利用三重测交群体剖析玉米株高与穗位高杂种优势的遗传学基础

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01186

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以玉米强优势杂交种组合豫玉22及其重组近交系为材料，按照TTC (triple testcross)遗传交配设计，组配了270个测交后代的TTC群体。利用复合区间作图法，对控制株高与穗位高的QTL进行了分析，分别检测到20和17个主效QTL，其中超显性位点最多(11个和8个)，加性次之(5个和6个)，显性(2个和0个)和部分显性较少(2个和3个)。分析发现，存在同时控制株高与穗位高杂种优势的QTL区域，即Bin1.06区域(umc2151~umc1122)、Bin3.05区域(umc2127~umc2166~ umc1539)以及Bin7.03区域(umc1865~umc1888)，这也与在各个环境中株高与穗位高的相关性吻合。另外，还分别检测到两性状4个和7个QTL与遗传背景之间的互作，22对和12对标记间的互作，分别解释表型变异的3.26%~16.58%和3.44%~22.41%，说明上位性也可能与这两个性状及其杂种优势的形成有重要关系。

关键词: 玉米, 株高, 穗位高, 杂种优势, QTL定位

Abstract: In this study, the genetic basis of plant height and ear position for highly heterotic hybrid Yuyu 22 was analyzed by using TTC (triple testcross) genetic mating design, with a population including 270 testcross progenies. By using composite interval mapping, the number of detected QTLs for plant height and ear position was 20 and 17, respectively. These QTLs for plant height and ear position were classified as overdominant (11 and 8), additive (5 and 6), dominant (2 and 0) and partially dominant (2 and 3). Further analysis indicated that several QTL regions, including Bin1.06 (umc2151–umc1122), Bin3.05 (umc2127–umc2166–umc1539) and Bin7.03 (umc1865–umc1888), contributed to both plant height and ear position, which was consistent with the significant correlation between plant height and ear position. One-dimensional genome scan showed four and seven genome regions of QTL ´ genetic background interactions, 22 and 12 marker pairs with epistatic effects for plant height and ear height respectively and the contribution for phenotypic variation was 3.26–16.58% and 3.44–22.41%, which suggests that the contribution of epistasis to the heterosis of the two traits is important.

Key words: Maize, Plant height, Ear position, Heterosis, QTL

宋方威, 彭惠茹, 刘婷, 张义荣, 孙其信, 倪中福. 利用三重测交群体剖析玉米株高与穗位高杂种优势的遗传学基础[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(07): 1186-1195.

SONG Fang-Wei, BANG Hui-Ru, LIU Ting, ZHANG Xi-Rong, SUN Ji-Shen, NI Zhong-Fu. Heterosis for Plant Height and Ear Position in Maize Revealed by Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis with Triple Testcross Design[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(07): 1186-1195.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01186

