[1]Halmann M. Synthetic plant-growth regulators. Adv Agron, 1990, 43: 47–105



[2]何钟佩, 闵祥佳, 李丕明, 奚惠达. 植物生长延缓剂DPC对棉花根系活力的生理作用. 北京农业大学学报, 1988, 14: 235–241



He Z P, Min X J, Li P M, Xi H D. The physiological role of plant growth retardant DPC on the root activity of cotton plants. J Beijing Agric Univ, 1988, 14: 235–241 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]田晓莉, 李召虎, 段留生, 王保民, 何钟佩. 作物化学调控技术的进展与展望. 中国农业科技导报, 2004, 6(5): 11–15



Tian X L, Li Z H, Duan L S, Wang B M, He Z P. Progress and prospect of crop chemical regulation technology. Rev China Agric Sci Tech, 2004, 6(5): 11–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Zhao D L, Oosterhuis D M. Pix plus and mepiquat chloride effects on physiology, growth, and yield of field-grown cotton. J Plant Growth Regul, 2000, 19: 415–422



[5]金子渔, 杨秉芳, 何钟佩. 用同位素示踪研究DPC对棉花生理作用的影响. 北京农业大学学报, 1984, 10: 245–253



Jin Z Y, Yang B F, He Z P. Study in physiological response of DPC on cotton by means of isotope. J Beijing Agric Univ, 1984, 10: 245–253 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Fernandéz C J, Cothren J T, Mcinnes K J. Partitioning of biomass in well-watered and water-stressed cotton plants treated with mepiquat chloride. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 1224–1228



[7]Xu X, Taylor H M. Increase in drought resistance of cotton seedlings treated with mepiquat chloride. Agron J, 1992, 84: 569–574



[8]Jost P, Dollar M. Comparison of mepiquat pentaborate and mepiquat choride effects on DP555BR. In Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, TX. Jan. 5–9. National Cotton Council. Am., Memphis, TN. 2004



[9]Pettigrew W T, Johnson J T. Effects of different seeding rates and plant growth regulators on early-planted cotton. J Cotton Sci, 2005, 9: 189–198



[10]杨富强. 提高棉花钾肥利用效率的相关栽培措施研究. 中国农业大学博士学位论文, 2012



Yang F Q. Study on Relative Agronomic Measures for Better Utilization of Fertilizer Potassium in Cotton Cultivation. PhD Dissertation of China Agricultural University, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]王铭伦, 王福青, 韩广清, 陶世蓉, 郑芝荣. DPC浸种对花生幼苗根系和叶片生理功能的影响. 西北植物学报, 2002, 22: 168–172



Wang M L, Wang F Q, Han G Q, Tao S R, Zheng Z R. Effects of soaking seeds with DPC on the physiological functions of root system and leaf of peanut seedlings. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident, 2002, 22: 168–172 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]李召虎, 何钟佩, 李丕明. 棉花幼苗侧根发生的化学诱导研究: I. NAA诱导棉花幼苗侧根发生的效应与机理研究. 北京农业大学学报, 1991, 17(增刊): 6–12



Li Z H, He Z P, Li P M. Study on lateral roots initiation of cotton seedling: I. Effects of NAA on lateral roots initiation of cotton seedling and its mechanism. J Beijing Agric Univ, 1991, 17(suppl): 6–12 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]田晓莉, 谭伟明, 李召虎. DPC与DTA-6复配对转基因抗虫棉苗期生长发育的调控. 棉花学报, 2006, 18: 3–7



Tian X L, Tan W M, Li Z H. The effects of mixture of DPC and DTA-6 on seedlings of insect-resistant transgenic cotton. Cotton Sci, 2006, 18: 3–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]王刚卫. 棉花钾营养效率筛选体系的建立及在基因型差异研究中的应用. 北京: 中国农业大学硕士学位论文, 2006



Wang G W. The Difference and Physiology Mechanism on Potassium Efficiency among Different Cotton Genotypes. MS Thesis of China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Bioch, 2010, 48: 909–930



[16]Bhattacharjee S. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative burst: roles in stress, senescence and signal transduction in plants. Curr Sci, 2005, 89: 1113–1121



[17]Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2004, 55: 373–399



[18]周运刚, 王俊刚, 马天文, 何泽敏. 不同DPC缩节胺处理对棉花生理生化特性的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47: 1142–1146



Zhou Y G, Wang J G, Ma T W, He Z M. Influences of different DPC treatments on physiological and biochemical characteristics of cotton. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2010, 47: 1142–1146 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]郑青松, 刘友良. DPC浸种提高棉苗耐盐性的作用和机理. 棉花学报, 2001, 13: 278–282



