欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1688-1695.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响

勾玲1,3,黄建军3,张宾1,李涛1,孙锐1,赵明2,*   

  1. 1 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094;2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081;3 石河子大学新疆兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室,新疆石河子832003
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-10-12 网络出版日期:2007-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵 明

Effects of Population Density on Stalk Lodging Resistant Mechanism and Agronomic Characteristics of Maize

GOU Ling 1,3, HUANG Jian-Jun3, ZHANG Bin1, LI Tao1, SUN Rui1, ZHAO Ming 2,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3 Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Agriculture of Xinjiang Construction Corps, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2007-01-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-10-12 Published online:2007-10-12
  • Contact: ZHAO Ming

摘要:

适当增加种植密度是提高玉米产量的重要途径之一,而倒伏是玉米增加群体密度的主要限制因素。2005—2006年以茎秆抗倒伏性不同的3个品种(稀植大穗型品种京科519、耐密抗倒型品种登海3719和当地主栽品种农大108)为材料,设3.0、5.25、7.5、9.25、12.0万株 hm-2 5个密度处理,研究了种植密度对茎秆的抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响。结果表明,随着群体密度的增加,茎秆的压碎强度(SCS)和外皮穿刺强度(RPS)以及节间直径、干重(DW)、干物质百分比、单位茎长干物质重(RDWL)显著降低,而节间长度有所增加,以上这些变化在供试品种间存在着明显的差异;茎秆抗倒力学性状随群体密度呈指数曲线(y = aebx)变化。茎秆抗倒力学性状与农艺性状密切相关。节间伸长慢且节间变细可能是耐密品种在高密度群体下的适应性表现,而节间干物质积累、尤其高位节间的干物质积累较高的品种抗倒伏能力强。在玉米抽雄前1周茎秆第4节间以上干物质百分比大于7.5%,单位茎长干物质重(RDWL)高于0.2 g cm-1时较为抗倒。逐步回归分析表明,单位茎长干物质对茎秆压碎强度(SCS)和外皮穿刺强度(RPS)的正向影响最大,可以作为玉米抗倒伏品种选择的重要农艺指标。

关键词: 玉米, 群体密度, 抗倒力学, 农艺性状

Abstract:

Lodging is a major constraint to limit grain yield under increased planting density in modern maize (Zea mays L.) production. Effects of planting density on stalk mechanical and agronomic characteristics were investigated using three maize cultivars differing in lodging resistant ability,i.e. Jingke 519 (with a large spike under thinned planting density), Denghai 3719 (tolerant to high density) and Nongda 108 (a main local cultivar). Five levels of density treatment were imposed, 3.0, 5.25, 7.5, 9.25 and 12.0×104 plants ha-1. Experiments were arranged in a split plot design with four replicates. The irrigation and fertilizer management in the experiment plot was consistent with typical agronomic practices in the local high-yield field. The results indicated that the increase of planting density would cause significant decreases in stalk crushing strength (SCS), rind penetration strength (RPS), internode diameter and dry weight (DW), percentage of dry matter and ratio of dry matter weight to length of internode (RDWL), and dramatic increase in internode length. The relationship between stalk mechanical characteristics and planting density fitted a exponential curve (y = aebx) significantly. The stalk mechanical characteristics were highly correlated with the agronomic characteristics. These characteristics of Jingke 519 were susceptive of the increasing planting density above 75 000 plant ha-1, especially for these above the 4th internode was. The whole plant would have high lodging resistant ability if the dry matter accumulation was high in the 4th and above 4th internods. That the internod length enlarged slowly and diameter of internode decreased significantly with increasing plant density was an adaptability to high planting density for the resistant cultivar. When the percentage of DW of the 4th and above 4th internods was more than 7.5%, and its RDWL was more than 0.2 g cm-1 at a week prior to anthesis, the plants would be resistant to lodging .The stepwise regression analysis revealed that the RDWL contributed positively the most to SCS and RPS. RDWL was definite as an agronomic indicator of maize stalk lodging resistant ability.

Key words: Maize (Zea mays L.), Density, Lodging resistant mechanism, Agronomic characteristics

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[4] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[5] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[11] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[12] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[13] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[14] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[15] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!