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2011/V37/I07/1186

参考文献

[1]Shull G H. The composition of a field of maize. Am Breeders Assoc Rep, 1908, 4: 196-301
[2]Bruce A B. The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science, 1910, 32: 627-628
[3]East E M. Heterosis. Genetics, 1936, 21: 375-397
[4]Hochholdinger F, Hoeckera N. Towards the molecular basis of heterosis. Trend Plant Sci, 2007, 12: 427-432
[5]Semel Y, Nissenbaum J, Menda N, Zinder M, Krieger U, Issman N, Pleban T, Lippman Z, Gur A, Zamir D. Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 12981-12986
[6]Lu H, Romero-Severson J, Bernarbo R. Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 107: 494-502
[7]Kusterer B, Muminovic J, Utz H F, Piepho H P, Barth S, Heckenberger M, Meyer R C, Altmann T, Melchinger A E. Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis. Genetics, 2007, 175: 2009-2017
[8]Xiao J H, Li J M, Yuan L P, Tanksley S D. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular makers. Genetics, 1995, 140: 745-754
[9]Li Z K, Luo L J, Mei H W, Wang D L, Shu Q Y, Tabien R, Zhong D B, Ying C S, Stansel J W, Khush G S, Paterson A H. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice: I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics, 2001, 158: 1737-1753
[10]Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Xu C G, Sun X L, Yu S B, Zhang Q F. Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics, 2002, 162: 1885-1895
[11]Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Wu W R, Xu C G, Sun X L, Yu S B, Zhang Q F. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interaction can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 2574-2579
[12]Tang J-H(汤继华), Yan J-B(严建兵), Ma X-Q(马西青), Teng W-T(滕文涛), Meng Y-J(孟义江), Dai J-R(戴景瑞), Li J-S(李建生). Genetic dissection for grain yield and its components using an immortalized F2 population in maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(8): 1299-1303 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Tang J H, Yan J B, Ma X Q, Teng W T, Wu W R, Dai J R, Dhillon B S, Melchinger A E, Li J S. Dissection of the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite maize hybrid by QTL mapping in an immortalize F2 population. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 333-340
[14]Li Z-K(李卓坤), Xie Q-G(谢全刚), Zhu Z-L(朱占玲), Liu J-L(刘金良), Han S-X(韩淑晓), Tian B(田宾), Yuan Q-Q(袁倩倩), Tian J-C(田纪春). Analysis of plant height heterosis based on QTL mapping in wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(5): 771-778 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Xu Q-Z(徐庆章), Wang Q-C(王庆成), Niu Y-Z(牛玉贞), Wang Z-X(王忠孝), Zhang J(张军). Studies on relationship between plant type and canopy photosynthesis in maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1995, 21(4): 492-496 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Salas Fernandez M G, Becraft P W, Yin Y H, Lübberstedt T. From dwarves to giants? Plant height manipulation for biomass yield. Trends Plant Sci, 2009, 14: 454-461
[17]Beavis W D, Grant D, Albertsen M C, Fincher R. Quantitative trait loci for plant height in four maize populations and their associations with qualitative genetic loci. Theor Appl Genet, 1991, 83: 141-145
[18]Stuber C W, Lincoln S E, Wolff D W, Helentjaris T, Lander E S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from 2 elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics, 1992, 132: 823-839
[19]Lin Y R, Schertz K F, Paterson A H. Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting plant height and maturity across the Poaceae, in reference to an interspecific sorghum population. Genetics, 1995, 141: 391-411
[20]Yan J-B(严建兵), Tang H(汤华), Huang Y-Q(黄益勤), Shi Y-G(石永刚), Li J-S(李建生), Zheng Y-L(郑用琏). Dynamic analysis of QTL for plant height at different developmental stages in maize (Zea mays L.). Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2003, 48(23): 2601-2607 (in Chinese)
[21]Lan J-H(兰进好), Chu D(褚栋). Study on the genetic basis of plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.) by QTL dissection. Hereditas (遗传), 2005, 27(6): 925-934(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]Tang H(汤华), Yan J-B(严建兵), Huang Y-Q(黄益勤), Zheng Y-L(郑用琏), LI J-S(李建生). QTL mapping of five agronomic traits in maize. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2005, 32(2): 203-209 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]Yang J-P(杨俊品), Rong T-Z(荣廷昭), Xiang D-Q(向道权), Tang H-T(唐海涛), Huang L-J(黄烈健), Dai J-R(戴景瑞). QTL mapping of quantitative traits of maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(2): 188-196 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]Zhang Z M, Zhao M J, Ding H P, Rong T Z, Pan G T. Quantitative trait loci analysis of plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.). Russian J Genet, 2006, 42: 306-310
[25]Tang J-H(汤继华), Ma X-Q(马西青), Teng W-T(滕文涛), Yan J-B(严建兵), Wu W-R(吴为人), Dai J-R(戴景瑞), Li J-S(李建生). Detection of heterotic locus and quantitative trait loci for plant height using an immortalized F2 population in maize. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2006, 51(24): 2864-2869 (in Chinese)
[26]Yu Y-T(于永涛), Zhang J-M(张吉民), Shi Y-S(石云素), Song Y-C(宋燕春), Wang T-Y(王天宇), Li Y(黎裕). QTL analysis for plant height and leaf angle by using different populations of maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2006, 14(2): 88-92 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]Wang Y, Yao J, Zhang Z F, Zheng Y L. The comparative analysis based on maize integrated QTL map and meta-analysis of plant height QTLs. Chin Sci Bull, 2006, 51: 2219-2230
[28]Zhang Z-M(张志明), Zhao M-J(赵茂俊), Rong T-Z(荣廷昭), Pan G-T(潘光堂). SSR linkage map construction and QTL identification for plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(2): 341-344 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]Frascaroli E, Cané M A, Landi P, Pea G, Gianfranceschi L, Villa M, Morgante M, Pè M E. Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics, 2007, 176: 625-644
[30]Kusterer B, Piepho H-P, Utz H F, Schön C C, Muminovic J, Meyer R C, Altmann T, Melchinger A E. Heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics, 2007, 177: 1839-1850
[31]Yang X-J(杨晓军), Lu M(路明), Zhang S-W(张世煌), Zhou F(周芳), Qu Y-Y(曲延英), Xie C-X(谢传晓). QTL mapping of plant height and ear position in maize (Zea mays L.). Hereditas (遗传), 2008, 30(11): 1477-1486 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]Shi Y-S(石云素), Yu Y-T(于永涛), Song Y-C(宋燕春), Liu Z-Z(刘志斋), Li Y(黎裕), Wang T-Y(王天宇). QTL identification for plant height in a new dwarf germplasm of maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(2): 256-260 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]Bai W, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Teng F, Wang L, Tao Y, Zheng Y. The evidence for non-additive effect as the main genetic component of plant height and ear height in maize using introgression line populations. Plant Breed, 2010, 129: 376-384
[34]Kearsey M J, Jinks J L. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits: I. Theory. Heredity, 1968, 23: 403-409
[35]Kearsey M J, Pooni H S, Syed N H. Genetics of quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity, 2003, 91: 456-464
[36]Zeng Z B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 1994, 136: 1457-1468
[37]Wang D L, Zhu J, Li Z K, Paterson A H. Mapping QTL with epistatic effects and QTL×environment interactions by mixed model approaches, Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 99: 1255-1264
[38]Stuber C W, Edwards M D, Wendel J F. Molecular marker-facilitated investigation of quantitative trait loci in maize: II. Factors in?uencing yields and its component traits. Crop Sci, 1987, 27: 639-648
[39]Graham G I, Wolff D W, Stuber C W. Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci, 1997, 37: 1601-1610

相关文章 15

[1]	刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2]	梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3]	唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4]	郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[5]	孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6]	张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7]	杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[8]	张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[9]	杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[10]	韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[11]	蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[12]	田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[13]	杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[14]	张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[15]	郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed