欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (07): 1206-1212.

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏丹草高粱及其杂种的细胞遗传学研究

詹秋文1,2;朱立猛1;吴娟娟2;张伟1;张天真2   

  1. 1安徽科技学院植物科学学院, 安徽凤阳 233100; 2南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室, 江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2007-08-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-12 网络出版日期:2008-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 詹秋文

Cytogenetical Studies on Sorghum (S. bicolor), Sudangrass (S. sudanense), and Their Hybrid

ZHAN Qiu-Wen12,ZHU Li-Meng1,WU Juan-Juan2,ZHANG Wei1,ZHANG Tian-Zhen2   

  1. 1 College of Plant Science, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui; 2 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics &
    Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2007-08-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-07-12 Published online:2008-07-12
  • Contact: ZHAN Qiu-Wen12

摘要: 苏丹草(S. sudanense)与高粱(S. bicolor)均为禾本科高粱属植物, 两者的杂种优势明显, 杂交种品质好, 抗逆性强, 在水产、畜禽养殖及资源利用与环境保护上有着广阔的开发利用前景, 但两者是否属于同一个种至今存在争议。本文采用去壁低渗-火焰干燥法, 分析了2份苏丹草、2份高粱及其3个杂种F1有丝分裂核型, 观察了3个杂种F1减数分裂染色体行为和2个杂种F2体细胞染色体数目。结果表明, 苏丹草、高粱及其杂种F1均为1A核型, 但核型公式不完全相同, 苏丹草Sa为2n=18m+2sm(sat), 高粱3042A和3042A×Sa F1为2n=20m, 其余材料均为2n=20m(sat)。苏丹草、高粱及其杂种F1 3者在10条染色体的绝对长臂、绝对短臂、绝对全长、臂比和相对全长上差异均不显著(P>0.05), 说明苏丹草与高粱在染色体长度上的变化不明显。杂种F1花粉母细胞减数分裂, 终变期和中期I染色体核型和数目清晰可见(2n=2x=20), 配对行为规则; 棒状和环状二价体的频率因组合不同而异, Tx623A×S722 F1、3042A×Sa F1和Tx623A×Sa F1棒状二价体频率分别为4.887、5.710和5.126, 环状二价体频率分别为5.113、 4.290和4.874; 在后期I, 配对的染色体能够正常分离。杂种F2体细胞染色体数目为20(2n=20)。因此, 苏丹草与高粱的亲缘关系非常近。

关键词: 苏丹草, 高粱, 杂交种, 染色体, 细胞遗传学

Abstract: Sudangrass (Sorghum sudanense) and sorghum (S. bicolor) are two members of the genus Sorghum (Gramineae). Their hybrids have exhibited favorable forage yields and overall improved quality and disease resistance. They are widely used in aquaculture, production of livestock food and environmental protection, but some disagreements exist as to whether they actually belong to the same species. The Karyotypes of two sudangrass varieties, two sorghum varieties, three sorghum-sudangrass F1 hybrids were analyzed by the method of cell wall degradation and hypotonic treatment for chromosome preparations, and the meiosis behavior of three F1 hybrids and the chromosome numbers of two F2 hybrids were observed. The result showed that the karyotypic types of sorghum and sudangrass were 1A, and the karyotype formula was 2n=18m+2sm (sat) for Sa, 2n=20m for 3042A and 3042A×Sa F1, and 2n=20m(sat) for the others. The difference of chromosomes among three groups (i.e. sudangrass, sorghum, and sor-ghum-sudangrass hybrid F1) were not significant in terms of absolute long arm, absolute short arm, absolute total length, arm ratio (l/s), relative total length (P>0.05); the change of chromosome length was not obvious in sorghum and sudangrass. The paired chromosome configuration of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid F1 in pollen mother cells at diakinesis and metaphaseIwas 2n=2x=20(10II) and the chromosome pairing behavior was regular, but the frequencies of rod bivalent of Tx623A×S722 F1, 3042A×Sa F1, and Tx623A×Sa F1 were 4.887, 5.710, and 5.126, respectively; those of ring bivalent were 5.113, 4.290, and 4.874, respectively. At anaphase I, the paired chromosomes of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid F1 could separate from each other. The chromosome numbers of F2 hybrid were 20 (2n=20). Therefore, the sudangrass/sorghum relationship is sufficiently close.

Key words: Sudangrass [Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf], Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], Karyotypes, Chromosome, Cytogenetics

中图分类号: 

  • 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01206
[1] 王海波, 应静文, 何礼, 叶文宣, 涂卫, 蔡兴奎, 宋波涛, 柳俊. rDNA和端粒重复序列鉴定马铃薯和茄子体细胞杂种染色体丢失和融合[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1273-1278.
[2] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[3] 陶军, 兰秀锦. 小麦-中间偃麦草2A/6St代换系014-459的分子细胞遗传学鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 511-517.
[4] 罗江陶, 郑建敏, 蒲宗君, 范超兰, 刘登才, 郝明. 四倍体小麦与六倍体小麦杂种的染色体遗传特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
[5] 罗兰, 雷丽霞, 刘进, 张瑞华, 金桂秀, 崔迪, 黎毛毛, 马小定, 赵正武, 韩龙植. 利用东乡普通野生稻染色体片段置换系定位产量相关性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1391-1401.
[6] 王蕊, 施龙建, 田红丽, 易红梅, 杨扬, 葛建镕, 范亚明, 任洁, 王璐, 陆大雷, 赵久然, 王凤格. 玉米杂交种纯度鉴定SNP核心引物的确定及高通量检测方案的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 770-779.
[7] 沈文强, 赵冰冰, 于国玲, 李凤菲, 朱小燕, 马福盈, 李云峰, 何光华, 赵芳明. 优良水稻染色体片段代换系Z746的鉴定及重要农艺性状QTL定位及其验证[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 451-461.
[8] 王媛, 王劲松, 董二伟, 武爱莲, 焦晓燕. 长期施用不同剂量氮肥对高粱产量、氮素利用特性和土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 342-350.
[9] 董二伟, 王劲松, 武爱莲, 王媛, 王立革, 韩雄, 郭珺, 焦晓燕. 行距和密度对高粱籽粒灌浆、淀粉及氮磷钾累积特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2459-2470.
[10] 董庆园,马德清,杨学,刘勇,黄昌军,袁诚,方敦煌,于海芹,童治军,沈俊儒,许银莲,罗美中,李永平,曾建敏. 高抗黑胫病烤烟BAC文库的构建及分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 869-877.
[11] 张瑞栋,肖梦颖,徐晓雪,姜冰,邢艺凡,陈小飞,李邦,艾雪莹,周宇飞,黄瑞冬. 高粱种子对萌发温度的响应分析与耐低温萌发能力鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 889-901.
[12] 宝力格,陆平,史梦莎,许月,刘敏轩. 中国高粱地方种质芽期苗期耐盐性筛选及鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(5): 734-744.
[13] 董建科, 涂卫, 王海波, 应静文, 杜鹃, 赵喜娟, 赵庆浩, 黄维, 蔡兴奎, 宋波涛. 马铃薯高效染色体加倍方法建立与抗寒资源创制[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(11): 1659-1666.
[14] 王小雷, 李炜星, 曾博虹, 孙晓棠, 欧阳林娟, 陈小荣, 贺浩华, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系对水稻粒形及千粒重QTL检测与稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1517-1525.
[15] 殷家明,钟荣棋,林呐,唐章林,李加纳. 诸葛菜小孢子培养及其单倍体减数分裂染色体配对观察[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 194-203.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!