Zheng Q S, Liu Y L. Effects of soaking seeds in DPC increasing the salinity tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings and its mechanism. Cotton Sci, 2001, 13: 278–282 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]段留生, 何钟佩. DPC对棉花叶片发育及活性氧代谢的影响. 棉花学报, 1996, 8: 321–315



Duan L S, He Z P. Effects of DPC in leaf development and active oxygen metabolism cotton leaf. Acta Gossypii Sin, 1996, 8: 321–315 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Knievel D P. Procedure for estimating ratio of live to dead root dry matter in root core samples. Crop Sci, 1973, 13: 124–126



[22]Shabala S. Ionic and osmotic components of salt stress specifically modulate net ion fluxes from bean leaf mesophyll. Plant Cell Environ, 2000, 23: 825–837



[23]Ünal D, Uyanikgil Y. UV-B induces cell death in the lichen Physcia semipinnata. Turk J Biol, 2011, 35: 137–144



[24]Turcsanyi E, Lyons T, Plochl M, Barnes J. Does ascorbate in the mesophyll cell walls form the first line of defence against ozone? Testing the concept using broad bean (Vicia faba L.). J Exp Bot, 2000, 51: 901–910



[25]Nayyar H, Bainsb T S, Kumar S. Chilling stressed chickpea seedlings: effect of cold acclimation, calcium and abscisic acid on cryoprotective solutes and oxidative damage. Environ Exp Bot, 2005, 54: 275–285



[26]Gossett D R, Millhollon E P, Lucas M C, Banks S W, Marney M M. The effects of NaCl on antioxidant enzyme activities in callus tissue of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Rep, 1994, 13: 498–503



[27]Parida A K, Das A B, Mohanty P. Defense potentials to NaCl in a mangrove, Bruguiera parvi?ora: differential changes of isoforms of some antioxidative enzymes. J Plant Physiol, 2004, 161: 531–542



[28]Romero-Puertas M C, Rodríguez-Serrano M, Corpas F J, Gómez M, Delrío L A, Sandalio L M. Cadmium-induced subcellular accumulation of O2– and H2O2 in pea leaves. Plant Cell Environ, 2004, 27: 1122–1134



[29]Verma S, Mishra S N. Putrescine alleviation of growth in salt stressed Brassica juncea by inducing antioxidative defence system. J Plant Physiol, 2005, 162: 669–677



[30]Briggs C L, Morris E C. Seed-coat dormancy in Grevillea linearifolia: little change in permeability to an apoplastic tracer after treatment with smoke and heat. Ann Bot, 2008, 101: 623–632



[31]Zhou Y, Lu D, Li C, Luo J, Zhu B F, Zhu J, Shang G Y, Wang Z, Sang T, Zhou B, Han B. Genetic control of seed shattering in rice by the APETALA2 transcription factor SHATTERING ABORTION1. Plant Cell, 2012, 24: 1034–1048



[32]Cross A R, Jones C T G. Enzymic mechanism of superoxide production. Acta Biochim Biophys, 1991, 1057: 281–298



[33]Skulacher V P. Why are mitochondria involved in apoptosis. FEBS Lett, 1996, 397: 7–10



[34]Hirota K, Matsui M, Nishiyama A, Mori K, Yodoi J. AP-1 transcriptional activity is regulated by a direct association between thioredoxin and Ref-1. PNAS, 1997, 94: 3633–3638



[35]Willekens H, Van-Camp W, Van-Montagu M, Inze D, Langebartels C, Sandermann H J. Ozolle, sulfur dioxide and ultraviolet-B have similar effects on mRNA accumulation of antioxidant genes in Nicotiana plumbaginifolial L. Plant Physiol, 1994, 106: 1007–1014



[36]Desikan R, Reynolds A, Hancock J T, Neill S J. Harpin and hydrogen peroxide both initiate programmed cell death but have differential effects on defence gene expression in Arabidopsis suspension cultures. Biochem J, 1998, 330: 115–120



[37]Storey R, Walker R R. Citrus and salinity. Sci Hort, 1999, 78: 39–81



[38]马怀宇, 吕德国, 杨洪强. NaCl胁迫下平邑甜茶根系线粒体特性和细胞死亡特征. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34: 1448–1453



Ma H Y, Lv D G, Yang H Q. Characteristics of mitochondria and cell death in roots of Malus hupehensis var. pingyiensis under NaCl stress. Chin J P E, 2010, 34: 1448–1453 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[39]Shabala S. Salinity and programmed cell death: unravelling mechanisms for ion speci?c signaling. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 709–712



[40]Demidchik V, Cuin T A, Svistunenko D, Smith S J, Miller A J, Shabala S, Sokolik A, Yurin V. Arabidopsis root K+-efflux conductance activated by hydroxyl radicals: single-channel properties, genetic basis and involvement in stress-induced cell death. J Cell Sci, 2010, 123: 1468–1479