Faculty of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou
  • Received:2015-11-07 Revised:2016-03-02 Published:2016-05-12 Published online:2016-03-11
  • Contact: Chai Qiang, E-mail: chaiq@gsau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (31360323), t the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201503125-3), and National Key Technology Support Program of China (2012BAD14B10).

摘要:

研究茬口对轮作作物的产量贡献及干物质积累与分配规律的影响,对于优化作物高产高效栽培理论和技术具有重要意义。本研究在甘肃河西绿洲灌区,通过田间试验,研究了前茬小麦不同秸秆还田方式(25 cm高茬收割免耕, NTSS; 25 cm高茬等量秸秆覆盖免耕, NTS; 25 cm高茬等量秸秆翻压, TIS; 低茬收割翻耕, CT)对轮作玉米干物质积累和分配及产量的影响,以期为该区前茬小麦轮作玉米生产模式提供优化依据。结果表明,CT相比,NTSSNTSTIS提高了玉米抽穗后干物质的积累量,两年平均高4.8%~12.7%NTSNTSSTIS具有更高的干物质累积作用NTSSNTSTIS可提高玉米叶、茎、鞘对籽粒的贡献率,提高幅度平均为12.8%~25.0%6.3%~11.3%18.3%~78.4%,其中NTSNTSSTIS提高作用更突出。NTSSNTSTIS提高了玉米的籽粒产量,增幅为11.3%~17.5%,其中NTS两年籽粒产量最高,分别达到13 470 kg hm-213 274 kg hm-2,较TIS5.6%~9.0%;穗粒数增加是小麦秸秆还田提高轮作玉米产量的主要原因。同时NTS获得较高的收获指数,提高比例为6.4%~8.4%,说明NTS较其他处理增产的另一原因是提高了收获指数。本研究表明,其前茬小麦秸秆覆盖结合免耕(NTS)可作为绿洲灌区优化后茬玉米干物质累积规律及获得高产的理想耕作措施。

关键词: 秸秆还田, 轮作, 干物质分配, 产量, 收获指数

Abstract:

Research on the response of dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of crops to previous straw returning usually plays an important role for optimizing cropping systems. In this investigation, a field experiment was carried out in typical oasis irrigation region, to determine the characteristics of dry matter distribution and yield of rotated maize with four previous wheat straw treatments, including 25 cm no tillage with straw standing (NTSS); 25 cm no tillage with straw covering (NTS); 25 cm tillage with straw incorporation (TIS); and conventional tillage (CT). The results showed that, compraed with CT,NTSS, NTS, TIS significantly increased dry matter accumulation by an average of 4.8% to 12.7% after maize heading stage in two years; and improved contribution rate to grain yield (i.e. GCR) of maize by an average of 12.8% to 25.0% from leaf, 6.3% to 11.3% from stem, and 18.3% to 78.4% from sheath, respectively. especially, NTS had more improvement than NTSS, TIS. The grain yield of maize was 11.3% to 17.5% higher in the three straw returning treatments than in CT check. NTS exhibited the most significant effect opf improving yield, reaching 13 470 and 13 274 kg ha-1 in two study years, which was 5.6% to 9.0% higher than that of TIS due to the increase of kernel number per spike. Meanwhile, NTS had the best effect on increasing harvest index, which was increased by 6.4% to 8.4% during the two study years,and redulted in a high grain yield. Our results showed that NTS treatment is recommended as thebest feasible cultural method to optimize dry matter accumulation, distribution and obtain high yield for rotated maize in the oasis irrigation region.

Key words: Straw returning, Rotation, Dry matter distribution, Yield, Harvest index

