欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (07): 1206-1212.

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏丹草高粱及其杂种的细胞遗传学研究

詹秋文1,2;朱立猛1;吴娟娟2;张伟1;张天真2   

  1. 1安徽科技学院植物科学学院, 安徽凤阳 233100; 2南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室, 江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2007-08-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-12 网络出版日期:2008-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 詹秋文

Cytogenetical Studies on Sorghum (S. bicolor), Sudangrass (S. sudanense), and Their Hybrid

ZHAN Qiu-Wen12,ZHU Li-Meng1,WU Juan-Juan2,ZHANG Wei1,ZHANG Tian-Zhen2   

  1. 1 College of Plant Science, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui; 2 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics &
    Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2007-08-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-07-12 Published online:2008-07-12
  • Contact: ZHAN Qiu-Wen12

摘要: 苏丹草(S. sudanense)与高粱(S. bicolor)均为禾本科高粱属植物, 两者的杂种优势明显, 杂交种品质好, 抗逆性强, 在水产、畜禽养殖及资源利用与环境保护上有着广阔的开发利用前景, 但两者是否属于同一个种至今存在争议。本文采用去壁低渗-火焰干燥法, 分析了2份苏丹草、2份高粱及其3个杂种F1有丝分裂核型, 观察了3个杂种F1减数分裂染色体行为和2个杂种F2体细胞染色体数目。结果表明, 苏丹草、高粱及其杂种F1均为1A核型, 但核型公式不完全相同, 苏丹草Sa为2n=18m+2sm(sat), 高粱3042A和3042A×Sa F1为2n=20m, 其余材料均为2n=20m(sat)。苏丹草、高粱及其杂种F1 3者在10条染色体的绝对长臂、绝对短臂、绝对全长、臂比和相对全长上差异均不显著(P>0.05), 说明苏丹草与高粱在染色体长度上的变化不明显。杂种F1花粉母细胞减数分裂, 终变期和中期I染色体核型和数目清晰可见(2n=2x=20), 配对行为规则; 棒状和环状二价体的频率因组合不同而异, Tx623A×S722 F1、3042A×Sa F1和Tx623A×Sa F1棒状二价体频率分别为4.887、5.710和5.126, 环状二价体频率分别为5.113、 4.290和4.874; 在后期I, 配对的染色体能够正常分离。杂种F2体细胞染色体数目为20(2n=20)。因此, 苏丹草与高粱的亲缘关系非常近。

关键词: 苏丹草, 高粱, 杂交种, 染色体, 细胞遗传学

Abstract: Sudangrass (Sorghum sudanense) and sorghum (S. bicolor) are two members of the genus Sorghum (Gramineae). Their hybrids have exhibited favorable forage yields and overall improved quality and disease resistance. They are widely used in aquaculture, production of livestock food and environmental protection, but some disagreements exist as to whether they actually belong to the same species. The Karyotypes of two sudangrass varieties, two sorghum varieties, three sorghum-sudangrass F1 hybrids were analyzed by the method of cell wall degradation and hypotonic treatment for chromosome preparations, and the meiosis behavior of three F1 hybrids and the chromosome numbers of two F2 hybrids were observed. The result showed that the karyotypic types of sorghum and sudangrass were 1A, and the karyotype formula was 2n=18m+2sm (sat) for Sa, 2n=20m for 3042A and 3042A×Sa F1, and 2n=20m(sat) for the others. The difference of chromosomes among three groups (i.e. sudangrass, sorghum, and sor-ghum-sudangrass hybrid F1) were not significant in terms of absolute long arm, absolute short arm, absolute total length, arm ratio (l/s), relative total length (P>0.05); the change of chromosome length was not obvious in sorghum and sudangrass. The paired chromosome configuration of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid F1 in pollen mother cells at diakinesis and metaphaseIwas 2n=2x=20(10II) and the chromosome pairing behavior was regular, but the frequencies of rod bivalent of Tx623A×S722 F1, 3042A×Sa F1, and Tx623A×Sa F1 were 4.887, 5.710, and 5.126, respectively; those of ring bivalent were 5.113, 4.290, and 4.874, respectively. At anaphase I, the paired chromosomes of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid F1 could separate from each other. The chromosome numbers of F2 hybrid were 20 (2n=20). Therefore, the sudangrass/sorghum relationship is sufficiently close.

Key words: Sudangrass [Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf], Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], Karyotypes, Chromosome, Cytogenetics

中图分类号: 

  • 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01206
[1] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[2] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[3] 付江鹏, 柳发财, 闫宝琴, 王永栋, 李利利, 魏玮, 周英霞. 控释肥替代普通尿素对旱作高粱干物质积累分配、产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2501-2513.
[4] 蒋优, 马雪融, 张博, 李陈建. 苏丹草种子萌发期耐盐性评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 835-844.
[5] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 张立异. 中国高粱株高和节间数全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 568-585.
[6] 陈琛, 付修义, 陈传永, 吴珊珊, 张华生, 张春原, 陈绍江, 赵久然, 王元东. 不同玉米自交系的单倍体育种性能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 526-533.
[7] 张瀚, 余金琎, 谭林璐, 张婧泉, 王小董, 谢庄, 谢可盈, 凌英华, 赵芳明. 基于CSSL-Z267的单/双片段代换系的水稻产量性状QTL遗传效应解析与设计育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3157-3170.
[8] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
[9] 陈昊翔, 万鑫杰, 陈青, 王劲松, 董二伟, 王媛, 黄晓磊, 刘秋霞, 焦晓燕. 石灰性褐土条件下高粱与玉米耐瘠薄特性及对土壤肥力响应的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2775-2787.
[10] 刘园园, 董建科, 应静文, 梅文祥, 程刚, 郭晶晶, 焦文标, 宋波涛. 利用野生种Solanum boliviense创制马铃薯抗寒种质[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1384-1393.
[11] 孙美红, 王彩琴, 王蓉, 白文斌, 高振峰. Bacillus velezensis G-1·脂肽悬浮种衣剂的制备及其对高粱丝黑穗病菌的防侵染效果[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1467-1485.
[12] 陈玉章, 吴松果, 卢成霖, 李瑞, 龚利娟, 文悦, 宁佳欣, 吴宇涵. 条带垄覆对西南黄壤坡耕地径流和高粱水分利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1325-1340.
[13] 李航宇, 刘心诚, 贺文婷, 刘可意, 乔振华, 吕品苍, 张献华, 何玉池, 蔡得田, 宋兆建. 四倍体海稻86的诱导、鉴定及其耐盐碱特性评价分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 914-931.
[14] 薛丽, 李心怡, 黄勇泰, 欧财篮, 吴小青, 余泽怀, 崔泽田, 张木清, 邓祖湖, 余凡. 甘蔗与斑茅杂交染色体组构成特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 633-644.
[15] 王瑞, 张福耀, 詹鹏杰, 楚建强, 晋敏姗, 赵威军, 程庆军. 基于RNA-Seq筛选高粱低氮胁迫相关候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 669-685.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!