欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (05): 782-789.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮胁迫与非胁迫条件下玉米不同时期株高的动态QTL定位

刘宗华;汤继华*;王春丽;田国伟;卫晓轶;胡彦民;崔党群   

  1. 河南农业大学农学院,河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2006-03-27 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-05-12 网络出版日期:2007-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 汤继华

QTL Analysis of Plant Height under N-Stress and N-Input at Different Stages in Maize

LIU Zong-Hua,TANG Ji-Hua*,WANG Chun-Li,TIAN Guo-Wei,WEI Xiao-Yi,HU Yan-Min,CUI Dang-Qun   

  1. Collage of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
  • Received:2006-03-27 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-05-12 Published online:2007-05-12
  • Contact: TANG Ji-Hua

摘要:

以玉米杂交种农大108的203个F2:3家系为材料,在施氮(N+)和不施氮(N-)2种条件下对拔节期到灌浆期的株高变化进行了动态QTL分析。结果表明,N胁迫条件对亲本许178影响较小,而对亲本黄C的影响较大,F2:3群体在不同时期的株高均值在2种施肥水平下没有显著差异,但变异范围存在一定的差异。利用包含199个SSR标记的遗传连锁图谱与复合区间作图法,在N-条件下,拔节期、小喇叭口期、大喇叭口期、灌浆期分别定位1、1、2和2个非条件QTL,可分别解释各时期株高表型变异的8.42%、13.86%、24.33%和22.66%;在N+条件下,相应时期分别定位1、1、2和4个非条件QTL,可分别解释各时期株高表型变异的8.10%、12.92%、21.30%和44.41%。在N-条件下,拔节期至喇叭口期、开花期至灌浆期分别定位了1和5个条件QTL,可分别解释该时期株高动态变异的9.14%和50.98%;在N+条件下,相应时期分别定位1和4个条件QTL,可分别解释该时期株高动态变异的13.33%和44.47%。这些非条件QTL和条件QTL多数表现以显性和部分显性为主。

关键词: 玉米, 氮素, 株高, 发育时期, QTL分析

Abstract:

Nitrogen is a large necessary element in maize development, and the nitrogen use efficiency is an important factor in deciding the cost of maize production, and also the plant height is served as an important index of the biomass. The purpose of this study was to locate the QTL for plant height in maize(Zea mays L.)in different developing stages under N-input (N+) and N-stress (N-) conditions. The unconditional and conditional QTLs for plant height were detected using F2:3 population derived from an elite maize cultivar Nongda 108 (Huang C × Xu 178). The results showed that N-stress had more influence to plant height in the parent Huang C than in Xu 178, and there was no significant difference in the average of plant height for the F2:3 families between the two nitrogen treatments, but the ranges of variation were different. The QTLs for plant height at different stages were detected with the composite interval mapping method and a molecular linkage map including 199 SSR markers. Under N- treatment, 1, 1, 2, and 2 QTLs were detected for plant height at elongation stage, small bell stage, large bell stage and grain filling stage, respectively. The total contribution of the detected QTLs could explain 8.42%, 13.86%, 24.33%, and 22.66% of phenotypic variation. Under N+ treatment, there were 1, 1, 2, and 4 QTLs for plant height in the four different stages above, accounting for 8.10%, 12.92%, 21.30%, and 44.41% of total phenotypic variation respectively. One and five QTLs for plant height were detected from elongation to bell stage and from large bell to grain filling stage under N- treatment, while 1, 4 QTLs were detected under N+ treatment, the total contributions of the detected QTLs were 9.14% and 50.98% as well as 13.33% and 44.47%, respectively. The inbred line Xu178 was less sensitive to low N stress than Huang C for plant height and was an inbred with high nitrogen use efficiency under low N condition. The 12 conditional and unconditional QTLs for plant height mainly located on chromosomes 1, 4, 5, and 9, four of them are different from those reported by predecessors in gene locations. About all of the conditional and unconditional QTLs detected appeared to be of dominant and partially dominant effects on plant height with explained the phenotype variation nearly ranging from 8% to 16%. Some QTLs such as qPH4b, qPH1c, and qPH7 only expressed in specific stages, that is the spatial temporal expression characteristics during the formation of plant height, which may be related with high N use efficiency.

Key words: Maize, Nitrogen, Plant height, Developing stage, QTL analysis

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[7] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[8] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[9] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[10] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[11] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[12] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[13] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[14] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[15] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!