[1] 戴景瑞, 鄂立柱. 我国玉米育种科技创新问题的几点思考. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(1): 1–5
Dai J R, E L Z. Scientific and technological innovation of maize breeding in China. Maize Sci, 2010, 18(1): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 卢秉林, 包兴国, 张久东, 胡志桥, 杨新强, 曹卫东, 杨文玉, 李全福. 河西绿洲灌区玉米与绿肥间作模式对作物产量和经济效益的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014, (2): 67–71
Lu B L, Bao X G, Zhang J D, Hu Z Q, Yang X Q, Cao W D, Yang W Y, Li Q F. Effects of different intercropping systems of corn and green manure on crop yield and economic benefit in Hexi Oasis Irrigation. China Soils Fert, 2014, (2): 67–71 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] G??b T, ?cigalska B, ?abuz B. Effect of crop rotation on the root system morphology and productivity of triticale (× Triticosecale Wittm). J Agric Sci, 2014, 152: 642–654
[4] Grandy A S, Porter G A, Erich M S. Organic amendment and rotation crop effects on the recovery of soil organic matter and aggregation in potato cropping systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2002, 66: 1311–1319
[5] 李明, 李文雄. 玉米产量形成与源库关系. 玉米科学, 2006, 14(2): 67–70
   Li M, Li W X. Relationship between maize yield formation and source-sink. Maize Sci, 2006, 14(2): 67–70 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Monneveux P, Quillerou R, Sanchez1 C, Lopez-Cesati J. Effect of zero tillage and residues conservation on continuous maize cropping in a subtropical environment. Plant Soil, 2006, 279: 95–105
[7] Sun H Y, Shao L W, Liu X W, Miao W F, Chen S Y, Zhang X Y. Determination of water consumption and the water-saving potential of three mulching methods in a jujube orchard. Eur J Agron, 2012, 43: 87–95
[8] 杨国虎, 李建生, 罗湘宁, 王承莲. 干旱条件下玉米叶面积变化及地上干物质积累与分配的研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 33(5): 27–32
Yang G H, Li J S, Luo X N, Wang C L. Studies on leaf area change and above-ground dry material accumulation and distribution of maize in different droughts. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2005, 33(5): 27–32 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] Bidinger F, Musgrave R, Fischer R. Contribution of stored pre-anthesis assimilate to grain yield in wheat and barley. Nature, 1977, 270: 431–433
[10] 骆兰平, 于振文, 王东, 张永丽, 石玉. 土壤水分和种植密度对小麦旗叶光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 1049–1059
Luo L P, Yu Z W, Wang D, Zhang Y L, Shi Y. Effects of planting density and soil moisture on flag leaf photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter accumulation and distribution in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 1049–1059 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 李青军, 张炎, 胡伟, 孟凤轩, 冯广平, 胡国智, 刘新兰. 氮肥运筹对玉米干物质积累、氮素吸收分配及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17: 755–760
    Li Q J, Zhang Y, Hu W, Meng F X, Feng G P, Hu G Z, Liu X L. Effects of nitrogen management on maize dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and distribution and maize yield. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011, 17: 755–760 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 农梦玲, 魏贵玉, 李伏生. 不同时期根区局部灌溉对玉米干物质积累和水氮利用的影响. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(5): 115–120
Nong M L, Wei G Y, Li F S. Effect of partial root-zone irrigation at different growth stages on dry mass accumulation and water and nitrogen use of maize. Maize Sci, 2012, 20(5): 115–120 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 李利利, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 杨今胜. 不同株高夏玉米品种同化物积累转运与分配特性. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 1080–1087
Li L L, Zhang J W, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B, Yang J S. Characteristics of accumulation, transition and distribution of assimilate in summer maize varieties with different plant height. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 1080–1087 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] Monneveux P, Quillerou E, Sanchez1 C, Lopez-Cesati J. Effect of zero tillage and residues conservation on continuous maize cropping in a subtropical environment. Plant Soil, 2006, 279: 95–105
[15] Roldan A, Carabaca F, Hernandez M T, Garcia C, Sanchez-Brito C, Velasquez M, Tiscareno M. No-tillage, crop residue additions and legume cover cropping effects on soil quality characteristics under maize in Patzcuaro watershed (Mexico). Soil Till Res, 2003, 72: 65–73
[16] Sekhon N, Hira G, Sidhu A, Thind S. Response of soybean (Glycine max Mer.) to wheat straw mulching in different cropping seasons. Soil Use Manage, 2005, 21: 422–426
[17] 李静静, 李从锋, 李连禄, 丁在松, 赵明. 苗带深松条件下秸秆覆盖对春玉米土壤水温及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 1787–1796
Li J J, Li C F, Li L L, Ding Z S, Zhao M. Effect of straw mulching on soil temperature, soil moisture and spring maize yield under seedling strip subsoiling. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 1787–1796 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 朱自玺, 方文松, 赵国强, 邓天宏, 付祥军. 麦秸和残茬覆盖对夏玉米农田小气候的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2000, 18(2): 19–24
Zhu Z X, Fang W S, Zhao G Q, Deng T H, Fu X J. Effects of straw and residue mulching on microclimate of summer corn field. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2000, 18(2): 19–24 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] Chai Q, Yu J H, Yin W, Zhao C, Hu F L, Gan Y T. Integrated double-mulching practices optimizes soil temperature and improves soil water utilization in arid environments. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium for Farming Systems Design. Mentpellier, France: European Society for Agronomy, 2015. pp 31–32

[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[11] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[12] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[13] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[14] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[15] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!