欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 471-476.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00471

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

花生根边缘细胞发育影响因子的分析

张裕晨;马伯军*;顾志敏;施美凤   

  1. 浙江师范大学化学与生命科学学院,浙江金华321004
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-12 网络出版日期:2008-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 马伯军

Factors Associated with Root Border Cell Development in Peanut

ZHANG Yu-Chen,MA Bo-Jun*,GU Zhi-Min,SHI Mei-Feng   

  1. College of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinghua 321004, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2007-07-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-03-12 Published online:2008-03-12
  • Contact: MA Bo-Jun

摘要:

以花生品种新昌小京生和江西一把抓为材料,采用种子悬空气培法,研究了根边缘细胞(BC)的数目、活性及其影响因子。结果表明,花生根长为1 mm时开始产生BC,当根生长到13~17 mm时,BC数达最大值,约10 000个。在根边缘细胞的发育过程中,根冠果胶甲酯酶(PME)的活性与根BC发育、诱导存在密切的相关性,说明PME在BC产生、发育和游离过程中起着重要作用。BC释放出的胞外抑制剂不但可以抑制BC的产生而且还能降低其活性,且浓度越高抑制作用越强烈。与BC活性相比,胞外抑制剂对BC的产生影响更大。高温和低温环境不但抑制花生根的生长,而且影响花生根BC的产生速度、最大值及其活性。与对BC产生的影响相比,温度对BC活性影响较大。根尖黏液层渗透势的维持可以使BC在较长时间内维持高活性。

关键词: 花生, 根边缘细胞, 发育调控, 根尖分生组织, 胞外抑制剂

Abstract:

Border cells (BCs), originated from root-cap meristem, are a kind of active cells deposited in the periphery of roots to protect the root tips from extracellular biotic and abiotic stresses. Some investigators believe it is a constitutive expression in BC’s production, while others suggest that it is an induced process regulated by intro- and extro-signals. BCs in different plant species show completely different responses to temperature stress. In this paper, we investigated the factors associated with the production and development of BCs in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), which had never been reported before. Two peanut cultivars, Xinchang Xiaojingsheng and Jiangxi Yibazhua were employed and their seeds were aerobic cultured after imbibition. The BC number and activity (percentage of BC survival/total) as well as their responses to pectin methylesterase (PME) activity, BC liquor, temperature, and osmotic potential were measured. Under normal cultural condition, the number of BCs increased with the development and elongation of the root. The first BC formation almost synchronously occurred with root tip emergence. When the root length was 13–17 mm at 25℃, the number of BCs reached the maximum (about 10 000 BCs). When the BCs were removed from root tip, a new generation of BCs was induced within 72 h. During this period, the PME activity increased quickly to the maximum within 4 h and then decreased to pre-induction background levels subsequently, suggesting that the PME may play an important role in production and development of BC. The number and survival percentage of detached BCs were significantly different when the roots cultured in the media with three different BC liquor concentrations containing extracellular inhibitor of BC. The extracellular inhibitor of BC released could inhibit not only the production of BC but also its activity, and the inhibition was strong with the increment of the concentration. The extracellular inhibitor affected more greatly on BC production as compared with the BC activity. Temperature directly or indirectly affected the root growth, and regulated the production and development of BCs. Both high and low temperatures inhibited the root growth and affected the production rate, maximum number, and activity of BC, and low temperature had more severe harmness to the development of the peanut root. Temperature had greater impact on BC activity as compared with secretion rate of BC. The activities of detached BCs in different culture conditions show significant difference. The survival percentage of detached border cells was significantly higher under culture in the aerobic or mannitol than in MS medium or ddH2O, suggesting that maintenance of mucus layer osmolarity in root apex can maintained the survival percentage of BCs at a high level within a relative long time. The results supported the hypothesis of induced model of BC formation that regulated by the intrinsic and extrinsic signals.

Key words: Peanut, Root border cell, Development control, Root apical meristem, Extracellular inhibitor

[1] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[2] 李海芬, 魏浩, 温世杰, 鲁清, 刘浩, 李少雄, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 梁炫强. 花生电压依赖性阴离子通道基因(AhVDAC)的克隆及在果针向地性反应中表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1558-1565.
[3] 刘嘉欣, 兰玉, 徐倩玉, 李红叶, 周新宇, 赵璇, 甘毅, 刘宏波, 郑月萍, 詹仪花, 张刚, 郑志富. 耐三唑并嘧啶类除草剂花生种质创制与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1027-1034.
[4] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
[5] 黄莉, 陈玉宁, 罗怀勇, 周小静, 刘念, 陈伟刚, 雷永, 廖伯寿, 姜慧芳. 花生种子大小相关性状QTL定位研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 280-291.
[6] 汪颖, 高芳, 刘兆新, 赵继浩, 赖华江, 潘小怡, 毕晨, 李向东, 杨东清. 利用WGCNA鉴定花生主茎生长基因共表达模块[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1639-1653.
[7] 王建国, 张佳蕾, 郭峰, 唐朝辉, 杨莎, 彭振英, 孟静静, 崔利, 李新国, 万书波. 钙与氮肥互作对花生干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1666-1679.
[8] 石磊, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 高伟, 张忠信, 齐飞艳, 刘娟, 董文召, 张新友. 花生AhFAD2-1基因启动子及5'-UTR内含子功能验证及其低温胁迫应答[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1703-1711.
[9] 高芳, 刘兆新, 赵继浩, 汪颖, 潘小怡, 赖华江, 李向东, 杨东清. 北方主栽花生品种的源库特征及其分类[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1712-1723.
[10] 张鹤, 蒋春姬, 殷冬梅, 董佳乐, 任婧瑶, 赵新华, 钟超, 王晓光, 于海秋. 花生耐冷综合评价体系构建及耐冷种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1753-1767.
[11] 薛晓梦, 吴洁, 王欣, 白冬梅, 胡美玲, 晏立英, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 低温胁迫对普通和高油酸花生种子萌发的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1768-1778.
[12] 郝西, 崔亚男, 张俊, 刘娟, 臧秀旺, 高伟, 刘兵, 董文召, 汤丰收. 过氧化氢浸种对花生种子发芽及生理代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1834-1840.
[13] 张旺, 冼俊霖, 孙超, 王春明, 石丽, 于为常. CRISPR/Cas9编辑花生FAD2基因研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1481-1490.
[14] 戴良香, 徐扬, 张冠初, 史晓龙, 秦斐斐, 丁红, 张智猛. 花生根际土壤细菌群落多样性对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1581-1592.
[15] 黄冰艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 房元瑾, 石磊, 苗利娟, 张毛宁, 张忠信, 徐静, 张梦圆, 董文召, 张新友. 花生巢式群体的脂肪含量遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1100-1108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!